The Buffalo Raiders

The Buffalo Raiders
The Atavist Magazine, No. 173


Stephen Wood is a writer based in New York. His work has appeared in The Guardian, Current Affairs, Jacobin, The Athletic, and McSweeney’s, among other publications. He was previously a producer with Gilded Audio, where he worked on shows including Snafu with Ed Helms and The Reason We’re All Still Here.

Editor: Seyward Darby
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Emily Injeian
Illustrator: Michael Hirshon

Published in March 2026.


Paul was the favorite of Betty Good’s ten children. His next-eldest brother, Jim, still remembers his christening in 1947 as a momentous occasion, given that Paul was his maternal grandparents’ fiftieth grandchild. Consider yourself advised, right off the bat, that this is a story about Catholics.

Jim described his brother as “a young man that just loved life.” By his teenage years, Paul was such a notorious pool shark that he had to travel farther and farther from his family’s Western Pennsylvania home in search of marks. “You didn’t wanna play pool against Paul Good,” Jim said. “That was out of the question.”

Shortly after Paul graduated from high school, he was called up to serve in the Army and sent to Vietnam. When Betty put him on the plane, she was proud of what he was doing and convinced that it was right. But just a few weeks later, on June 19, 1967, she awoke with a premonition that something terrible had happened to Paul.

It took a few days, but when the men from the Army arrived outside her house, she knew why they were there. She knew what they were going to say even as she waited for her husband to come and receive the news with her. Paul Good was killed in action outside Saigon on June 19, a few months shy of his twentieth birthday.

Like many people his age, Jim already had serious problems with U.S. foreign policy. Now it had claimed the life of his younger brother. “At that point,” he said, “I just wanted to make the government feel like they’re not as secure as they think they are.” Eventually, he and some friends hatched a plan to do just that—one as outrageous as it was outrageously simple.

Jim is in his eighties now, and he can’t say for certain how many government offices he broke into following his brother’s death. But it all began in Buffalo, New York.

Jim started out on a path of righteousness—a spiritual one, that is. He entered seminary at 14 and spent eight years training to be a Catholic priest. It wasn’t spreading the faith that excited him so much as the opportunity to travel; he wanted to be a missionary. But shortly before he was to be ordained and sent overseas, Jim was, in his words, “politely asked to leave” due to his chronic inability to obey orders.

Instead he became something of a secular missionary, traveling to the Dominican Republic as a Peace Corps volunteer. He arrived less than a year after President Lyndon Johnson sent tens of thousands of U.S. troops to the island nation to prop up a strongman friendly to his administration. Most locals gave Jim a chilly reception. “When I got out there, it was like, ‘Hey, hi! My name is Jaime Bueno, Jim Good, and I’m here to help!’ And they said, ‘Screw you.’” Jim quickly realized that the troops were there to protect American landowners, not Dominicans, and that the local Catholic clergy “lived very well” while their flocks toiled on plantations. When he began to speak out against the injustice around him, according to Jim, he fell out of favor with the Peace Corps bureaucracy. He ended up leaving his post three months early.

Now known as Jaime Bueno to his friends—James was the most popular name for boys born in the United States every single year between 1940 and 1952, so a distinctive nickname was vital—Jim moved to New York City and fell in with the growing antiwar community. He eventually moved to Buffalo, where he met a number of like-minded people, many of whom had also grown up Catholic.

“I always wanted to be a saint,” said Jeremiah Horrigan, a Buffalonian from a family of ten children, whose father, Jack, was a beloved sportswriter turned executive for the Buffalo Bills. Studious, morally upright, and the son of a local bigwig, Jeremiah was a natural fit at Canisius High School, an elite boys’ school he described as “a training ground for the eventual leaders in Buffalo—at least, the Catholic leaders.”

Mike Hickey, the eldest of ten from a South Buffalo family, attended Canisius on a scholarship. As a kid, Mike always took the Church seriously, but his “scrupulous conscience” alerted him to some major contradictions between doctrine and practice. While studying the catechism in grade school, he was surprised that the illustration accompanying the Fifth Commandment in his book was a photograph of soldiers storming the beaches of Normandy: “It seems pretty straightforward, you know, as a commandment: Thou shalt not kill.”

Ken Mudie referred to the neighborhood where he and Mike grew up as “an Irish-Catholic ghetto.” Ken and his brother stood out. “We had two strikes against us,” he said. “My parents were divorced and we weren’t Irish.” His early life was chaotic, with his mother working multiple jobs and a variety of “transient” relatives cycling through his home. But he had a great time, and he got good grades, which earned him a ticket to Canisius.

Maureen “Meaux” Considine grew up in a suburb of Buffalo, one of “only” five kids. Her parents were “devout,” she said, “but there were things about the Catholic Church that they questioned a little bit.” Had the Church allowed it, her mom would have been a priest. The Considines were the rare suburban white couple who purposefully sent their daughter into the city proper for high school, to Mount St. Joseph Academy. Being in an urban environment exposed Meaux to the effects of racial segregation and grinding poverty. It also put her in proximity to Canisius boys, including Mike, Ken, and Jeremiah.

After the four of them graduated high school, in 1968, they headed to college. Ken and Mike enrolled at Le Moyne College in Syracuse. A Jesuit school, Le Moyne until recently had employed Father Daniel Berrigan, a radical antiwar priest. The Catholics there dressed and talked more like hippies than like the Mass-goers Ken had grown up with, and they weren’t above getting their hands dirty when the spirit moved them.

Le Moyne was where Mike first got picked up by the cops, for leafleting on behalf of farmworkers. He’d been a literal and figurative Boy Scout before college. “ I was always a good boy and never disobeyed any rules,” he said. “But it just seemed like the right thing to do. So we did it.” He and Ken also protested racist hiring practices at a construction site, and they began to recognize the connections between racism in the United States and what was happening in Vietnam. In the early years of U.S. military involvement in the conflict, Black Americans were drafted and killed in disproportionately high numbers.

Ken’s upbringing wasn’t political, beyond his family’s general affinity for John F. Kennedy because he was Catholic. His father was a World War II veteran who had fought in the Battle of the Bulge, and Ken was raised not to question what America did overseas. Jocular and self-effacing, he continued to defend the Vietnam War in conversations with friends and fellow students, until one day, he said, “I just couldn’t argue why we were there.”

Listen: Ken Mudie on music and antiwar politics.
0:00
0:00

Ken, Mike, and Jeremiah all attended Woodstock, the generation-defining music festival in upstate New York, and their accounts of this period are laced with references to countercultural music. One song that’s stuck with Ken is “Sky Pilot,” a catchy but haunting piece of psychedelia released in 1968 by Eric Burdon and the Animals (of “House of the Rising Sun” fame). Over seven and a half minutes, it tells the story of a military priest blessing troops as they head into battle, listening to the firefight, then watching the men return, wounded and traumatized. Burdon’s tone is one of pity mixed with disdain. It’s a song about a man who keeps his head down and stays quiet, allowing great evil to unfold around him.

Meaux was studying at St. Mary’s College, just across the street from Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana, when in 1969 the U.S. Selective Service began to draft young men by date of birth via a televised lottery. America watched as men in suits picked blue capsules out of a glass container, like some perverse game show, to determine the order in which the most recent crop of draft-eligible boys would be called into service. “It was a terrible night,” Meaux said. “Lots of drunk people. They were drunk because they were happy or because they were sad. There were people who were hysterically crying because their number was really low.”

Ken got lucky—his draft number was high. So high that he quit Le Moyne after two years, giving up the possibility of a student deferment, and started working full-time. “There’d have to be a ground invasion in Iowa before I would ever be drafted,” he said. Mike stayed in school, but his deferment weighed on him as he watched more and more young men get called up.

Jeremiah credits the alternative of a “death sentence” in Vietnam with his decision to go to college. At Fordham University in the Bronx, another Jesuit school, he discovered a scene similar to the one at Le Moyne: Professors assigned books with titles like The Nonviolent Cross. One of those professors was John Peter Grady, a sociologist who appears to have used his teaching position primarily to foment nonviolent resistance to U.S. foreign policy. Gregarious, canny, and hard-drinking, Grady took every opportunity to convert casual war opponents into crusaders against the war machine. And it was an open secret on campus that Grady had been involved in some of the recent high-profile raids on Selective Service offices, better known as the draft boards.

In 1966, determined that neither he nor any of his eleven younger brothers should be drafted, 19-year-old Barry Bondhus emptied a bucket of excrement into the drawer containing his file at a Minneapolis-area draft board. Thankfully, for the sake of public health, this exact method of protest didn’t catch on, but Barry had exposed just how easy it was to destroy the documentation required to draft young men into military service.

In October 1967, four individuals, including Father Philip Berrigan, brother of Daniel, entered a draft board in Baltimore, poured blood—a mixture of animal and their own—over a quantity of files, and were arrested. The following spring, a group now known as the Catonsville Nine, among them both Berrigan brothers, removed files from a suburban Maryland draft board in broad daylight, destroyed them with homemade napalm in the parking lot, and were arrested. “Our apologies, dear friends, for the fracture of good order. For the burning of papers, instead of children,” the Catonsville Nine said in their official statement, which Daniel Berrigan read to reporters over the pyre.

What separated these raids from nearly all other antiwar actions was, to put it bluntly, their potential to be effective. In a world without computers, the physical documents containing the personal information of draft-eligible men might have been the only materials linking them to the Selective Service. “ I often thought, what about the women who worked in those offices?” Jim Good said. “Did they see those files as death certificates?” He and other peace activists came to view the contents of draft boards’ filing cabinets as no different from bombs or bullets: They were just tools that helped the government kill. Crucially, destroying files could be accomplished without any violence, unless you counted the destruction of property, which raiders did not. They believed that some property simply didn’t have a right to exist. 

