Protected: Big Game

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

The Buffalo Raiders

The Buffalo Raiders
The Atavist Magazine, No. 173


Stephen Wood is a writer based in New York. His work has appeared in The Guardian, Current Affairs, Jacobin, The Athletic, and McSweeney’s, among other publications. He was previously a producer with Gilded Audio, where he worked on shows including Snafu with Ed Helms and The Reason We’re All Still Here.

Editor: Seyward Darby
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Emily Injeian
Illustrator: Michael Hirshon

Published in March 2026.


Paul was the favorite of Betty Good’s ten children. His next-eldest brother, Jim, still remembers his christening in 1947 as a momentous occasion, given that Paul was his maternal grandparents’ fiftieth grandchild. Consider yourself advised, right off the bat, that this is a story about Catholics.

Jim described his brother as “a young man that just loved life.” By his teenage years, Paul was such a notorious pool shark that he had to travel farther and farther from his family’s Western Pennsylvania home in search of marks. “You didn’t wanna play pool against Paul Good,” Jim said. “That was out of the question.”

Shortly after Paul graduated from high school, he was called up to serve in the Army and sent to Vietnam. When Betty put him on the plane, she was proud of what he was doing and convinced that it was right. But just a few weeks later, on June 19, 1967, she awoke with a premonition that something terrible had happened to Paul.

It took a few days, but when the men from the Army arrived outside her house, she knew why they were there. She knew what they were going to say even as she waited for her husband to come and receive the news with her. Paul Good was killed in action outside Saigon on June 19, a few months shy of his twentieth birthday.

Like many people his age, Jim already had serious problems with U.S. foreign policy. Now it had claimed the life of his younger brother. “At that point,” he said, “I just wanted to make the government feel like they’re not as secure as they think they are.” Eventually, he and some friends hatched a plan to do just that—one as outrageous as it was outrageously simple.

Jim is in his eighties now, and he can’t say for certain how many government offices he broke into following his brother’s death. But it all began in Buffalo, New York.

Jim started out on a path of righteousness—a spiritual one, that is. He entered seminary at 14 and spent eight years training to be a Catholic priest. It wasn’t spreading the faith that excited him so much as the opportunity to travel; he wanted to be a missionary. But shortly before he was to be ordained and sent overseas, Jim was, in his words, “politely asked to leave” due to his chronic inability to obey orders.

Instead he became something of a secular missionary, traveling to the Dominican Republic as a Peace Corps volunteer. He arrived less than a year after President Lyndon Johnson sent tens of thousands of U.S. troops to the island nation to prop up a strongman friendly to his administration. Most locals gave Jim a chilly reception. “When I got out there, it was like, ‘Hey, hi! My name is Jaime Bueno, Jim Good, and I’m here to help!’ And they said, ‘Screw you.’” Jim quickly realized that the troops were there to protect American landowners, not Dominicans, and that the local Catholic clergy “lived very well” while their flocks toiled on plantations. When he began to speak out against the injustice around him, according to Jim, he fell out of favor with the Peace Corps bureaucracy. He ended up leaving his post three months early.

Now known as Jaime Bueno to his friends—James was the most popular name for boys born in the United States every single year between 1940 and 1952, so a distinctive nickname was vital—Jim moved to New York City and fell in with the growing antiwar community. He eventually moved to Buffalo, where he met a number of like-minded people, many of whom had also grown up Catholic.

“I always wanted to be a saint,” said Jeremiah Horrigan, a Buffalonian from a family of ten children, whose father, Jack, was a beloved sportswriter turned executive for the Buffalo Bills. Studious, morally upright, and the son of a local bigwig, Jeremiah was a natural fit at Canisius High School, an elite boys’ school he described as “a training ground for the eventual leaders in Buffalo—at least, the Catholic leaders.”

Mike Hickey, the eldest of ten from a South Buffalo family, attended Canisius on a scholarship. As a kid, Mike always took the Church seriously, but his “scrupulous conscience” alerted him to some major contradictions between doctrine and practice. While studying the catechism in grade school, he was surprised that the illustration accompanying the Fifth Commandment in his book was a photograph of soldiers storming the beaches of Normandy: “It seems pretty straightforward, you know, as a commandment: Thou shalt not kill.”

Ken Mudie referred to the neighborhood where he and Mike grew up as “an Irish-Catholic ghetto.” Ken and his brother stood out. “We had two strikes against us,” he said. “My parents were divorced and we weren’t Irish.” His early life was chaotic, with his mother working multiple jobs and a variety of “transient” relatives cycling through his home. But he had a great time, and he got good grades, which earned him a ticket to Canisius.

Maureen “Meaux” Considine grew up in a suburb of Buffalo, one of “only” five kids. Her parents were “devout,” she said, “but there were things about the Catholic Church that they questioned a little bit.” Had the Church allowed it, her mom would have been a priest. The Considines were the rare suburban white couple who purposefully sent their daughter into the city proper for high school, to Mount St. Joseph Academy. Being in an urban environment exposed Meaux to the effects of racial segregation and grinding poverty. It also put her in proximity to Canisius boys, including Mike, Ken, and Jeremiah.

After the four of them graduated high school, in 1968, they headed to college. Ken and Mike enrolled at Le Moyne College in Syracuse. A Jesuit school, Le Moyne until recently had employed Father Daniel Berrigan, a radical antiwar priest. The Catholics there dressed and talked more like hippies than like the Mass-goers Ken had grown up with, and they weren’t above getting their hands dirty when the spirit moved them.

Le Moyne was where Mike first got picked up by the cops, for leafleting on behalf of farmworkers. He’d been a literal and figurative Boy Scout before college. “ I was always a good boy and never disobeyed any rules,” he said. “But it just seemed like the right thing to do. So we did it.” He and Ken also protested racist hiring practices at a construction site, and they began to recognize the connections between racism in the United States and what was happening in Vietnam. In the early years of U.S. military involvement in the conflict, Black Americans were drafted and killed in disproportionately high numbers.

Ken’s upbringing wasn’t political, beyond his family’s general affinity for John F. Kennedy because he was Catholic. His father was a World War II veteran who had fought in the Battle of the Bulge, and Ken was raised not to question what America did overseas. Jocular and self-effacing, he continued to defend the Vietnam War in conversations with friends and fellow students, until one day, he said, “I just couldn’t argue why we were there.”

Listen: Ken Mudie on music and antiwar politics.
0:00
0:00

Ken, Mike, and Jeremiah all attended Woodstock, the generation-defining music festival in upstate New York, and their accounts of this period are laced with references to countercultural music. One song that’s stuck with Ken is “Sky Pilot,” a catchy but haunting piece of psychedelia released in 1968 by Eric Burdon and the Animals (of “House of the Rising Sun” fame). Over seven and a half minutes, it tells the story of a military priest blessing troops as they head into battle, listening to the firefight, then watching the men return, wounded and traumatized. Burdon’s tone is one of pity mixed with disdain. It’s a song about a man who keeps his head down and stays quiet, allowing great evil to unfold around him.

Meaux was studying at St. Mary’s College, just across the street from Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana, when in 1969 the U.S. Selective Service began to draft young men by date of birth via a televised lottery. America watched as men in suits picked blue capsules out of a glass container, like some perverse game show, to determine the order in which the most recent crop of draft-eligible boys would be called into service. “It was a terrible night,” Meaux said. “Lots of drunk people. They were drunk because they were happy or because they were sad. There were people who were hysterically crying because their number was really low.”

Ken got lucky—his draft number was high. So high that he quit Le Moyne after two years, giving up the possibility of a student deferment, and started working full-time. “There’d have to be a ground invasion in Iowa before I would ever be drafted,” he said. Mike stayed in school, but his deferment weighed on him as he watched more and more young men get called up.

Jeremiah credits the alternative of a “death sentence” in Vietnam with his decision to go to college. At Fordham University in the Bronx, another Jesuit school, he discovered a scene similar to the one at Le Moyne: Professors assigned books with titles like The Nonviolent Cross. One of those professors was John Peter Grady, a sociologist who appears to have used his teaching position primarily to foment nonviolent resistance to U.S. foreign policy. Gregarious, canny, and hard-drinking, Grady took every opportunity to convert casual war opponents into crusaders against the war machine. And it was an open secret on campus that Grady had been involved in some of the recent high-profile raids on Selective Service offices, better known as the draft boards.

In 1966, determined that neither he nor any of his eleven younger brothers should be drafted, 19-year-old Barry Bondhus emptied a bucket of excrement into the drawer containing his file at a Minneapolis-area draft board. Thankfully, for the sake of public health, this exact method of protest didn’t catch on, but Barry had exposed just how easy it was to destroy the documentation required to draft young men into military service.

In October 1967, four individuals, including Father Philip Berrigan, brother of Daniel, entered a draft board in Baltimore, poured blood—a mixture of animal and their own—over a quantity of files, and were arrested. The following spring, a group now known as the Catonsville Nine, among them both Berrigan brothers, removed files from a suburban Maryland draft board in broad daylight, destroyed them with homemade napalm in the parking lot, and were arrested. “Our apologies, dear friends, for the fracture of good order. For the burning of papers, instead of children,” the Catonsville Nine said in their official statement, which Daniel Berrigan read to reporters over the pyre.

What separated these raids from nearly all other antiwar actions was, to put it bluntly, their potential to be effective. In a world without computers, the physical documents containing the personal information of draft-eligible men might have been the only materials linking them to the Selective Service. “ I often thought, what about the women who worked in those offices?” Jim Good said. “Did they see those files as death certificates?” He and other peace activists came to view the contents of draft boards’ filing cabinets as no different from bombs or bullets: They were just tools that helped the government kill. Crucially, destroying files could be accomplished without any violence, unless you counted the destruction of property, which raiders did not. They believed that some property simply didn’t have a right to exist. 

No central structure existed to plan the raids, but a diffuse network of participants, consisting primarily of working-class Catholics, adopted the moniker of the East Coast Conspiracy to Save Lives. The Berrigan brothers were the most visible members, and they were often assumed to be the movement’s leaders—J. Edgar Hoover even branded Phil a terrorist during a Senate hearing. But neither was personally involved in more than a handful of raids. By 1971, the brothers were in prison for the Maryland actions; Phil went quietly, but Dan led the FBI on a weeks-long chase, during which he occasionally surfaced to deliver guerrilla sermons. Many of their fellow organizers evaded detection, and soon more young people were joining their ranks.

Chuck Darst was one of them. Chuck was a bookish, articulate Catholic kid from Knoxville, Tennessee, whose parents were so apolitical that neither knew how the other voted. He intended to join the ROTC when he enrolled at Notre Dame, then maybe serve in the Air Force. But before long, Chuck was studying just-war theory, reading Gandhi, and plumbing the depths of his own psyche to the tunes of Bob Dylan and Joan Baez. He also fell in love with Meaux over at St. Mary’s.

In the summer of 1968, Chuck was selling books in rural Alabama when his older brother, David, was arrested along with the rest of the Catonsville Nine. Back at school, Chuck tore up his draft card beside other young men during a Mass celebrated before the campus mural known as Touchdown Jesus. They sent their destroyed cards to the Selective Service but weren’t arrested. “ I did get a call from the FBI asking me, ‘Did you knowingly and without duress do that?’” Chuck recalled, laughing. “And I said, ‘Yeah, you could cast it that way.’

Then his brother died suddenly. A writer and member of the De La Salle Christian Brothers, a community of laymen who take vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, David taught religion at a Catholic high school in Nebraska. He’d been convicted for the Catonsville action, but had yet to start his prison sentence, when he was killed in a car accident at age 27.

Chuck took a semester off to focus on compiling a book of his brother’s writings. Maybe some part of him already knew that he wasn’t going back to college. “It just seemed like I was inexorably being drawn to do something more than I had done at Notre Dame,” Chuck said. “The mantle of draft resistance and resistance to the Vietnam War kind of seemed to come to me.”

Meaux also found her studies increasingly meaningless as the fabric of society seemed to fray around her. Buffalo became a favorite port of call for Chuck as he hitchhiked back and forth from South Bend to talk to East Coast publishers about his brother’s book, and when she finally dropped out of St. Mary’s, Meaux ended up back in her hometown, living with Chuck and working for an antiwar congressional candidate.

Chuck’s and Meaux’s fates were sealed when they joined Mike Hickey in a drive across the state to see an off-Broadway play Daniel Berrigan had written about Catonsville. The production incorporated footage of Chuck’s late brother that Chuck had never seen before, and it helped him and his friends come to a monumental decision. “As Meaux and Mike and I made our way back to Buffalo, we were saying, ‘We’ve gotta do an action,’” Chuck recalled.

In the summer of 1971, Mike called Ken Mudie and asked if he wanted to attend a meeting about raiding a draft board. Ken agreed to go, in his telling because he happened to have time on his hands. Once they were gathered, the participants introduced themselves with some words about what had brought them there. Everyone shared a story of personal growth and discovery—except Ken.

“I’m Ken Mudie,” he said. “My favorite band is the Kinks, and my favorite color is green.”

He now wonders if he should’ve said something a little less flippant, but his humor had a function. “I think the point I was trying to make was, I’m just new to this, folks,” he said. 

Other newcomers to righteous lawbreaking were there that day: Mike, Meaux, and Chuck, as well as Jeremiah Horrigan. But the two Jims—Jim Martin and Jim Good—were civil-disobedience veterans. That June, they’d gone to the Washington, D.C., headquarters of the Selective Service to carry out a citizen’s arrest of its director, Curtis Tarr. They’d arranged a meeting, invited reporters to join them, and, once in Tarr’s office, announced that they were charging him with war crimes. They asked him to sign an affidavit admitting his guilt. He declined. Martin moved to place handcuffs on him, but Tarr was six feet seven inches tall and a World War II veteran. He brushed Martin aside with enough force to knock him on his ass. The next morning, papers across the country ran a photo of Tarr towering like a victorious boxer over a falling Martin. To the side, Jim Good is holding handcuffs and perhaps starting to wonder if there might be a more effective way to mess with the war machine.

Martin’s girlfriend, Ann Masters, was also at the meeting in Buffalo, along with Barb and Mike Dougherty, a married couple with a newborn baby. The Doughertys were a bit older than the rest of the crew, but they were moved by the spirit of the age, and their guidance was crucial to their younger comrades. “They were the rocks that we built around,” Jeremiah said. Ken described Mike Dougherty as a natural leader and Barb as an “earth mother” who shocked his delicate sensibilities by squirting breast milk across the room at unsuspecting targets. (The Doughertys are now deceased, as is Jim Martin. Ann Masters declined an interview for this story.)

By all available evidence, no member of the Buffalo cell had ever raided a draft board before; among them, however, they had several points of contact with the East Coast Conspiracy to Save Lives and a clear sense of what they wanted to accomplish. Their mark was so obvious, it almost went without saying: The Old Post Office stuck out like a Gothic Revival thumb over downtown Buffalo. The six-story gray square with a glass-covered atrium in the middle—Jim Good described it as both a “stone fortress” and a “square doughnut”—housed all manner of federal offices, including two draft boards. It also contained a branch of U.S. Army Intelligence, which was of great interest to the antiwar crowd. Buffalo was often the last stop on the path to Canada for young men fleeing the draft, just as it had been for people escaping slavery on the Underground Railroad. The local peace community believed that Army Intelligence was trying to track down draft dodgers, and raiding their office seemed like a good way of finding out.

After their first meeting, the Buffalo group went through what some in their circle called a “period of discernment,” a Catholic term that refers to a time of serious contemplation, often undertaken before entering seminary. In this case, it meant weighing the ethics and consequences of breaking into a suite of government offices. Nobody in the group could pinpoint the moment when they decided that they were in; each came to the conclusion over a period of weeks. “It seemed pretty natural,” Mike Hickey recalled. “I was 20, so my left prefrontal cortex was not fully developed. But it was, I would say, a moral decision at that point.” Jim Good said that he came to see planning the raid as “more of a challenge than a risk. It almost became a game. Except it was a serious game.”

As with any break-in, the key to raiding a draft board was casing. The Buffalo crew spent countless hours staring at the Old Post Office, noting mundane details like foot and car traffic at various times of day; the patterns of nearby police patrols; and which lights were left on at night, and how late. They typically cased in twos, for safety and to stave off boredom. Mixed-gender pairings had the option to sit in parked cars. That way if cops took an interest, they could simply pretend they were there to make out.

Listen: Mike Hickey on surveilling the Old Post Office.
0:00
0:00

Jim Good and Jeremiah Horrigan went into the Old Post Office during the day to determine, among other things, if there were any armed guards. Nobody was willing to risk the possibility of guns going off. Luckily, according to Jeremiah, “it was not a difficult building to infiltrate.” There was no camera or alarm system—no security infrastructure beyond the locks on the doors and a single watchman on duty around the clock. Over the course of several summer weeks, the crew did not observe any employees staying late or working weekends.

A simple-enough plan began to form: The raiders would enter the building during a busy workday, and each would quietly make their way to a staircase that led to the top floor. There they would hide in an unused attic until the dead of night, when they’d sneak downstairs. Five members of the group would hit the draft board offices, while Jim Good and Mike Hickey would enter the Army Intelligence office two floors below. They’d all escape in a van waiting outside, disguised to look like a Postal Service vehicle, with Ken at the wheel. Unlike the Berrigan brothers, they weren’t interested in public arrests—they wanted to get away.

Planning took place primarily at the West Street apartment of Cathy McCue, a local college student who was subletting her spare room to Meaux and Chuck. Cathy came from a socially conscious family residing in the New York City suburbs, but was too busy at the time to engage seriously with the plot being hatched in her living room. She claimed that she only learned after the fact just how many meetings had taken place in her apartment while she was at school, at work, or asleep.

Meaux’s “key role” was to get into the rooms where the draft files were kept. “When we cased the building, we saw what kind of locks were in the doors, and then we went out and bought a bunch of those locks, put them in a two-by-four, and just started practicing,” she said. Meaux “fiddled and fiddled and fiddled” with crochet hooks, knitting needles, and fondue forks until she was certain she could efficiently pick the locks that stood between the raiders and the files.

At some point, the group realized that there would be too many files in the offices for them to carry away. They’d have to destroy some of them on-site. “Just ripping them wouldn’t be enough,” Jeremiah explained, because the government could piece the documents back together. “And fire was out of the question.” Destroying papers was one thing, but the group wasn’t ready to risk burning down the Old Post Office. When raiders elsewhere had encountered this problem, they’d soaked draft documents in a substance that made them impossible to read. The activists in Buffalo decided to buy Rit Dye, typically used to color fabric, and a tub they could dump the files in.

Along with her fondue forks and knitting needles, Meaux concealed an uninflated kiddie pool inside her clothes when she entered the Old Post Office on August 20. Mike Hickey was alongside her, in a Goodwill suit several sizes too big, with bottles of dye taped to his body. He also carried two items he wanted with him in the event that he went to jail: a toothbrush and a picture of his girlfriend, Lucy.

Chuck was confident it wouldn’t come to that. He thought their chances of getting away were good. The night before the raid, he drafted a statement on behalf of the group, taking credit for what they were about to do. “Okay,” it began, “the war goes on.” The statement referenced the Gospels and Albert Camus (“I wish I could love my country and still love justice”). It called the war “a violence of extraordinary arrogance and cruelty.”

“In you, good neighbor,” one passage read, “we wish to inspire neither alarm nor disgust by this, our night’s work. We move here against vandals and terrorists especially those of official badge or office in our country.”

The statement was signed: The Buffalo.

The raiders made it inside the building undetected. “I think my comrades could tell I was a fucking nervous wreck,” Mike said. Jeremiah was excited. “I knew kids that were bound for Vietnam,” he said. “If I was able to make the machine, as I thought of it, stop—or at least throw some sand into the machine—that was the best feeling in the world.” They signed a guest book (Mike checked in as “K. Marx”) and then, one by one, made their way to the top floor.

What followed was more than twenty-four hours of nervous silence in the baking mid-August heat; the friends had decided to wait until Saturday night to emerge from the stuffy, filthy attic. They tiptoed out onto the roof to smoke and pee. Chuck meditated and wrote.

When Friday night fell, Jeremiah went downstairs to surveil the building’s lone watchman and came back having discovered a wrinkle. Devoid of people, the building’s atrium was like an echo chamber. The swishing of Jeremiah’s bell-bottom jeans had carried, and he was worried that the noises made by the group would alert the watchman. Father Jim Mang, a local priest, was scheduled to pull up outside and lean on his horn, providing a distraction as they broke into the offices. Still, out of an abundance of caution, everyone agreed to strip down to their underwear.

When the appointed hour came on Saturday night, the seven scantily clad friends descended the building’s stairs, split up, and took their places. Outside, the priest hit the horn, and the raiders got to work picking locks and pulling files from cabinets. Some documents went into mail sacks; others were destined for the kiddie pool. Jim Good took a break from the action to put his grubby stockinged feet on an Army officer’s desk, pick up the phone, and call a friend to brag about where he was.

Chuck’s job was to monitor the watchman, and before long his ears perked up: The elevator shaft in the atrium was active. Someone was coming.

Chuck alerted his friends, but it was too late. When the elevator doors opened, it wasn’t the watchman but two unknown men who stepped out, guns drawn. They were wearing flip-flops and tank tops.

“There they are!” one of the men shouted. They weren’t surprised to see the raiders—they were there to apprehend them. In that instant, Jim Good knew there must have been a snitch.

“FBI!” the agents yelled. 

Jim Good had planned for the worst. While casing the building, he’d taken the bold step of loosening the screws on the lock of a revolving door that offered an alternative exit. Now, from where he stood, with the agents advancing, he saw that he and his friends could scramble over a wrought-iron cage protecting a stairwell, drop down to the main floor of the building, and flee through that door. Jim made his move, and Mike clambered over the cage after him. As Jim began removing the screws from the lock, Mike expedited things: He rammed right through the door.

The FBI had the other five raiders cornered upstairs. Jeremiah started whistling the “Colonel Bogey March.” “You know, how could they shoot someone who was whistling?” he said. He was arrested along with Meaux, Chuck, Anne, and Jim Martin.

When he pulled up in the getaway van, Ken thought he’d stumbled across some crime scene—flashing lights in the middle of downtown—before realizing it was his crime scene. He kept driving, navigating calmly around the traffic circle outside the Old Post Office and heading right back the way he came, wondering what the hell had happened.

As they tasted fresh air, Jim and Mike were wondering the same. “The only thing that took the terror away was the adrenaline of escaping,” Mike recalled. He would have run the entire five miles home to South Buffalo if Jim hadn’t persuaded him to stop and take cover in a parking garage. They were still smeared with grime from the attic and stripped to their underwear; going any farther on foot would attract attention. When they spotted a group of young people hanging out in a nearby alley, they made their way over. The kids burst out laughing when they saw the pair.

“Is the man after you?” one of them asked.

Listen: Jim Good on fleeing the scene of the raid.
0:00
0:00

“Yeah,” Jim replied. “Frankly, quite a few of them.”

The kids said they’d give the two raiders a ride in exchange for Jim’s Bulova watch. “You can have it!” Mike said immediately, even though it wasn’t his to give. Jim took off the watch and handed it over.

Soon they were in the backseat of the car, on their way to a safe house where they could shower and put on some clothes. It was around then that Mike remembered the two items he’d left behind in the pocket of his pants, which were still up in the attic of the Old Post Office: his toothbrush and the picture of Lucy. As the sun rose, he hunkered down at his parents’ and devised escape routes for when the FBI came to take him away.

By coincidence, the Buffalo action took place the same night as a raid on a federal building in Camden, New Jersey. One of the people involved in that operation was Bob Good, Jim’s brother. As they were gearing up in Camden, Bob wondered aloud whether the Buffalo raid, which Jim had told him was in the works, might be happening the same night. A minute or so later, another member of the Camden crew, Bob Hardy, excused himself to call his wife.

In fact, Hardy was calling the FBI; he’d been an informant for months. His handlers alerted their colleagues at the FBI’s Buffalo office, the staff of which were enjoying an end-of-summer picnic—hence the casual attire of the agents who busted the Buffalo raiders.

The feds interrogated the five arrested friends. Chuck refused to give so much as his name. As the mustached 21-year-old repeatedly cited his Miranda Rights, one of the FBI agents across from him gave the other a knowing look and said he was stepping out to get some coffee. The remaining agent grabbed Chuck and bundled him over to an open window. “If you don’t tell me your goddamn name right now, you’re going out that window,” Chuck recalled the agent saying. “I’m just gonna tell him you jumped.” Even with his head and torso thrust through the window frame, Chuck didn’t take the threat seriously. So instead of freaking out, he just stared at the agent until he finally relented and hauled Chuck back inside.

Listen: Chuck Darst on being interrogated.
0:00
0:00

Monday morning’s Buffalo Courier-Express carried a photograph of a smiling Chuck, clad in a T-shirt and handcuffs, being led out of the Old Post Office by an FBI agent. In the photo, Ann Masters and another agent walk behind them, and next to Chuck is a suspect identified as “Joseph Hill”—Jeremiah Horrigan had refused to cooperate with the authorities, giving them the name of a deceased Swedish-American folk singer and labor activist in lieu of his own.

When the papers figured out Jeremiah’s identity, they contacted Jack Horrigan for comment. Jack refused to condemn the raid and described his son as “a warm, loving human being.” Being a Bills executive, Jeremiah explained, was “like being the Holy Ghost in Buffalo,” where everyone knew everyone and everyone loved the football team. Even Buffalonians who couldn’t relate to antiwar activists could probably relate to Jack Horrigan.

Next to the article on the Buffalo operation was the headline “20 Nabbed in Camden Draft Raid,” along with a photo of one of the people arrested: John Peter Grady, the Fordham professor. Eventually, eight more people would be arrested for the Camden action. All told, Bob Hardy’s snitching led to the arrest of more than two dozen people in two states.

For the next several weeks, it seemed like the FBI was everywhere. Cathy McCue was on the other side of the state the night of the raid, but as soon as she arrived back in Buffalo, her landlord met her outside and informed her that the feds had been there. Agents also visited professors in her department at the University of Buffalo and questioned the owner of a restaurant where she’d worked. “My whole life was picked apart,” Cathy said.

G-men tried to interview Meaux’s family, but her father kicked the agents out of his house after they suggested that Meaux was too dangerous to be in contact with her siblings. Meaux was out on bail by then; local activists had pooled funds, and priests had appealed to the consciences of well-to-do parishioners until there was enough money to free all five raiders. Ken’s family got a visit, too, even though he hadn’t been arrested. Ken thought he could detect a hint of pride in the way his grandmother talked about his friends “popping off”—her misstating of the colloquialism “ripping off”—a federal agency.