No central structure existed to plan the raids, but a diffuse network of participants, consisting primarily of working-class Catholics, adopted the moniker of the East Coast Conspiracy to Save Lives. The Berrigan brothers were the most visible members, and they were often assumed to be the movement’s leaders—J. Edgar Hoover even branded Phil a terrorist during a Senate hearing. But neither was personally involved in more than a handful of raids. By 1971, the brothers were in prison for the Maryland actions; Phil went quietly, but Dan led the FBI on a weeks-long chase, during which he occasionally surfaced to deliver guerrilla sermons. Many of their fellow organizers evaded detection, and soon more young people were joining their ranks.

Chuck Darst was one of them. Chuck was a bookish, articulate Catholic kid from Knoxville, Tennessee, whose parents were so apolitical that neither knew how the other voted. He intended to join the ROTC when he enrolled at Notre Dame, then maybe serve in the Air Force. But before long, Chuck was studying just-war theory, reading Gandhi, and plumbing the depths of his own psyche to the tunes of Bob Dylan and Joan Baez. He also fell in love with Meaux over at St. Mary’s.

In the summer of 1968, Chuck was selling books in rural Alabama when his older brother, David, was arrested along with the rest of the Catonsville Nine. Back at school, Chuck tore up his draft card beside other young men during a Mass celebrated before the campus mural known as Touchdown Jesus. They sent their destroyed cards to the Selective Service but weren’t arrested. “ I did get a call from the FBI asking me, ‘Did you knowingly and without duress do that?’” Chuck recalled, laughing. “And I said, ‘Yeah, you could cast it that way.’

Then his brother died suddenly. A writer and member of the De La Salle Christian Brothers, a community of laymen who take vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, David taught religion at a Catholic high school in Nebraska. He’d been convicted for the Catonsville action, but had yet to start his prison sentence, when he was killed in a car accident at age 27.

Chuck took a semester off to focus on compiling a book of his brother’s writings. Maybe some part of him already knew that he wasn’t going back to college. “It just seemed like I was inexorably being drawn to do something more than I had done at Notre Dame,” Chuck said. “The mantle of draft resistance and resistance to the Vietnam War kind of seemed to come to me.”

Meaux also found her studies increasingly meaningless as the fabric of society seemed to fray around her. Buffalo became a favorite port of call for Chuck as he hitchhiked back and forth from South Bend to talk to East Coast publishers about his brother’s book, and when she finally dropped out of St. Mary’s, Meaux ended up back in her hometown, living with Chuck and working for an antiwar congressional candidate.

Chuck’s and Meaux’s fates were sealed when they joined Mike Hickey in a drive across the state to see an off-Broadway play Daniel Berrigan had written about Catonsville. The production incorporated footage of Chuck’s late brother that Chuck had never seen before, and it helped him and his friends come to a monumental decision. “As Meaux and Mike and I made our way back to Buffalo, we were saying, ‘We’ve gotta do an action,’” Chuck recalled.

In the summer of 1971, Mike called Ken Mudie and asked if he wanted to attend a meeting about raiding a draft board. Ken agreed to go, in his telling because he happened to have time on his hands. Once they were gathered, the participants introduced themselves with some words about what had brought them there. Everyone shared a story of personal growth and discovery—except Ken.

“I’m Ken Mudie,” he said. “My favorite band is the Kinks, and my favorite color is green.”

He now wonders if he should’ve said something a little less flippant, but his humor had a function. “I think the point I was trying to make was, I’m just new to this, folks,” he said. 

Other newcomers to righteous lawbreaking were there that day: Mike, Meaux, and Chuck, as well as Jeremiah Horrigan. But the two Jims—Jim Martin and Jim Good—were civil-disobedience veterans. That June, they’d gone to the Washington, D.C., headquarters of the Selective Service to carry out a citizen’s arrest of its director, Curtis Tarr. They’d arranged a meeting, invited reporters to join them, and, once in Tarr’s office, announced that they were charging him with war crimes. They asked him to sign an affidavit admitting his guilt. He declined. Martin moved to place handcuffs on him, but Tarr was six feet seven inches tall and a World War II veteran. He brushed Martin aside with enough force to knock him on his ass. The next morning, papers across the country ran a photo of Tarr towering like a victorious boxer over a falling Martin. To the side, Jim Good is holding handcuffs and perhaps starting to wonder if there might be a more effective way to mess with the war machine.

Martin’s girlfriend, Ann Masters, was also at the meeting in Buffalo, along with Barb and Mike Dougherty, a married couple with a newborn baby. The Doughertys were a bit older than the rest of the crew, but they were moved by the spirit of the age, and their guidance was crucial to their younger comrades. “They were the rocks that we built around,” Jeremiah said. Ken described Mike Dougherty as a natural leader and Barb as an “earth mother” who shocked his delicate sensibilities by squirting breast milk across the room at unsuspecting targets. (The Doughertys are now deceased, as is Jim Martin. Ann Masters declined an interview for this story.)

By all available evidence, no member of the Buffalo cell had ever raided a draft board before; among them, however, they had several points of contact with the East Coast Conspiracy to Save Lives and a clear sense of what they wanted to accomplish. Their mark was so obvious, it almost went without saying: The Old Post Office stuck out like a Gothic Revival thumb over downtown Buffalo. The six-story gray square with a glass-covered atrium in the middle—Jim Good described it as both a “stone fortress” and a “square doughnut”—housed all manner of federal offices, including two draft boards. It also contained a branch of U.S. Army Intelligence, which was of great interest to the antiwar crowd. Buffalo was often the last stop on the path to Canada for young men fleeing the draft, just as it had been for people escaping slavery on the Underground Railroad. The local peace community believed that Army Intelligence was trying to track down draft dodgers, and raiding their office seemed like a good way of finding out.

After their first meeting, the Buffalo group went through what some in their circle called a “period of discernment,” a Catholic term that refers to a time of serious contemplation, often undertaken before entering seminary. In this case, it meant weighing the ethics and consequences of breaking into a suite of government offices. Nobody in the group could pinpoint the moment when they decided that they were in; each came to the conclusion over a period of weeks. “It seemed pretty natural,” Mike Hickey recalled. “I was 20, so my left prefrontal cortex was not fully developed. But it was, I would say, a moral decision at that point.” Jim Good said that he came to see planning the raid as “more of a challenge than a risk. It almost became a game. Except it was a serious game.”

As with any break-in, the key to raiding a draft board was casing. The Buffalo crew spent countless hours staring at the Old Post Office, noting mundane details like foot and car traffic at various times of day; the patterns of nearby police patrols; and which lights were left on at night, and how late. They typically cased in twos, for safety and to stave off boredom. Mixed-gender pairings had the option to sit in parked cars. That way if cops took an interest, they could simply pretend they were there to make out.

Listen: Mike Hickey on surveilling the Old Post Office.
0:00
0:00

Jim Good and Jeremiah Horrigan went into the Old Post Office during the day to determine, among other things, if there were any armed guards. Nobody was willing to risk the possibility of guns going off. Luckily, according to Jeremiah, “it was not a difficult building to infiltrate.” There was no camera or alarm system—no security infrastructure beyond the locks on the doors and a single watchman on duty around the clock. Over the course of several summer weeks, the crew did not observe any employees staying late or working weekends.

A simple-enough plan began to form: The raiders would enter the building during a busy workday, and each would quietly make their way to a staircase that led to the top floor. There they would hide in an unused attic until the dead of night, when they’d sneak downstairs. Five members of the group would hit the draft board offices, while Jim Good and Mike Hickey would enter the Army Intelligence office two floors below. They’d all escape in a van waiting outside, disguised to look like a Postal Service vehicle, with Ken at the wheel. Unlike the Berrigan brothers, they weren’t interested in public arrests—they wanted to get away.

Planning took place primarily at the West Street apartment of Cathy McCue, a local college student who was subletting her spare room to Meaux and Chuck. Cathy came from a socially conscious family residing in the New York City suburbs, but was too busy at the time to engage seriously with the plot being hatched in her living room. She claimed that she only learned after the fact just how many meetings had taken place in her apartment while she was at school, at work, or asleep.

Meaux’s “key role” was to get into the rooms where the draft files were kept. “When we cased the building, we saw what kind of locks were in the doors, and then we went out and bought a bunch of those locks, put them in a two-by-four, and just started practicing,” she said. Meaux “fiddled and fiddled and fiddled” with crochet hooks, knitting needles, and fondue forks until she was certain she could efficiently pick the locks that stood between the raiders and the files.

At some point, the group realized that there would be too many files in the offices for them to carry away. They’d have to destroy some of them on-site. “Just ripping them wouldn’t be enough,” Jeremiah explained, because the government could piece the documents back together. “And fire was out of the question.” Destroying papers was one thing, but the group wasn’t ready to risk burning down the Old Post Office. When raiders elsewhere had encountered this problem, they’d soaked draft documents in a substance that made them impossible to read. The activists in Buffalo decided to buy Rit Dye, typically used to color fabric, and a tub they could dump the files in.

Along with her fondue forks and knitting needles, Meaux concealed an uninflated kiddie pool inside her clothes when she entered the Old Post Office on August 20. Mike Hickey was alongside her, in a Goodwill suit several sizes too big, with bottles of dye taped to his body. He also carried two items he wanted with him in the event that he went to jail: a toothbrush and a picture of his girlfriend, Lucy.

Chuck was confident it wouldn’t come to that. He thought their chances of getting away were good. The night before the raid, he drafted a statement on behalf of the group, taking credit for what they were about to do. “Okay,” it began, “the war goes on.” The statement referenced the Gospels and Albert Camus (“I wish I could love my country and still love justice”). It called the war “a violence of extraordinary arrogance and cruelty.”

“In you, good neighbor,” one passage read, “we wish to inspire neither alarm nor disgust by this, our night’s work. We move here against vandals and terrorists especially those of official badge or office in our country.”

The statement was signed: The Buffalo.

The raiders made it inside the building undetected. “I think my comrades could tell I was a fucking nervous wreck,” Mike said. Jeremiah was excited. “I knew kids that were bound for Vietnam,” he said. “If I was able to make the machine, as I thought of it, stop—or at least throw some sand into the machine—that was the best feeling in the world.” They signed a guest book (Mike checked in as “K. Marx”) and then, one by one, made their way to the top floor.