When the FBI showed up at Mike’s house, he hid in the bathroom. His mom told the agents that he wasn’t home, but then, feeling like a coward, Mike revealed himself. He assumed that the agents knew he’d been in the Old Post Office because his girlfriend’s picture was in the pants he’d left behind, but it quickly became clear they didn’t have anything on him. They just thought he might know something.

Along with Jim, Ken, and the Doughertys, Mike’s thoughts soon turned to revenge. In Washington, Hoover and Attorney General John Mitchell called a press conference to proclaim the end of the East Coast Conspiracy to Save Lives. “That pissed us off,” Mike said. “That’s why we decided, well, we’re gonna keep doing it.”

The five activists arrested in Buffalo never seriously considered a guilty plea. “We talked to one attorney who thought we ought to plead insanity,” Chuck said. Then, in “a real stroke of luck,” they got in touch with attorney Vinny Doyle. He and his partner, Joe Birmingham, agreed to an unorthodox approach. The Buffalo raiders, along with their counterparts in Camden, wanted to represent themselves at trial, put questions directly to witnesses, and make themselves as sympathetic as possible in the eyes of the jury. Doyle, Birmingham, and other legal minds in the antiwar movement would act as a backstop, advising them and handling some of the courtroom technicalities, but it would be the defendants’ show. Doyle “just wanted to help us say what we needed to say,” Chuck said.

The home of University of Buffalo professor Ed Powell became a node for the defense campaign, a place to gather and strategize. A disenchanted former FBI agent and his wife also offered their sizable suburban home as a base of operations; Meaux, Chuck, and some other activists eventually moved in. Before the trial, the activists decided to conduct an extended speaking tour across Buffalo, taking every opportunity to explain their opposition to the war to the people of western New York, in the hope of raising public consciousness and softening up the jury pool. They also compiled a list of potential witnesses that included prominent academics and war veterans, people whose testimony could be argued—fairly—to have nothing to do with the facts of the case. The Buffalo hoped to deliver a history lesson and tell a morality tale. They might not escape jail, but they would go down doing their part to change people’s minds about Vietnam.

While the defendants prepared for trial, Jim, Mike, and Ken cased draft offices throughout New York as possible targets for new raids. They decided to hit three on the same night, in Niagara, right on the U.S.–Canada border; in Batavia, halfway to Rochester; and in Geneseo, a college town south of Rochester. These offices were much smaller than the Old Post Office and seemingly had no night watchmen. The crew knew where to break in and how. But with their co-conspirators awaiting trial, they needed new recruits.  

One of them was Sally Hamlin. Another Buffalo native, Sally was a self-professed religious nerd. “I was enamored, fascinated by all the weird stories of the saints and  martyrs,” she said. When she was seven or eight, Sally still swears, she heard the voice of God calling her to be a priest, a notion her parents dismissed. “I really thought that I would get stigmata because I was so holy,” she said. “As a little kid, third, fourth grade, I would look at my hands and go, ‘It’s not there yet, Mom!’ She’d just say, ‘Keep prayin’!’ ”

Listen: Sally Hamlin on her precocious religious fervor.
0:00
0:00

The liberalizing reforms that swept Catholicism after the Second Vatican Council—Masses in languages other than Latin, nuns allowed to wear shorter habits—buoyed Sally’s spirits, and by her late teen years she’d embraced the gospel of the Catholic left. “It spoke to me,” she said, “as a person who thought that Jesus had it going on, in the nonviolent, Jesus Christ Superstar kind of way.” She opposed the war on principle and was devastated when it touched her directly. Sally and her best friend, Joanie, both had older brothers. When the boys got drafted, Sally said, “we shaved their hair in our kitchen and drank a lot of beer and sent them off to war.”

Sally got a shock when she picked up the paper on the morning of August 22, 1971, and learned that several of her friends were in federal custody for trying to raid the Old Post Office. She immediately got involved in the volunteer defense committee that had sprung up to aid the defendants. Soon she found herself attending weekend retreats where people were laying the groundwork for future raids, and she fell in with the new cell planning to hit three draft boards in one night.

Sally’s widower father couldn’t afford to send her to college. “ I had no money, I had no education,” Sally said, “but I had a body.” She figured she should use it.

Sally was working as a nanny, and she made sure to give her employers, the Carlsons, a heads-up prior to burglarizing the Batavia draft board. “I’m gonna get involved with some things that may show up in the newspaper,” she told them. The Carlsons were cool. They didn’t ask questions.

On the afternoon of October 28, 1971, Sally dropped off the Carlson kids at home and hitchhiked to Batavia. She walked right through the door of the draft board building, nonchalantly ascended a flight of stairs, and slid into a broom closet to wait until nightfall. The office was on the town’s main drag, but Batavia didn’t have much in the way of nightlife. Once the coast was clear, Sally let two other activists in through the front door.

The raiders rifled through cabinets, stuffed draft files into sacks, then hauled the sacks downstairs and loaded them into a waiting car driven by another new accomplice named Paul. He and Sally set off for a cabin in the Finger Lakes that was the rendezvous point for everyone involved in the raids that night “We were feeling pretty good that we’d gotten away with it,” Sally said, until she and Paul were about a dozen miles from their destination. “All of a sudden we see flashing lights in the car behind us.”

Paul and Sally pulled over and instinctively sidled up to one another, to pretend they were a couple out for a romantic drive. But that wouldn’t explain the bulging sacks in the back of their car. The policeman approached Paul’s window to ask for his license, and Paul said they were on their way to his family’s cabin for the weekend. The officer told Paul that his taillight was out—that was the reason for the stop. Then he shined his flashlight on the sacks. In a moment of inspiration, Paul told him that they were full of Halloween costumes for the kids at a local Catholic orphanage.

Miraculously, the cop didn’t search the bags, but he offered to follow Paul and Sally to the cabin to make sure they arrived safely. After all, a broken taillight could be a hazard. Thinking it would be suspicious to refuse, Paul and Sally agreed. They set off again, still in possession of several bags of purloined federal property, leading a cop directly to the rendezvous point.

The Niagara break-in was more complicated from the start. Betsy Feltham, a student at Niagara University, was a new raider—she’d been reading Thoreau and Gandhi in school and connected with an “alternative, sort of underground” Catholic community. She couldn’t recall who had asked her to help knock over the Niagara draft board, but she remembered consenting immediately. “It would never occur to me not to,” she said.

The office was adjacent to an outpost of the Social Security Administration, and Betsy cased the building under the pretext that she was doing a school report on the agency. “I set my hair, put on a miniskirt, shaved my legs, and went to interview people,” she said. “That was not the way I normally looked, for sure.” The two government bureaus shared a bathroom, so it was easy enough for Betsy to excuse herself and scope out the target without raising suspicion. Nevertheless, she was so nervous she had to put on her research act “two or three times” to gather the information she needed, which must have made a couple of local Social Security administrators feel very interesting.

The plan in Niagara was for two people to hide in a closet and let Betsy and Mike Hickey into the draft board late at night. But as he waited at a safe house, Mike was alarmed to receive an early phone call from his comrades inside the office. They had emerged from hiding to find the doors to the building locked from the outside. To let the other raiders in, they’d have to improvise.

From there, Mike said, the operation proceeded “kinda like from a Three Stooges movie.” While casing, the raiders had noticed an exterior door that should have led into the Social Security office, but Betsy saw no sign of it from the inside. The activists realized it had been drywalled over. Now they figured that if they got the door to open from the outside, they could cut through the drywall, enter the Social Security office, and access the draft board via the shared bathroom.

To carry out the new plan, they would need to bypass a construction fence, which meant Mike and Betsy had to scramble up a ladder and onto the office’s roof. They’d made it about twenty yards across the flat rooftop, by Mike’s estimation, when he glanced at the window of an adjacent house. His blood ran cold. “There was a face looking at me out the window, and I completely fucking freaked out,” he said. “Then I slowly looked again and it was a jack-o’-lantern.”

Once they were off the roof, Mike set about carving through the sealed door with a drill and a handsaw. Within minutes they were inside, where their co-conspirators had already begun bagging up files. There were too many to fit in the getaway car, so they dumped the extras in the building’s sinks and turned the faucets on. Betsy still feels bad about leaving the water running.

Finally able to fulfill his destiny as a getaway driver, Ken Mudie picked up the group and drove Betsy back to her dorm. It was a Wednesday night, and she had a midterm to study for. Ken and Mike then got on the highway, heading for the rendezvous point. They were a few exits away from the cabin when, for reasons he still doesn’t understand, the hood of Ken’s Ford Fairlane flew up, obstructing his view. For what felt like forever, but was probably just a few seconds, Ken was driving an accomplice and several thousand stolen government files down the New York State Thruway functionally blind.

Mike stuck his head out the window and guided Ken to the median, then tied down the hood using his belt and some rope. The friends started up the Fairlane again and took the first exit. They’d use surface roads to get to the cabin.

Jim Good was part of the crew that hit the Geneseo office, but the specifics of that raid had blurred together with others in his memory. What’s certain is that, like their comrades in Batavia and Niagara, the Geneseo crew left behind a note, which Jim had written, addressed to Nixon, Hoover, and Mitchell. One of Jim’s accomplices that night was a guy named Harry, whom some of the other raiders had accused of being a government informant. Jim and Harry were waiting at the lake cabin with their batch of stolen files when Sally and Paul came driving up with a police officer tailing them. Harry burst out laughing and climbed a tree. “And you thought I was an informant?” he cried down at Jim.

To their relief, after seeing them to the cabin, the cop bade Sally and Paul good night and left. As the squad car disappeared into the night, most of the group breathed a sigh of relief, but Jim couldn’t relax. For all he knew, the cop might be back any minute with the FBI in tow. Jim decided it would be unwise for everyone to remain, and he told his accomplices to split. When Ken and Mike arrived, fresh off their ordeal with the car hood, Jim took the files they’d confiscated and asked them to leave, too.

Back home, Ken called Mike Dougherty to let him know, in code, that the raids had been a success. “Game went well last night!” he said. “I got up three times and had three hits, hit the ball outta the park.” Ken hung up to find his grandmother at the threshold to the kitchen, having heard every word.

“Did you do another pop-off last night?” she asked.

He told her the truth. She smiled and said, “Well, good for you.” Ken never heard another word about it. “She hated Nixon,” he said, chuckling at the memory.

Jim and Sally still had one more job to do before they could rest. From the cabin, they drove to a nearby shopping center, found a pay phone, and rang up the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle. Without giving his name, Jim read a copy of the letter left behind after each of the raids, then stayed on the line to answer the reporter’s questions. While he spoke, Sally kept watch.

The first sign of trouble was an unmarked car carrying men in trench coats. They looked like FBI agents, and they were circling the lot. Then a police car arrived. Jim might have chatted with the Democrat and Chronicle all day if Sally hadn’t dragged him from the phone booth and forced him to get back on the road. The unmarked car followed them.

Sally assumed that someone at the paper had tipped off the FBI, and that Jim’s conversation with the reporter gave the feds time to trace the call. Now, as men she was sure were law enforcement tailed them on the highway, Sally realized she was carrying an address book that contained contact information for a number of people in the antiwar movement. She tore out the pages one by one, swallowing some and tossing others out the window.

Soon Sally was fed up with the chase. “Let’s just stop and ask them who they are and what they’re doing,” she told Jim. They pulled into a small town and got out of the car. The men tailing them did the same. Jim, who had a camera on him, took photos of the men, who refused to answer the activists’ questions and told them they’d “better leave.” So Sally and Jim started driving again—only for police cars to appear in their mirrors. They were pulled over and arrested.

Yet, after all that, they were only charged with loitering in the small town where they’d briefly stopped. If Sally’s theory about why they’d been followed was right, the authorities had come incredibly close, but in the end they couldn’t link her or Jim to the break-ins. The pair got out on bail, and the loitering charges were eventually dropped. According to Sally, she and Jim returned to the cabin to deal with the stolen draft files. They mailed as many as they could to the young men named in them.

On October 28, the front page of the Buffalo Evening News read, “Three WNY Draft Offices Ransacked.” The accompanying article quoted the raiders’ letter: “You did not break [our] back, as you claimed”—a reference to Hoover and Mitchell’s gloating press conference. FBI special agent Karl Brouse told the paper that the investigation into the newest raids would “be a full-time job.”

As the trial of the five members of the Buffalo neared, the government kept pressure on peace activists and their families, hoping to smoke out other raiders. It was these tactics that finally brought Ken Mudie’s mother around to his political point of view. FBI agents showed up at her house and, in an effort to get her to talk about Ken’s activities, informed her that they had observed him driving over one hundred miles per hour, in gross violation of traffic law. When his mother confronted him, Ken laughed. The vehicle in question was a Ford Pinto. “That car would disintegrate at a hundred,” Ken said. “It’s like driving a roller skate with a door!” His mother, with whom he’d had some “knock-down-drag-outs” about his antiwar stance, was shocked that government agents would come to her house and lie to her. “They lie all the time,” he said.

Betsy Felthem believed that the FBI identified her as a suspect because she’d used the name of a girl who lived down the hall from her when she signed in to the Niagara Social Security office to case the draft board. But they didn’t arrest her for the break-in. That happened when she failed to comply with a subpoena from a grand jury. When federal marshals came for Betsy, Sally sat down in front of their car, earning her a night in jail.

Betsy was compelled to testify before the grand jury, and she sensed that the authorities thought she was a soft target. “If I were going to pick who might crack, who might talk,” she said, “I would’ve picked me.” But she stonewalled, giving the grand jury nothing, and the government let her go after a few hours.

The authorities had failed to turn up evidence they could use to prosecute even a single person for the triple raid. It was a clear victory for the antiwar movement. Still, in Buffalo, the feds had five defendants dead to rights.

There were two federal judges in line to hear the case against the five Buffalo defendants, and one of them was a known right-winger likely to throw the book at them. The other was John Thomas Curtin, a World War II veteran, former U.S. attorney, and Great Society liberal, appointed by President Johnson on the personal recommendation of Robert F. Kennedy. Perhaps most important, Curtin was a Catholic from Buffalo. When they ended up on Curtin’s docket, the Buffalo activists lucked out—he literally knew where they were coming from.  

Nevertheless, the odds weren’t in their favor. The prosecution had an open-and-shut case, not least because the defendants readily admitted what they’d done. If they had any chance of winning and avoiding jail time, they’d need to convince the jury that their actions had been justified. “We have souls,” Meaux said at one point, “and that is what brought us here.”

On the first morning of the trial, in April 1972, the defendants immediately risked Curtin’s goodwill by refusing to stand when he entered the courtroom. As Jeremiah Horrigan explained, “We wanted everybody to be equally treated.” Curtin could have held them in contempt right there. Instead, when the defendants returned from the day’s lunch break, they found that he’d had their seats removed, forcing them to stand. The chairs were eventually returned, and it was agreed that all participants in the trial would stand for each other as they entered.

Prosecutor James W. Grable’s case was simple: These kids had broken the law. He trotted out cops, FBI agents, and draft board officials to testify to the crimes and the damage done. The defendants then played attorney and cross-examined the prosecution’s witnesses. “The agents all have that Nixonian rigidity of body and walk, bereft of laughter, grace, kindness,” professor Ed Powell wrote in his notes from the gallery. “These agents of the Government, the state, Grable, the cops, the FBI people will never know the freedom of expressed conviction; never have freedom really to express that conviction, therefore will never have a conviction, an honest belief, valued as a truth in itself.”

When Grable asked a witness whether the Buffalo had left a statement behind, to which the answer was a simple “yes,” defense attorney Vinny Doyle had the presence of mind to ask if Grable might read the statement. Grable did. How far into the statement did Grable realize his error? Somewhere around “repression of dissent and resistance here at home goes on,” perhaps? When he finished reading, the defendants joined the jam-packed gallery in a round of applause. In his notebook, Powell wrote, “The Judge permitted maximum leeway in discussion of the war.”

Outside the courtroom, the defendants and their allies kept the faith at a local church. “We did a lot of singing, we did a lot of great meals,” Sally said. “We did a lot of having fun together and telling stories and just staying up late and talking about our lives and what in the world was happening.” Chuck and Meaux even decided to get married in the middle of the trial. “We had friends who could come for a wedding and friends who could come for a trial, but not for both,” Meaux said. “It was unusual. It was a great party, though.” Bob Good, himself preparing to go on trial in Camden, made their wedding cake.

Eventually, it came time for the defense to make its case. Curtin had determined that the war was germane to the proceedings, which allowed the Buffalo to call witnesses with no direct connection to the break-in: a Vietnamese refugee, a veteran who had witnessed U.S. troops using prisoners for target practice, experts in the psychological effects of conflict on soldiers and civilians. Grable declined to question these witnesses. Not so with the defendants: The Buffalo were free to speak at length about their justifications for the raid, but each of them was also subject to cross-examination, which meant five chances for Grable to interrogate them about the two extra pairs of pants and shoes left behind in the attic of the Old Post Office.

Each defendant took the stand in turn and was questioned by one of their friends. Ann Masters went first. As part of her testimony, she screened a ten-minute film about Vietnam, which Grable refused to watch. She then put a question to the courtroom: “Can we say we did not know?” One by one the defendants made a moral case for what they’d done. “If a house is on fire and you break down the door to rouse the people inside and get ’em up,” Chuck said, “sure, you broke a door down, but is that breaking and entering in that case? That was the analogy that we used.”

According to Ken Mudie, it was Jim Good’s idea to “do the Spartacus thing.” Already hiding a number of secrets, Ken wasn’t eager to draw attention to himself, but he agreed with Jim that something had to be done, and that Spartacus was a cool movie. On April 25, the day Ann testified, Ken, Jim, and Mike Hickey entered the courtroom prepared to take one more risk.

On cross-examination, Grable got Ann to confirm most of the basic facts of the burglary, but when he asked her point-blank who else had been with them in the attic, she hesitated. Into the breach stepped Jim, Ken, and Mike.

“I was there!”

“I was with them!”

“The shoes are mine!”

None of them could remember who said what. Probably Jim was the first to stand up. “What was really neat about the Spartacus thing was that we told the truth,” Ken said. It was exhilarating, and maybe a bit of a balm to the Catholic conscience, to make such a confession.

Then a remarkable thing happened: Other people stood up. “I hadn’t even seen the movie. I didn’t know what the hell they were doing,” said Cathy McCue, who was in the gallery. But sometimes courage is contagious. “Jim Good was sitting next to me, and he stood up, and I thought, Oh God, I better stand up, too.”

One after the other, people in the gallery rose to take responsibility for the Buffalo’s crimes. Then they did it again, and again, as Grable put the same query about the unidentified accomplices to successive defendants. “The third time the question was asked, before the prosecutor got the question completely out of his mouth, the whole courtroom stood up as one body,” Chuck said. “I thought, I’ll never see a moment more dramatic and life-affirming than that, you know?”

When both sides had rested, Curtin was clear in his instructions to the jury: If you think they did it, you must vote guilty. The facts alone should inform their decision. Only he could take their motivations into account, and that would happen if sentences were issued.

It took seven hours for the jurors to return with a verdict. The Buffalo were convicted of conspiracy to destroy government property and intent to commit third-degree burglary. They were acquitted on the charge of removing files from Army Intelligence, as the government could not prove who exactly had gone in to that office. All five defendants faced the possibility of at least six years behind bars.  

For the three weeks between the verdict and sentencing, the activists could only hope that Curtin would be merciful. “ I went to the hearing with maybe six or eight of my favorite books under my arms, thinking I was gonna be going to prison for a year or two,” Chuck said. Jeremiah, who had recently learned that his girlfriend was pregnant, wondered if he could still be a good father from a federal penitentiary.

Listen: Meaux Considine on preparing for prison.
0:00
0:00

The courtroom was overflowing on Friday, May 19. Curtin began the proceedings with a lecture about the importance of acting within the law. “Concerning the action that you took, it was fortunate no one was injured,” he said to the convicted five. He advised them to get involved in electoral campaigns instead of illegal activities. He chastised them for unilaterally deciding that some property shouldn’t exist, pointing out that the same logic could be deployed to defend torching abortion clinics.

“And then,” Chuck said, “he turned a corner.”

Curtin told them he wished more people had their courage. He complimented them on how they had conducted themselves in court and said that he admired their commitment to peace. “I don’t speak for myself here,” he said. “I speak for all of the people in the community.” Curtin sentenced them each to a year in prison—then suspended the sentences. The Buffalo were free.

“The room just erupted,” Jeremiah recalled. “And we walked away.” The crowd applauded Curtin as he exited his courtroom. Once they were outside, people started singing “Here Comes the Sun.” For the first time in months, Jeremiah imagined a future outside of prison. “There was a whole new page,” he said. “I had to do something with my life.”

In the wake of the trial, Curtin publicly criticized the Vietnam War. At a commencement ceremony less than a month after letting the Buffalo go free, he implored a graduating class, “We must end the war in Vietnam before it ends us. This war has turned all our best ideals to dust.” The following summer, Curtin took a class on civil disobedience taught by Father Jim Mang, the priest who’d blared his horn outside the Old Post Office during the raid. Five years later, Curtin tried one of the most significant cases in Buffalo history, issuing a ruling that at long last desegregated the city’s public schools.

The raiders, meanwhile, took his words to heart and resolved to pursue their goals through legal means. For the most part.           

After the trial, Chuck and Meaux moved to a tiny town in Washington State. They divorced within a few years. Meaux worked as a nurse, remarried, had kids, got divorced again, and came out as lesbian. Before Curtin’s passing in 2017, Meaux visited the judge three times. She also took his advice. “No more actions,” she said. “I wasn’t gonna show up in the courtroom again.” She channeled her politics into an international youth-exchange program, where she’s worked for the better part of the past three decades. “I think everyone should be thinking about peace,” she said. “Everyone.”

Like Meaux, “one raid was enough” for Chuck. He opened a bookstore, remarried, and had kids. But he never had regrets about Buffalo. “I’m more proud of those two felonies than I would be of a degree from Notre Dame,” he said.

Jim Martin made his living as a geologist and a farmer; he passed away in 2024. Ann Masters became a fleet maintenance supervisor for the New York City Department of Sanitation. Jeremiah Horrigan drove a cab, worked at the Buffalo Zoo, and eventually settled into a career as a journalist. He and his girlfriend, Patty, got married and named their son, born less than a year after the trial, after John Peter Grady. Jeremiah and Patty now live in the Hudson Valley.

Ken Mudie had a successful career in the insurance business, retired to Cape Cod, and is now the town moderator, a nonpartisan elected official who oversees democratic decision-making, in Yarmouth Port. He claims to have abided by the law since the early 1970s, notwithstanding a few traffic offenses perhaps, but says the draft raids changed him for the better. “What it did is embedded in my mind that passiveness is not a good offense,” he said.

Mike Hickey became a chiropractor, married, and had a daughter. In 2024, he ran into Lucy, the girlfriend whose photograph he’d left behind at the scene of the crime in August 1971. Only then, more than fifty years after the fact, did Mike learn that the FBI had indeed found her photo, identified Lucy, and questioned her and her father. Lucy dumped Mike as a result, but she didn’t give him up to the authorities.

“ I did not avoid the draft,” Mike told me. “I ran head-first into the draft. I attacked my draft board.” Now living in the San Francisco Bay Area, Mike continues to participate in antiwar protests, including recent actions against arms shipments to Israel.

Around the time of the Buffalo trial, Sally Hamlin and Betsy Feltham moved to a Catholic Worker house in Niagara Falls. Feeding, clothing, and housing the poor were their top priorities, but within weeks of the five raiders being set free by Judge Curtin, Sally said, “a few of us drove to Chicago.” Jim Good went, too. The crew decided to hit draft boards in Evanston and Cicero.

The raids went off without a hitch, except that a getaway driver had backed out at the last minute. The replacement driver allowed Jim to use her typewriter to draft the statement of responsibility, which her paranoid boss discovered when he went through her trash and found the discarded typewriter tape. After successfully avoiding arrest for the Batavia raid, Sally served ninety days in jail for the Evanston action. Her arrest and conviction put her at odds with her family. “ My dad said, ‘You were a thorn in my side.’ He told me he didn’t wanna see me anymore,” she said. But it didn’t last: “In the end, he told me, ‘You kids were right.’ ”

Sally stayed in countercultural circles for several years before moving with her husband to Vancouver, British Columbia, and becoming a nurse and a mother. When the last of her kids was out of the house, the girl who heard God’s voice in grade school quit her job, sold everything she owned, and used the money to pay for seminary. She became a Unitarian Universalist minister at the age of 51 and has served several congregations in western New York.

In addition to being a chief organizer of multiple raids in western New York and the Chicago area, Jim Good pulled off at least one more draft board action, which ended with a sack of files floating down the Cuyahoga River in Ohio. “It wasn’t like we were gonna close the war down just by destroying a few draft records,” Jim said, but it felt important “to let the government know that there are people who are seriously opposed to this war and are willing to take the risk to demonstrate that.” Jim eventually became a carpenter and now lives on the Big Island of Hawaii with his husband. (His brother Bob and the rest of the Camden raiders also went free following a sensational 1973 trial.)

Today there’s no comprehensive list of all the draft board actions that took place across the country, but there were at least several dozen, and possibly more than one hundred. They took place in Providence, Rhode Island; Pasadena, California; and many places in between. Their impact is hard to quantify, but it’s possible that hundreds of thousands of files were liberated or destroyed. Even disrupted raids like the Old Post Office break-in hamstrung individual draft boards and drew public attention to the antiwar cause.

When the draft ended in early 1973, it was a victory for the peace movement, but it also provided political cover for Nixon and Henry Kissinger to intensify bombing in Southeast Asia, particularly Cambodia. Some people believe that the antiwar movement died with the draft; the American public could more easily tune out what the government was doing overseas, particularly as new technologies allowed the U.S. to wage war with fewer boots on the ground. Meanwhile, the proliferation of surveillance technologies made resistance actions like the draft board raids much harder to pull off.

Still, if there’s one thing the Buffalo activists know, it’s that peace is a lifelong cause. You have to keep fighting for it, however you can.

After retiring from draft board raids, Jim Good helped some friends open a drop-in center for peace organizing in an abandoned storefront in downtown Buffalo. Over the next five decades, he mellowed a bit, but his commitment to civil disobedience remained ironclad. “People should be willing to call out our government, our military, our businesses, when they’re out of line,” Jim said. “And they are, most of the time.”