What followed was more than twenty-four hours of nervous silence in the baking mid-August heat; the friends had decided to wait until Saturday night to emerge from the stuffy, filthy attic. They tiptoed out onto the roof to smoke and pee. Chuck meditated and wrote.

When Friday night fell, Jeremiah went downstairs to surveil the building’s lone watchman and came back having discovered a wrinkle. Devoid of people, the building’s atrium was like an echo chamber. The swishing of Jeremiah’s bell-bottom jeans had carried, and he was worried that the noises made by the group would alert the watchman. Father Jim Mang, a local priest, was scheduled to pull up outside and lean on his horn, providing a distraction as they broke into the offices. Still, out of an abundance of caution, everyone agreed to strip down to their underwear.

When the appointed hour came on Saturday night, the seven scantily clad friends descended the building’s stairs, split up, and took their places. Outside, the priest hit the horn, and the raiders got to work picking locks and pulling files from cabinets. Some documents went into mail sacks; others were destined for the kiddie pool. Jim Good took a break from the action to put his grubby stockinged feet on an Army officer’s desk, pick up the phone, and call a friend to brag about where he was.

Chuck’s job was to monitor the watchman, and before long his ears perked up: The elevator shaft in the atrium was active. Someone was coming.

Chuck alerted his friends, but it was too late. When the elevator doors opened, it wasn’t the watchman but two unknown men who stepped out, guns drawn. They were wearing flip-flops and tank tops.

“There they are!” one of the men shouted. They weren’t surprised to see the raiders—they were there to apprehend them. In that instant, Jim Good knew there must have been a snitch.

“FBI!” the agents yelled. 

Jim Good had planned for the worst. While casing the building, he’d taken the bold step of loosening the screws on the lock of a revolving door that offered an alternative exit. Now, from where he stood, with the agents advancing, he saw that he and his friends could scramble over a wrought-iron cage protecting a stairwell, drop down to the main floor of the building, and flee through that door. Jim made his move, and Mike clambered over the cage after him. As Jim began removing the screws from the lock, Mike expedited things: He rammed right through the door.

The FBI had the other five raiders cornered upstairs. Jeremiah started whistling the “Colonel Bogey March.” “You know, how could they shoot someone who was whistling?” he said. He was arrested along with Meaux, Chuck, Anne, and Jim Martin.

When he pulled up in the getaway van, Ken thought he’d stumbled across some crime scene—flashing lights in the middle of downtown—before realizing it was his crime scene. He kept driving, navigating calmly around the traffic circle outside the Old Post Office and heading right back the way he came, wondering what the hell had happened.

As they tasted fresh air, Jim and Mike were wondering the same. “The only thing that took the terror away was the adrenaline of escaping,” Mike recalled. He would have run the entire five miles home to South Buffalo if Jim hadn’t persuaded him to stop and take cover in a parking garage. They were still smeared with grime from the attic and stripped to their underwear; going any farther on foot would attract attention. When they spotted a group of young people hanging out in a nearby alley, they made their way over. The kids burst out laughing when they saw the pair.

“Is the man after you?” one of them asked.

Listen: Jim Good on fleeing the scene of the raid.
0:00
0:00

“Yeah,” Jim replied. “Frankly, quite a few of them.”

The kids said they’d give the two raiders a ride in exchange for Jim’s Bulova watch. “You can have it!” Mike said immediately, even though it wasn’t his to give. Jim took off the watch and handed it over.

Soon they were in the backseat of the car, on their way to a safe house where they could shower and put on some clothes. It was around then that Mike remembered the two items he’d left behind in the pocket of his pants, which were still up in the attic of the Old Post Office: his toothbrush and the picture of Lucy. As the sun rose, he hunkered down at his parents’ and devised escape routes for when the FBI came to take him away.

By coincidence, the Buffalo action took place the same night as a raid on a federal building in Camden, New Jersey. One of the people involved in that operation was Bob Good, Jim’s brother. As they were gearing up in Camden, Bob wondered aloud whether the Buffalo raid, which Jim had told him was in the works, might be happening the same night. A minute or so later, another member of the Camden crew, Bob Hardy, excused himself to call his wife.

In fact, Hardy was calling the FBI; he’d been an informant for months. His handlers alerted their colleagues at the FBI’s Buffalo office, the staff of which were enjoying an end-of-summer picnic—hence the casual attire of the agents who busted the Buffalo raiders.

The feds interrogated the five arrested friends. Chuck refused to give so much as his name. As the mustached 21-year-old repeatedly cited his Miranda Rights, one of the FBI agents across from him gave the other a knowing look and said he was stepping out to get some coffee. The remaining agent grabbed Chuck and bundled him over to an open window. “If you don’t tell me your goddamn name right now, you’re going out that window,” Chuck recalled the agent saying. “I’m just gonna tell him you jumped.” Even with his head and torso thrust through the window frame, Chuck didn’t take the threat seriously. So instead of freaking out, he just stared at the agent until he finally relented and hauled Chuck back inside.

Listen: Chuck Darst on being interrogated.
0:00
0:00

Monday morning’s Buffalo Courier-Express carried a photograph of a smiling Chuck, clad in a T-shirt and handcuffs, being led out of the Old Post Office by an FBI agent. In the photo, Ann Masters and another agent walk behind them, and next to Chuck is a suspect identified as “Joseph Hill”—Jeremiah Horrigan had refused to cooperate with the authorities, giving them the name of a deceased Swedish-American folk singer and labor activist in lieu of his own.

When the papers figured out Jeremiah’s identity, they contacted Jack Horrigan for comment. Jack refused to condemn the raid and described his son as “a warm, loving human being.” Being a Bills executive, Jeremiah explained, was “like being the Holy Ghost in Buffalo,” where everyone knew everyone and everyone loved the football team. Even Buffalonians who couldn’t relate to antiwar activists could probably relate to Jack Horrigan.

Next to the article on the Buffalo operation was the headline “20 Nabbed in Camden Draft Raid,” along with a photo of one of the people arrested: John Peter Grady, the Fordham professor. Eventually, eight more people would be arrested for the Camden action. All told, Bob Hardy’s snitching led to the arrest of more than two dozen people in two states.

For the next several weeks, it seemed like the FBI was everywhere. Cathy McCue was on the other side of the state the night of the raid, but as soon as she arrived back in Buffalo, her landlord met her outside and informed her that the feds had been there. Agents also visited professors in her department at the University of Buffalo and questioned the owner of a restaurant where she’d worked. “My whole life was picked apart,” Cathy said.

G-men tried to interview Meaux’s family, but her father kicked the agents out of his house after they suggested that Meaux was too dangerous to be in contact with her siblings. Meaux was out on bail by then; local activists had pooled funds, and priests had appealed to the consciences of well-to-do parishioners until there was enough money to free all five raiders. Ken’s family got a visit, too, even though he hadn’t been arrested. Ken thought he could detect a hint of pride in the way his grandmother talked about his friends “popping off”—her misstating of the colloquialism “ripping off”—a federal agency.

When the FBI showed up at Mike’s house, he hid in the bathroom. His mom told the agents that he wasn’t home, but then, feeling like a coward, Mike revealed himself. He assumed that the agents knew he’d been in the Old Post Office because his girlfriend’s picture was in the pants he’d left behind, but it quickly became clear they didn’t have anything on him. They just thought he might know something.

Along with Jim, Ken, and the Doughertys, Mike’s thoughts soon turned to revenge. In Washington, Hoover and Attorney General John Mitchell called a press conference to proclaim the end of the East Coast Conspiracy to Save Lives. “That pissed us off,” Mike said. “That’s why we decided, well, we’re gonna keep doing it.”

The five activists arrested in Buffalo never seriously considered a guilty plea. “We talked to one attorney who thought we ought to plead insanity,” Chuck said. Then, in “a real stroke of luck,” they got in touch with attorney Vinny Doyle. He and his partner, Joe Birmingham, agreed to an unorthodox approach. The Buffalo raiders, along with their counterparts in Camden, wanted to represent themselves at trial, put questions directly to witnesses, and make themselves as sympathetic as possible in the eyes of the jury. Doyle, Birmingham, and other legal minds in the antiwar movement would act as a backstop, advising them and handling some of the courtroom technicalities, but it would be the defendants’ show. Doyle “just wanted to help us say what we needed to say,” Chuck said.

The home of University of Buffalo professor Ed Powell became a node for the defense campaign, a place to gather and strategize. A disenchanted former FBI agent and his wife also offered their sizable suburban home as a base of operations; Meaux, Chuck, and some other activists eventually moved in. Before the trial, the activists decided to conduct an extended speaking tour across Buffalo, taking every opportunity to explain their opposition to the war to the people of western New York, in the hope of raising public consciousness and softening up the jury pool. They also compiled a list of potential witnesses that included prominent academics and war veterans, people whose testimony could be argued—fairly—to have nothing to do with the facts of the case. The Buffalo hoped to deliver a history lesson and tell a morality tale. They might not escape jail, but they would go down doing their part to change people’s minds about Vietnam.

While the defendants prepared for trial, Jim, Mike, and Ken cased draft offices throughout New York as possible targets for new raids. They decided to hit three on the same night, in Niagara, right on the U.S.–Canada border; in Batavia, halfway to Rochester; and in Geneseo, a college town south of Rochester. These offices were much smaller than the Old Post Office and seemingly had no night watchmen. The crew knew where to break in and how. But with their co-conspirators awaiting trial, they needed new recruits.  

One of them was Sally Hamlin. Another Buffalo native, Sally was a self-professed religious nerd. “I was enamored, fascinated by all the weird stories of the saints and  martyrs,” she said. When she was seven or eight, Sally still swears, she heard the voice of God calling her to be a priest, a notion her parents dismissed. “I really thought that I would get stigmata because I was so holy,” she said. “As a little kid, third, fourth grade, I would look at my hands and go, ‘It’s not there yet, Mom!’ She’d just say, ‘Keep prayin’!’ ”

Listen: Sally Hamlin on her precocious religious fervor.
0:00
0:00

The liberalizing reforms that swept Catholicism after the Second Vatican Council—Masses in languages other than Latin, nuns allowed to wear shorter habits—buoyed Sally’s spirits, and by her late teen years she’d embraced the gospel of the Catholic left. “It spoke to me,” she said, “as a person who thought that Jesus had it going on, in the nonviolent, Jesus Christ Superstar kind of way.” She opposed the war on principle and was devastated when it touched her directly. Sally and her best friend, Joanie, both had older brothers. When the boys got drafted, Sally said, “we shaved their hair in our kitchen and drank a lot of beer and sent them off to war.”

Sally got a shock when she picked up the paper on the morning of August 22, 1971, and learned that several of her friends were in federal custody for trying to raid the Old Post Office. She immediately got involved in the volunteer defense committee that had sprung up to aid the defendants. Soon she soon found herself attending weekend retreats where people were laying the groundwork for future raids, and she fell in with the new cell planning to hit three draft boards in one night.

Sally’s widower father couldn’t afford to send her to college. “ I had no money, I had no education,” Sally said, “but I had a body.” She figured she should use it.

Sally was working as a nanny, and she made sure to give her employers, the Carlsons, a heads-up prior to burglarizing the Batavia draft board. “I’m gonna get involved with some things that may show up in the newspaper,” she told them. The Carlsons were cool. They didn’t ask questions.

On the afternoon of October 28, 1971, Sally dropped off the Carlson kids at home and hitchhiked to Batavia. She walked right through the door of the draft board building, nonchalantly ascended a flight of stairs, and slid into a broom closet to wait until nightfall. The office was on the town’s main drag, but Batavia didn’t have much in the way of nightlife. Once the coast was clear, Sally let two other activists in through the front door.

The raiders rifled through cabinets, stuffed draft files into sacks, then hauled the sacks downstairs and loaded them into a waiting car driven by another new accomplice named Paul. He and Sally set off for a cabin in the Finger Lakes that was the rendezvous point for everyone involved in the raids that night “We were feeling pretty good that we’d gotten away with it,” Sally said, until she and Paul were about a dozen miles from their destination. “All of a sudden we see flashing lights in the car behind us.”

Paul and Sally pulled over and instinctively sidled up to one another, to pretend they were a couple out for a romantic drive. But that wouldn’t explain the bulging sacks in the back of their car. The policeman approached Paul’s window to ask for his license, and Paul said they were on their way to his family’s cabin for the weekend. The officer told Paul that his taillight was out—that was the reason for the stop. Then he shined his flashlight on the sacks. In a moment of inspiration, Paul told him that they were full of Halloween costumes for the kids at a local Catholic orphanage.

Miraculously, the cop didn’t search the bags, but he offered to follow Paul and Sally to the cabin to make sure they arrived safely. After all, a broken taillight could be a hazard. Thinking it would be suspicious to refuse, Paul and Sally agreed. They set off again, still in possession of several bags of purloined federal property, leading a cop directly to the rendezvous point.

The Niagara break-in was more complicated from the start. Betsy Feltham, a student at Niagara University, was a new raider—she’d been reading Thoreau and Gandhi in school and connected with an “alternative, sort of underground” Catholic community. She couldn’t recall who had asked her to help knock over the Niagara draft board, but she remembered consenting immediately. “It would never occur to me not to,” she said.

The office was adjacent to an outpost of the Social Security Administration, and Betsy cased the building under the pretext that she was doing a school report on the agency. “I set my hair, put on a miniskirt, shaved my legs, and went to interview people,” she said. “That was not the way I normally looked, for sure.” The two government bureaus shared a bathroom, so it was easy enough for Betsy to excuse herself and scope out the target without raising suspicion. Nevertheless, she was so nervous she had to put on her research act “two or three times” to gather the information she needed, which must have made a couple of local Social Security administrators feel very interesting.

The plan in Niagara was for two people to hide in a closet and let Betsy and Mike Hickey into the draft board late at night. But as he waited at a safe house, Mike was alarmed to receive an early phone call from his comrades inside the office. They had emerged from hiding to find the doors to the building locked from the outside. To let the other raiders in, they’d have to improvise.

From there, Mike said, the operation proceeded “kinda like from a Three Stooges movie.” While casing, the raiders had noticed an exterior door that should have led into the Social Security office, but Betsy saw no sign of it from the inside. The activists realized it had been drywalled over. Now they figured that if they got the door to open from the outside, they could cut through the drywall, enter the Social Security office, and access the draft board via the shared bathroom.

To carry out the new plan, they would need to bypass a construction fence, which meant Mike and Betsy had to scramble up a ladder and onto the office’s roof. They’d made it about twenty yards across the flat rooftop, by Mike’s estimation, when he glanced at the window of an adjacent house. His blood ran cold. “There was a face looking at me out the window, and I completely fucking freaked out,” he said. “Then I slowly looked again and it was a jack-o’-lantern.”

Once they were off the roof, Mike set about carving through the sealed door with a drill and a handsaw. Within minutes they were inside, where their co-conspirators had already begun bagging up files. There were too many to fit in the getaway car, so they dumped the extras in the building’s sinks and turned the faucets on. Betsy still feels bad about leaving the water running.

Finally able to fulfill his destiny as a getaway driver, Ken Mudie picked up the group and drove Betsy back to her dorm. It was a Wednesday night, and she had a midterm to study for. Ken and Mike then got on the highway, heading for the rendezvous point. They were a few exits away from the cabin when, for reasons he still doesn’t understand, the hood of Ken’s Ford Fairlane flew up, obstructing his view. For what felt like forever, but was probably just a few seconds, Ken was driving an accomplice and several thousand stolen government files down the New York State Thruway functionally blind.

Mike stuck his head out the window and guided Ken to the median, then tied down the hood using his belt and some rope. The friends started up the Fairlane again and took the first exit. They’d use surface roads to get to the cabin.

Jim Good was part of the crew that hit the Geneseo office, but the specifics of that raid had blurred together with others in his memory. What’s certain is that, like their comrades in Batavia and Niagara, the Geneseo crew left behind a note, which Jim had written, addressed to Nixon, Hoover, and Mitchell. One of Jim’s accomplices that night was a guy named Harry, whom some of the other raiders had accused of being a government informant. Jim and Harry were waiting at the lake cabin with their batch of stolen files when Sally and Paul came driving up with a police officer tailing them. Harry burst out laughing and climbed a tree. “And you thought I was an informant?” he cried down at Jim.

To their relief, after seeing them to the cabin, the cop bade Sally and Paul good night and left. As the squad car disappeared into the night, most of the group breathed a sigh of relief, but Jim couldn’t relax. For all he knew, the cop might be back any minute with the FBI in tow. Jim decided it would be unwise for everyone to remain, and he told his accomplices to split. When Ken and Mike arrived, fresh off their ordeal with the car hood, Jim took the files they’d confiscated and asked them to leave, too.

Back home, Ken called Mike Dougherty to let him know, in code, that the raids had been a success. “Game went well last night!” he said. “I got up three times and had three hits, hit the ball outta the park.” Ken hung up to find his grandmother at the threshold to the kitchen, having heard every word.

“Did you do another pop-off last night?” she asked.

He told her the truth. She smiled and said, “Well, good for you.” Ken never heard another word about it. “She hated Nixon,” he said, chuckling at the memory.

Jim and Sally still had one more job to do before they could rest. From the cabin, they drove to a nearby shopping center, found a pay phone, and rang up the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle. Without giving his name, Jim read a copy of the letter left behind after each of the raids, then stayed on the line to answer the reporter’s questions. While he spoke, Sally kept watch.

The first sign of trouble was an unmarked car carrying men in trench coats. They looked like FBI agents, and they were circling the lot. Then a police car arrived. Jim might have chatted with the Democrat and Chronicle all day if Sally hadn’t dragged him from the phone booth and forced him to get back on the road. The unmarked car followed them.

Sally assumed that someone at the paper had tipped off the FBI, and that Jim’s conversation with the reporter gave the feds time to trace the call. Now, as men she was sure were law enforcement tailed them on the highway, Sally realized she was carrying an address book that contained contact information for a number of people in the antiwar movement. She tore out the pages one by one, swallowing some and tossing others out the window.

Soon Sally was fed up with the chase. “Let’s just stop and ask them who they are and what they’re doing,” she told Jim. They pulled into a small town and got out of the car. The men tailing them did the same. Jim, who had a camera on him, took photos of the men, who refused to answer the activists’ questions and told them they’d “better leave.” So Sally and Jim started driving again—only for police cars to appear in their mirrors. They were pulled over and arrested.

Yet, after all that, they were only charged with loitering in the small town where they’d briefly stopped. If Sally’s theory about why they’d been followed was right, the authorities had come incredibly close, but in the end they couldn’t link her or Jim to the break-ins. The pair got out on bail, and the loitering charges were eventually dropped. According to Sally, she and Jim returned to the cabin to deal with the stolen draft files. They mailed as many as they could to the young men named in them.

On October 28, the front page of the Buffalo Evening News read, “Three WNY Draft Offices Ransacked.” The accompanying article quoted the raiders’ letter: “You did not break [our] back, as you claimed”—a reference to Hoover and Mitchell’s gloating press conference. FBI special agent Karl Brouse told the paper that the investigation into the newest raids would “be a full-time job.”

As the trial of the five members of the Buffalo neared, the government kept pressure on peace activists and their families, hoping to smoke out other raiders. It was these tactics that finally brought Ken Mudie’s mother around to his political point of view. FBI agents showed up at her house and, in an effort to get her to talk about Ken’s activities, informed her that they had observed him driving over one hundred miles per hour, in gross violation of traffic law. When his mother confronted him, Ken laughed. The vehicle in question was a Ford Pinto. “That car would disintegrate at a hundred,” Ken said. “It’s like driving a roller skate with a door!” His mother, with whom he’d had some “knock-down-drag-outs” about his antiwar stance, was shocked that government agents would come to her house and lie to her. “They lie all the time,” he said.