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

Master and Commander

MASTER
AND
COMMANDER


When a scraggly band of folk musicians arrived to tour the UK, residents of a small Welsh town were enamored—until they learned that the bands leader ruled with an iron fist.

By Peter Ward

The Atavist Magazine, No. 172


Peter Ward’s writing has appeared in GQ, The Atlantic, Wired, The Guardian, and other publications. He explored the privatization of space in his first book, The Consequential Frontier, and reported on billionaires and biohackers pursuing eternal life in his second, The Price of Immortality. He lives in the United Kingdom.

Editor: Jonah Ogles
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Marta Campabadal Graus
Illustrator: Patrik Svensson

Published in February 2026.


1.

Come all you young sailormen, listen to me
I’ll sing you a song of the fish in the sea, and it’s
Windy weather, boys, stormy weather, boys
When the wind blows were all together, boys
—“Fish in the Sea,” Scottish fisherman’s shanty

As dawn broke on a crisp morning in May 2021, two large passenger vans pulled into the cobbled square of Caerwys, a town in North Wales. The vehicles parked outside Hereford House, a grand Victorian-era building, and a mass of figures emerged sleepily, lugging suitcases and mountains of musical equipment. They were bearded and bedraggled, outsiders in Caerwys, which has fewer than a thousand inhabitants, most of them elderly. Caerwys, like many small towns in the United Kingdom, is the kind of place where curtains twitch, gossip thrives, and news travels abnormally fast. Residents near Hereford House who spied the visitors that morning may have wondered what their arrival portended for the town.

By the afternoon, an answer was pouring into the square: the sounds of whistles and bagpipes, drums and fiddles, lively disruptions to the town’s usual peace. The visitors were lodging at Hereford House and also using its ground floor as a practice space. They were musicians in a band called the Old Time Sailors, from Argentina, and they were embarking on their first UK tour.

Erica Burney lived just off the town square. A singer who performed locally, she also ran a catering business out of On the Corner Café, a Caerwys eatery. Soon after the band arrived, Burney ran into Russ Williams, the landlord of Hereford House. He told her a terrible tale: The band had endured a nightmare journey from South America to Europe. Pandemic restrictions had forced them to detour to Turkey and then Albania, and they’d arrived months later than planned. In addition to the gigs they’d missed from the delay, their tour faced continuing restrictions on indoor gatherings, causing pubs to close and forcing live entertainment outdoors. Williams asked: Could Burney help them? Drum up some goodwill and publicity?

He introduced her to the band’s leader, Nicolás Andrés Guzmán. Tall and powerfully built, with jet-black hair, a voluminous beard, and a slickly styled mustache, Guzmán oversaw a crew of seventeen musicians. To them he was the Captain. During the band’s performances he played the accordion. When Burney expressed sympathy for the problems the band had encountered, Guzmán replied, in near perfect English, that he had instructed lawyers to investigate. That struck Burney as odd. “You’re not fucking U2,” she recalled thinking.

On June 1, Burney met the full band at Hereford House. They wore their performance attire: a white cotton work shirt layered with a vest and a jacket, tucked into either trousers or a kilt, and accessorized with a leather belt, a neckerchief, and a jaunty cap. True to their name, they looked like sailors plucked from a nineteenth-century ship. They played music to match—sea shanties, mostly, dating back hundreds of years.

The band shuffled into place so Burney could take photos and film them playing, then she posted the content to the town’s Facebook page. “So, as some of you will have no doubt heard, we have a merry band of sailors in town!” she wrote. “Of all the places they could have chosen to stay, I hope we can make them glad they chose here.” 

It was strange, this motley group of musicians showing up in Caerwys, cosplaying as seafarers of yore. Strange, that is, if you weren’t on TikTok. The Old Time Sailors were riding the phenomenon known as ShantyTok, which exploded in early 2021, after a Scottish postal worker named Nathan Evans posted a video of himself belting out a traditional shanty and pounding a table in time with the music. The video went viral, and soon other TikTok users were harmonizing with Evans and posting their own shanty covers.

Shanties originated as work songs to accompany repetitive, laborious tasks such as raising sails and lowering anchors, and they’re earworms by design. They have audience-friendly, foot-tapping rhythms—what shall we do with a drunken sailor / early in the morning—and often feature call and response, where a chorus of singers answer a lead vocalist. Media coverage attributed the advent of ShantyTok to the pandemic. “They are unifying, survivalist songs,” one critic wrote, “designed to transform a huge group of people into one collective body.” Trapped at home, staring at their computers and phones, shanties offered people a common, joyful cause.

After a period of enforced isolation in Caerwys to ensure that none of them had COVID, the Old Time Sailors put on their first local show at a glamping venue called Penbedw Estate. They yelled, stomped their feet, and sang at the top of their lungs as roughly fifty people watched and some joined in. The Sailors’ energy was infectious, anarchic. On the town’s Facebook page, one enthusiastic commenter, a fan of shanties well before they took TikTok by storm, declared, “These guys have torn up the rule book!”

The band planned to stay in Caerwys for a few months, using it as a base of operations. Soon they were drinking maté in the square and joining jam sessions with a local band of ukulele players. Friendships formed. One of them was between Alex Sganga, the band’s lead violinist, and Roland Ward, the warden for St. Michael’s Church, an eighth-century stone building that dominates the Caerwys skyline. Ward is my father, and despite previously showing little enthusiasm for popular music beyond the Beach Boys, he regularly sent me photos and videos of the Sailors’ performances. Like others in the community, he quickly developed a passion for the band. “They captured the imagination of people,” he told me. “And the individual band members won them over. Instead of being intruders, they saw them as good musicians—sociable, friendly people.”

Griffith sensed tension between the band members and Guzmán, and he noticed that the individual Sailors seemed to be scraping by. “They had nothing,” he said.

My dad invited Sganga to perform a solo concert of Irish and Argentinean folk music before his packed church, then organized another show for the whole band at Penbedw Estate. This time there were more than three hundred attendees, each of whom paid ten pounds (about $15) to be there. The profits would be used for building repairs at St. Michael’s.

My father was so enamored of the band that he persuaded a national TV station to send a camera crew and reporter to the Penbedw show. But as they set up their equipment for interviews, Guzmán was nowhere to be found. According to my dad, when he called the Captain on his cell phone, he was defensive, speaking as if the televised gig were being forced upon him. Guzmán finally showed up to be filmed, but he replied to questions hesitantly, like he didn’t speak English well.

Steve Griffith, a grizzled former detective enjoying a peaceful retirement in Caerwys, was one of the Sailors’ biggest fans and a member of the ukulele band that sometimes played with them. Like my dad, he helped them book shows. “As we got to know them a bit more, we were finding out that the majority of them were classically trained musicians,” Griffith said. “They were something else.” Yet Griffith also felt as if the musicians “were guarding something.” He sensed tension between the band members and Guzmán, and he noticed that the individual Sailors seemed to be scraping by. “They had nothing,” he said.

A few weeks into the Sailors’ stay in Caerwys, the UK’s pandemic restrictions eased, which allowed the band to book shows across the country. They were soon gone six nights a week, and sometimes played two shows a day. The shows were dynamic, sweaty affairs that left the musicians exhausted. From the windows of her home, Burney noticed that they almost always returned in the early-morning hours. The grueling schedule was made all the more so, according to several former band members, by Guzmán’s insistence that they practice for long hours when they were in Caerwys.

One evening that August, Burney visited Hereford House and sang with the band during a rehearsal. From across the room, she locked eyes with a man playing two small drums, named Jorge Fernández. (The Atavist is using a pseudonym for this individual out of concern for his safety.) When the rehearsal ended, Fernández grabbed his guitar and asked Burney if she would sing just for him. He strummed a Nat King Cole song, which she knew well: Smile, though your heart is aching / Smile, even though it’s breaking. Fernández told me he thought Burney was “a siren, the most beautiful girl in the village.”

Burney invited Fernández and his bandmate Claudio Toscanini over to her house. They drank, smoked weed, sang, and talked, until Fernández told Toscanini to make his excuses and leave. Toscanini returned a short time later bearing a message from Guzmán: Fernández was out too late and had to return to Hereford House. Burney thought the message was strange, but Fernández paid it no heed. “He told him to fuck off and we had a snog,” Burney said.

She later learned that Guzmán had strict rules for the band. Fernández had violated a nightly curfew, after which band members weren’t even supposed to leave their rooms at Hereford House to go to the toilet. There was also a prohibition on romantic attachments within the band while on tour. The latter was a rule that, according to multiple sources, Guzmán himself didn’t seem to follow. Eighteen-year-old Lola Weschler, a singer and bodhran player, was the band’s only female member and appeared to be Guzmán’s girlfriend—despite his introduction of another woman, who designed the band’s promotional materials, as his wife. Weschler’s father, Daniel, was also in the band and texted Guzmán one day when he was looking for his daughter. “Tell Lola to turn on her cell phone so I can call her,” he wrote in Spanish in a message that was later shared with me. Guzmán sent a string of short, angry replies. “Dani, I’m fucking,” he wrote. “Don’t call out of nowhere, dude. Don’t be annoying.” (When I reached out to Guzmán for an interview, he refused to speak with me, threatened legal action, and blocked my number. He later declined to answer detailed fact-checking questions on the record.)

Money was the biggest source of conflict between the Sailors and the Captain. When recruiting musicians in Argentina, Guzmán had allegedly promised them up to $600 per month for the UK tour, though band members told me that rates varied and Guzmán refused to draft official contracts. Most of the Sailors paid for their own transatlantic plane tickets, a big expenditure for gig musicians. They said they were told that they would eventually be reimbursed, but once the band was in Caerwys, Guzmán was slow to issue payments of any kind.

Guitarist Matías Vergara told me he threatened to quit after he learned that he would only get half the money he was promised when he joined the band in Buenos Aires. He and Guzmán argued about the payment until, according to Vergara, Guzmán kicked him out of the Sailors. Vergara stayed with Steve Griffith, with whom he’d become friendly, for a week before leaving the UK. “Mati was quite upset about it all,” Griffith said. “This guy was just driving them into the ground.”

Before Vergara flew home, he got a voice message from Guzmán, which was later shared with me. “If I see you in Caerwys, I will beat you to death,” Guzmán said. “I’m not exaggerating. Don’t get close to me, because I’ll murder you.”

As Guzmán was losing band members, he also gained a photographer. Lizzie Ferdinando was a mainstay of the British pirate community, a niche social circle of people who don eyepatches and tricorn hats and meet up to drink beer and listen to folk music. Think Renaissance fairs but for pirate fans. The biggest events draw thousands of revelers. In 2012, more than fourteen thousand people in the town of Hastings set the Guinness World Record for the largest single gathering of pirates.

Ferdinando saw the Old Time Sailors for the first time at a July 2021 gig, and she fell in love with the band. “They put on a really good show,” she said. She talked to Guzmán about becoming the band’s full-time photographer and was so enthralled that she offered to do so without pay. The Captain said she’d need to move to Caerwys, because the band couldn’t pick her up every time they had a show. In early fall, Ferdinando moved into Hereford House.

She soon became concerned with the way the band were living. They worked hard, ate little, barely slept, and seemed utterly depleted. Several members told her that Guzmán had yet to pay them the wages they were owed. She could quit and go home at any time, but for most of the Sailors that wasn’t so easy. Flights to Argentina were expensive. The musicians didn’t have savings they could tap into or families with the means to help them. They were effectively trapped in a foreign country and wholly dependent on a man who allegedly wouldn’t pay them. Ferdinando began to wonder if Guzmán might be in violation of UK labor laws. “I said, I’ve got to stick October out to get, if nothing else, just all the evidence of what’s going on,” she told me. October was the final month of the tour.

One day, as Marcelo Salusky was playing his double bass at a gig, he began to feel faint. Back in Caerwys, he stayed in bed for two days. When he showed no signs of improvement, he was taken to the hospital and diagnosed with COVID and a lung infection. He was given antibiotics and told to rest, but he was back on stage three days later. When Fernández came down with a fever and cough, which turned out to be symptoms of COVID, he wanted to stay at Burney’s to convalesce, but according to Fernández, Guzmán wouldn’t allow it. Fernández said the Captain yelled at him for getting sick.

On October 28, the band performed their last show of the tour. It was in Caerwys, at the town hall, an old brick building crammed between modest homes. The community turned out in force to bid farewell to their guests. The ukulele group performed, as did Burney, and videos posted to the town’s Facebook page toasted the Sailors’ talents. Many locals hoped they would return the following year for another tour.

Despite performing alongside the Sailors, Burney quietly seethed over the way Guzmán treated the band, and Fernández in particular. The couple agreed not to confront the Captain, preferring to keep matters friendly until Fernández had secured his salary, even though that went against Burney’s fiery instincts. “I sent Nicholas a lovely message at the end of the tour saying, ‘I admire what you’ve done, blah, blah, blah,’ because I wanted Jorge to get his fucking money,” Burney said. But according to Fernández, that never happened.

2.

Now the Captain’s a wicked man
He gets drunk whenever he can
And he don’t give a damn for grandpappy and me
He kicks us around
And he knocks us about
Well I feel so broke up, I want to go home
—“Sloop John B.,” Bahamian folk song

The exact origins of the Old Time Sailors are hard to pin down. Some people I spoke to said Guzmán started the group. Others said he took it over. Guzmán’s own history is also shrouded in mystery. According to differing accounts, he holds a degree in psychology, lived in the United States for years, married an actress, and once considered suicide before the sound of Irish folk music gave his life meaning. Several former band members feared repercussions for talking to me, believing Guzmán had political or underworld connections that could make their lives in Argentina difficult. I found no conclusive evidence of such ties and began to wonder if the tales originated with Guzmán himself.

What’s certain is that many of the early band members had a background in Celtic folk music, and they wanted to go on the UK tour because the money they were promised was good. Argentina has been in financial crisis for the better part of a decade. Between 2017 and 2020, the country’s GDP plummeted and inflation soared. Amid economic uncertainty made worse by the pandemic, Guzmán offered musicians a steady, well-paying gig—and in Europe, no less.

But three musicians from the 2021 tour went on to file lawsuits against Guzmán, alleging that he failed to pay them and exploited their labor. The plaintiffs were Marcelo Salusky, the bass player who got sick; Daniel Weschler, Lola’s father; and Alberto Lamberti, a mandolin player. In his lawsuit, Lamberti claimed that Guzmán owed him $2,800 in wages, or about 80 percent of Argentina’s average household income in 2021. Lamberti told me that the UK tour “destroyed” him. He spent six months performing, rehearsing, and abiding by bizarrely draconian rules—one being that the musicians should brush their teeth three times a day—and had virtually nothing to show for it. “I lost my faith in humanity,” Lamberti said.

“Mr. Guzmán, more than anything, rigorously commanded—and in writing—when and how to go to the bathroom, with whom they could speak and with whom they could not, what they could eat, what they could not,” Weschler’s lawsuit reads. “Moreover, he insulted the musicians, with denigrating statements and constant threats to the plaintiff at the slightest dissent.”

Fernández didn’t file a suit against Guzmán, but he told me that when he inquired about his back wages, Guzmán said his pay was being reduced because he’d contracted COVID. Then Guzmán allegedly said he wouldn’t pay Fernández in full unless he agreed to join the band on its next UK tour, which was slated to begin late in the spring of 2022. Fernández refused.

Ultimately, only four musicians—less than a quarter of the band—signed on again for the 2022 tour. The rest warned friends and colleagues about the Captain, but the pool of talented Argentine musicians in need of money was deep, and Guzmán had no trouble finding new recruits. Fifteen fresh faces joined the Sailors in preparation for their return to the UK. Lucas Ordóñez was one of them.

Ordóñez is a mandolin player, and he was twenty-nine when he saw an ad for musicians posted by the Sailors. He liked their music and was intrigued by the idea of traveling internationally. Guzmán warned him that the tour would be intense. He said Ordóñez would need to master more than a hundred songs in preparation. Ordóñez, a respected folk musician in Buenos Aires, relished the challenge. The pay enticed him even further. The financial arrangements varied, but most musicians were again offered $600 per month, plus food and accommodation. Like their predecessors, Ordóñez and his bandmates would need to pay for their flights. Guzmán allegedly described this as insurance against people abandoning the group when they arrived in the UK, and said that the musicians would eventually be reimbursed.

In March 2022, Ordóñez received his first $600 payment. It was a good wage for almost anyone in Argentina, and an excellent one for a musician. Then, just prior to departure, the band members were presented with a contract, which contained more than financial terms. It had a list of rules, and the consequences for breaking them were explained in full. After an initial warning, band members found to be violating the rules would be docked 5 percent of their total income for the tour. Further violations could incur a punishment of up to 50 percent and even expulsion from the group. One rule stated that the musicians could not “play in the village church,” referring to St. Michael’s, where Sganga had performed the previous year. Another directive had to do with Ferdinando, the British photographer, presumably as a result of her refusal to remove the watermark from the photos she’d taken on the 2021 tour because of Guzmán’s alleged treatment of the musicians. Band members were instructed not to “have any type of communication, whether in person, through networks, letters, email, telephone, and others, with Lizzie Ferdinando.” The same proscription applied to former members of the band.

According to the musicians I spoke to, they’d already bought their plane tickets by the time they received the contract, and felt they had little choice but to sign. Along with everything else in the document, they agreed to not “contradict the Captain in public” or “speak badly of ‘Old Time Sailors,’ or of any band member, including the Captain.”

Meanwhile, in Caerwys, locals were gearing up for the band’s arrival, but not in the joyful spirit of the sendoff from the previous fall. During the months the Sailors had been away, residents who were close to the musicians had told their neighbors about what they saw as Guzmán’s ill treatment of the band. Some people said that they’d boycott the Sailors’ shows. Steve Griffith went so far as to contact the UK Border Agency, hoping that the government would block the band’s entry into the country—he alleged that Guzmán had brought in the last bunch of musicians on tourist visas when they should have had work papers. “I got really disillusioned with the authorities here, because I phoned them—it wasn’t just once, I phoned them on a number of occasions,” Griffith recalled. He also suggested that Russ Williams cancel the band’s booking at Hereford House, but Williams said he hated the thought of breaking an agreement. And when Griffith asked former band members to make written statements about their experiences the previous year, hoping he might furnish them to UK authorities, they refused. “They were all too bloody scared of him,” Griffith said.

When the 2022 Sailors arrived in Caerwys, Griffith vowed to keep an eye out for evidence that Guzmán was exploiting the musicians. Erica Burney did the same. When she saw Lola Weschler, one of the few musicians from the previous tour to come back, she was immediately concerned. She was “painfully thin,” with “sunken eyes,” Burney said. “You know when you look at a girl if she’s miserable. And it was clear she was miserable.” Burney heard from a former band member that Weschler’s father, Daniel, feared for his daughter’s safety, because Lola was allegedly still in a relationship with Guzmán.

Burney took photos of the license plates on the band’s vans, hoping they might help law enforcement track the Sailors’ movements if Guzmán were ever investigated. While scoping out the vehicles, Burney was surprised to see a new addition to the band’s fleet: a large motor home. She later learned that it was apparently for Guzmán’s exclusive use, a place for him to sleep when the band traveled.

Unlike the first tour, the Sailors didn’t return to Caerwys each night after a gig. They often slept in their vans while parked at service stations, or in the open air on the side of the road. Some of them used sleeping bags and tents. Ordóñez was shocked by the conditions, which he said left the musicians exposed. “I remember hugging my mandolin while I slept,” he told me, “so that when I woke up in the morning, it would still be there.”

Before long, the Sailors decamped from Caerwys entirely, shifting their base of operations twenty miles west to Old Colwyn, where a friend of Guzmán’s lived. After the move, according to Ordóñez, the band’s situation deteriorated further. Their meals, which were prepared by a member of Guzmán’s inner circle in the band, had been meager to begin with. After the move, Ordóñez said, they were often served cold, and the portions shrank.

To make matters worse, the rules in the contract the musicians had signed stated that they could not “take food from the refrigerator outside of the assigned meal times.” As a result, the musicians were constantly hungry. Ordóñez told me that there were times he begged strangers for food. Several musicians fell ill from the exhausting performance schedule. Ordóñez recalled playing a show in Cardiff with a fever of 105 degrees. “It was as if they were testing how far we could go, constantly pushing the limits of the human body,” he said.

Ordóñez developed a reputation as a troublemaker, questioning Guzmán’s orders and raising concerns about the band’s living conditions. According to a lawsuit Ordóñez later filed in Argentina, when he sought payment after the first month of the tour, Guzmán attempted to hit him and yelled at him in front of his bandmates.

Then one night, Guzmán gathered the entire band in a circle for what Ordóñez called “a sailor’s tribunal.” According to band members who were present, it was essentially a shaming exercise dressed up as old-school maritime justice, hearkening back to a time when captains were judge and jury over the men under their command. Guzmán allegedly described Ordóñez’s infractions, and other accusers joined him. They were so-called “core members” of the Sailors, all close with the Captain, and they allegedly received special privileges and snitched on musicians who violated Guzmán’s rules. Now they pointed the finger at Ordóñez. “Psychologically, it was very troubling,” Ordóñez said. “They accused me of all sorts of things—of stealing food, of disrespecting others, of being violent.”

According to two other band members who were present that night, the core members also declared their devotion to Guzmán. One stood up and announced he would “suck Nick’s dick if he asked me to.” A silence fell over the group as the man sat back down.

Eventually, Guzmán issued a verdict: Ordóñez would no longer be informed of the band’s schedule. He would have to go where he was taken, no questions asked. From that point on, according to Ordóñez, he rarely knew where in the UK he was or where he was going next. He told me that even the drivers of the vans wouldn’t tell him. “I was kidnapped,” he said. Like the majority of the band, Ordóñez had a cell phone, but he couldn’t afford the UK’s data rates, and he was never able to connect to Wi-Fi long enough to learn where he was.

Ordóñez knew he needed someone with the means and the know-how, someone who spoke fluent English, to extricate him from the Sailors. He managed to reach out to former band members in Argentina, who in turn got in touch with Lizzie Ferdinando. She offered to help. The Hastings Pirate Festival was coming up, and the Sailors were scheduled to perform there. Ferdinando planned to locate Ordóñez at the festival and offer her aid.

The Hastings festival is a raucous scene. In addition to drunken merriment, people perform elaborate reenactments of sea battles, with cutlass-carrying pirates firing cannons from replicas of seventeenth-century ships. Attendees tend to dress as swashbucklers in the vein of Jack Sparrow from Pirates of the Caribbean, or as characters from the popular Starz show Black Sails. Ferdinando went another route, one that would fully conceal her identity.

Ordóñez was standing in a plaza where the band had just played when a woman approached him. She was wearing a furry, snub-nosed mask resembling a pug, along with a black pirate hat. “I’m Lizzie,” she said. “I’m here to help you.” Ordóñez had never met Ferdinando, and before he could learn who she was, several other band members walked over. So did Guzmán. Ferdinando wasn’t sure whether he recognized her; if he did, he didn’t let on. She made a quick exit, because she didn’t want Ordóñez to get in trouble for speaking to her.

Other people tried to assist the musicians. In Caerwys, residents were still concerned about the former tenants of Hereford House. Armed with photos of license plates, testimonies from former band members, and even a screenshot of Guzmán’s passport she’d managed to obtain, Burney called a national hotline for suspected cases of modern slavery. The hotline was an outgrowth of the Modern Slavery Act of 2015, heralded as one of the most progressive laws of its kind in Europe. Few reports, however, result in convictions—only around 2 percent. Alleged victims are often wary of testifying. But victims were exactly what the woman who answered the hotline told Burney she needed. For the state to investigate Guzmán, it required testimony. Band members would have to come forward. Burney explained why this would be difficult if not impossible for the musicians. The woman told her there was little she could do. To Burney, it felt like “no one wanted to help.”

Ferdinando had also called the modern slavery hotline, shortly after the 2021 tour ended, on behalf of the musicians in the band. She said the authorities’ response had been similarly underwhelming. The calls may have piqued law enforcement’s interest, however. According to Ordóñez and other musicians, as the 2022 tour continued, police stopped the band’s vehicles on several occasions and asked whether the musicians considered themselves victims of exploitation. No one stepped forward—several band members told me they were afraid of Guzmán, afraid of being deported, afraid of never getting paid.

When Ordóñez and another musician finally decided to cut their losses and abandon the band after a gig, they had their own run-in with law enforcement in the town of Shrewsbury, where they were detained on suspicion of immigration violations. Ordóñez tried to explain what was happening inside the band but suspects the police had trouble understanding his English. He also wondered whether Guzmán had something to do with his detention. Perhaps the Captain wanted revenge for Ordóñez’s early departure from the band.

After they were released from custody, Ordóñez and his bandmate decided to do odd jobs until they earned enough money to go home. They weren’t the only ones to escape: Around the same time, Lola Weschler fled the band. According to several ex-members of the Sailors, Guzmán could be aggressive toward Weschler, screaming at her until she cried. The people who helped her get out asked that I not reveal any details about how they did it, out of concern for their and especially Weschler’s safety. “There were good moments that had nice colors and bad moments that felt like hell,” Weschler wrote me of her time in the Sailors. “I felt broken inside.”

Once he was back in Argentina, Ordóñez filed his lawsuit against Guzmán, accusing him of withholding payment and demanding compensation for physical and psychological harm. He also began referring to the Sailors as a cult. “People developed a kind of devotion toward [Guzmán], like he was an ideal to be worshipped,” he said. “He manipulated people until they were entirely dependent on him, and it became increasingly dangerous.”

The Sailors lived on, and the same pattern repeated itself. When the 2022 tour ended, Guzmán recruited new musicians in Argentina to return to the UK the following spring. This time the band stayed in a shed-like structure without a bathroom in Devon. A video shared on Facebook by one of the musicians shows thin mattresses laid on a concrete floor. The caption describes how “the rats came to visit us at night,” and asserts that the band members were only given a plate of noodles to eat each day. According to musicians I interviewed, they received a third of the wages Guzmán had offered them. But as the band suffered behind the scenes, their music was more popular than ever. The Sailors’ packed schedule that year included several sets at the popular Glastonbury Festival.

When the tour wrapped, Guzmán was already looking ahead to 2024. By then Burney had realized that she’d have to bide her time if she wanted to see justice. The Captain “had to get so arrogant,” she said, “that he was going to make a stupid mistake.”

3.

I hate to sail on this rotten tub
Leave her Johnny, leave her
No grog allowed and rotten grub
And it’s time for us to leave her
Leave her Johnny, leave her
Oh leave her Johnny, leave her
For the voyage is long and the winds don’t blow
And it’s time for us to leave her
—“Leave Her Johnny,” a traditional sea shanty

Amy Harrison was a 26-year-old actress struggling to find work in London when she saw an Instagram post announcing that the Old Time Sailors were looking for singers for their 2024 UK tour. She figured she’d audition; she had nothing to lose. “I’ve been rejected from all these other things, so let’s just get rejected from a shanty band as well and then we’ll have a funny story to tell,” Harrison told me.

When she first spoke with Guzmán, on a video call, he gave her a familiar spiel: The band required hard work and played many gigs. Was she up for that? According to Harrison, the Captain also said she would have to travel to Argentina for rehearsals at her own expense, but that she would be reimbursed at the end of the tour. Harrison said that all sounded fine, sent along three recorded songs as her audition, and found herself on a plane to Buenos Aires in January 2024.

Diego Silvero was another recruit for the tour. The singer from Argentina had a wide range of interests—he sang opera as well as heavy metal—and taught music when he wasn’t performing. When he first met Guzmán, he was dazzled by talk of major festivals such as Glastonbury. “I was like, ‘That’s my dream, man,’ ” he said. Other new members included Franco Galante, a singer and musician with a boyish face, and Tana Abel, who quit his job as a systems engineer to play in the band. 

According to Silvero, Galante, Abel, and other musicians, rehearsals for the 2024 tour lasted up to ten hours each day. The band would practice without its leader for several hours, then Guzmán would arrive for the final stretch. He’d listen to a handful of songs and, as if channeling J. K. Simmons in the film Whiplash, pick a musician and accuse them of being out of tune, off-tempo, lazy, or stupid. Allegedly he sometimes used homophobic or racist insults. Silvero said he was a frequent target of Guzmán’s attacks. The Captain told him he was too fat to stand at the front of the stage and disparaged his musical talent.

Harrison couldn’t understand what Guzmán said in the rehearsals—she didn’t speak Spanish—but she found herself frustrated nonetheless. The harmonies she was supposed to sing were written for a soprano, and she was an alto. Her dyslexia made it hard for her to pick up all the lyrics. And according to Harrison, Guzmán said strange things to her. “I’m going to make you cry,” he told her once, adding that he wouldn’t try to sleep with her because he no longer dated European women. Harrison wasn’t happy, but it would be embarrassing to return home without the job she’d flown to Argentina for, so she knuckled down and kept rehearsing.

Prior to the band’s departure for the UK in April, Guzmán organized the musicians into small groups. Each was allegedly told to take a different flight and book accommodations that could be canceled without paying a fee. According to multiple musicians I spoke to, everyone had return tickets dated three weeks after their arrival, which they planned to change once they were in the UK. Guzmán allegedly instructed the band members to tell border officials they were on vacation and visiting friends. Abel was shocked. “What the fuck is going on here?” he remembered thinking. “I never knew that I was going to work illegally.”

Once the band was in the country, they made their way to that year’s lodgings: three large stationary RVs set up near a barn outside the town of Tavistock. The bathrooms and showers were in what looked like a converted cargo container. Lights strung outside gave the place a bohemian feel. But the shine wore off quickly. “The place wasn’t OK for living,” Abel told me. “It was full of rats. Diseases, obviously. And next to the barn, there was the place where the cows are stored. There was cow shit everywhere.” 

The Captain had his own camper van that he shared with his new girlfriend, a musician whom he reportedly showered with expensive gifts, and whose harp, which was used in only a few of the band’s songs, took up precious cargo space when the Sailors traveled to gigs. The other members were assigned to the RVs—as many as nine in each. In one, Galante slept on the sofa, while Harrison had her own small room.

The new recruits experienced what musicians from previous years had reported: deprivations, bullying, exhaustion. Around a month and a half into the tour, according to Galante, the Captain learned about a flippant comment Galante had made about his girlfriend’s harp—Galante had said it cost more than his salary. The next day, Guzmán sent a long message to the band’s WhatsApp group chat, saying that he didn’t need to justify how he spent his money to “Little Franco.” An argument ensued at the camp. According to several musicians, Abel sided with Galante and told Guzmán he was mistreating the band. In response, several of the Captain’s allies berated Abel and accused him of being ungrateful.

The musicians turned on one another, reporting trivial offenses like, say, not washing their dishes, speaking ill of another band member, or arriving late to rehearsal.

The next day, Abel, Galante, and Silvero, who’d supported his bandmates in the argument, were summoned one by one for a meeting with Guzmán. They were allegedly told that if they wanted to stay in the band, they would need to type out an apology, send it to one of the band’s core members for approval, and then post it to WhatsApp. Faced with the prospect of never getting paid, and of being stranded in the UK, they all complied. 

Galante’s difficulties weren’t over. He and Harrison had grown close. Despite Guzmán’s ban on dating within the band, on a rare night off from performing, after watching a movie together, “stuff happened” with Harrison, Galante told me. Guzmán soon became suspicious of their relationship, so he moved Galante to a different RV and allegedly told Harrison he’d kick Galante out of the group if they continued talking. Undeterred, Galante would squeeze through a small window into Harrison’s room in the RV so they could spend the night together. After another band member spotted Galante at Harrison’s window and told Guzmán, the Captain questioned Harrison. She said Galante was just bringing her candy.

In July, Guzmán wrote Harrison an email asking her to apologize for staying in London after a show to see friends. An exchange ensued, which quickly turned to the topic of Harrison’s relationship with Galante. Harrison said she had feelings for Galante but stopped short of admitting they were dating. Hoping to deflect suspicion, she apologized. “I’m so sorry for this, as I got carried away with my emotions, and I was selfish and not thinking of the band,” she wrote. “I really want to make it right.” Guzmán rejected her apology, claiming it wasn’t specific enough. “Feelings don’t develop unless one develops them,” he wrote. “You make it seem as an act of god when it wasn’t ever that. Flirting comes before feelings. Basic biology.” He signed the email “Cap’n Nick.”

Harrison considered leaving, but the Sailors were scheduled to open for a popular English band the following week, and her parents and a family friend were planning to be there. What’s more, she told me, “I still thought it was important for my career.” Harrison stayed on and broke things off with Galante.

Around the same time, Guzmán introduced the musicians to what he called the “distinctions” system. It was, musicians told me, a way of alternately rewarding and punishing their behavior. The Captain even created fake bank notes featuring a cartoon image of his own face, stamped with the phrase “In Poseidon We Trust.” The money, he allegedly told the band, could be earned by good behavior or by reporting fellow Sailors who broke his rules. The fake currency could be exchanged at the end of the tour for real money, or spent on beers and snacks at gigs. 

By then, most of the band members were broke and desperate to eat something other than guiso, an Argentinean stew made by the vat that was allegedly the Sailors’ only meal most days—that is, when it didn’t spoil in the heat during van rides. The musicians turned on one another, reporting trivial offenses like, say, not washing their dishes, speaking ill of another band member, or arriving late to rehearsal. A culture of paranoia developed. “You didn’t know who you could trust at that point,” Harrison told me. “You were looking around to see if somebody was trying to take a photo or a video of you. You didn’t know what, but at any point you could be doing something wrong and you could be penalized for it.”

In the second week of August, Galante was riding home from a gig with the band’s sound and lighting team when Emanuel Vázquez started talking to a fellow technician about standing up to Guzmán. Galante chimed in. “You need to be a warrior, otherwise dragons will eat you,” he said. Vázquez joked that if Guzmán didn’t pay him there would be consequences. The bandmates laughed.

Within minutes, Vázquez and Galante were notified that they’d been removed from the band’s group chat. Vázquez was then promptly abandoned at a service station, where he messaged Galante to tell him that a core member of the band had recorded their conversation and sent it to Guzmán. Vázquez had been fired.

When Harrison found out, she frantically contacted friends and family, hoping to find a place where Vázquez could stay. “I just couldn’t believe what was happening,” she said. She felt like she was in “the middle of hell.”

Galante wasn’t left on the roadside, but the next morning Guzmán summoned him to a meeting. According to Galante, core members stood around him in a circle as the Captain told him he was being let go. He was taken to a train station with his suitcase, where he messaged Harrison and asked if he could stay with her parents. He had no money, so it was either that or live on the street until he figured out how to earn enough to return to Argentina.

Harrison called her parents, leaving a tearful voicemail. They agreed to help but also told her they were worried about her. They could tell how anxious she was. “Once Franco got kicked out, I think he was my safety—what kept me going in the band,” Harrison told me. “I was scared of what would happen.” She worried Guzmán might become violent toward her.

The next day, she went to see the Captain in his motor home. She had already decided to quit, but she wanted to record their conversation as evidence of how he treated musicians. She later shared the recording with me. Over forty minutes, Guzmán criticized various band members, including Abel, Galante, and Silvero. “Those people,” he said, “they’ve never achieved nothing in life.” At one point, he picked up a copy of the contract that band members had signed. “This is a legal fucking document, with this shit I win a fucking suit,” he said. “Franco signed it, and here it says he can’t fuck you.”

Finally, Harrison informed the Captain that she wanted to quit. Guzmán told Harrison she was missing out on a huge career opportunity by leaving the band. “You literally fell in love with the wrong person,” he told her. “Someday, admit it to yourself, dude. You took away something from yourself, something that was going to be big. This thing is going to grow regardless. It’s going to go far. And you’re missing it because you wanted to shag someone.” Before ending the conversation, he hugged her. “You will always mean a lot to me,” he said. “I’m sorry, I don’t cry, but I mean it. Look at my face, bitch, I mean it.” 

Harrison was dropped at a halfway point between the band’s base near Tavistock and her parents’ home; her father picked her up. She rested for two or three days, then set her mind to taking down Guzmán for good.


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

The Two Faces of Lummie Jenkins


The Atavist Magazine, No. 170 — Originally published by Topic


Alexandra Marvar is a journalist and photographer based in New England. Her work has appeared in the New York Times, WSJ Magazine, The Believer, and other publications.

Editor: Seyward Darby
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Emily Injeian
Ilustrator: Fede Yankelevich

Published in December 2025.


Author’s Note: The American sheriff is an office as old as the colonies. In England, the sheriff—the reeve of the shire—was appointed by the king to maintain law and order, collect taxes for the crown, and raise the posse comitatus. After the Revolutionary War, this British import became an elected position. But 250 years on, some U.S. sheriffs seem to still want to answer to a king—and in the absence of a king, to hold absolute power. The following story was first published in 2018, in a too-short-lived magazine called Topic. At the time, I thought of my work as righting a whitewashed historical record, sharing an underrepresented perspective, filling out the context around a supposedly heroic “legend in his own time” in the Deep South. We were not quite one year into Donald Trump’s first presidential term, and constitutional sheriffs—ironically, the term for sheriffs who believe they have more authority than the Constitution when it comes to choosing whether or not to enforce federal laws—were emerging as some of his most vocal supporters. Now a year into Trump’s second term, this claque of sheriffs are ever more boldly superseding federal law on issues like immigration, voting rights, and election procedures. Revisiting this story now, I understand Lummie Jenkins differently. I’d originally considered my piece to be a history, revealing the dark truth about a man who tamped down the civil rights movement in his county while maintaining a public reputation of charm and humor. Now I also see it as a case study on the making of the constitutional sheriff and how that figure’s particular brand of power has persevered through wave after wave of democratic reform.

—Alexandra Marvar


Talk to anyone over the age of 70 in Camden, Alabama, and they can tell you a story about Lummie Jenkins, the sheriff of Wilcox County from 1939 to 1971. According to newspapers across the Deep South, Percy Columbus Jenkins—also known as Sheriff Lummie, Mr. Lummie, or just Lummie—was “a superb raconteur,” a “master psychologist,” and a “modern-day hero.” It was common lore that, unlike other sheriffs in the region, Lummie didn’t need to carry a gun, and he didn’t go prowling for suspects. Instead, he kicked back in his chair at his chinaberry-wood desk, packed his pipe with Prince Albert tobacco, and summoned the guilty parties to the Wilcox County Courthouse in downtown Camden simply by word of mouth. Out of fear or respect, the legend goes, suspects came in of their own accord.

Introducing The Atavist’s Revived series.

The length of Lummie’s tenure as Wilcox County’s chief law enforcer—eight consecutive terms—broke records in Alabama. And because much of it took place before the dawn of Miranda rights, which were enshrined in law by a Supreme Court ruling in 1966, there are countless stories, some surely truer than others, about the sheriff’s knack for coercing a confession from anyone. Newspapers reported claims that he employed sorcery, mind reading, and dreaded doses of “Truth Medicine”—sips from a glass bottle of Listerine he kept in his office that sported the disclaimer “Will paralyze if you lie.” Lummie had powers, people said, that exceeded those of ordinary lawmen.

You could say that law enforcement was in his blood. His father, P. C. Jenkins Sr., was sheriff of Wilcox County from 1911 to 1914. Lummie was just 12 when he snuck out of school to watch his dad preside over a public execution by hanging in Camden’s town square. “There were so many people,” he later recalled. “It looked just like a show day.”

Wilcox County sits in Alabama’s Black Belt, so named for its rich, dark soil and concentration of Black residents. It’s a place where the legacy of slavery runs deep; immediately before the Civil War, few counties across the South had more enslaved people. The sheriff’s domain comprises the city of Camden, four small towns, and a tangle of hilly two-lane highways and red-dirt roads that weave through the overgrowth of fallen cotton empires and felled pine woods. In 1960, there were some 18,000 residents in Wilcox County, 78 percent of whom were Black. Today, the population is fewer than 10,000 and more than 70 percent of residents are Black. Then as now, Wilcox hovered near the top of the list of the nation’s poorest counties.

In 2008, Lummie’s granddaughter, Delynn Jenkins Halloran, celebrated her grandfather’s gilded reputation by self-publishing a compendium of lightly edited newspaper articles and collected praise titled Lummie Jenkins: The Unarmed Sheriff of Wilcox County. The contributors to her crowdsourced book included white family members, white journalists, white congressmen, white governors, and white sheriffs of nearby Alabama counties—as well as the white wives of many of these men. An additional source on Lummie’s legacy, from autobiographical cassette tapes he recorded in his final years, was the man himself.

On the cover of the 168-page paperback is a color photograph of the sheriff. He wears a jaunty grimace and a white cowboy hat to match the white vest buttoned over his brick-red shirt. One of his cherished pistol-themed tie clips glistens at the center of his chest. Taken for the Birmingham News in 1968, and appearing above the caption “Wilcox County’s gunless sheriff always gets his man,” the photo shows Lummie leaning against a sheriff’s cruiser before the antebellum columns of the Wilcox County Courthouse, squinting through the fat lenses of his glasses.

I visited the site of this photograph in the fall of 2018. The courthouse looked exactly the same as it does in the Birmingham News photo; even the Jim Crow–era drinking fountain still protruded, unmarked, from a patch of grass on the street corner. I’d been to the area a couple of months earlier to meet a legendary group of quilt-making artisans in a nearby community called Gee’s Bend.1 Lummie Jenkins had been dead for forty years, but in Gee’s Bend I kept hearing mention of the late sheriff and his granddaughter’s book.

1. During the Great Depression and into the mid-twentieth century, women in Gee’s Bend stitched quilts from every available fabric—cotton scraps, old blue jeans, feed sacks—to keep their families warm. In the 1960s, civil rights organizers helped the women set up a mail-order business. In the 1990s, a pioneering art collector named Bill Arnett came to the community, purchased quilts in large numbers, and surfaced them to arts critics, collectors, and curators. Today its quilts are on U.S. postage stamps and in the permanent collections of major museums worldwide.

I was hard-pressed to find a cup of coffee in Camden—Hardee’s had run out—but I did come across copies of The Unarmed Sheriff on two occasions. It was on a shelf at the Wilcox County Library, upstairs from Lummie’s former office in the courthouse, where a researcher helped me locate news clippings about him. (“Mr. Lummie!” she remembered warmly, and told me that he had once given her family a puppy.) The book was also available for $16.95 at the Black Belt Treasures Cultural Arts Center, a nonprofit gallery and shop packed with gifts, paintings, and crafts, located about five hundred feet from the courthouse door.

Outside Wilcox County, copies of The Unarmed Sheriff were harder to come by. There was a used copy available on Amazon, where the book had two reviews.2 One gave it five stars: “Awesome book. Very very good read.” The other was a one-star review: “Wait a minute wasn’t this the ‘infamous’ Sheriff who beat the Black woman McDuffie to death with a rubber hose? … So thankful my father got me and my Mom out of Alabama as soon as I was born.”

2. Today I can only find a copy on eBay, for $84.

“Wait a minute wasn’t this the ‘infamous’ Sheriff who beat the Black woman McDuffie to death with a rubber hose?”

Gee’s Bend is an unincorporated town, tucked so deep into one of the Alabama River’s oxbow arcs that it feels (and functions) like an island. The families there can trace their roots and last names directly back to slavery. In the generations that followed the Civil War, white landowners left; Black residents stayed. The town’s geography makes it thirty-eight miles from Camden by car via the nearest bridge, or about six miles on the local ferry—an hour and a half drive or a fifteen-minute boat ride.

In 1949, during Lummie’s tenure, the government decided to change the town’s name, which was taken from plantation owner Joseph Gee. Authorities rechristened it Boykin, after a segregationist senator. Following Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination in 1968, residents filed a request to rename their home again, this time to King. Nearly sixty years on it’s still Boykin, but most everyone calls it Gee’s Bend.

On an afternoon in October 2018, I boarded the ferry in Camden. I rode across a wide, flat reservoir to the muddy shore of the Bend. The Welcome Center served a free hot lunch to seniors on weekdays, and when I arrived a few women—all quilt makers—were picking over the carrot-and-raisin salad or skipping directly to the Moon Pies.

Lummie’s reign as sheriff ended almost a half-century ago, but several of the women remembered him well. At first the stories I got—as a white stranger asking questions in a community where outsiders are few and memories are long—felt reserved. But as the women cautiously gauged my response, their physical reactions said more than their words. When I asked Lola Pettway, then 77, if she remembered Lummie Jenkins, she recoiled, like I’d spooked her. She could remember Mr. Lummie standing at the edge of a field, watching her and her family pick cotton; something about that image sent chills through her body. Nancy Pettway, then 83, told me about how, just before she was married, Mr. Lummie made the trip over to the Bend, arrested her fiancé, and threw him in jail after hearing that he’d killed a dog that attacked him.

I left the Welcome Center and drove a few miles down dirt lanes and through rolling fields to a farm on John Gragg Road. A silver Cadillac was parked askew near some hay bales in a field of cows. Barking dogs eagerly surrounded my car. I was there to see none other than John Gragg, 88, the son of a well-known preacher and landowner in the Bend. Gragg came to the door with his walking stick and invited me into the living room of his one-story 1930s farmhouse.

“Lummie Jenkins?” Gragg said. He sat back in his recliner, his walking stick resting on his knee. “He was the boss man.” He chuckled to himself. The music from an old black-and-white western flared up from his television set. I asked him if it was true that Lummie didn’t carry a gun. “Didn’t carry a gun?” Gragg sounded amused. “He carried a gun and a nightstick.”

Virtually everything I’d read—all the profiles, op-eds, obituaries, and tributes—pegged the sheriff’s mystique to the idea that he was unarmed. But Gragg remembered a different Lummie. He also remembered the sheriff’s cronies. “He had his snitches,” Gragg said, “and they would tell him what he want to know.”

As I kept talking to people in the Bend, I heard more about this other Lummie Jenkins. The one who, if he was in a mood and caught a Gee’s Bend resident on the wrong side of the river after Camden’s eight o’clock curfew, would make them swim home, even in winter. Fear was essential to keeping white power intact, and as the civil rights movement whipped up revolutionary energy across the Black Belt, Lummie’s and his colleagues’ efforts intensified. People told me that, in 1962, as voting rights organizers started to arrive in Wilcox County, the leadership shut down the Gee’s Bend ferry, turning a short passage into an all but unmanageable journey—you needed a car, gas money, and time. This effectively cut Bend residents off from local services, including the voting registration office. Lummie reportedly made a comment about the decision that’s the stuff of legend: “We didn’t close the ferry because they were Black. We closed it because they forgot they were Black.” (The ferry would remain out of commission for forty-four years. In 2006, it was reopened with fanfare and hat-in-hand apologies.)

Gee’s Bend residents also remembered King’s visits in 1965, and the march on Selma’s Edmund Pettus Bridge, some forty miles north. They remembered walking as children and teenagers for days in the rain with King and John Lewis. They remembered gathering by the hundreds at the Camden courthouse for another demonstration, being blockaded by Lummie and Mayor F. R. Albritton, being immersed in tear gas and pummeled with smoke bombs, getting arrested, kneeling in the street, refusing to leave. They remembered the songs they sang. Some people also remembered what happened to David Colston, what happened to Della McDuffie.

Some people would have preferred not to remember that time at all.

The Wilcox County Courthouse

Lummie Jenkins may have been a nonpareil in Wilcox County, but he was not an anomaly in the Jim Crow South, where sheriffs were considered more powerful than the American president. He held office during the rise of “peace officer” organizations—groups of law enforcement officials, organized state by state, who shared similar conservative ideas about the Constitution and other matters. Lummie was a loyal member of the Alabama Peace Officers Association and something of a celebrity among its ranks, serving as vice president and then president between 1959 and 1963. As one admirer wrote in a 1975 edition of the Alabama Peace Officers Journal, “Lummie is not only respected and loved by his people in Wilcox County; he is the only officer I have ever seen walk into a meeting of law enforcement officers and get a standing ovation.”

Members of peace officer organizations embraced a concept called interposition: They believed that it was a sheriff’s job to insert himself between state or federal authorities and his constituents to prevent the enforcement of laws he didn’t agree with. In 1958, the Supreme Court held that this doctrine had no legal basis, but peace officer groups continued to foster and amplify sheriffs’ dissent against legislation they didn’t like. This would last decades. In 1994, a pair of sheriffs filed a suit against the federal government over a new law that compelled police to run background checks on people who bought handguns. The sheriffs won—it was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled, for the feds to make local police enforce the policy. Then, in 2013, in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre, dozens of sheriffs united again, this time against gun-control regulations proposed (but never passed) during the Obama administration.

American sheriffs are still spreading the doctrine of interposition. The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA), which was established in 2011, is now a nationwide organization of right-wing law enforcement officers who share an interpretation of the Constitution that gives sheriffs the “authority to check and balance all levels of government within the jurisdiction of the County.” Among its most famous members is Joe Arpaio, the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, who was pardoned by Donald Trump in 2017 for racially profiling Latinos in order to turn them over to immigration authorities.

There’s always been just one way for most sheriffs to maintain their power: They have to keep getting elected to office. For most of Lummie’s career, that wasn’t a problem. Then came the civil rights movement.

In January 1965, registration of eligible Black voters across the South was upwards of 40 percent, but in Wilcox County it was zero percent. Meanwhile, white registration was 113 percent—some deceased residents were still on the rolls.

One day in 1963, a dozen or so men dressed in their Sunday best climbed into pickup trucks and caravanned from the Bend to Camden. They intended to register to vote, a right guaranteed them by the Fifteenth Amendment, which by then had been on the books nearly a century. They knew that they were breaking ground and risking everything. They’d all heard the infamous story about an elderly Black minister who, years prior, tried to register in Wilcox County, only to be shot and killed. The incident wasn’t documented, but true or not it had an impact. One by one, the men filled out an application at the county courthouse. All of them were rejected.3

3. The first documented instance of a Black man attempting to register to vote in the county was the Reverend James Foster Reese, a transplant from Kentucky. He believed racial dynamics in Wilcox County could and should change, so one day in 1958, he went to the courthouse to exercise his right to get his name on the voting roll; he was turned away. He kept trying to register, but the more he persisted, the more consequences he faced, including physical attacks and threats to his family. He eventually moved to Tennessee. He never succeeded at registering to vote in Alabama.

Hundreds of Black residents would follow their lead in the next two years. Every one of them had to overcome the fear of death. They also had to accept that they could lose their jobs, and that they and their families might face intimidation and threats. The Ku Klux Klan and other vigilantes across the South torched churches, set off car bombs, and assaulted or murdered Black neighbors and voting rights organizers in a desperate war to keep the white power structure intact.

As if that weren’t enough, Black would-be voters had to contend with onerous logistics. As of early 1965, the voting registration office in Camden was open for business twice a month. If a Black resident had a way to get there at the right time on the right day, they still had to pass a literacy test. If they did that, state law dictated that they needed two registered voters of good “moral character” to vouch for them before their registration could be validated. In Wilcox County, there were apparently no white voters willing to vouch for their neighbors of color. In January 1965, registration of eligible Black voters across the South was upwards of 40 percent, but in Wilcox County it was zero percent. Meanwhile, white registration was 113 percent—some deceased residents were still on the rolls.

That February, during a civil rights demonstration in Camden, Martin Luther King Jr. himself approached Sheriff Lummie in a crowd outside the courthouse with a request: Would Lummie himself vouch for voters of color? Onlookers would remember that the sheriff was courteous. He explained plainly to King that, well now, being “in politics” as he was, he couldn’t vouch for any individual voters. King asked him if that was indeed the law. “I haven’t read that in the law, but I’ve heard it,” Lummie said. King then asked if he and his colleagues could at least count on Lummie’s protection. The sheriff shrugged: “I only have two deputies.”

The following month, Jim Clark, the sheriff of Dallas County, Alabama, made international headlines for the violence he and his officers wrought on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, on what became known as Bloody Sunday—March 7, 1965. Even local news coverage celebrated King’s march and vilified Clark.

The press wasn’t a problem for Wilcox County’s sheriff, at least not locally. Once in a while, a reporter from elsewhere would note the county’s “bad reputation” in the context of civil rights, but what happened there tended to stay there. Hollis Curl, the publisher of the local paper, was an old friend and hunting buddy who would later eulogize Sheriff Lummie warmly.4 Curl’s paper didn’t run a word about the marches, smoke bombs, and tear gas in Camden in 1965.

4. Curl described the sheriff as folksy, humble, loyal, larger than life—“a mighty man.” Lummie “loved people” and helped anyone who came to him. He “had the respect of both races,” said Curl, who was sure that “some of his best friends were colored.”