Betsy Felthem believed that the FBI identified her as a suspect because she’d used the name of a girl who lived down the hall from her when she signed in to the Niagara Social Security office to case the draft board. But they didn’t arrest her for the break-in. That happened when she failed to comply with a subpoena from a grand jury. When federal marshals came for Betsy, Sally sat down in front of their car, earning her a night in jail.

Betsy was compelled to testify before the grand jury, and she sensed that the authorities thought she was a soft target. “If I were going to pick who might crack, who might talk,” she said, “I would’ve picked me.” But she stonewalled, giving the grand jury nothing, and the government let her go after a few hours.

The authorities had failed to turn up evidence they could use to prosecute even a single person for the triple raid. It was a clear victory for the antiwar movement. Still, in Buffalo, the feds had five defendants dead to rights.

There were two federal judges in line to hear the case against the five Buffalo defendants, and one of them was a known right-winger likely to throw the book at them. The other was John Thomas Curtin, a World War II veteran, former U.S. attorney, and Great Society liberal, appointed by President Johnson on the personal recommendation of Robert F. Kennedy. Perhaps most important, Curtin was a Catholic from Buffalo. When they ended up on Curtin’s docket, the Buffalo activists lucked out—he literally knew where they were coming from.  

Nevertheless, the odds weren’t in their favor. The prosecution had an open-and-shut case, not least because the defendants readily admitted what they’d done. If they had any chance of winning and avoiding jail time, they’d need to convince the jury that their actions had been justified. “We have souls,” Meaux said at one point, “and that is what brought us here.”

On the first morning of the trial, in April 1972, the defendants immediately risked Curtin’s goodwill by refusing to stand when he entered the courtroom. As Jeremiah Horrigan explained, “We wanted everybody to be equally treated.” Curtin could have held them in contempt right there. Instead, when the defendants returned from the day’s lunch break, they found that he’d had their seats removed, forcing them to stand. The chairs were eventually returned, and it was agreed that all participants in the trial would stand for each other as they entered.

Prosecutor James W. Grable’s case was simple: These kids had broken the law. He trotted out cops, FBI agents, and draft board officials to testify to the crimes and the damage done. The defendants then played attorney and cross-examined the prosecution’s witnesses. “The agents all have that Nixonian rigidity of body and walk, bereft of laughter, grace, kindness,” professor Ed Powell wrote in his notes from the gallery. “These agents of the Government, the state, Grable, the cops, the FBI people will never know the freedom of expressed conviction; never have freedom really to express that conviction, therefore will never have a conviction, an honest belief, valued as a truth in itself.”

When Grable asked a witness whether the Buffalo had left a statement behind, to which the answer was a simple “yes,” defense attorney Vinny Doyle had the presence of mind to ask if Grable might read the statement. Grable did. How far into the statement did Grable realize his error? Somewhere around “repression of dissent and resistance here at home goes on,” perhaps? When he finished reading, the defendants joined the jam-packed gallery in a round of applause. In his notebook, Powell wrote, “The Judge permitted maximum leeway in discussion of the war.”

Outside the courtroom, the defendants and their allies kept the faith at a local church. “We did a lot of singing, we did a lot of great meals,” Sally said. “We did a lot of having fun together and telling stories and just staying up late and talking about our lives and what in the world was happening.” Chuck and Meaux even decided to get married in the middle of the trial. “We had friends who could come for a wedding and friends who could come for a trial, but not for both,” Meaux said. “It was unusual. It was a great party, though.” Bob Good, himself preparing to go on trial in Camden, made their wedding cake.

Eventually, it came time for the defense to make its case. Curtin had determined that the war was germane to the proceedings, which allowed the Buffalo to call witnesses with no direct connection to the break-in: a Vietnamese refugee, a veteran who had witnessed U.S. troops using prisoners for target practice, experts in the psychological effects of conflict on soldiers and civilians. Grable declined to question these witnesses. Not so with the defendants: The Buffalo were free to speak at length about their justifications for the raid, but each of them was also subject to cross-examination, which meant five chances for Grable to interrogate them about the two extra pairs of pants and shoes left behind in the attic of the Old Post Office.

Each defendant took the stand in turn and was questioned by one of their friends. Ann Masters went first. As part of her testimony, she screened a ten-minute film about Vietnam, which Grable refused to watch. She then put a question to the courtroom: “Can we say we did not know?” One by one the defendants made a moral case for what they’d done. “If a house is on fire and you break down the door to rouse the people inside and get ’em up,” Chuck said, “sure, you broke a door down, but is that breaking and entering in that case? That was the analogy that we used.”

According to Ken Mudie, it was Jim Good’s idea to “do the Spartacus thing.” Already hiding a number of secrets, Ken wasn’t eager to draw attention to himself, but he agreed with Jim that something had to be done, and that Spartacus was a cool movie. On April 25, the day Ann testified, Ken, Jim, and Mike Hickey entered the courtroom prepared to take one more risk.

On cross-examination, Grable got Ann to confirm most of the basic facts of the burglary, but when he asked her point-blank who else had been with them in the attic, she hesitated. Into the breach stepped Jim, Ken, and Mike.

“I was there!”

“I was with them!”

“The shoes are mine!”

None of them could remember who said what. Probably Jim was the first to stand up. “What was really neat about the Spartacus thing was that we told the truth,” Ken said. It was exhilarating, and maybe a bit of a balm to the Catholic conscience, to make such a confession.

Then a remarkable thing happened: Other people stood up. “I hadn’t even seen the movie. I didn’t know what the hell they were doing,” said Cathy McCue, who was in the gallery. But sometimes courage is contagious. “Jim Good was sitting next to me, and he stood up, and I thought, Oh God, I better stand up, too.”

One after the other, people in the gallery rose to take responsibility for the Buffalo’s crimes. Then they did it again, and again, as Grable put the same query about the unidentified accomplices to successive defendants. “The third time the question was asked, before the prosecutor got the question completely out of his mouth, the whole courtroom stood up as one body,” Chuck said. “I thought, I’ll never see a moment more dramatic and life-affirming than that, you know?”

When both sides had rested, Curtin was clear in his instructions to the jury: If you think they did it, you must vote guilty. The facts alone should inform their decision. Only he could take their motivations into account, and that would happen if sentences were issued.

It took seven hours for the jurors to return with a verdict. The Buffalo were convicted of conspiracy to destroy government property and intent to commit third-degree burglary. They were acquitted on the charge of removing files from Army Intelligence, as the government could not prove who exactly had gone in to that office. All five defendants faced the possibility of at least six years behind bars.  

For the three weeks between the verdict and sentencing, the activists could only hope that Curtin would be merciful. “ I went to the hearing with maybe six or eight of my favorite books under my arms, thinking I was gonna be going to prison for a year or two,” Chuck said. Jeremiah, who had recently learned that his girlfriend was pregnant, wondered if he could still be a good father from a federal penitentiary.

Listen: Meaux Considine on preparing for prison.
0:00
0:00

The courtroom was overflowing on Friday, May 19. Curtin began the proceedings with a lecture about the importance of acting within the law. “Concerning the action that you took, it was fortunate no one was injured,” he said to the convicted five. He advised them to get involved in electoral campaigns instead of illegal activities. He chastised them for unilaterally deciding that some property shouldn’t exist, pointing out that the same logic could be deployed to defend torching abortion clinics.

“And then,” Chuck said, “he turned a corner.”

Curtin told them he wished more people had their courage. He complimented them on how they had conducted themselves in court and said that he admired their commitment to peace. “I don’t speak for myself here,” he said. “I speak for all of the people in the community.” Curtin sentenced them each to a year in prison—then suspended the sentences. The Buffalo were free.

“The room just erupted,” Jeremiah recalled. “And we walked away.” The crowd applauded Curtin as he exited his courtroom. Once they were outside, people started singing “Here Comes the Sun.” For the first time in months, Jeremiah imagined a future outside of prison. “There was a whole new page,” he said. “I had to do something with my life.”

In the wake of the trial, Curtin publicly criticized the Vietnam War. At a commencement ceremony less than a month after letting the Buffalo go free, he implored a graduating class, “We must end the war in Vietnam before it ends us. This war has turned all our best ideals to dust.” The following summer, Curtin took a class on civil disobedience taught by Father Jim Mang, the priest who’d blared his horn outside the Old Post Office during the raid. Five years later, Curtin tried one of the most significant cases in Buffalo history, issuing a ruling that at long last desegregated the city’s public schools.

The raiders, meanwhile, took his words to heart and resolved to pursue their goals through legal means. For the most part.           

After the trial, Chuck and Meaux moved to a tiny town in Washington State. They divorced within a few years. Meaux worked as a nurse, remarried, had kids, got divorced again, and came out as lesbian. Before Curtin’s passing in 2017, Meaux visited the judge three times. She also took his advice. “No more actions,” she said. “I wasn’t gonna show up in the courtroom again.” She channeled her politics into an international youth-exchange program, where she’s worked for the better part of the past three decades. “I think everyone should be thinking about peace,” she said. “Everyone.”

Like Meaux, “one raid was enough” for Chuck. He opened a bookstore, remarried, and had kids. But he never had regrets about Buffalo. “I’m more proud of those two felonies than I would be of a degree from Notre Dame,” he said.

Jim Martin made his living as a geologist and a farmer; he passed away in 2024. Ann Masters became a fleet maintenance supervisor for the New York City Department of Sanitation. Jeremiah Horrigan drove a cab, worked at the Buffalo Zoo, and eventually settled into a career as a journalist. He and his girlfriend, Patty, got married and named their son, born less than a year after the trial, after John Peter Grady. Jeremiah and Patty now live in the Hudson Valley.

Ken Mudie had a successful career in the insurance business, retired to Cape Cod, and is now the town moderator, a nonpartisan elected official who oversees democratic decision-making, in Yarmouth Port. He claims to have abided by the law since the early 1970s, notwithstanding a few traffic offenses perhaps, but says the draft raids changed him for the better. “What it did is embedded in my mind that passiveness is not a good offense,” he said.