In charming the local media, Lummie was less like Jim Clark than like Laurie Pritchett, police chief of Albany, Georgia. If Clark galvanized the civil rights movement, Pritchett, whom journalist and historian James Reston once called “the smartest of King’s adversaries,” did the opposite. Just like King, Pritchett had studied civil disobedience and the strategies of Mahatma Gandhi, and he set out to diffuse civil rights efforts without producing martyrs. His tactics included keeping racially motivated violence in check, skillfully managing public relations, and cultivating a cordial relationship with King himself. He countered a civil rights push in Albany in November 1961 by ordering his officers to be nonviolent and calling on every Georgia sheriff within a 70-mile radius to give him access to their jails. Hundreds of demonstrators were arrested and dispatched to borrowed cells.

Pritchett’s success was of great interest to Alabama authorities. Bull Connor, the notoriously violent public safety commissioner of Birmingham, once offered what Pritchett called “an outrageous sum” for him to take a short break from his police chief duties and come on as an adviser in the Alabama capital. Pritchett reluctantly agreed, only to leave after a short time in disgust. “I didn’t have anything in common with Bull Connor,” he later said.

Like Pritchett, Lummie had less overt ways of imposing fear and keeping the racial hierarchy intact. Once, when civil rights leaders asked for his protection while they ate at a local restaurant, Lummie let the activists know that it wasn’t his job to look out for them. He also asked for their home addresses. He wanted to be able to reach their families, the sheriff said, because the restaurant’s proprietor was “going to kill you for sure.”

Law enforcement using tear gas and smoke bombs against Camden students in the spring of 1965.

“He was the lawless lawman,” said Sheryl Threadgill Matthews, who at 15 became one of the first of two Black students to integrate Wilcox County High School. There was no police protection for students like Matthews, and no punishment for the classmates who verbally and physically abused her. She wasn’t getting much of an education, she said, so her enrollment lasted only a year before she returned to Camden Academy, the Black Presbyterian secondary school where her father, the Reverend Thomas Threadgill, was a chaplain. “Lummie didn’t play by the book,” Matthews told me. “He did whatever he wanted.”

For a time in 1965, Camden Academy offered housing to student volunteers who came in from across the U.S. to help with voter registration efforts. One student Matthews remembers from that time was Maria Gitin, a skinny white 19-year-old on summer break from college in San Francisco. She had seen the attacks of Bloody Sunday on TV and left home to enlist in a ten-week voter registration program in Wilcox County.

“Lummie Jenkins: not my favorite subject!” Gitin emailed in response to my interview request. She described the sheriff in her 2014 memoir of the civil rights movement, This Bright Light of Ours, as a “notoriously cruel,” “bandy-legged,” “homely” man who endorsed and enforced segregation, and lent his full support to the local Ku Klux Klan, “all while shaking hands and patting Black children’s heads.” Gitin recalled a traumatizing night she spent in the Camden jail, listening to a fellow organizer being brutally beaten in a neighboring cell. (“He was always arresting us,” she said of Lummie when we spoke on the phone. “Every few days.”) Upon her release the next morning, she remembered, she had to pass through the sheriff’s office, where Lummie and his deputies heckled her, laughing and passing around a jar of moonshine. “He was far from unarmed,” she said. “He pretty much always had a big shotgun with him.” It had been pointed at her the day before, when he came to round up her group of civil rights organizers at a local church for “conspiracy to boycott.”

That church was Antioch Baptist, a hub for voter registration efforts. King spoke there at least twice. One night that June, a white mob broke into the building and beat two Black teenagers so severely they were hospitalized. Two days later, on July 1, Lummie showed up at Antioch, ordered everyone out, and padlocked the doors shut.

White students in Gitin’s voter registration program were paired with Black locals. Her canvassing partner was a 16-year-old named Robert Powell. Now living in Bridgeport, Connecticut, Powell still had family in Wilcox County. He laughed out loud when I asked him on the phone about the “unarmed sheriff.”

“When we was demonstrating, we had songs made up about him,” Powell told me. “I’ll never forget some of those songs.” He recited one: “ ‘Ol’ Lummie, you’ll never be able to jail us all—segregation is bound to fall.’ ” Powell said that Lummie hated the songs. As for the people singing them: “There wasn’t much he could do at the time, with a hundred or two hundred fifty people, but jail them. And the jail wasn’t big enough to hold everybody,” Powell said. “He couldn’t stand it.”

Shelly Dale was arrested in the summer of 1965 during a voting rights demonstration. She was a teenager at the time; she went on to become Wilcox County’s tax assessor. She kept her arrest record in her desk drawer and fished it out to show me. “When you’re young, you’ll do some crazy things, right?” she said.5

5. Shelly Dale’s interview wasn’t originally featured in this story, because the audio files of my conversation with her were corrupted. I was later able to salvage them and can now include her perspective.

But getting arrested wasn’t the most memorable occurrence of that summer. “My baby sister got shot right there, right [in] front,” she gestured out the window of her office, at the town square. She recalled the bullet ricocheting off a parked car. It went in one of her sister’s shoulders and out the other. The bullet left “a long scar,” Dale said, and nothing worse. “If it had went that way,” Dale drew a line with her finger from her shoulder toward her heart, “she would have been dead.”

I asked her if, amid everything that happened that summer, she ever met Lummie Jenkins personally. “Please don’t call him Lummie Jenkins, OK?” she asked me gently. “He was such a mighty man. Please call him Mr. Lummie.” She saw him, she said, but never spoke to him. She told me it wasn’t her place to judge what he did back then. “He just had… power,” she said. “And people was afraid of him. Simple as that.”

By the end of the summer of 1965, the number of Black voters registered in Wilcox County had gone from a couple dozen to five hundred and counting. When the national Voting Rights Act became law that August, Alabama’s vouching rule was no more. The following year, federal election supervisors would arrive to see that Black voters were able to cast their ballots in the 1966 election. It wouldn’t be long before Black voters outnumbered white voters in Wilcox County and throughout Alabama.

Still, the past kept dogging the present, and Sheriff Lummie helped it along.

“Please don’t call him Lummie Jenkins, OK? He was such a mighty man. Please call him Mr. Lummie.”

“We had a café on the side of the road, right down there,” John Gragg told me as we sat in his house in Gee’s Bend. He pointed over his shoulder, toward where Route 5 joins the top of the Bend to the west. In his slow, low voice, he said, “They went in there, beat her up, and killed her.”

By the mid-1960s, there were outside eyes on white law enforcement here. But in the years before the civil rights movement, things were different. Stories from that time still circulate in whispers around Gee’s Bend. Della McDuffie’s story is one of them.

On a Saturday just after midnight in April 1953, Lummie Jenkins and other officers entered a Black-owned café, apparently to enforce a law that no music be played on Sundays. The place was bustling, and witnesses later told the Chicago Defender and the Afro-American that the sheriff and his deputies stormed in swinging blackjacks and a rubber hose, firing shots into the ceiling and floor “to scare the n–––s.” It worked. Patrons dove out windows to escape. One person, however, couldn’t run: the café owner’s wife, Della McDuffie. She was 63 and paralyzed, so she used a wheelchair. Several accounts would describe Lummie ordering her to get up and go to bed. When she couldn’t, he beat her with a rubber hose. Within an hour—despite frantic care from her husband, William, and the arrival of a doctor—Della was dead.

William would later recall seeing a trickle of blood running from his wife’s ear down her face. Her death certificate, prepared by the sheriff’s office, listed her cause of death as a “preexisting blood condition.”

Her family fought back. Future Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall, then a lawyer and head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, asked the Justice Department to open an investigation into Della’s death, along with injuries sustained by another woman on the scene. According to press coverage from the period, the FBI made preliminary inquiries, but local witnesses, some of whom had already been threatened, refused to testify, and law enforcement was uncooperative. A year later, William McDuffie drowned in unclear circumstances. DOJ investigators wrote back to Marshall that they couldn’t do anything further with the case. Subsequently, the surviving McDuffies reported house fires and death threats made against them. They eventually left Alabama.

On Lummie’s watch, there were other suspicious and often violent deaths of Black residents that the sheriff’s office never found any foul play in connection with. In January 1966, 32-year-old David Colston was killed by a white farmer, J. T. Reaves, near Antioch Baptist Church. Colston had been on his way to a funeral, after which he was going to a rally for the election of Black citizens to local office, when Reaves rear-ended his car. Reaves claimed that Colston got out of his vehicle and confronted him, so he shot him in self-defense. Colston died at the scene.

Following the shooting, Reaves turned himself in to Lummie. As for what happened next, some reports say that, after handing over his gun, Reaves went home. Others claim that he spent a night in jail. Either way, in short order Reaves was free. He was never punished for the crime, which the sheriff’s office recorded was the result of heated tempers during a “traffic incident.”

Witnesses contradicted this account from the start. Colston’s wife, who was in the car with him, said there was no argument between her husband and Reaves. In her telling, Colston went to check his car’s bumper after Reaves hit him and Reaves shot him in the head at close range. It was an assassination.

Colston’s murder seems to have shifted the tone of life in Wilcox County. Black residents recalled their white neighbors becoming emboldened, leaving guns on their car seats and dashboards for all to see. They understood Reaves’s violence to be not just against Colston but against all of them. Colston’s funeral portrait was hung in the Southern Christian Leadership Conference headquarters in Selma—“a literal picture,” Jet magazine reported at the time, “of Alabama Negros’ drive to secure the vote.” 6

6. The NAACP called for the investigation of other deaths of Black Wilcox County residents that occurred in 1967—a year Lummie also happened to serve as the countys coroner. One of the deceased was 31-year-old Rodell Williamson, whose body was found “hung up” with fishing line in the Alabama River. The sheriff’s office declared it an accidental drowning. Lummie was quoted in Jetmagazine as speculating that Williamson “may have been in the river swimming. Or he could have fell in.” Family members who identified Williamson’s body told reporters that his neck was gashed and appeared to be broken, that his head was “smashed,” and that there were bruises on his chest. A number of area residents claimed they’d heard that Williamson had been beaten to death, but Lummie’s deputy said that was “a damn lie—and you can quote me.”

Walter Calhoun campaigning for sheriff.

Fewer than two weeks after Colston’s death, a Black grocery store owner named Walter Calhoun put on a suit, drove down to the courthouse, and filed papers to run for sheriff of Wilcox County. Calhoun was evicted from his store two days later, but he didn’t bow to intimidation. His name stayed on the ballot.

Meanwhile, with encouragement from King, Black residents of Wilcox County continued to register to vote. Lummie didn’t seem worried about his electoral prospects. “I’ve always tried to protect people of both races and the people know it,” he told a New York Times reporter. “I believe I’m going to get votes from both sides.”

White federal election supervisors were again appointed to watch over the polls. Ballot counters were white; polling places were white businesses. There was no guarantee that Black citizens’ votes would be counted, that they would feel safe voting for the candidate they wanted, or that they would feel safe voting at all. Whatever happened, whoever was able to vote as they wished, of the 6,198 votes cast in the sheriff’s race, Lummie beat Calhoun by a margin of 722.

It would be four more years before Lummie’s reign finally came to an end. In the 1970 election, at the age of 69, he lost to his opponent by just ninety-three votes. The victor wasn’t a Black man, however. It was F. R. Albritton, the former mayor who’d once joined Lummie in trying to block civil rights protesters from reaching the county courthouse. “The other man catered to the n––– vote,” Lummie lamented to Bob Adelman, a photographer who covered the civil rights movement. “He made speeches to them. He went to their churches. I’ve never done that.”7

7. Albritton said he ran for sheriff because his old friend Lummie—who’d had two heart attacks—was planning to retire. Only at the last minute, Albritton claimed, did Lummie decide to stay in the race. According to Albritton, when he won Lummie didn’t speak to him for a month.

The Alabama Peace Officers Association would print that Lummie Jenkins had “retired.” According to a report from a university student teaching in Wilcox County at the time, he went out with a vow to “fill the jails with n–––s” before he left office.

Among the Gee’s Bend voters who cast a ballot for Albritton was John Gragg. “We all voted for Albritton,” he told me. “Albritton got to be the sheriff and forced Lummie Jenkins out.” That was satisfying. “But then Albritton made him a deputy,” Gragg added.

Lummie didn’t leave the law completely, but he no longer had absolute power: a small but significant change that showed Wilcox County might soon be ready for a bigger transformation. And two terms later, in the November 1978 election, a remarkable thing happened. Albritton was beaten by Prince Arnold, a 27-year-old Black schoolteacher from the tiny unincorporated town of Pine Apple. Arnold would go on to serve eight terms, tying Lummie for the title of longest-serving sheriff in the state.

A month after Arnold was elected, but before he took office, 77-year-old Lummie Jenkins died of a heart attack. By then, Sheryl Threadgill Matthews was a social welfare officer at the Alabama Department of Human Resources. “My coworker, a white lady, came up to me at the water fountain,” she remembered. “She said to me, ‘Mr. Lummie said he would die and go to hell before he see a Black man become sheriff. And, well, I guess he sure did.’ ”

According to a report from a university student teaching in Wilcox County at the time, Lummie went out with a vow to “fill the jails with n–––s” before he left office.

In the summer of 1965—the same summer when white residents shot at and tried to run down Maria Gitin, Robert Powell, and other voter registration volunteers in Wilcox County—19-year-old Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, a recent graduate of Wilcox County High School, was still living in Camden. In 2006, as a U.S. senator from Alabama, Jeff Sessions voted along with the rest of Congress to unanimously extend the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Still, he complained that it was outdated and unfair to the history of his state. “I am worried because [the extension] does little to acknowledge the tremendous progress made over the last forty years in Alabama and other covered jurisdictions,” Sessions said at the time. “Today is not 1965, and the situation with respect to voting rights in Alabama and other covered jurisdictions is dramatically different from 1965. I would have expected Congress to recognize this tremendous progress.”

In 2013, Sessions championed a Supreme Court decision restricting federal oversight of voting rules in nine southern states, calling it “good news for the South.” Within two years, Alabama codified a requirement that voters show state-issued identification at the polls, then proceeded to announce that it was closing the offices that issue driver’s licenses in nearly half the state’s sixty-seven counties. All the affected locations were rural, and they included every county where at least 75 percent of the population was Black. Wilcox was among them.

In some ways, Wilcox County is different than it was in Lummie’s time. Many of its current elected officials are Black, including Earnest Evans, the current sheriff, who has held the position since 2010. In a photograph on Evans’s 2018 reelection campaign website, he stands before the Wilcox County Courthouse Annex, which was erected in 1976. It looks a lot like the courthouse Lummie posed in front of in the photo adorning the cover of his granddaughter’s book. Evans’s sheriff’s badge shines on his suit jacket. His gaze is toward the horizon. Underneath the photograph is a reminder: “You will need a Photo I.D. to vote.” Meanwhile, at the county’s main public high school—the one Sessions attended, the one where Sheryl Threadgill Matthews toughed out a year of abuse in the name of desegregation—enrollment has flipped entirely. Due to white flight, not a single enrolled student is white.8

8. Today the school is 98 percent Black.

When Robert Powell looks at today’s Wilcox County, he doesn’t see the progress he fought for. “We put our lives on the line to try to create some type of change, as a people, as a race of people,” he told me. “But Camden is still a segregated place to this day.” Despite “all the struggles and sacrifices we made, the more things change, the more they stay the same.”


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

14,445 and Counting

The Blue Book Burglar

The Social Register was a who’s who of America’s rich and powerful—the heirs of robber barons, scions of political dynasties, and descendants of Mayflower passengers. It was also the perfect hit list for the country’s hardest-working art thief.

By Jack Rodolico

The Atavist Magazine, No. 168


Jack Rodolico is a freelance writer and radio reporter. His work has aired on NPR, the BBC, Marketplace, and 99% Invisible.

Editor: Jonah Ogles
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Jake Conley
Illustrator: Nada Hayek

Published in October 2025.


The phone inside the mansion rang relentlessly—five times, twenty, forty—echoing from the spacious kitchen to the bedrooms upstairs. The house was a 5,200-square-foot Georgian Colonial constructed of red brick. It had a pool and a tennis court, and it stood at the end of a long wooded driveway, off a secluded cul-de-sac in Greenwich, Connecticut. The town was the crown jewel of the state’s so-called Gold Coast, a swath of wealthy enclaves where Prescott Bush—father of George H. W.—was buried, where Robert F. Kennedy got married, and where Donald Trump would soon purchase his starter mansion. The owners of the red-brick mansion were a banker and his wife (herself the daughter of another banker) whose wedding had been written up in the New York Times. It was Independence Day 1980, and like many people in their social set, they were vacationing on the South Shore of Long Island.

That’s exactly what the caller was hoping for. As the phone rang again and again, his two accomplices listened outside the home. The caller hung up after fifty rings. The men hiding in the dark were confident that the home was empty, but they took one more precaution to be absolutely sure. Once the ringing stopped, they snipped the phone line clean through, setting off a silent alarm that notified police of a break-in. The men then hid in the trees near the house and waited. A Greenwich patrolman pulled up, surveyed the property, assumed it was a false alarm, and left.

Listen to the audio version of this story from Apple News

It was time. The two men broke a pane of glass near the back door, entered the mansion, and proceeded to plunder its contents. From a linen closet they took several pillowcases and filled them with approximately 350 pieces of silver: salad forks, fish knives, and bouillon spoons; a pair of grape shears and a cold-meat fork; a baby’s hairbrush and an ashtray; something called a star-footed muffineer. In the master bedroom, they emptied drawers of pearls, a gold watch, and a diamond-and-platinum band. They were thorough, searching cabinets in the library and lowering a pull-down ladder to ransack the attic. They took choice baubles, such as a porcelain umbrella stand and a tea caddy with an ivory finial.

In the living room, the men did something out of the ordinary for most house thieves: They removed a handful of paintings from the walls, but stole just two. These were landscapes by eighteenth-century Dutch and American painters whose names were unlikely to appear in an art history textbook. They were valuable pieces of art, but obscure ones.

Once the thieves had collected what they came for, they exited the house and walked to the end of the driveway. The third accomplice, who had been circling the block in a getaway car since calling the residence, picked them up there, and together they drove off into the night.

When the adjusters at Tiffany & Co. later appraised what had been taken from the mansion, the inventory stretched to five pages. The robbery was valued at more than $100,000, a figure that, when adjusted for inflation, nearly quadruples in today’s dollars—although the art has likely increased tenfold in value.

Greenwich detective Jim Hirsch had become somewhat inured to such crimes when he first heard about the burglary. Home robberies peaked nationally in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and Greenwich, where many houses were essentially poorly guarded museums, attracted talented thieves. There was the Silver Bandit, who snuck into the dining room of a home while its occupants were sleeping to steal antique silver. There was the Dinner Set Gang, who, while the rich entertained in the dining room, tore apart the bedrooms in search of jewelry. These thieves were a “pain in the ass,” Hirsch told me.

It would take Hirsch some time to discern what was exceptional about the crew that pulled off the Independence Day heist. For one, their M.O. was supremely cautious. Even more unusual was that this crew had an eye for quality, be it silver, jewels, antiques, or art. “They knew when they saw something,” said Hirsch. “They knew value.”

Actually, just one of the thieves knew value. And he was not yet done stealing the prized possessions of the East Coast elite. Not even close.

While stealing art is a challenge, selling it—and making a profit—is much, much harder.

I came across the Greenwich case in 2017. At the time, I was part of a team producing an investigative podcast about the 1990 robbery of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston. The Gardner burglary is a case of utmost superlatives. It ranks as the largest property theft in U.S. history, and has been called “the greatest art heist ever.” More than half a billion dollars’ worth of masterpieces were stolen, including Rembrandt’s only seascape. None of them have been recovered, and no one has ever been charged for the crime.

And yet I couldn’t help but wonder: Greatest art heist compared with what?

In searching for an answer, I learned everything I could about art robberies big and small, from the decades before and since the Gardner heist. I interviewed cops and crooks, academics and insurance adjusters. I pulled news clips about museum jobs across the U.S. and Europe. I read papers about organized-crime syndicates looting archaeological sites in Asia and the Middle East. I learned a lot about this rarified corner of the crime world—for instance, that the black market values stolen art at about 10 percent of the legitimate market price, and that authorities are most likely to recover missing pieces at the point of sale, whether that’s a Christie’s auction or a handoff in a hotel room to an undercover cop pretending to be a cash buyer. While stealing art is a challenge, selling it—and making a profit—is much, much harder.

So when I read a news story about the thief who had led the crew behind the Greenwich robbery, I wanted to know more. The red-brick mansion burglarized in 1980 was just one hit on a long list of them. Dozens of homes owned by members of America’s moneyed class were raided by the same thief and his crew. They were after art, but not the sort that would draw interest from the press. They wanted lesser-known works, and lots of them—the kinds of pieces that would be relatively easy to sell because the entire world wasn’t looking for them.

Over the course of my reporting, I came to believe that the ringleader of these crimes was in a class by himself. I doubt there’s such a thing as the greatest art thief of all time, but I don’t know of any burglar who worked so hard.

Jim Hirsch admired the titans of finance, politics, business, and industry he was sworn to protect. “Loved ’em,” he said. I interviewed Hirsch in a conference room at a Greenwich hedge fund where he’d taken a job as head of security after retiring from the police force. “Old money is tremendous. New money stinks. They seem to think they’re something special,” Hirsch said.

He told me about a friend of his: Andrew Rockefeller, of the Rockefellers, who passed away a few years ago. “Nicest guy you ever want to meet. Khaki pants, Top-Siders, and a sport shirt.” Hirsch was proud to know Rockefeller and his ilk. “Super, super people who remained friends with you after you left the job,” he said.

So when more than eighty homes in Greenwich were stripped of riches on Hirsch’s watch between 1980 to 1982—and that’s not counting the dozens more that happened in nearby communities—he took it a little personally. “It was embarrassing,” he said.

What the burglars stole was as impressive as who they stole it from. From the home of a political strategist Richard Nixon once included on his “enemies list,” they took a collection of oriental rugs (worth $19,400 at the time) and cracked a safe to find a sizable collection of antique stamps ($60,249). From the palatial estate of a family so rich they gifted a library to Yale University, the thieves stole three Tiffany floor lamps ($31,000). “These are not lamps, these are lamps,” Hirsch told me. “Highly identifiable tempered lampshades. They’re magnificent.”

From an insurance executive, the thieves took a nineteenth-century Swiss music box ($20,000). From a Rockefeller—not Andrew, another one—they took a platinum bracelet embedded with 280 diamonds ($15,300). They broke in to the homes of a pioneering cardiologist, the chairman of the National Audubon Society’s board of directors, and a descendant of an early investor in Thomas Edison’s light bulb. They stole a pair of handheld fans originally owned by an emperor of France ($2,000) and a full-length raccoon-fur coat ($2,000). They stuffed an untold fortune’s worth of silverware into countless pillowcases.

And then there were the paintings. The thieves homed in on eighteenth- and nineteenth-century oils, each canvas small enough to fit inside a briefcase. The works had humdrum titles such as A Hawking Party Resting at a Wayside Inn ($2,400), Hunter in Pink Coat on Brown Horse Jumping Fence ($3,000), and H.M.S. Duncannon 120 Guns ($5,000). They were painted by long-dead British, American, and Dutch artists for whom there was a boutique market of small galleries catering to the tastes of the very types of people the art was stolen from. It was uncanny what the thieves recognized as valuable. For instance, from the widow of a descendant of a signer of the Declaration of Independence they stole an 1842 painting by a French artist, a work that had not been on the open market in generations because it was passed down through the family.

Victims of these thefts returned from vacations in Europe, Martha’s Vineyard, or the Virgin Islands to find their homes ransacked—although one police report stated, “The entry was not immediately noticed due to the enormity of the house.” Losing family heirlooms was bad enough, but the violation of privacy and security was something else. “The property’s always insured,” Hirsch told me. “The problem that your home was invaded is a whole different world. There were some people that sold their houses. Some people used to greet you at the door with a baseball bat after that.”

DNA evidence was not yet a forensic tool, which was unfortunate since the thieves left behind plenty of it, often on cigarette butts stubbed out in the course of the robberies. Once, in a guest bathroom, a burglar defecated in the toilet and did not flush.

As the rate of the robberies picked up, from about one per month in 1980 to several per weekend in 1982, police began to notice patterns: the pillowcases used as loot bags, the broad array of high-value spoils, the timing (always after dark and on weekends). “You could take the complainant’s name off any of these burglary reports and exchange it with any other one,” Hirsch once told a newspaper reporter. “They were all identical.” Law enforcement concluded that the burglars cut the phone lines in the homes they targeted to deliberately trigger alarm systems, most likely to watch hapless patrolmen visit and then leave the scene.

Who was buying all the loot from the thieves? The cops figured it was someone with art-world savvy. “A burglar is only as good as his fence,” a detective from Bedford, New York, just across the state line from Greenwich, told a New York Times reporter. “A junkie doesn’t have a good fence—he goes to a pawnbroker. But someone who steals paintings, he has a good fence. You know you’re not dealing with something run-of-the-mill.”

Law enforcement also became convinced that there was a link among the victims. Not just their wealth and the location of their homes—something more singular. Detectives in Fairfield County, Connecticut, and Westchester County, New York, cross-referenced their cases. Did the victims belong to any clubs? Only the most exclusive yacht and country clubs in the country, but there wasn’t one they all belonged to. What about academic affiliations? Collectively, they’d been to every elite boarding school and Ivy League university, but they weren’t all, say, graduates of Yale. Did they use the same arborist? Was the same individual collecting their trash? No and no. The police did notice one thing: Many of the victims’ phone numbers were not publicly listed, which made the fifty-ring calls odd—to say nothing of the hang-up calls some targets had received prior to being robbed.

Two years into the crime wave, investigators were no closer to identifying the burglars, who were more prolific than ever. Over Memorial Day weekend in 1982, they hit five houses in Bedford alone. In Greenwich, they were returning to rob homes they’d previously struck. Police decided to cast a wider net via teletype, a messaging system used by law enforcement around the country, in the hope that someone, somewhere, knew something useful. According to Hirsch, the teletype spelled out the thieves’ methods and asked any department experiencing similar crimes in its jurisdiction to contact the Greenwich police.

The next morning, Hirsch got a call from a cop in Massachusetts who wanted to know: Had he ever heard of a book called the Social Register?

Blue Book members were the richest of the rich, the oldest of old money. Their homes were almost guaranteed to be chock-full of high-value loot.

America’s aristocracy traces its lineage to a time between the end of the Civil War and the dawn of the twentieth century, in the Gilded Age. Think Andrew Carnegie, J. P. Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt. Robber barons built obscene fortunes, monopolies lined the pockets of corrupt politicians, and unchecked capitalism opened a permanent chasm between the very rich and everyone else. The upper crust loved to throw opulent balls and banquets, which allowed hosts to show off their money, power, and influence, and prominent socialites kept so-called visiting lists of well-connected friends, acquaintances, and business contacts.

Louis Keller was not part of the new aristocracy, but he recognized a business opportunity in these quasi-private lists. He collected them, consolidated them, and produced a master copy of high society, selling it only to those who’d made the cut. First published in 1886, the Social Register was a thin, elegantly bound book with pumpkin-colored lettering on a black background. When later editions featured a blue cover, it became known as the Blue Book.

The first edition drew exclusively from the social lists of people with homes in Newport, Rhode Island, a favorite vacation destination of the elite. In time there were Blue Books for almost every major U.S. city. A group called the Social Register Association became the gatekeeper of the Blue Book, and it created strict rules for new entries. A person could be listed because of marriage to someone already included in the book, if they were elected president of the United States, or if they were nominated by an existing member. For many years, the Social Register was classist as well as anti-Semitic and racist; excluded Jewish society members in Chicago created their own version of the Blue Book in 1918, and the Social Register did not include a Black member for nearly a century after its creation.

In 1976, the city books were consolidated into a single volume covering high society nationwide. It listed approximately 50,000 names. By the 1980s, being in the book still had low-key cultural cachet, particularly for direct descendants of Gilded Age gentry. Members could flip through the Social Register’s pages to learn the essentials about each other. What school did so-and-so attend? What yacht club did they belong to? Were they related to someone on the Mayflower? And, for the purposes of correspondence, what was their address and telephone number?

While it was difficult to get listed in the Blue Book, it did not take a criminal genius to obtain a copy. “All you gotta do is one burglary in one house, and there they are!” said Roland Anderson, a retired Massachusetts detective who, as far as I could ascertain, was the first person to suspect that the burglars targeting Greenwich, Bedford, and other wealthy East Coast communities were using the Social Register as a hit list.

Anderson spent forty years as a cop in the Boston suburb of Weston, which, during his tenure, was the richest town in Massachusetts. Now 82, “Rolie” Anderson possesses a stunning memory for details about burglars he chased in the 1970s. When I met with him for an interview, he drove me around Weston as if still on patrol. “That one up there was hit,” he said, gesturing toward a single-family home large enough to be a castle. “Think of the dark of night. They entered through a cellar window near the garage. And they cleaned it out.”

When Anderson joined the force, in 1968, home robberies were common but not lucrative; burglars typically struck during the daytime, when victims were at work, stealing televisions and maybe a fistful of jewelry. But in 1978, two years before the Greenwich robberies began, a more ambitious crew commenced working in Weston. “We started to see the oriental rugs rolled up, antique furnishings taken,” Anderson said. “And, in some cases, paintings.” The thieves also cut their targets’ phone lines during robberies. Anderson questioned victims about their affiliations, hoping to figure out why the thieves had singled them out. One of them said, “Well, we are listed in the Social Register.”

Anderson had never heard of it. But thumbing through the book’s pages, he decided that what the thieves were doing made perfect sense. Any big house in Weston was likely to be a decent target for a thief, but Blue Book members were the richest of the rich, the oldest of old money. Their homes were almost guaranteed to be chock-full of high-value loot.

In an era of police work that Anderson calls “the dark ages,” he was particularly effective at shoe-leather investigating. That included combing through teletypes, which were, he said, “the only network we really had among all of us.” Though reading all the messages that came over the transom could be tedious and time-consuming, Anderson and his colleagues still did it “every single day.” That’s how he discovered a slew of identical unsolved robberies in virtually every exclusive Boston suburb, as well as tony communities in Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and Maine.

So he’d figured out the scheme. But who was behind it? Anderson studied the rap sheets of known antiques thieves and their associates, and soon built up a lengthy, almost encyclopedic list of men he believed were capable of pulling off the Social Register robberies. “Rolie Anderson is probably the best detective I’ve ever worked with,” said Arthur Bourque, a former trooper with the Massachusetts State Police’s major crimes unit. “He’s just got a ferocious appetite for background and research.”

On November 19, 1979, Bourque met with Anderson and produced the single oldest law enforcement document I obtained about the Blue Book burglaries. The memo’s subject line reads: “Intelligence regarding antique thefts in Massachusetts received from Det. Rollie [sic] Anderson of the Weston, Mass. P.D.” It includes a list of fifty-eight names, all people Anderson believed were involved in organized antiques theft. But he had no way to know which of them—if any—were using the Blue Book. “They were so adept at what they were doing and how they did it,” Anderson told me.

No sooner had Anderson handed off his list of suspects to the state police than the Social Register robberies in northern New England stopped. Bourque concluded that the thieves suspected law enforcement was onto them. “There was just too much heat going on up here,” he said.

Two years later, in August 1982, Bourque stepped up to the long roll of paper issuing from his office’s teletype machine to inspect what had come in overnight. That’s where he found the notice describing a string of burglaries in Connecticut and New York with a familiar M.O.

Convinced that the thieves Anderson investigated had moved their operations south, Bourque dialed up Jim Hirsch. “Get ahold of this fuckin’ book,” Hirsch remembered Bourque telling him, “because whoever you got in town who’s in that book is a potential target.”

Armed with intelligence from Massachusetts, Greenwich police went into Labor Day weekend 1982 as prepared as they’d ever been to catch the burglars in the act. They suspected that the crew were driving down from Massachusetts to commit their crimes, so patrolmen were directed to look out for cars with Massachusetts plates. Police were confident that the homes of people in the Social Register were at risk. The problem was knowing which ones: Greenwich was home to more Blue Book members than any suburban community in America.

At 1:30 a.m. on Friday, a resident heard banging noises next door at the house of a Blue Book member who was away for the weekend. Police arrived to find the house’s phone line snipped and a window busted; a perpetrator had slashed his arm on the broken glass and fled before entering the home. Then, at 12:04 a.m. on Saturday, a Social Register family reported that they had returned from dinner to find their power and phone lines cut and their home robbed. According to a police memo, “The intruder/s had made entry to a room which can only be described as a vault.” There they filled seventeen pillowcases with sterling silver. While inspecting the outside of the home, cops “heard what they felt to be a large subject running away,” but they were unable to track him through the dark woods. Later, on Saturday night, a third Social Register family returned from vacation to find their home stripped of more than $80,000 in valuables.

Despite law enforcement’s best efforts, the thieves had a good haul to show for the weekend. But it would prove to be their last ride in Greenwich.

The following weekend, at 10:50 on Friday night, a Greenwich cop spotted a white 1982 Plymouth Reliant with Massachusetts plates. There were three men in it, and they were cruising down Round Hill Road, where seven homes had been hit over the previous two years, more than on any other street in town. Police followed the car onto the Merritt Parkway, where it set off eastbound toward Boston, then pulled it over. According to a police memo describing the stop, the men in the Reliant said they were returning from the racetrack at Belmont Park, on Long Island, and were looking for a place to eat.

The driver handed over a license that identified him as Dennis Quinn; the car was a rental, Quinn said, from a company in Cape Cod. The other two men had no identification but gave their surnames as Gallagher and Hogan. Quinn allowed the police to check the car’s trunk. “Nothing was found,” the memo states. “Subjects were allowed to continue on their way.”

The next morning, after Hirsch learned about the traffic stop, he compared the names the men had provided against Rolie Anderson’s list of suspects and found a match: Dennis Quinn, 34, short and slight, with a mop-top haircut and an aquiline nose. Police then found that Quinn had rented a hotel room near Greenwich nearly every weekend that summer.

As for the other two men, one of them was identified as Charles Gallagher, 26, tall and hulking, with a horseshoe mustache. He wasn’t on Anderson’s list, but he had a criminal record—larceny, breaking and entering, stealing government property, assault with a deadly weapon. Police records turned up nothing about the man who called himself Hogan.

So Hirsch went to the expert. He dialed up Anderson and described the unidentified man in the Reliant: five feet ten, paunchy, with blue eyes, shaggy brown hair, and a hooked nose above a chevron mustache. Anderson knew exactly who Hirsch was talking about, but his name wasn’t Hogan. It was Raymond Flynn.

amazingly, they appeared to commit yet another burglary right under the FBI’s nose.

After years of playing cat and mouse with the Blue Book thieves, law enforcement finally had information they could work with, and in the waning weeks of the summer of 1982, a rare collaboration began. A dozen local police departments from York, Maine, down to Long Island worked with state police from Massachusetts, New York, and Connecticut to funnel intelligence to the FBI, which committed three dozen agents from six field offices to the investigation. The expansive team engaged in round-the-clock surveillance—including unmarked cars and fixed-wing aircraft—of Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher, who were now officially known as the Social Register gang.

Eager to shut down the burglary operation, the FBI came up with a two-step plan: First observe Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher robbing a home. Then follow the suspects to their fence. Step two was crucial. “It all revolves around their fence. And in some cases, like artwork, there’s probably only one real fence who can get rid of it, maybe two,” Bourque told me. “You can have twenty-five different burglary operations and one or two fences.”

Law enforcement tracked the Reliant the men had been driving to a rental company near Flynn’s home on Cape Cod. There they learned that the men often rented the same car. By the time the suspects rented it again and drove to the North Shore of Long Island—Great Gatsby territory, where Blue Book homes had been intermittently struck since 1980—the FBI had equipped it with a tracking device. According to a law enforcement memo, the suspects cased homes in Oyster Bay, Mill Neck, and Laurel Hollow, all towns “of Social Register caliber.” Three times, Quinn dropped off Flynn and Gallagher in ritzy neighborhoods. Though agents did not observe a robbery, they suspected that one had occurred because when the suspects convened at a Ramada Inn later that night, “they were observed to be carrying clothing, possibly attempting to conceal any contraband.”

The next morning, Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher drove to a Western Union in Queens and picked up $1,500, which the FBI hypothesized had been wired to them by their fence as an advance on whatever they’d stolen the previous night. The suspects then proceeded to the Belmont Park racetrack. After gambling, they drove to Providence, Rhode Island, where they stopped for Chinese food. There, according to a police memo, the “suspects became involved in an argument between themselves and Gallagher walked out.” Flynn and Quinn hopped into the Plymouth and caught up with Gallagher as he ascended an entrance ramp to the highway. “Gallagher got into the car and a fistfight ensued,” the memo states. As the men threw punches inside the parked Plymouth, the FBI tail was forced to continue onto the highway to avoid being spotted. “Suspects then backed down the ramp,” the memo notes, “and FBI lost the car.”

The next weekend, the FBI were on their heels when Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher drove the Plymouth to a Holiday Inn in Princeton, New Jersey. FBI agents booked the room next to the suspects as well as the room above, and from a surveillance van in the hotel’s parking lot, they snapped tight-framed black-and-white photographs: Quinn placing a call from a phone booth. Gallagher scratching his ass while pointing at a parked Corvette. Flynn, more than once, seeming to look directly into the camera. “Suspects were overheard to say that they only had six dollars among themselves,” reads a law enforcement memo.

Agents observed the men casing five Social Register homes in a single neighborhood on Saturday night. On Sunday night, undercover law enforcement followed the men back to the same area, where, amazingly, the crew appeared to commit yet another burglary right under the FBI’s nose. “When the suspects returned to the motel,” a memo states, “they were observed to be carrying a large box.” This time agents were able to confirm that a robbery had occurred: Someone had just stolen $25,000 worth of silver, jewelry, and three yellow pillowcases from the Princeton home of a great-great-great-grandson of President Martin Van Buren.

The next morning, the suspects picked up more cash from the Western Union in Queens and again drove to the racetrack. As they gambled, something happened that gave the FBI an advantage. “While the car was at the track parking lot, it sustained a flat tire,” a memo reads. There is no evidence that the FBI was responsible for the flat, but it was certainly a fortuitous development. When the thieves returned to the vehicle and opened the trunk to look for tools to change the tire, a photographer in the FBI’s surveillance van was perfectly positioned to see what was inside—including a yellow pillowcase. It was the kind of evidence law enforcement had been looking for.

Now all the agents had to do was follow the burglars to their fence. But when the thieves slammed the Reliant’s trunk shut, according to a memo, “the FBI [tracking] device fell from the car and was discovered by the suspects.” The men left the racetrack “very wary of any tails.”

Fence or no fence, the FBI was not about to lose the suspects again. Agents swarmed the car and arrested the Social Register gang on the Throgs Neck Bridge connecting Queens to the Bronx. Inside the Reliant, in addition to yellow pillowcases full of silver, agents found road atlases for the Northeast with various locations circled; hand-written lists of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of 917 people listed in the Social Register; and a 1975 edition of the Blue Book for New York City and its wealthy suburbs.

Over his three-decade career, from 1967 to 1998, FBI agent Peter Melley worked all kinds of cases: terrorism, organized crime, even the bomb squad. “This was my one and only art theft case,” he told me. When I sat down in Melley’s dining room in Long Island for an interview, he presented me with an extraordinary artifact: the Blue Book seized from the Plymouth Reliant, its yellowed pages crammed with handwritten marginalia. I flipped through it with something approaching reverence.

Melley was not on the Throgs Neck Bridge on October 4, 1982, but the case landed on his desk shortly after the arrests. The Department of Justice tasked him with tying Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher to as many Blue Book burglaries as possible and pressuring them to flip on their fence. He sent a memo to police departments requesting unsolved cases that fit the burglars’ M.O. He was quickly inundated with files—none of which definitively tied the men to the robberies.

When Melley visited them in jail, he quickly figured out who was in charge. “Quinn and Gallagher were not the most intelligent people in the world,” Melley said. Quinn was the wheelman, the getaway driver, while Gallagher struck Melley as more of an opportunist than a seasoned art thief. The two men refused to cooperate. Even if they had talked, Melley told me, “they wouldn’t have made much difference.” (Both pleaded guilty to interstate transportation of stolen property. Gallagher was sentenced to four years; Quinn got 18 months.)

Ray Flynn, on the other hand, “was a highly intelligent person,” Melley said. If the feds hoped to bring a case against the fence, Melley was sure, Flynn would have to talk.

Flynn was one of eight children raised in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and his siblings were all upstanding. Some were veterans of the Army, Navy, and Coast Guard. Some were elementary school educators. One of his brothers was a Cape Cod police officer. Flynn started out on the straight and narrow. He attended Stony Brook University on Long Island but dropped out, according to Melley. Throughout his twenties, Flynn caught a slew of larceny charges, serving two yearlong sentences in state prison. In 1974, when he was 27, his Massachusetts rap sheet abruptly ceased growing, but not because he stopped breaking the law. “He was getting busted when he was younger,” Rolie Anderson said. “He was making some stupid mistakes.” Simply put, he stopped getting arrested because he got better at his line of work.

When Melley interviewed Flynn, he was facing several years in federal prison for the Blue Book burglaries. So prosecutors offered him a deal: Confess to the crimes, identify the fence and any other people involved in the scheme, and prosecutors would grant him immunity. That would allow him to return home to his wife and their children. “We wanted to know every crime he had ever committed,” Melley said.

But Flynn wouldn’t sing. Instead, in December 1982, he pleaded guilty at the U.S. District Court in Brooklyn to interstate commerce of stolen goods. Afterward he was moved to federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut.

Within a year, circumstances changed. In September 1983, Flynn learned that his family had been in a horrific car crash. His wife and daughter would recover, but his two-year-old son was in a coma. The news pushed Flynn over the edge, and he agreed to talk if it meant getting out of prison. “He gave us chapter and verse,” Melley said. “He was fully cooperative.”

Once Flynn started talking, he had a lot to say. “We must have spent about three or four months with him,” Melley said. “He took us all over Connecticut, Westchester County, and the North Shore, and showed us all the different homes they burglarized. He remembered when they did it and what they had taken. He had a phenomenal memory.”

Flynn answered all manner of niggling questions. For example, Melley had interviewed many Social Register targets who owned large purebred dogs. “They all swore up and down that they had the best guard dogs in the world,” Melley told me. “They invariably would tell us that the burglars obviously had drugged the dog.” But Flynn said they didn’t need to. “The dogs loved Charlie,” Melley remembered Flynn saying, referring to Gallagher. Flynn’s accomplice played with the dogs, fed them from the target’s refrigerator, locked them in a bathroom, and released them when the robbery was done.

With Flynn’s help, Melley solved burglaries at the homes of 103 members of the Social Register in six states, with property losses valued at upwards of $40 million in today’s dollars. Flynn also told the FBI that his crew wasn’t the only one using the Blue Book. He gave Melley the names of nine men from New England, most of them on Anderson’s list of suspected antiques thieves, who had used the Social Register as a hit list over the years. It turned out that between 1981 and 1982, three teams of thieves were breaking in to Blue Book houses in Connecticut, Long Island, Massachusetts, and Westchester County.

But to Melley’s mind, those other thieves were dabblers. Flynn was the one who’d perfected the Blue Book scheme. He’d been involved with the lion’s share of the robberies. And the 1975 copy of the Blue Book that Melley showed me when I interviewed him? That was Flynn’s. His notes were all over its pages.

How, though, had Flynn gotten so good at identifying quality art? Knowing which paintings to steal, and which to leave behind? The answer was his fence. Or at least one of them. Because, as Flynn confessed, he actually had two.

Over time and dozens if not hundreds of robberies, Flynn came to recognize by sight the kinds of paintings His Fence was looking for.

In February 1984, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York announced that a grand jury had indicted Anthony Ursillo, a 49-year-old antiques dealer in Providence, on twenty-four counts in connection to fencing the proceeds of sixty-one Blue Book burglaries. Ursillo had done time for breaking and entering, and the FBI in Boston long suspected he was dealing in stolen goods. The Tiffany lamps, the sterling silver, the antique baubles and tchotchkes—Flynn said Ursillo took it all.

Phone records showed that the burglars would call Ursillo after a robbery, after which he would wire them a down payment. Then he would meet the burglars in Rhode Island to exchange the goods for more cash. The evidence was damning. Ursillo took a plea deal and was sentenced to four years in prison and a $20,000 fine.

But Flynn said that he’d used a different fence for paintings, a Boston art dealer named Michael Filides. The child of Greek immigrants, and by all appearances a good citizen, Filides had worked his way up from a blue-collar background. He was briefly employed in finance before opening a gallery in the heart of the city’s arts district. An artist himself, Filides specialized in appraising nineteenth-century European paintings.

A federal grand jury indicted Filides, 51, on three charges of receiving stolen property and three charges of transporting it across state lines—all in connection with thirteen Blue Book burglaries. But the case against Filides wasn’t as cut-and-dried as the one against Ursillo. Filides didn’t deny buying art from Flynn. Rather, he claimed that he didn’t know that the works were stolen. “I am a victim of the lies of a convicted felon who is trying to shift his criminal conduct … onto me,” he told the press. That argument struck at the heart of the most serious charge against Filides—conspiracy in furtherance, which meant that he knew he was an integral part of the Blue Book robberies. Filides pleaded innocent to all charges and soon became the only person allegedly involved in the Social Register scheme to face a jury.

His trial began on June 4, 1984, with Flynn the star witness. Describing himself to jurors as a professional thief who made ends meet by “selling silver, gold, jewelry, antiques, and paintings from burglaries,” Flynn testified that he originally met Filides at the dealer’s gallery in 1976, when Flynn showed up with another burglar and a stolen painting. Flynn said that Filides not buy that piece, but he did offer tips for future targets: He wanted to fence landscapes and seascapes, not portraits, which were too easy to trace. He didn’t want any paintings larger than a suitcase, because that would make it too difficult to transport them to Europe, where Flynn claimed that Filides sold stolen art to other galleries. Flynn also said that Filides wanted paintings valued between $4,000 and $50,000—anything less would damage his reputation in the art business, and anything more would draw too many questions from buyers and insurance companies. Flynn even claimed that Filides provided him with a list of more than one hundred marketable French and Dutch artists whose work he and his crew should look for. Over time and dozens if not hundreds of robberies, Flynn came to recognize by sight the kinds of paintings Filides was looking for.

Testifying in his own defense, Filides was “alternately pained and bemused,” according to Newsday. He admitted that he had never questioned Flynn on the provenance of the art he came in with—something respectable dealers routinely do. Filides testified that, yes, he did often fly to Europe, despite his gallery turning an annual profit of only about $15,000. (Prosecutors pointed to this discrepancy as evidence that the dealer spent far more money than he “officially” earned.) Filides acknowledged, too, that he had sold paintings Flynn handed him. In fact, he still had several pieces in his possession at the time of Flynn’s arrest. (Filides eventually forfeited those works, twelve in all, to the FBI. They would be the only ones ever returned to the targets of the Social Register gang.) Still, Filides maintained that he had no idea anything he did was illegal.

A jury of nine men and three women deliberated for five days. They sent the judge twenty notes asking for explanations of legal issues and readings of testimony. On the fifth day, the foreman informed the judge, “We are hopelessly deadlocked on all seven counts in this case after infinite amounts of deliberation and many secret ballots.” The judge declared a mistrial. In an interview with a reporter, one of the jurors said they didn’t trust Flynn or Filides. Asked by the press how he felt about his odds in a new trial, Filides only smiled.

Melley sat through the whole thing. He had built the case against Filides—interviewing Blue Book victims, collating police reports from more than a dozen departments, driving Flynn all over New England to get eyes on the Social Register homes the thief had robbed. He knew prosecutors couldn’t bring Filides to court a second time without new evidence.

Melley wanted another witness, someone who would testify about Filides’s criminal activities. And that person needed to be someone who wasn’t a professional thief, because the feds needed the jury to trust them. “Fortunately,” Melley said, “Flynn had a very good memory.”

Flynn had first met Jack Farrell, a Boston insurance appraiser who worked for wealthy clients, at the racetrack—a place where they each spent a lot of time. As the two became more friendly, Flynn mentioned that he needed to get rid of some paintings of questionable origin. Farrell told Flynn he knew exactly who to turn to: Filides, a dealer willing to buy purloined art.

Though Farrell introduced the men well before Flynn began robbing Social Register homes, law enforcement decided to bring Farrell in as a character witness in Filides’s second trial, someone who could attest to the art dealer’s misbehavior. The trial began in September 1984, and the proceedings unfolded much as they had the first time—until Farrell arrived in the courtroom. Melley described his first appearance as if it were a scene from a movie. When Farrell walked in, everyone turned to get a look at him, including Filides. Prosecutors had told Filides that they’d be putting Farrell on the witness stand, and he’d made no objections. Now Melley wondered if that was because Filides hadn’t remembered Farrell. “Filides was looking at him like he had no concept,” Melley said. “Then all of a sudden, Farrell starts giving all these details.” Melley kept his eye on Filides, whose face fell as Farrell’s testimony proceeded.

Farrell did exactly what Melley had hoped he would: persuade jurors to believe Flynn when he said that Filides had been in on the Blue Book robberies. On October 2, a jury found Filides guilty of receiving stolen property, interstate transport of stolen property, and conspiracy.

Melley hoped for a yearslong sentence. But a few weeks later, District Court Judge I. Leo Glasser sentenced Filides to five years’ probation, a $30,000 fine, and a thousand hours of community service in the form of art lectures to disadvantaged Boston residents. The decision still mystifies Melley. “He was a person who deserved to be incarcerated. And, more importantly, had he been incarcerated, he would surely have cooperated and told us where the art went,” Melley said.

Of everyone involved in the conspiracy, Flynn was sentenced to the most time: five years behind bars. Thanks to his cooperation as a witness, though, he was out in less than twelve months.

Finding him wasn’t easy. All I had to go on was the Boston equivalent of John Smith—indeed, shortly after Ray Flynn’s arrest in 1982, voters in the city elected a mayor by the same name.

Most people involved in the Social Register robberies are now dead. Both fences are gone: Ursillo passed away in 1994, Filides three years later. Charlie Gallagher died in 2019. His obituary recounts a favorite expression: “I’ll be with you until the wheels fall off.”

As for Dennis Quinn, when I started working on this story, I traced him to a public housing apartment in the Boston area, which I visited twice. The first time, there was no answer when I knocked on his door, so I left a note. At my next visit, his name was no longer on the mail slot. This fall, I turned up his obituary: He died in April 2025, at 77.

The person I wanted to speak to the most was Ray Flynn. Other than a passing comment to a courthouse reporter at Filides’s trials, Flynn was never interviewed by a journalist. He never spoke publicly about the extent of his crimes, which, by all accounts, were voluminous.

Finding him wasn’t easy. All I had to go on was the Boston equivalent of John Smith—indeed, shortly after Ray Flynn’s arrest in 1982, voters in the city elected a mayor by the same name. I didn’t catch a break until I talked to Rolie Anderson, who immediately remembered Flynn’s middle initial, even decades after the investigation. It was X, for Xavier.

With his full name in hand, I found records that showed the Blue Book case was not the end of the line for Flynn. In 1996, he was arrested for robbing a room in the luxurious Mount Washington Hotel in New Hampshire. A manager and bellman doing a routine security check spotted him wearing tennis shorts and a dress shirt. When they asked if he was a guest, he ran away. Police then tracked him to a country road, where they nabbed him and recovered a diamond ring, a Tiffany watch, three credit cards, and a master room key to the hotel.

Flynn was convicted and sentenced to several years in prison; he was released in 2000. Prosecutors later brought other charges against him, mostly for breaking into other hotels. But in every instance he was either found not guilty, the charges were dismissed or dropped, or he was sentenced to probation. Still, buried in one of the police reports from these cases, I found Flynn’s phone number.

“Maybe I was a little adventurous. Maybe it was challenging to some degree.”

During my first phone call with Flynn, he took credit for two major heists. Years before the Blue Book robberies, in 1975, he claimed to have stolen a Winslow Homer painting from the public library in Malden, Massachusetts, in broad daylight. The next year, he said, he broke in to the Cambridge home of the president of Harvard University and stole six paintings valued at $380,000, including works by the French landscape painter Eugène Boudin.

I knew about these robberies from my research of famous art heists, but Flynn was never mentioned in the stories or police reports I’d read. Though I couldn’t confirm his connection to the Homer theft, an FBI agent I spoke to remembered driving past the Harvard president’s home with Flynn and Melley when Flynn, unprompted, told him, “Oh yeah, I did that one.” As I looked into the various crimes Flynn said he’d committed, the evidence I found often backed up what he’d told me. It never contradicted it. Flynn might have been a thief, but he didn’t strike me as a liar.

I hoped to learn more from Flynn. When I told him that I wanted to do a recorded interview, he suggested we meet at the Barnstable District Courthouse, of all places—the same place he’d beat his latest burglary charges. So I drove to Cape Cod, where Flynn was living. When I walked in, Flynn and his attorney were there to greet me in the lobby. Flynn looked healthy. He was trimmer than in his old mug shots, with short gray hair and no mustache. Dressed in business casual, he looked like he could be on his way to a country club.