Mike Hickey became a chiropractor, married, and had a daughter. In 2024, he ran into Lucy, the girlfriend whose photograph he’d left behind at the scene of the crime in August 1971. Only then, more than fifty years after the fact, did Mike learn that the FBI had indeed found her photo, identified Lucy, and questioned her and her father. Lucy dumped Mike as a result, but she didn’t give him up to the authorities.

“ I did not avoid the draft,” Mike told me. “I ran head-first into the draft. I attacked my draft board.” Now living in the San Francisco Bay Area, Mike continues to participate in antiwar protests, including recent actions against arms shipments to Israel.

Around the time of the Buffalo trial, Sally Hamlin and Betsy Feltham moved to a Catholic Worker house in Niagara Falls. Feeding, clothing, and housing the poor were their top priorities, but within weeks of the five raiders being set free by Judge Curtin, Sally said, “a few of us drove to Chicago.” Jim Good went, too. The crew decided to hit draft boards in Evanston and Cicero.

The raids went off without a hitch, except that a getaway driver had backed out at the last minute. The replacement driver allowed Jim to use her typewriter to draft the statement of responsibility, which her paranoid boss discovered when he went through her trash and found the discarded typewriter tape. After successfully avoiding arrest for the Batavia raid, Sally served ninety days in jail for the Evanston action. Her arrest and conviction put her at odds with her family. “ My dad said, ‘You were a thorn in my side.’ He told me he didn’t wanna see me anymore,” she said. But it didn’t last: “In the end, he told me, ‘You kids were right.’ ”

Sally stayed in countercultural circles for several years before moving with her husband to Vancouver, British Columbia, and becoming a nurse and a mother. When the last of her kids was out of the house, the girl who heard God’s voice in grade school quit her job, sold everything she owned, and used the money to pay for seminary. She became a Unitarian Universalist minister at the age of 51 and has served several congregations in western New York.

In addition to being a chief organizer of multiple raids in western New York and the Chicago area, Jim Good pulled off at least one more draft board action, which ended with a sack of files floating down the Cuyahoga River in Ohio. “It wasn’t like we were gonna close the war down just by destroying a few draft records,” Jim said, but it felt important “to let the government know that there are people who are seriously opposed to this war and are willing to take the risk to demonstrate that.” Jim eventually became a carpenter and now lives on the Big Island of Hawaii with his husband. (His brother Bob and the rest of the Camden raiders also went free following a sensational 1973 trial.)

Today there’s no comprehensive list of all the draft board actions that took place across the country, but there were at least several dozen, and possibly more than one hundred. They took place in Providence, Rhode Island; Pasadena, California; and many places in between. Their impact is hard to quantify, but it’s possible that hundreds of thousands of files were liberated or destroyed. Even disrupted raids like the Old Post Office break-in hamstrung individual draft boards and drew public attention to the antiwar cause.

When the draft ended in early 1973, it was a victory for the peace movement, but it also provided political cover for Nixon and Henry Kissinger to intensify bombing in Southeast Asia, particularly Cambodia. Some people believe that the antiwar movement died with the draft; the American public could more easily tune out what the government was doing overseas, particularly as new technologies allowed the U.S. to wage war with fewer boots on the ground. Meanwhile, the proliferation of surveillance technologies made resistance actions like the draft board raids much harder to pull off.

Still, if there’s one thing the Buffalo activists know, it’s that peace is a lifelong cause. You have to keep fighting for it, however you can.

After retiring from draft board raids, Jim Good helped some friends open a drop-in center for peace organizing in an abandoned storefront in downtown Buffalo. Over the next five decades, he mellowed a bit, but his commitment to civil disobedience remained ironclad. “People should be willing to call out our government, our military, our businesses, when they’re out of line,” Jim said. “And they are, most of the time.”


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

Master and Commander

MASTER
AND
COMMANDER


When a scraggly band of folk musicians arrived to tour the UK, residents of a small Welsh town were enamored—until they learned that the bands leader ruled with an iron fist.

By Peter Ward

The Atavist Magazine, No. 172


Peter Ward’s writing has appeared in GQ, The Atlantic, Wired, The Guardian, and other publications. He explored the privatization of space in his first book, The Consequential Frontier, and reported on billionaires and biohackers pursuing eternal life in his second, The Price of Immortality. He lives in the United Kingdom.

Editor: Jonah Ogles
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Marta Campabadal Graus
Illustrator: Patrik Svensson

Published in February 2026.


1.

Come all you young sailormen, listen to me
I’ll sing you a song of the fish in the sea, and it’s
Windy weather, boys, stormy weather, boys
When the wind blows were all together, boys
—“Fish in the Sea,” Scottish fisherman’s shanty

As dawn broke on a crisp morning in May 2021, two large passenger vans pulled into the cobbled square of Caerwys, a town in North Wales. The vehicles parked outside Hereford House, a grand Victorian-era building, and a mass of figures emerged sleepily, lugging suitcases and mountains of musical equipment. They were bearded and bedraggled, outsiders in Caerwys, which has fewer than a thousand inhabitants, most of them elderly. Caerwys, like many small towns in the United Kingdom, is the kind of place where curtains twitch, gossip thrives, and news travels abnormally fast. Residents near Hereford House who spied the visitors that morning may have wondered what their arrival portended for the town.

By the afternoon, an answer was pouring into the square: the sounds of whistles and bagpipes, drums and fiddles, lively disruptions to the town’s usual peace. The visitors were lodging at Hereford House and also using its ground floor as a practice space. They were musicians in a band called the Old Time Sailors, from Argentina, and they were embarking on their first UK tour.

Erica Burney lived just off the town square. A singer who performed locally, she also ran a catering business out of On the Corner Café, a Caerwys eatery. Soon after the band arrived, Burney ran into Russ Williams, the landlord of Hereford House. He told her a terrible tale: The band had endured a nightmare journey from South America to Europe. Pandemic restrictions had forced them to detour to Turkey and then Albania, and they’d arrived months later than planned. In addition to the gigs they’d missed from the delay, their tour faced continuing restrictions on indoor gatherings, causing pubs to close and forcing live entertainment outdoors. Williams asked: Could Burney help them? Drum up some goodwill and publicity?

He introduced her to the band’s leader, Nicolás Andrés Guzmán. Tall and powerfully built, with jet-black hair, a voluminous beard, and a slickly styled mustache, Guzmán oversaw a crew of seventeen musicians. To them he was the Captain. During the band’s performances he played the accordion. When Burney expressed sympathy for the problems the band had encountered, Guzmán replied, in near perfect English, that he had instructed lawyers to investigate. That struck Burney as odd. “You’re not fucking U2,” she recalled thinking.

On June 1, Burney met the full band at Hereford House. They wore their performance attire: a white cotton work shirt layered with a vest and a jacket, tucked into either trousers or a kilt, and accessorized with a leather belt, a neckerchief, and a jaunty cap. True to their name, they looked like sailors plucked from a nineteenth-century ship. They played music to match—sea shanties, mostly, dating back hundreds of years.

The band shuffled into place so Burney could take photos and film them playing, then she posted the content to the town’s Facebook page. “So, as some of you will have no doubt heard, we have a merry band of sailors in town!” she wrote. “Of all the places they could have chosen to stay, I hope we can make them glad they chose here.” 

It was strange, this motley group of musicians showing up in Caerwys, cosplaying as seafarers of yore. Strange, that is, if you weren’t on TikTok. The Old Time Sailors were riding the phenomenon known as ShantyTok, which exploded in early 2021, after a Scottish postal worker named Nathan Evans posted a video of himself belting out a traditional shanty and pounding a table in time with the music. The video went viral, and soon other TikTok users were harmonizing with Evans and posting their own shanty covers.

Shanties originated as work songs to accompany repetitive, laborious tasks such as raising sails and lowering anchors, and they’re earworms by design. They have audience-friendly, foot-tapping rhythms—what shall we do with a drunken sailor / early in the morning—and often feature call and response, where a chorus of singers answer a lead vocalist. Media coverage attributed the advent of ShantyTok to the pandemic. “They are unifying, survivalist songs,” one critic wrote, “designed to transform a huge group of people into one collective body.” Trapped at home, staring at their computers and phones, shanties offered people a common, joyful cause.

After a period of enforced isolation in Caerwys to ensure that none of them had COVID, the Old Time Sailors put on their first local show at a glamping venue called Penbedw Estate. They yelled, stomped their feet, and sang at the top of their lungs as roughly fifty people watched and some joined in. The Sailors’ energy was infectious, anarchic. On the town’s Facebook page, one enthusiastic commenter, a fan of shanties well before they took TikTok by storm, declared, “These guys have torn up the rule book!”

The band planned to stay in Caerwys for a few months, using it as a base of operations. Soon they were drinking maté in the square and joining jam sessions with a local band of ukulele players. Friendships formed. One of them was between Alex Sganga, the band’s lead violinist, and Roland Ward, the warden for St. Michael’s Church, an eighth-century stone building that dominates the Caerwys skyline. Ward is my father, and despite previously showing little enthusiasm for popular music beyond the Beach Boys, he regularly sent me photos and videos of the Sailors’ performances. Like others in the community, he quickly developed a passion for the band. “They captured the imagination of people,” he told me. “And the individual band members won them over. Instead of being intruders, they saw them as good musicians—sociable, friendly people.”

Griffith sensed tension between the band members and Guzmán, and he noticed that the individual Sailors seemed to be scraping by. “They had nothing,” he said.

My dad invited Sganga to perform a solo concert of Irish and Argentinean folk music before his packed church, then organized another show for the whole band at Penbedw Estate. This time there were more than three hundred attendees, each of whom paid ten pounds (about $15) to be there. The profits would be used for building repairs at St. Michael’s.

My father was so enamored of the band that he persuaded a national TV station to send a camera crew and reporter to the Penbedw show. But as they set up their equipment for interviews, Guzmán was nowhere to be found. According to my dad, when he called the Captain on his cell phone, he was defensive, speaking as if the televised gig were being forced upon him. Guzmán finally showed up to be filmed, but he replied to questions hesitantly, like he didn’t speak English well.