His attorney ushered us into a small, windowless conference room. As soon as we sat down, Flynn said that he’d changed his mind; he didn’t want to be recorded anymore. We talked briefly about the story I wanted to tell—at one point, he stood up to mime taking a painting off the wall—and then he left.

This was the start of what became a yearslong back-and-forth between us. Flynn didn’t shy away from questions, but he always ended our conversations quickly. Sometimes I called and left a message, and he wouldn’t get back to me. During other periods we talked on multiple occasions in a single month. He was sad when I told him that Charles Gallagher was dead. More recently Flynn asked me, “How’s Pete Melley doing?”

Mostly, though, we talked about his crimes. The master room key for the Mount Washington Hotel? “It was like picking candy off a tree,” he said. Flynn claimed that he’d used the key to rob upwards of 150 rooms over the course of a decade before management finally caught him. Did he ever struggle to sell his stolen paintings? Sometimes, he said. But he never held on to them for long. “One thing you can do, which I did 200 times,” he told me, “is burn them.”

When I brought up the Social Register case, Flynn told me that he’d hit close to 500 Blue Book homes, far more than the hundred-some robberies the FBI had linked to him. When I relayed this claim to Melley and Anderson, both men found it credible.

I don’t know of any art thief who stole more and spent less time in jail. I found police reports and court records linking him to crimes ranging from 1965 to 2010. That’s not a job—it’s a career. Not that Flynn didn’t pay a price. When I asked about his family’s car accident, he said that his son woke up from a coma but remained in poor health, and died at the age of five. “You say to yourself, ‘If I was there, it wouldn’t have happened,’ ” Flynn told me. He and his wife are now divorced.

There are as many reasons to steal art as there are to steal anything else. There’s opportunism: In 1911, long before thieves in reflective vests plucked jewelry from the Louvre, an Italian handyman who had installed protective glass over the Mona Lisa stole the famous painting from the Paris museum. (The work was recovered twenty-eight months later, and the thief was arrested.) There’s kleptomania, as in the case of the French thief who stole more than 300 works from museums throughout Europe, and who remains under house arrest today. There are also more convoluted motivations, as with a Boston burglar who stole a Rembrandt to use as a bargaining chip, returning it in exchange for a reduction in the sentence he was facing for stealing other paintings.

But Flynn had a different reason altogether. A more mundane one. He found something he did well and worked at it—hard. “I needed fast money. I went to Las Vegas a lot,” he told me. “Maybe I was a little adventurous. Maybe it was challenging to some degree.”

Even now, Flynn’s motivation hasn’t changed much. Once, on a handshake deal at a bar on Cape Cod, he again agreed to let me record our conversation—if I was able to sell a podcast about him. But he later backed out when he realized that he wouldn’t make any money off the deal.

It’s not that Flynn is cagey; he’s calculating. As one of his lawyers told me, “Ray rhymes with pay.”


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

I’ve Gone to Look for America

I’ve Gone to Look for America

All That Glitters

All That Glitters
His alleged victims say he bribed New York Police Department officials, stole millions in diamonds, and persuaded Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Kim Kardashian to shill for a scam cryptocurrency. So why is Jona Rechnitz still free?

By Miranda Green

The Atavist Magazine, No. 162


Miranda Green is a journalist based in Los Angeles. She was the national investigative reporter at HuffPost and director of investigations at Floodlight News.

Editor: Jonah Ogles
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Alison Van Houten 
Illustrator: Lily Qian

Published in April 2025.


It was like something out of a fairy tale—or the Los Angeles society pages. As a crowd of celebrities and reality-show cast members mingled near displays of diamond jewelry at the five-star Hotel Bel-Air, Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Ben Talei got down on one knee to propose to his girlfriend. “Congratulations!” a bewildered Kim Kardashian said to the couple. Then she looked at the stone. “Come on, now’s your time,” she joked about the ring. “You want it thicker.”

The November 2019 scene, caught on phone cam and later shared with the New York Post, was exactly the kind of spectacle the event’s organizer, Jona Rechnitz, must have hoped for. Rechnitz, the proprietor of a jewelry firm called Jadelle, had put together that evening’s Holiday Diamond Showcase to celebrate his business. Smiling wide, Rechnitz mingled easily with the attendees. Faye Resnick of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills was there, as was Kris Jenner—the event’s official host. Yet Rechnitz didn’t stray far from Kardashian, who graciously accepted requests for selfies throughout the night.

Six-foot-four and 300 pounds, Rechnitz cut an imposing figure, but his dimpled cheeks and engaging eyes made him look younger than his 37 years. It was a face people tended to trust. His company’s profile was growing. That September, Kardashian had worn some of Jadelle’s bling to the Emmys. Jadelle recently announced a partnership with storied handbag brand Judith Leiber, and its jewelry had landed on the cover of Vogue Japan—huge accomplishments for a company that had existed for only two years.

The night was an opportunity to make big-ticket sales and to claim Jadelle’s spot as the go-to jewelry company for the city’s privileged class. Attendees tried on high-carat, multicolored diamond rings, necklaces, and earrings between hors d’oeuvres; a portion of the proceeds was promised to Toys for Tots. The party also marked a successful homecoming for Rechnitz, who had returned from New York to his native Los Angeles to launch Jadelle. His father was there, as were diamond dealers Rechnitz had worked with on both coasts. By all appearances, he was living his best life: he owned a Bugatti, rented an office at a premier Beverly Hills address, and paid $17,000 a month for the estate he lived in with his wife and six children.

Rechnitz’s return to the West Coast, however, was less a fresh start than an escape. In 2016, he had pled guilty in New York City to conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud, meaning that he had attempted to bribe public officials. When he left New York, he told a judge that he hoped to put his past behind him, to become a better man. Jadelle was his vehicle for doing so, and Los Angeles’s celebrity culture was the fuel, Rechnitz told the judge, that he needed to power his rebirth.

But shortly after the Holiday Diamond Showcase, much about Jadelle’s success would come into question; even the marriage proposal was later revealed to be a stunt. Within months, Rechnitz faced multiple lawsuits for fraud and theft, allegations that he’d taken out multimillion-dollar loans using stolen property as collateral, and accusations that he’d leveraged his celebrity connections to create a false impression of credibility.

Yet, despite a decade of legal troubles, Rechnitz to date has escaped serious consequences. He has yet to spend a single day in prison, even for the New York conviction. In reporting this story, I reviewed thousands of pages of legal documents and spoke to 15 associates, former friends, and lawyers involved in more than a dozen lawsuits against Rechnitz. Many of them think Rechnitz avoided justice because he cooperated with federal authorities in New York, and may still be acting as a government informant—something Rechnitz himself is said to have claimed. Whatever the truth, nothing seems to stick to him.

Chapter 1

Rechnitz was born into an affluent Orthodox Jewish family with roots in California. He attended Yavneh Hebrew Academy, a prestigious private school, and graduated from Yeshiva University Los Angeles High School, in the same class as conservative pundit Ben Shapiro. Rechnitz’s father, Robert, worked as a real estate developer, served as the national finance cochair for Republican senator Lindsey Graham’s 2016 presidential campaign, and was active in American Friends of Likud, a not-for-profit outfit that promotes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s political party through educational programs. After attending New York’s Yeshiva University, Rechnitz married his girlfriend, Rachel, and followed his dad into real estate. By 2007, he had a job at the U.S. branch of international development firm Africa Israel Investments, owned by Israeli billionaire diamond magnate Lev Leviev. He eventually rose to become the company’s director of acquisitions.

While at Africa Israel Investments, Rechnitz noticed that a client of his had a car with plates marked “Sheriff,” which allowed him to park wherever he wanted—street cleaning, tow-away zones, and handicap signs be damned. The client offered to introduce him to the man who’d provided them, Jeremy Reichberg, an official liaison between the New York Police Department and Borough Park’s Orthodox Jewish community. As luck would have it, Reichberg would soon be hosting a benefit for the NYPD’s football team. Rechnitz spent $5,000 on a ticket to get into a room with the department’s top brass. According to later testimony by Rechnitz, he made an impression on Reichberg. His donation even netted him a plaque from the team.

“It made him look good, made me look good, and we started to become friends,” Rechnitz said in court, according to The New York Times. “I didn’t know many people that had connections with police, growing up in Los Angeles, and I thought this would be an awesome tool for me personally and for my business.” His time with Reichberg also scored him points professionally. When Rechnitz’s boss came into town on a business trip, Reichberg had the police escort Leviev from his private plane.

In 2011, on the verge of turning 30, Rechnitz decided to establish his own real estate firm. He named it JSR Capital, using his initials. Rechnitz rented an office in the heart of the midtown diamond district. It was at JSR that Rechnitz developed a taste for the high life. He’d later testify that he charged more than $1 million annually to his credit cards; one lawyer claimed Rechnitz’s receipts showed that he spent more on tickets to New York Knicks games than he did on his taxes.

Though his real estate company was considered a midlevel firm, Rechnitz spent liberally to forge connections at the police department. The first of many trips he helped finance occurred in February 2013, when he and Reichberg coughed up nearly $60,000 to charter a private jet to fly themselves and two police officials to the Super Bowl in Las Vegas. According to prosecutors, they also bankrolled the group’s stay at the MGM Grand, as well as a female escort who joined them on the plane wearing a sexy stewardess outfit provided by Reichberg. Once home, according to court documents, Rechnitz and Reichberg continued to send gifts to at least one of the officers. In August, they paid part of the hotel bill for that officer’s vacation with his family in Rome. A few months later, the pair bought him a $3,000 watch and paid $6,000 to install railings at his Staten Island home. They even showed up to his house at Christmas—two Hanukkah-celebrating Jews in elf costumes, delivering jewelry and a Nintendo.

It was around this time that Philip Banks III, the top Black official on the force, was promoted to the NYPD’s highest uniformed position, and requested that his protégé, Michael Harrington, move from Brooklyn South to work as his executive officer. It just so happened that Harrington was one of the officers who did favors for Reichberg, and he was happy to satisfy yet another request: introducing Rechnitz and Reichberg to Chief Banks. The three men began dining out twice a month. Rechnitz paid for meals at glitzy Kosher restaurants, and they bought Banks a ring that Rechnitz testified had belonged to Muhammad Ali.

In December 2013, Rechnitz and Reichberg decided to charter another private jet, this time to the Dominican Republic. The guest list included Banks and his longtime friend Norman Seabrook, who was president of the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association (COBA), a union for New York City’s jail guards. During one especially debauched evening, Rechnitz testified, Seabrook admitted to wishing he’d been more financially successful—he was in crippling mortgage debt. What’s more, he’d recently lost his beloved dog. Distraught and inebriated, he opened up his shirt to show Rechnitz the tattoo of the animal on his chest. “You should be making money,” Rechnitz told him, according to testimony. Seabrook agreed. “It’s time Norman Seabrook got paid,” he responded.

Rechnitz soon connected Seabrook with an old family friend, Murray Huberfeld, founder of a hedge fund called Platinum Partners. Rechnitz’s grandfather and Huberfeld’s father grew up in Poland, and both had survived the Holocaust. Rechnitz had sold Huberfeld apartments on the Upper West Side, and he came to Huberfeld with a new business opportunity: Would Platinum Partners be interested in investments from Seabrook’s union? The only catch, Rechnitz told him, was that Seabrook would have to get a kickback.

Eventually, Seabrook directed $20 million of COBA’s money to the fund, according to court documents. To uphold his side of the deal, Rechnitz needed a way to pay Seabrook. Rechnitz decided he would pull $60,000 from his own savings, then make himself whole by sending fake invoices to Huberfeld for eight pairs of courtside Knicks tickets. He allegedly routed the ticket transaction through a business acquaintance of his, who was later charged for a Ponzi-style ticket-reselling scheme. Now he just needed to get Seabrook the cash. One day in December 2014, Rechnitz visited the Ferragamo store on Fifth Avenue. Emerging with a new men’s handbag, he stuffed $60,000 cash inside and walked a few blocks to an idling SUV where Seabrook was waiting. Little did the men know that law enforcement was watching everything—and the exchange of money would eventually take everyone down.

Everyone, that is, except Jona Rechnitz.

“Rechnitz has been, without exaggeration, one of the single most important and prolific white collar cooperating witnesses in the recent history of the Southern District of New York.”

Over the next two years, investigators questioned more than twenty police officials and charged seven people with crimes ranging from misapplying police resources to conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud. Eight people associated with Platinum Partners were indicted in a $1 billion investment-fraud enterprise for operating “like a Ponzi scheme,” according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. Rechnitz was facing significant prison time. But according to court records, Rechnitz cut a deal with prosecutors to become a cooperating government witness. Rechnitz subsequently met with the U.S. Attorney’s Office some 80 times. He spilled dirt on his business transactions with Huberfeld and Reichberg, and cooperated with a probe of New York mayor Bill de Blasio’s fundraising practices after testifying that he’d helped raise $100,000 for de Blasio’s 2013 campaign, expecting political favors in return. (Asked about Rechnitz by CBS News, de Blasio called him “a liar and a felon.” De Blasio was not charged.)

The federal case was considered the biggest modern corruption scandal in New York City at the time. In signing the cooperating witness agreement, Rechnitz agreed to plead guilty to the fraud conspiracy charge and to testify against his co-conspirators. Fighting for his freedom, Rechnitz appeared to hold nothing back on the witness stand. Though Rechnitz was facing 20 years in prison, prosecutors nevertheless praised his candor. “Rechnitz has been, without exaggeration, one of the single most important and prolific white collar cooperating witnesses in the recent history of the Southern District of New York,” wrote Assistant U.S. Attorney Martin Bell in a 51-page memo.

As Rechnitz awaited his sentencing, two new realities became apparent. First, he was no longer seen as a macher in his community of God-fearing, family-minded men, but as another of the city’s countless grifters. Second, his name was synonymous with fraud and snitching; who would invest with him now?

And Rechnitz desperately needed income. While he claimed that his real estate firm owned as much as $100 million in property, he faced foreclosure on one of his prime holdings: 32,000 square feet of retail and office space that took up an entire block in the Borough Park neighborhood in Brooklyn. Rechnitz also had mounting legal fees and was facing millions in potential restitution payments to COBA. So Rechnitz did what innumerable dreamers have done: He went west to reinvent himself.

Chapter 2

When Rechnitz returned home to Los Angeles in 2017, he needed a place to live. Finding one was no easy task. The house had to be large enough to fit his family of eight, within walking distance of a reputable synagogue, and owned by someone who wouldn’t slam the door when they looked up his credit or googled his name. To help, Rechnitz turned to the Jewish community. A local real estate broker suggested a home owned by an ER doctor and property investor named Joe Englanoff. At first Englanoff demurred; he’d heard about Rechnitz’s past. But then Englanoff’s father called. “Look, I’ve known Jona’s dad for years,” the elder Englanoff told his son. “We don’t do business, but he made a personal call to me, and if you could find it in your heart to give him a second chance, because he’s trying to move out here to California from New York. He’s really in a bad way. He’s reformed.”

Englanoff offered to rent Rechnitz a house down the street from his own in the coveted Beverlywood neighborhood. The modern Italian-style estate had a pool, waterfall jacuzzi, basketball court, in-ground trampoline, and balcony with city views. The rent was $17,000 a month.

The two men settled into a friendly relationship. Their families saw each other at temple functions and waved hello on the street. Englanoff’s family was charmed by Rechnitz’s generosity and personal touch. After Englanoff’s son mentioned that he liked basketball, Rechnitz showed up at his house with former Celtics forward Paul Pierce.

With his family established in one of L.A.’s trendiest neighborhoods, Rechnitz turned his attention to building his new company, Jadelle Jewelry and Diamonds. The company was registered in late 2017 in Delaware under Rechnitz’s wife’s name. The logo, a butterfly, carried its own significance—the endeavor would be a metamorphosis and a new beginning.

It would take more than a logo to grow the company; Rechnitz needed both gems and clients. Soon, Jadelle was trumpeting its first big get: Former Lakers center Shaquille O’Neal, with dozens of carats of glittering diamonds hanging from his neck, appeared on the company’s Instagram account in June 2018. “Another satisfied client @shaq wearing the Jaddelle [sic] HAMSA proudly,” read the post.

Two weeks later, Jadelle’s account shared a post from celebrity realtor Josh Altman, of Bravo’s Million Dollar Listing. “@jadellejewelry of Beverly Hills got me looking like Mr. T today,” read the caption. “Not sure this is good for my neck.”

One connection Rechnitz made in those early days was Peter Voutsas, who remembered Rechnitz striding into his Rodeo Drive storefront with otherworldly levels of confidence. “He told me, ‘I’ve heard you’re my biggest competition. We should work together on sales, because we have mutual clients,’” said Voutsas, who had never heard of Rechnitz.

At first, Voutsas was skeptical of Rechnitz’s pitch, so he consulted his peers. The network of diamond dealers and wholesalers in L.A. was small and tight-knit. Many of them, like Rechnitz, were Orthodox, and had followed previous generations into the industry. Updates and gossip flowed easily. When Voutsas called several other jewelers whose names Rechnitz had dropped, they vouched for him and told Voutsas that they were impressed by his celebrity clientele. No one had a bad word to say. That was enough for Voutsas, and the two began what Voutsas called a “successful and trusting relationship.”

Jewelry is sold largely on consignment, known as memorandum or memo, and while there is usually a written agreement, paper is only as good as the person behind it. “This is one of the few businesses left on this earth that’s done on handshake, where it’s based on trust,” said Jerry Kroll, a lawyer who handles insurance cases in the industry. It worked like this: Rechnitz would approach Voutsas with clients and ask to take some of Voutsas’s jewelry on memo. Voutsas would tell him how much a piece cost; if Rechnitz sold it for more than that, he kept the difference. If Rechnitz didn’t complete the sale, he returned the item. In short order, the two men did more than thirty successful transactions together, which Voutsas said totaled $39.4 million, and were hobnobbing basketball stars like O’Neal, Scottie Pippen, and Sam Cassell. “At the beginning it was legitimate,” Voutsas told me.

Rechnitz even told Voutsas about a tactic he used to drum up high-net-worth clients: He bought the best seats at basketball games. “If you have front-row seats on the floor or one or two rows back, all you have to do is look to the left or the right and you see famous people,” Voutsas said. There, Rechnitz could mention his businesses and work his charm.

It was at a game, Rechnitz told acquaintances, that he met the man who would become one of his most loyal clients and business partners, boxing legend Floyd Mayweather Jr. Early in Jadelle’s posts, Mayweather appeared in two videos on the company’s Instagram account, wearing hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of gem-encrusted watches and thick gold chain necklaces. “It’s one thing to buy jewelry from @jadellebh but it’s another thing to wear it fashionably,” read one caption that tagged Mayweather. Another post promoted Jadelle’s appearance at a jewelry expo in Miami Beach: “@JadelleBH in MIAMI—By day you can find us at The Original Miami Antique Show… and after dark, we’ll be catering diamonds to our local clients—with #tbe @floydmayweather. Thanks Champ🙏🏼.”

One day in June 2019, Rechnitz told Voutsas that he had a meeting scheduled with the Kardashian sisters at one of their homes. He asked if he could borrow a security guard for the day to protect the jewelry, Voutsas told me. Over the following weeks, Jadelle posted a slew of photos: Kim in a diamond cross necklace, Kylie in a double strand necklace of teardrop diamonds, Khloé with trillion-cut diamond earrings, and Kourtney in heart-shaped diamond studs. It’s unclear whether the Kardashians paid for the jewelry or Rechnitz gifted them the pieces in exchange for posts, but Voutsas said he was paid for the items he’d given to Rechnitz. The social-media campaign brought Jadelle significant celebrity clout—and helped grow its Instagram followers to more than 175,000.

The coup de grâce was an appearance Kim made on the red carpet at the Emmys that year, wearing three layers of diamond chains and a thick cross. Two months later, she was the star of Rechnitz’s Holiday Diamond Showcase. There was just one thing holding Rechnitz back from a future of glitz and glamour: He had to fly back to New York for sentencing.

“I am a changed man,” Rechnitz wrote to U.S. District Court Judge Alvin Hellerstein ahead of his December 2019 sentencing hearing. Rechnitz was facing up to 20 years in prison and millions in restitution.

Rechnitz blamed his actions on his naivete and a work culture that rewarded social climbers. “While living in New York City, I wrongly felt pressure to become a big shot,” he told the judge. “I was in my late twenties, and big people in the real estate industry were dealing with me. My ego was big, and I so badly wanted to impress these people in order to advance my career and profile.”

Family and friends focused on the new, redeemed Rechnitz. His wife, Rachel, promised the judge that her husband had “become a much better, humble, more open and truthful person.” His neighbor and landlord, Joe Englanoff, wrote a letter saying that Rechnitz appeared to be making amends and wanted to leave his past behind. His father, Robert, even tried to accept some of the blame, saying, “It was unfair of me to allow Jona to take so many responsibilities upon himself without my guidance and involvement.”

Judge Hellerstein, however, had followed Rechnitz’s testimony in the other trials and drew his own conclusion. “He cheapens people. He works on their insecurities and their quest for material possessions and just does the opposite. He diminishes people,” Hellerstein wrote in his decision.

Rechnitz’s co-conspirators had already been sentenced. Huberfeld and Reichberg received two and a half and four years in prison, respectively; Seabrook, who took the bribes, was sentenced to nearly five years. Harrington, who had introduced Rechnitz to Chief Banks, was sentenced to two years of probation and 180 hours of community service. (Banks, who appeared to have learned that the feds were closing in and abruptly quit the NYPD a day after investigators applied for a wiretap in the case, was never charged.) In light of those sentences—and how vital Rechnitz had been to the case, according to the assistant U.S. attorney—Hellerstein sentenced Rechnitz to five months in prison and five months’ house arrest, and ordered him to repay as much as $10 million to the union. Rechnitz immediately vowed to appeal and was released on bail. He flew back to Los Angeles and his growing jewelry business.

What’s more, according to court records, Voutsas later got wind that Rechnitz hadn’t sold the jewelry at all, but instead pawned it for a $1 million cash loan.

Peter Voutsas had consigned roughly $7 million worth of jewelry with Rechnitz before the 2019 holidays, including two pieces Voutsas took on memo from another jeweler, David Rovinsky: a 43-carat yellow diamond ring with a $1.9 million price tag, and a 134-carat yellow radiant diamond necklace priced at $1.5 million, according to court filings. Voutsas was told that 16 pieces sold, but by late January 2020 he had yet to be paid for them. What’s more, according to court records, Voutsas later got wind that Rechnitz hadn’t sold the jewelry at all, but instead pawned it for a $1 million cash loan with an interest rate of 6.5 percent per month. On January 21, Voutsas received a series of panicked texts from Rechnitz.

“I’m dealing with a huge crisis now and my dad is at bank trying to sort out issue for me in regards to all this,” Rechnitz texted Voutsas, according to screenshots included in a later lawsuit. “I understand if you never want to deal with me again or see my fave [sic] ever again i’m so sorry.”

As the men texted back and forth, Voutsas learned that other jewelers were hounding Rechnitz for money, too. One of them was Oved Anter, who had consigned seven pieces of jewelry worth $2.8 million to Jadelle, according to a lawsuit Anter later filed. When Anter asked for his money, Rechnitz offered various excuses, and at one point begged for leniency claiming that his mother had suddenly become ill. “Dont say a word paramedics were here. So i’m not in the mood. My siblings dont know. She had a blood clot. Please,” he texted Anter. But by then, Anter had begun to doubt everything Rechnitz told him. “You already use that excuse a few days ago with somebody else,” he responded.

Four days later, Rechnitz texted Voutsas, asking him to keep quiet about any issues between them—particularly since another jeweler had flown in to check on his own diamonds: “I also have Moty Klein in town at the same time while this is all going on which is extra stress as he can’t hear any of this.” Klein, whose name is spelled Moti, was one of the owners of Julius Klein Diamonds, which shared the same office building as JSR Capital in New York. Even after Rechnitz’s criminal conviction, Klein’s son had consigned several jewelry pieces with Rechnitz at the holiday showcase. Now Klein wanted his money, as did David Rovinsky, the jeweler whose pieces Voutsas had loaned to Rechnitz.

On March 18, 2020, Rovinsky sued Voutsas for loaning his jewelry to a known felon. The two settled and in April 2020 filed a joint suit against Rechnitz, claiming that he had stolen jewelry worth $7 million. Anter filed his own suit in June. Each lawsuit echoed the other: stories of early sales followed by bounced checks and pawned jewelry. In his suit, Anter referred to the ordeal as one of “Jona Rechnitz’s blazing trail of Ponzi scheme frauds.”

In fact, according to a separate lawsuit brought by real estate investor Victor Franco Noval, Rechnitz had been bankrolling his company for at least a year on borrowed money. The suit alleged that, in January 2019, Rechnitz had taken out a sizable loan with an astronomical interest rate in Jadelle’s name. He borrowed the money from Noval, who was trying to sell one of the most coveted plots of land in Beverly Hills, known as the Mountain, for $1 billion. In an email exchange coordinated by his lawyer, Noval told me that he was introduced to Rechnitz through their fathers, who worked in real estate. Shortly after, according to Noval’s suit, he gave Rechnitz a $2.9 million loan with a 9 percent monthly interest rate. As collateral, Rechnitz handed over diamonds valued at more than $7 million and a 2012 Bugatti worth $400,000. But in his lawsuit, Noval claimed that by the end of the year, Rechnitz had failed to make any payments on his loan and his debt had ballooned to $5.8 million.

Just weeks after Rechnitz was formally sentenced in New York, according to Noval’s suit, Rechnitz asked Noval’s brother if he could sell the jewelry he’d used as collateral at an upcoming trunk show; whatever profit he made from sales would pay down the loan. Noval allowed Rechnitz to retake ownership of the jewelry pieces for one day, and in exchange Rechnitz wrote two checks, for $2.5 million and $1.3 million.

The day after the trunk show, Noval’s brother went to Rechnitz’s office to collect the jewelry, only to be told that Rechnitz had an interested buyer and wanted to keep the pieces. When Noval tried to cash Rechnitz’s checks, they bounced. Noval filed a report with the Beverly Hills Police Department alleging that he’d been “swindled and defrauded.” A month later, Noval filed his suit against Rechnitz. In it he stated that he believed Rechnitz wasn’t the legitimate owner of the diamonds he’d used as collateral; he suspected that they, too, were on loan.