Steve Griffith, a grizzled former detective enjoying a peaceful retirement in Caerwys, was one of the Sailors’ biggest fans and a member of the ukulele band that sometimes played with them. Like my dad, he helped them book shows. “As we got to know them a bit more, we were finding out that the majority of them were classically trained musicians,” Griffith said. “They were something else.” Yet Griffith also felt as if the musicians “were guarding something.” He sensed tension between the band members and Guzmán, and he noticed that the individual Sailors seemed to be scraping by. “They had nothing,” he said.

A few weeks into the Sailors’ stay in Caerwys, the UK’s pandemic restrictions eased, which allowed the band to book shows across the country. They were soon gone six nights a week, and sometimes played two shows a day. The shows were dynamic, sweaty affairs that left the musicians exhausted. From the windows of her home, Burney noticed that they almost always returned in the early-morning hours. The grueling schedule was made all the more so, according to several former band members, by Guzmán’s insistence that they practice for long hours when they were in Caerwys.

One evening that August, Burney visited Hereford House and sang with the band during a rehearsal. From across the room, she locked eyes with a man playing two small drums, named Jorge Fernández. (The Atavist is using a pseudonym for this individual out of concern for his safety.) When the rehearsal ended, Fernández grabbed his guitar and asked Burney if she would sing just for him. He strummed a Nat King Cole song, which she knew well: Smile, though your heart is aching / Smile, even though it’s breaking. Fernández told me he thought Burney was “a siren, the most beautiful girl in the village.”

Burney invited Fernández and his bandmate Claudio Toscanini over to her house. They drank, smoked weed, sang, and talked, until Fernández told Toscanini to make his excuses and leave. Toscanini returned a short time later bearing a message from Guzmán: Fernández was out too late and had to return to Hereford House. Burney thought the message was strange, but Fernández paid it no heed. “He told him to fuck off and we had a snog,” Burney said.

She later learned that Guzmán had strict rules for the band. Fernández had violated a nightly curfew, after which band members weren’t even supposed to leave their rooms at Hereford House to go to the toilet. There was also a prohibition on romantic attachments within the band while on tour. The latter was a rule that, according to multiple sources, Guzmán himself didn’t seem to follow. Eighteen-year-old Lola Weschler, a singer and bodhran player, was the band’s only female member and appeared to be Guzmán’s girlfriend—despite his introduction of another woman, who designed the band’s promotional materials, as his wife. Weschler’s father, Daniel, was also in the band and texted Guzmán one day when he was looking for his daughter. “Tell Lola to turn on her cell phone so I can call her,” he wrote in Spanish in a message that was later shared with me. Guzmán sent a string of short, angry replies. “Dani, I’m fucking,” he wrote. “Don’t call out of nowhere, dude. Don’t be annoying.” (When I reached out to Guzmán for an interview, he refused to speak with me, threatened legal action, and blocked my number. He later declined to answer detailed fact-checking questions on the record.)

Money was the biggest source of conflict between the Sailors and the Captain. When recruiting musicians in Argentina, Guzmán had allegedly promised them up to $600 per month for the UK tour, though band members told me that rates varied and Guzmán refused to draft official contracts. Most of the Sailors paid for their own transatlantic plane tickets, a big expenditure for gig musicians. They said they were told that they would eventually be reimbursed, but once the band was in Caerwys, Guzmán was slow to issue payments of any kind.

Guitarist Matías Vergara told me he threatened to quit after he learned that he would only get half the money he was promised when he joined the band in Buenos Aires. He and Guzmán argued about the payment until, according to Vergara, Guzmán kicked him out of the Sailors. Vergara stayed with Steve Griffith, with whom he’d become friendly, for a week before leaving the UK. “Mati was quite upset about it all,” Griffith said. “This guy was just driving them into the ground.”

Before Vergara flew home, he got a voice message from Guzmán, which was later shared with me. “If I see you in Caerwys, I will beat you to death,” Guzmán said. “I’m not exaggerating. Don’t get close to me, because I’ll murder you.”

As Guzmán was losing band members, he also gained a photographer. Lizzie Ferdinando was a mainstay of the British pirate community, a niche social circle of people who don eyepatches and tricorn hats and meet up to drink beer and listen to folk music. Think Renaissance fairs but for pirate fans. The biggest events draw thousands of revelers. In 2012, more than fourteen thousand people in the town of Hastings set the Guinness World Record for the largest single gathering of pirates.

Ferdinando saw the Old Time Sailors for the first time at a July 2021 gig, and she fell in love with the band. “They put on a really good show,” she said. She talked to Guzmán about becoming the band’s full-time photographer and was so enthralled that she offered to do so without pay. The Captain said she’d need to move to Caerwys, because the band couldn’t pick her up every time they had a show. In early fall, Ferdinando moved into Hereford House.

She soon became concerned with the way the band were living. They worked hard, ate little, barely slept, and seemed utterly depleted. Several members told her that Guzmán had yet to pay them the wages they were owed. She could quit and go home at any time, but for most of the Sailors that wasn’t so easy. Flights to Argentina were expensive. The musicians didn’t have savings they could tap into or families with the means to help them. They were effectively trapped in a foreign country and wholly dependent on a man who allegedly wouldn’t pay them. Ferdinando began to wonder if Guzmán might be in violation of UK labor laws. “I said, I’ve got to stick October out to get, if nothing else, just all the evidence of what’s going on,” she told me. October was the final month of the tour.

One day, as Marcelo Salusky was playing his double bass at a gig, he began to feel faint. Back in Caerwys, he stayed in bed for two days. When he showed no signs of improvement, he was taken to the hospital and diagnosed with COVID and a lung infection. He was given antibiotics and told to rest, but he was back on stage three days later. When Fernández came down with a fever and cough, which turned out to be symptoms of COVID, he wanted to stay at Burney’s to convalesce, but according to Fernández, Guzmán wouldn’t allow it. Fernández said the Captain yelled at him for getting sick.

On October 28, the band performed their last show of the tour. It was in Caerwys, at the town hall, an old brick building crammed between modest homes. The community turned out in force to bid farewell to their guests. The ukulele group performed, as did Burney, and videos posted to the town’s Facebook page toasted the Sailors’ talents. Many locals hoped they would return the following year for another tour.

Despite performing alongside the Sailors, Burney quietly seethed over the way Guzmán treated the band, and Fernández in particular. The couple agreed not to confront the Captain, preferring to keep matters friendly until Fernández had secured his salary, even though that went against Burney’s fiery instincts. “I sent Nicholas a lovely message at the end of the tour saying, ‘I admire what you’ve done, blah, blah, blah,’ because I wanted Jorge to get his fucking money,” Burney said. But according to Fernández, that never happened.

2.

Now the Captain’s a wicked man
He gets drunk whenever he can
And he don’t give a damn for grandpappy and me
He kicks us around
And he knocks us about
Well I feel so broke up, I want to go home
—“Sloop John B.,” Bahamian folk song

The exact origins of the Old Time Sailors are hard to pin down. Some people I spoke to said Guzmán started the group. Others said he took it over. Guzmán’s own history is also shrouded in mystery. According to differing accounts, he holds a degree in psychology, lived in the United States for years, married an actress, and once considered suicide before the sound of Irish folk music gave his life meaning. Several former band members feared repercussions for talking to me, believing Guzmán had political or underworld connections that could make their lives in Argentina difficult. I found no conclusive evidence of such ties and began to wonder if the tales originated with Guzmán himself.

What’s certain is that many of the early band members had a background in Celtic folk music, and they wanted to go on the UK tour because the money they were promised was good. Argentina has been in financial crisis for the better part of a decade. Between 2017 and 2020, the country’s GDP plummeted and inflation soared. Amid economic uncertainty made worse by the pandemic, Guzmán offered musicians a steady, well-paying gig—and in Europe, no less.

But three musicians from the 2021 tour went on to file lawsuits against Guzmán, alleging that he failed to pay them and exploited their labor. The plaintiffs were Marcelo Salusky, the bass player who got sick; Daniel Weschler, Lola’s father; and Alberto Lamberti, a mandolin player. In his lawsuit, Lamberti claimed that Guzmán owed him $2,800 in wages, or about 80 percent of Argentina’s average household income in 2021. Lamberti told me that the UK tour “destroyed” him. He spent six months performing, rehearsing, and abiding by bizarrely draconian rules—one being that the musicians should brush their teeth three times a day—and had virtually nothing to show for it. “I lost my faith in humanity,” Lamberti said.

“Mr. Guzmán, more than anything, rigorously commanded—and in writing—when and how to go to the bathroom, with whom they could speak and with whom they could not, what they could eat, what they could not,” Weschler’s lawsuit reads. “Moreover, he insulted the musicians, with denigrating statements and constant threats to the plaintiff at the slightest dissent.”

Fernández didn’t file a suit against Guzmán, but he told me that when he inquired about his back wages, Guzmán said his pay was being reduced because he’d contracted COVID. Then Guzmán allegedly said he wouldn’t pay Fernández in full unless he agreed to join the band on its next UK tour, which was slated to begin late in the spring of 2022. Fernández refused.

Ultimately, only four musicians—less than a quarter of the band—signed on again for the 2022 tour. The rest warned friends and colleagues about the Captain, but the pool of talented Argentine musicians in need of money was deep, and Guzmán had no trouble finding new recruits. Fifteen fresh faces joined the Sailors in preparation for their return to the UK. Lucas Ordóñez was one of them.

Ordóñez is a mandolin player, and he was twenty-nine when he saw an ad for musicians posted by the Sailors. He liked their music and was intrigued by the idea of traveling internationally. Guzmán warned him that the tour would be intense. He said Ordóñez would need to master more than a hundred songs in preparation. Ordóñez, a respected folk musician in Buenos Aires, relished the challenge. The pay enticed him even further. The financial arrangements varied, but most musicians were again offered $600 per month, plus food and accommodation. Like their predecessors, Ordóñez and his bandmates would need to pay for their flights. Guzmán allegedly described this as insurance against people abandoning the group when they arrived in the UK, and said that the musicians would eventually be reimbursed.