Noval’s suit claimed that Rechnitz had acted as if he was impervious to criminal convictions, and it blamed his attitude on Rechnitz’s cooperation with federal authorities in New York. “Rechnitz mistakenly believes that this provides him immunity from committing fraud in California,” it read. “The fact that Jona only received 10 months custody time with 5 months house arrest has only emboldened him to commit more fraud, grand theft, and to issue worthless instruments.” Rechnitz and his wife both pled the fifth, declining to provide their side of the story for the record during the proceedings.

In April, Noval joined Voutsas and Anter in filing an involuntary bankruptcy suit against Jadelle Jewelry and Diamonds in an effort to liquidate the company’s assets and recoup some of their money. As proceedings continued into the summer, a motion was filed by an unexpected third party—the Department of Justice. Government attorneys submitted a request for a limited stay of discovery in the trial, arguing that it could jeopardize “parallel civil and criminal” FBI and IRS investigations into Noval “and associates.”

“The government believes that its investigations would be severely compromised if discovery into matters under criminal investigation were permitted, as it would likely reveal sensitive facts,” the filing read. (Additional details were sealed; a judge denied The Atavist’s request to unseal the documents.)

The motion revealed that Noval may have financed real estate transactions and development, including the Mountain, with money stolen from the government of Kuwait and transferred from a bank identified as “AUB” into California accounts. “Based on the government’s present investigation, some or all of the funds for the Noval-Jadelle Transfers appear to be traceable to the AUB Transfers,” the attorneys wrote in the public filing. (Noval’s attorney said that no criminal charges were filed, and the government told him that any criminal investigation related to the properties has been closed.)

The motion also announced that the FBI was separately investigating “the alleged theft or taking by fraud of millions of dollars in diamonds while on consignment with Jadelle.” Agents had recently obtained 31 pieces of jewelry believed reported stolen by jewelers. The pieces were confiscated from the home of a person identified by the initials TT; Fish and Wildlife Service agents had raided TT’s home earlier that month looking for two endangered ring-tailed lemurs, which are illegal to own in the U.S. For those suing Rechnitz, the DOJ’s motion gave them some hope that authorities were looking into Rechnitz’s business in California. But no charges have been filed against Rechnitz for the allegedly stolen jewelry.

Ultimately, the judge denied the DOJ’s request for a stay, arguing that there was no cause to grant it. And after months of legal filings, the trustee appointed to oversee the bankruptcy case moved to dismiss, because it was unlikely to generate any financial recoveries. Instead, the trustee accepted a settlement of $215,000. Noval, Anter, and Voutsas objected, arguing that “rather than proceed with the pursuit of tens of millions of dollars of potentially avoidable and recoverable transfers, the Trustee instead has capitulated and decided to do a deal with the devil, in the process allowing Jona Rechnitz, the perpetrator of this massive fraud, to buy his way out of this case.” The judge dismissed the case anyway.

Voutsas’s and Rovinsky’s case was ultimately settled, and Anter withdrew his suit. (His lawyer said he could not disclose the reason for withdrawing it.) Despite those victories, Rechnitz’s troubles continued to mount. Three more companies sued him for fraud from mid-2020 to early 2021. In all, the six lawsuits against Rechnitz asserted that he owed more than $15.5 million. L.A.’s diamond industry had by now largely blacklisted him, and it seemed as if Jadelle’s reputation was finished. One day in September 2020, Jadelle posted an Instagram photo of musician Justin Bieber wearing its jewels. The caption mentioned “ups and downs.” “We keep pushing and are here to stay. We shall prevail. Love always wins. Thank you to our customers and your loyalty. ❤️,” it read. The day after that post, Jadelle’s Instagram went quiet.

Then, in the spring of 2021, Rechnitz announced a new venture—one that would bring him into the highest echelons of the sporting world.

Jona Rechnitz and Floyd Mayweather, Jr.

Chapter 3

On May 5, 2021, Rechnitz called Joe Englanoff, his neighbor and landlord, with a proposition. He was working with Floyd Mayweather to organize a fight against YouTuber Logan Paul. Though Mayweather retired in 2017 with a 50-0 record, the 44-year-old had recently agreed to an unsanctioned fight with the 26-year-old Paul. Rechnitz was now considered part of Mayweather’s entourage, called the Money Team. He’d traded his suits for black T-shirts, “TMT” baseball caps.

“He said to me, ‘You know, I just got off the phone with Floyd, and we have this wonderful opportunity to buy these tickets,’ ” Englanoff told me. If Englanoff fronted some money—about a million dollars—Rechnitz could sell the tickets for up to ten times the face value; Englanoff would get his money back plus 25 percent of the profits. Rechnitz had introduced Englanoff to Mayweather. In fact, Englanoff tried to sell a Bel Air property to the boxer. In 2019, he visited Mayweather’s home in Las Vegas, and joined Rechnitz on a private flight to the Super Bowl aboard Mayweather’s jet. (The boxer did not join them.) Englanoff felt comfortable enough to invest $1.4 million, with Rechnitz acting as Mayweather’s agent.

In June, Englanoff flew to Miami for the fight. When Mayweather stepped into the ring at the Hard Rock Stadium to shake Paul’s hand, he wore a T-shirt bearing the red logo of EthereumMax, a new cryptocurrency Rechnitz was helping to market. The fighter told reporters that he was paid $30 million to wear the logo on his shorts. (According to a press release, EthereumMax would be the “exclusive cryptocurrency accepted for online ticket purchasing for the highly anticipated Floyd Mayweather vs. Logan Paul Pay-Per-View event.”) The match went the full eight rounds and no winner was declared, but that barely mattered: Mayweather reportedly made as much as $25 million from the event. After the fight, Englanoff joined Rechnitz in a hotel room, where Rechnitz sat at a desk tallying bricks of cash, surrounded by armed guards. In one corner, men operated whirring cash counters. “There was money everywhere,” Englanoff told me.

According to the lawsuit Englanoff later filed, things soon began to unravel. Weeks after the fight, Englanoff still hadn’t received a penny for the tickets. At the end of June, nearly a month after the fact, Rechnitz met with Englanoff in person and said that there had been a change of plans: The team reinvested Englanoff’s profits into an August exhibition fight between Yordenis Ugás and Manny Pacquiao in Las Vegas. Rechnitz told Englanoff not to worry, he would now make even more money.

Englanoff didn’t want assurances—he demanded to be paid the amount he was promised. According to the suit Englanoff later filed, Rechnitz agreed to send Englanoff a wire for the profits, and one of his partners would send a check for the original investment. Neither materialized. “Instead,” the suit read, “a series of false statements and excuses began.” First, Rechnitz claimed to be in Hawaii, and said that the wire didn’t come through “because of the different cut-off times.” Then Rechnitz claimed that his account had been locked because of fraud. On July 23, nearly two months after the Mayweather fight, Rechnitz wrote Englanoff a check for $100,000, calling it a “religious act and gesture.”

Eventually, according to the lawsuit, they reached a written agreement: Englanoff would agree to invest in the second fight and receive at least $4.9 million no later than September 6. But when the day came, Rechnitz had bad news: Sales for the event were lower than anticipated. Still, according to the lawsuit, he promised Englanoff $5.7 million within ten days. Again the money didn’t arrive. According to the suit, Rechnitz dispatched his father, Robert, to reassure Englanoff. On the phone, the elder Rechnitz said that he had invested in the tickets himself, and assured Englanoff that his son was good for the money. Englanoff said he told him: “Your son’s running a Ponzi scheme.”

The next day, Rechnitz wired Englanoff another $100,000, calling it an “act of good faith,” according to the suit. Rechnitz followed up with an in-person meeting with his father at Englanoff’s home later that week. There the Rechnitzes said that they had great news. They had reinvested Englanoff’s money into a third match between Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder scheduled for October, and would pay Englanoff a total of $5.8 million, according to the suit. Robert Rechnitz personally guaranteed the full payment. He put his hand on a Torah to drive home the point. But that fight, too, failed to meet financial expectations, according to the suit. Rechnitz reinvested Englanoff’s money in a fourth fight. By then Englanoff no longer believed he’d ever recoup his investment.

But as it turned out, Rechnitz was facing another problem: EthereumMax, the cryptocurrency he’d helped promote during the fights, had gone belly-up—and was about to come under investigation.

Joe Englanoff

EthereumMax launched on May 14, 2021, with copious celebrity endorsements, including Mayweather, Paul Pierce, and Kim Kardashian. Just two weeks after EthereumMax was unveiled, Pierce tweeted that he had made more money since the cryptocurrency’s launch than he had as a commentator for ESPN all year. Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Antonio Brown promoted it on Instagram three days later. That same week, Miami’s Liv and Story nightclubs announced that they would begin accepting crypto as payment—but only EthereumMax. Kardashian shared the announcement on her Instagram.

Despite the hype, EthereumMax lost 93 percent of its value in just two months. In January 2022, ten plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the company for making false or misleading statements to investors through social-media advertisements that disguised their control over a large percentage of the tokens. “It just stood out as one of the most egregious examples of a crypto scam,” said John Jasnoch, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, when I interviewed him. According to the class action lawsuit, Rechnitz had been instrumental in drumming up publicity for the currency. “EthereumMax’s entire business model relies on using constant marketing and promotional activities, often from ‘trusted’ celebrities, to dupe potential investors into trusting the financial opportunities available with EMAX Tokens,” the lawsuit claimed. “Rechnitz provided … access to several high-profile celebrities that were willing to tout EMAX Tokens in exchange for under-the-table payments.”

The lawsuit alleged that Rechnitz had made hundreds of thousands of dollars from liquidating his EMAX tokens when he knew that promotions were going to drive up the currency’s value. It also said that Mayweather was paid $2.5 million as a “marquee promoter.” (This wasn’t Mayweather’s first brush with crypto, or with legal trouble for promoting it. He’d was fined $615,000 in 2018 for promoting Initial Coin Offerings, another blockchain currency, with DJ Khaled.)

This time the federal government intervened. The Securities and Exchange Commission brought charges against Pierce and Kardashian in 2022, and announced settlements with each—for $1.4 million and $1.26 million, respectively. Neither Mayweather nor Rechnitz were fined by the SEC. Investigators there declined to comment for this story, and wouldn’t confirm whether any investigations into Rechnitz or Mayweather were ongoing.

As Englanoff’s family exited, Rechnitz stared at Englanoff’s 15-year-old son, made a threatening gesture, and yelled, “Do you have something to say to me?”

After eight months of waiting for his money, Englanoff filed a February 2022 lawsuit against Rechnitz and Mayweather for breach of contract, asking for $15 million. Less than a week later, Englanoff claims, he and his family began receiving threats. On February 7, Englanoff parked his Tesla outside his office and tried to open the door, but it wouldn’t budge. “I look up and there’s this really big, like six-foot-five thug, and behind him is a second guy, and they said, ‘We’re sent here by Jona. You’re fucking with the wrong guy,’ ” Englanoff told me. (He subsequently made the same claim when applying for a restraining order against Rechnitz.)

In mid-June, Rechnitz filed his own lawsuit against Englanoff, alleging that Rechnitz had been defrauded because Englanoff’s house was in poorer condition than originally stated. (Englanoff had filed a petition to evict Rechnitz from the property.) Two weeks later, Englanoff said, Rechnitz approached him on their street and made what Englanoff considered a blatant threat. “He said, ‘Either you drop the case against me or I’m going to bring up this whole thing about you being a tax cheat,’ ” Englanoff told me. “And I said, ‘Jona, it’s not true. It’s not even close to true.’ His response to me was, ‘Who cares about truth? Once I get your good name through the mud, try and get [it] back. You’ll never get the genie back in the bottle.’ ” (Englanoff reported the incident to the FBI. Rechnitz did not respond to a request for comment on this or any other allegations reported in this story.)

Where once the Englanoffs and Rechnitzes had waved to each other on the street, now every interaction was heated. The feud continued undiminished for nearly a year. In the spring of 2023, Englanoff’s wife was shooting video of the house rented by Rechnitz when he approached her car and began arguing, according to a restraining order request she later filed.

“Now I’m gonna turn ugly quick,” Rechnitz allegedly said.

“Oh, like you haven’t yet,” she responded.

“Oh, you are about to see, I’ve been holding back. You know what I’m talking about.”

“Uh ha, that sounds like a threat, sweety,” said Englanoff’s wife.

To which Rechnitz allegedly responded: “It is a threat!”

Finally, on June 14, 2023, an incident sent the two families over the edge. That night, Englanoff was out having dinner with his family for his mother’s birthday when he saw Rechnitz at the same restaurant. As Englanoff’s family were leaving, Rechnitz stared at Englanoff’s 15-year-old son, made a threatening gesture, and yelled, “Do you have something to say to me?” according to a request for a permanent restraining order filed by Englanoff’s wife the day after the confrontation. In the request, she cited the threats made to her family, writing that Rechnitz “knows dangerous and violent people” who were “not afraid to cause harm to people.” She also noted that her husband had spoken to the FBI about the harassment.

Rechnitz offered an alternative version of events in a statement he gave the court, claiming that the teenager had made faces at him throughout dinner. “It appeared that the Englanoffs had enlisted the teenager to vex me and cause an incident to erupt,” he wrote. (Englanoff briefly received a temporary restraining order. In July 2023, a separate request for a long-term restraining order filed by Englanoff’s wife was dismissed without prejudice when neither party appeared for a hearing. After an August 2023 hearing for Englanoff’s request for a long-term restraining order, a judge ruled that he had “failed to sustain [his]burden of proof,” ordered him to pay $15,000 in legal fees to Rechnitz, and dissolved the temporary restraining order.)

On the same day as the restaurant confrontation, a bizarre YouTube video of Englanoff had appeared online. It was titled “Exposing LA’s Biggest Tax Cheat,” and was produced by an influencer named Spencer Cornelia, whose channel has more than half a million subscribers. Most of Cornelia’s more than 500 videos focus on juicy celebrity lawsuits and wily scams. The ten-minute clip about Englanoff, which as of this writing had more than 116,000 views, argued that Englanoff illegally claimed he resided in Nevada to avoid paying state income tax. (Englanoff denied these allegations and told me that he offered to show Cornelia his tax records.)

It wasn’t the first video Cornelia posted about Englanoff—it was the replacement. The first, still viewable on the media-sharing platform Rumble, was about Englanoff’s lawsuit against Mayweather for the proceeds from the fight tickets. After Cornelia uploaded it, he got a call from Rechnitz. “The defendants in the case reached out to me and said, ‘Hold on, everything in that lawsuit is false, and here’s the proof,’ ” Cornelia told me. “That led me down a pathway of looking into Englanoff and making a video on him.” Cornelia uploaded the new video and then did something he said he’d never done before: He registered multiple URLs incorporating Englanoff’s and his wife’s names and embedded the YouTube video on them. He denied that Rechnitz paid him to do so, but Cornelia told me, “Admittedly, I’ve hung out with Jona a couple times.”

That September, Englanoff told me, he was followed as he and his wife drove to a sushi restaurant in the San Fernando Valley. Halfway through their meal, Englanoff told me, two large men walked into the restaurant and threatened him. “They started screaming at me, ‘Hey, you tax cheat. Hey, Floyd’s gonna fuck you up. Jona’s gonna fuck you up,’ ” Englanoff said. “I take my phone and I flip it on them, and it’s kind of like turning on the lights on cockroaches—they start to scatter and get out of there.” (Englanoff showed me soundless security footage in which the men left once Englanoff started filming them, retreating to a black SUV outside.)

Ten days later, Englanoff says, his 20-year-old daughter was approached by a man in the parking lot outside her doctor’s office. She called her father, terrified. To Englanoff the message was clear: We can get at your kids.

Englanoff reported both incidents to the FBI and provided the license plate of the SUV in the restaurant footage. He said that two FBI agents came to his home to interview his family and told him that a recent federal law against cyberbullying might be applicable. Later, an agent sent Englanoff a photo and asked his daughter if it was the the man who’d approached her. She said that it looked like him, but Englanoff has yet to hear anything more from the agency. (The FBI declined to comment.)

In the summer of 2023, something rare happened to Jona Rechnitz: He lost in court. In June, a judge granted $17.7 million plus interest to Noval, the real estate developer. “Ultimately the jewelry was never returned, and the loan was not repaid,” the judge wrote in his decision. He concluded: “There is no doubt in the court’s mind that the jewelry was taken by fraud.”

The victory seemed to pierce what Rechnitz’s alleged victims had come to believe was his impenetrable veneer. But Noval still had to collect the money, and Rechnitz claimed that he didn’t have it. Noval and his lawyer needed to file subpoenas to prove that Rechnitz was wrong—but doing so would take time and a lot of money.

Enter Joe Englanoff. By October 2023, Rechnitz had finally moved out of the Beverlywood house, but Englanoff was still waiting for a trial date for his own lawsuit. He and Noval shared the same lawyer, who now approached Englanoff with a proposition: Instead of waiting on his own judgment—and for Noval to be paid first—Englanoff could buy a controlling interest in the Noval settlement. Noval was tied up in his own legal battles with the federal government, but Englanoff had money to spare. The two hammered out an agreement. Englanoff registered a company to be the official party to the judgment, entitling him to any money collected from Rechnitz. He tauntingly named it Pay Up JR.

Since then, Englanoff’s team has received hundreds of pages in subpoenaed bank accounts associated with Rechnitz. Statements from September 2022 to September 2023 show payments to LLCs that Englanoff’s legal team says can be tied to Rechnitz, including $7.6 million from billionaire Robert Smith, who is producing a documentary series on Mayweather, and nearly $6 million paid to a company called Mayweather Promotions. The records also show payments totaling $680,000 to Rachel’s father. The bank statements from that year alone reveal transactions totaling tens of millions of dollars—more than enough to pay what the court ordered.

As Englanoff continues his efforts to recoup his money, two new lawsuits alleging Rechnitz’s involvement in fraudulent schemes were filed in the past nine months. The first, by Miami jeweler Leonard Sulaymanov against Mayweather, the rapper Tyga, and Mayweather’s Money Team, claimed that Rechnitz represented himself as Mayweather’s exclusive agent in a scheme to take watches and jewelry worth $4.15 million without paying a full or fair price. Though the lawsuit alleged that Mayweather posted images of himself wearing the jewelry on his social-media account, the jeweler claimed that he was never paid. (The case was voluntarily terminated in December 2024.)

The second suit, filed on behalf of a Miami digital artist named Jayson Winer, alleged that Rechnitz and his associates promised they could get Mayweather to use his close ties with billionaire Elon Musk to persuade the tech mogul to purchase Winer’s art and to reverse a shadow ban on his posts on X. (Rechnitz told Winer that Mayweather trained Musk for a much-hyped boxing match with Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg that never materialized.) All it would cost, Rechnitz told Winer, according to the suit, was several million dollars.

As it happened, Winer worked at Platinum Partners in New York around the same time Rechnitz helped illegally transfer funds there from COBA. Despite Rechnitz’s reputation, Winer told me, he initially trusted him. If Rechnitz knew a boxing champ, why not a billionaire? Winer said that he only came to believe it was a scam when the duo kept asking for more money up front without connecting him with Musk. In his response, Rechnitz admitted that he’d told Winer that Mayweather could arrange a call with Musk about Winer’s collection for a price, but denied any wrongdoing. (Mayweather did not respond to requests for comment.)

Instead, Rechnitz filed a counterclaim arguing that Winer failed to pay for services rendered by Mayweather. “To feed his celebrity obsession, Winer promised funds he knew he did not have for the chance to make himself and his ‘art’ known to Musk,” the counterclaim alleged. It went on to say that Winer “launched a scorched-earth defamation campaign falsely accusing Counter-Plaintiff Jona Rechnitz of extorting him.” The suit is ongoing.

Chapter 4

Though it has been nine years since Rechnitz pled guilty in the New York COBA case, he has yet to serve any time in prison—even as his co-conspirators were given years. In July 2023, he successfully overturned his 2019 sentence of five months in that case when a court ruled that Judge Hellerstein should have recused himself because he had a close relationship with a witness in a related case. Sentencing was reassigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla, who ruled in October 2024 that Rechnitz only owed the correctional officers’ union $891,000—some $9 million less than in the judgment handed down by Hellerstein. But Failla has yet to rule on how much prison time Rechnitz will serve; she delayed the hearing eight times over the course of two years. The next date is set for June 2025, though most believe that it, too, will be deferred.

 “Jona’s pretty much judgment-proof. He is the Jewish John Gotti,” said Andrew Smith, the lawyer representing the Miami jeweler who sold the watches to Mayweather and Tyga. “He gets charges brought against him. Then he turns out to be a confidential informant and he gets charges relaxed.”

The delays and inaction have led many to believe that Rechnitz may be protected by authorities. Several jewelers say Rechnitz claimed not only that he was a prolific government informant in New York—but that he was still working in that capacity.

Smith believes that the clearest indication that Rechnitz has some sort of influence with the government is that he has yet to be sentenced in the COBA case. “Jona robbed the New York City corrections officers pension fund. I mean, that’s as bad as stealing from the FBI, right?” said Smith. “You don’t get indicted, take a plea in 2016, and not get sentenced for nine years,” said Smith. “It doesn’t happen.”

The delays have incensed those who sued Rechnitz, many of whom wonder how he managed to escape prison time and further criminal indictments for years. “Rechnitz, a serial informant for the Justice Department, appears to believe that he can defraud victims with impunity, relying on his relationship with the Government to protect him from liability,” Winer’s January lawsuit read.

There have been at least 13 suits filed against Rechnitz or his companies since he moved to Los Angeles, but the courts have only ruled against him in two of them. Others were quietly settled. The EthereumMax class action has a trial date scheduled for January 2026. Englanoff lost his case against Mayweather last summer—the jury didn’t find sufficient evidence that Englanoff had entered into a contract with Mayweather’s production company. But a trial date against Rechnitz and other listed co-conspirators is set for July 2025.

For now Rechnitz remains free, and his alleged victims are left to commiserate with one another over a shared WhatsApp chat where they monitor what Rechnitz and Mayweather have been up to through social media and online articles and videos. The two met with injured Israeli Defense Force soldiers in Jerusalem last October; they were seen courtside at an L.A. Clippers game in early March; and Mayweather even thanked his “close friend” Rechnitz on a recent Fox Business appearance promoting a new line of workout supplements.

The FBI has not charged Rechnitz with any additional crimes. Some hope that will change soon. In January, Winer told me, two district attorneys flew to Miami to interview him about his lawsuit, with an FBI agent joining via Zoom. The Department of Justice then subpoenaed Winer to provide documents before a grand jury in Los Angeles at the end of February as part of a criminal investigation being conducted by the DOJ’s Criminal Division, Fraud Section, according to a copy of the subpoena obtained by The Atavist. But federal grand jury proceedings are secretive, and the government won’t comment on them—or even confirm their existence.

Several jewelers say Rechnitz claimed not only that he was a prolific government informant in New York—but that he was still working in that capacity.

“I cannot go on record,” Jona Rechnitz told me when I first spoke to him last summer. “I am a government witness, and I cannot be making public statements.” But, he added, he’d been thinking about talking anyway: “I did my homework on you. And because you’re an independent and you’re not controlled by anyone, that’s why I said, ‘You know what? Maybe I will actually take her call and respond to her.’ ”

We agreed to meet at Lamalo, a Kosher restaurant near Beverlywood. When I followed up by text the day before, he replied: “I think I have Covid! I’m getting tested if I’m ok then yes.” He texted later to say that, indeed, he was sick. We rescheduled for mid-August, only for Rechnitz to text me the weekend before that he was traveling and could no longer make it. We agreed to a time two weeks from then, but again he canceled. The fourth time we were supposed to meet, he texted me that morning, explaining that his flight had been canceled and it would have to wait until the following week. When I asked him for a new date, he didn’t respond.

I eventually did speak to Rechnitz face-to-face. After spending weeks at the small Santa Monica courthouse for the ongoing Pay Up JR lawsuit, I had all but abandoned hope that Rechnitz would ever appear. But as I sat amid the fold-down seats of the damp courtroom one foggy Monday morning, in he strode with his wife, Starbucks cup in hand. Rechnitz was dressed in a black T-shirt, black jeans, and black Vans. Rachel carried a plush Chanel bag. Englanoff followed shortly after, dressed in a suit, quiet and subdued. The Rechnitzes said little as their lawyer fought attempts by Englanoff’s team to force the release of more of Jadelle’s financial records.

I caught up to Rechnitz afterward and introduced myself. Towering over me, he smiled, as if we’d already met dozens of times. He waved off his worried lawyer, who cautioned him against speaking with me, and took me aside in the hallway. He asked me if Englanoff had said anything to me. I shrugged. “He won’t. He’s a tax cheat and has much too much to hide,” Rechnitz said. “Have you seen the videos about him? I’ll send you the link.” He promised me he’d be available following Yom Kippur; he had a lot to tell me. But after a few more days of fruitless texts, I lost hope of ever getting a sit-down interview. (While Rechnitz initially agreed to answer questions during the fact-check process for this story, he ignored a detailed list sent both by email and by text.)

The first time we spoke, last summer, Rechnitz did offer brief explanations for the more than a dozen lawsuits filed against him or Jadelle. The jewelry he had taken on memo from various jewelers back in 2019? He says his office was robbed. “That was a lot of merchandise, OK, but I wasn’t allowed to tell anybody, because it was an active police investigation, FBI investigation,” Rechnitz told me. But he didn’t clarify the alleged date of theft or provide proof that he’d filed a police report. (The Beverly Hills Police Department said that it had no record of any theft complaint by Rechnitz between December 2019 and August 2020. The FBI wouldn’t comment.)

Furthermore, he claimed he had proof of his innocence: The U.S. Attorney had called him a “victim” in a letter. But when I found the letter in question, written by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Axelrad, it did not include the word victim. Instead, it read: “The United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California (‘USAO’) has informed you that, based on the USAO’s current investigation and information known as of this date, Jona Rechnitz is considered a witness in any investigation relating to Jadelle Jewelry.”

Before we ended our call, Rechnitz told me that my article was focusing on the wrong angle. “Your real story is how shady the diamond district is,” Rechnitz said. “They’re all bullshitters hiding behind beards and yarmulkes.”

CLARIFICATION: After publication, the Atavist learned that the Englanoffs filed a second restraining order request that was denied after a hearing. The story has been updated to reflect that information.


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

The Crash of the Hammer

The Crash of the Hammer

How concerned citizens ran a neo-Nazi out of rural Maine.

City on Fire