In March 2022, Ordóñez received his first $600 payment. It was a good wage for almost anyone in Argentina, and an excellent one for a musician. Then, just prior to departure, the band members were presented with a contract, which contained more than financial terms. It had a list of rules, and the consequences for breaking them were explained in full. After an initial warning, band members found to be violating the rules would be docked 5 percent of their total income for the tour. Further violations could incur a punishment of up to 50 percent and even expulsion from the group. One rule stated that the musicians could not “play in the village church,” referring to St. Michael’s, where Sganga had performed the previous year. Another directive had to do with Ferdinando, the British photographer, presumably as a result of her refusal to remove the watermark from the photos she’d taken on the 2021 tour because of Guzmán’s alleged treatment of the musicians. Band members were instructed not to “have any type of communication, whether in person, through networks, letters, email, telephone, and others, with Lizzie Ferdinando.” The same proscription applied to former members of the band.

According to the musicians I spoke to, they’d already bought their plane tickets by the time they received the contract, and felt they had little choice but to sign. Along with everything else in the document, they agreed to not “contradict the Captain in public” or “speak badly of ‘Old Time Sailors,’ or of any band member, including the Captain.”

Meanwhile, in Caerwys, locals were gearing up for the band’s arrival, but not in the joyful spirit of the sendoff from the previous fall. During the months the Sailors had been away, residents who were close to the musicians had told their neighbors about what they saw as Guzmán’s ill treatment of the band. Some people said that they’d boycott the Sailors’ shows. Steve Griffith went so far as to contact the UK Border Agency, hoping that the government would block the band’s entry into the country—he alleged that Guzmán had brought in the last bunch of musicians on tourist visas when they should have had work papers. “I got really disillusioned with the authorities here, because I phoned them—it wasn’t just once, I phoned them on a number of occasions,” Griffith recalled. He also suggested that Russ Williams cancel the band’s booking at Hereford House, but Williams said he hated the thought of breaking an agreement. And when Griffith asked former band members to make written statements about their experiences the previous year, hoping he might furnish them to UK authorities, they refused. “They were all too bloody scared of him,” Griffith said.

When the 2022 Sailors arrived in Caerwys, Griffith vowed to keep an eye out for evidence that Guzmán was exploiting the musicians. Erica Burney did the same. When she saw Lola Weschler, one of the few musicians from the previous tour to come back, she was immediately concerned. She was “painfully thin,” with “sunken eyes,” Burney said. “You know when you look at a girl if she’s miserable. And it was clear she was miserable.” Burney heard from a former band member that Weschler’s father, Daniel, feared for his daughter’s safety, because Lola was allegedly still in a relationship with Guzmán.

Burney took photos of the license plates on the band’s vans, hoping they might help law enforcement track the Sailors’ movements if Guzmán were ever investigated. While scoping out the vehicles, Burney was surprised to see a new addition to the band’s fleet: a large motor home. She later learned that it was apparently for Guzmán’s exclusive use, a place for him to sleep when the band traveled.

Unlike the first tour, the Sailors didn’t return to Caerwys each night after a gig. They often slept in their vans while parked at service stations, or in the open air on the side of the road. Some of them used sleeping bags and tents. Ordóñez was shocked by the conditions, which he said left the musicians exposed. “I remember hugging my mandolin while I slept,” he told me, “so that when I woke up in the morning, it would still be there.”

Before long, the Sailors decamped from Caerwys entirely, shifting their base of operations twenty miles west to Old Colwyn, where a friend of Guzmán’s lived. After the move, according to Ordóñez, the band’s situation deteriorated further. Their meals, which were prepared by a member of Guzmán’s inner circle in the band, had been meager to begin with. After the move, Ordóñez said, they were often served cold, and the portions shrank.

To make matters worse, the rules in the contract the musicians had signed stated that they could not “take food from the refrigerator outside of the assigned meal times.” As a result, the musicians were constantly hungry. Ordóñez told me that there were times he begged strangers for food. Several musicians fell ill from the exhausting performance schedule. Ordóñez recalled playing a show in Cardiff with a fever of 105 degrees. “It was as if they were testing how far we could go, constantly pushing the limits of the human body,” he said.

Ordóñez developed a reputation as a troublemaker, questioning Guzmán’s orders and raising concerns about the band’s living conditions. According to a lawsuit Ordóñez later filed in Argentina, when he sought payment after the first month of the tour, Guzmán attempted to hit him and yelled at him in front of his bandmates.

Then one night, Guzmán gathered the entire band in a circle for what Ordóñez called “a sailor’s tribunal.” According to band members who were present, it was essentially a shaming exercise dressed up as old-school maritime justice, hearkening back to a time when captains were judge and jury over the men under their command. Guzmán allegedly described Ordóñez’s infractions, and other accusers joined him. They were so-called “core members” of the Sailors, all close with the Captain, and they allegedly received special privileges and snitched on musicians who violated Guzmán’s rules. Now they pointed the finger at Ordóñez. “Psychologically, it was very troubling,” Ordóñez said. “They accused me of all sorts of things—of stealing food, of disrespecting others, of being violent.”

According to two other band members who were present that night, the core members also declared their devotion to Guzmán. One stood up and announced he would “suck Nick’s dick if he asked me to.” A silence fell over the group as the man sat back down.

Eventually, Guzmán issued a verdict: Ordóñez would no longer be informed of the band’s schedule. He would have to go where he was taken, no questions asked. From that point on, according to Ordóñez, he rarely knew where in the UK he was or where he was going next. He told me that even the drivers of the vans wouldn’t tell him. “I was kidnapped,” he said. Like the majority of the band, Ordóñez had a cell phone, but he couldn’t afford the UK’s data rates, and he was never able to connect to Wi-Fi long enough to learn where he was.

Ordóñez knew he needed someone with the means and the know-how, someone who spoke fluent English, to extricate him from the Sailors. He managed to reach out to former band members in Argentina, who in turn got in touch with Lizzie Ferdinando. She offered to help. The Hastings Pirate Festival was coming up, and the Sailors were scheduled to perform there. Ferdinando planned to locate Ordóñez at the festival and offer her aid.

The Hastings festival is a raucous scene. In addition to drunken merriment, people perform elaborate reenactments of sea battles, with cutlass-carrying pirates firing cannons from replicas of seventeenth-century ships. Attendees tend to dress as swashbucklers in the vein of Jack Sparrow from Pirates of the Caribbean, or as characters from the popular Starz show Black Sails. Ferdinando went another route, one that would fully conceal her identity.

Ordóñez was standing in a plaza where the band had just played when a woman approached him. She was wearing a furry, snub-nosed mask resembling a pug, along with a black pirate hat. “I’m Lizzie,” she said. “I’m here to help you.” Ordóñez had never met Ferdinando, and before he could learn who she was, several other band members walked over. So did Guzmán. Ferdinando wasn’t sure whether he recognized her; if he did, he didn’t let on. She made a quick exit, because she didn’t want Ordóñez to get in trouble for speaking to her.

Other people tried to assist the musicians. In Caerwys, residents were still concerned about the former tenants of Hereford House. Armed with photos of license plates, testimonies from former band members, and even a screenshot of Guzmán’s passport she’d managed to obtain, Burney called a national hotline for suspected cases of modern slavery. The hotline was an outgrowth of the Modern Slavery Act of 2015, heralded as one of the most progressive laws of its kind in Europe. Few reports, however, result in convictions—only around 2 percent. Alleged victims are often wary of testifying. But victims were exactly what the woman who answered the hotline told Burney she needed. For the state to investigate Guzmán, it required testimony. Band members would have to come forward. Burney explained why this would be difficult if not impossible for the musicians. The woman told her there was little she could do. To Burney, it felt like “no one wanted to help.”

Ferdinando had also called the modern slavery hotline, shortly after the 2021 tour ended, on behalf of the musicians in the band. She said the authorities’ response had been similarly underwhelming. The calls may have piqued law enforcement’s interest, however. According to Ordóñez and other musicians, as the 2022 tour continued, police stopped the band’s vehicles on several occasions and asked whether the musicians considered themselves victims of exploitation. No one stepped forward—several band members told me they were afraid of Guzmán, afraid of being deported, afraid of never getting paid.

When Ordóñez and another musician finally decided to cut their losses and abandon the band after a gig, they had their own run-in with law enforcement in the town of Shrewsbury, where they were detained on suspicion of immigration violations. Ordóñez tried to explain what was happening inside the band but suspects the police had trouble understanding his English. He also wondered whether Guzmán had something to do with his detention. Perhaps the Captain wanted revenge for Ordóñez’s early departure from the band.

After they were released from custody, Ordóñez and his bandmate decided to do odd jobs until they earned enough money to go home. They weren’t the only ones to escape: Around the same time, Lola Weschler fled the band. According to several ex-members of the Sailors, Guzmán could be aggressive toward Weschler, screaming at her until she cried. The people who helped her get out asked that I not reveal any details about how they did it, out of concern for their and especially Weschler’s safety. “There were good moments that had nice colors and bad moments that felt like hell,” Weschler wrote me of her time in the Sailors. “I felt broken inside.”

Once he was back in Argentina, Ordóñez filed his lawsuit against Guzmán, accusing him of withholding payment and demanding compensation for physical and psychological harm. He also began referring to the Sailors as a cult. “People developed a kind of devotion toward [Guzmán], like he was an ideal to be worshipped,” he said. “He manipulated people until they were entirely dependent on him, and it became increasingly dangerous.”

The Sailors lived on, and the same pattern repeated itself. When the 2022 tour ended, Guzmán recruited new musicians in Argentina to return to the UK the following spring. This time the band stayed in a shed-like structure without a bathroom in Devon. A video shared on Facebook by one of the musicians shows thin mattresses laid on a concrete floor. The caption describes how “the rats came to visit us at night,” and asserts that the band members were only given a plate of noodles to eat each day. According to musicians I interviewed, they received a third of the wages Guzmán had offered them. But as the band suffered behind the scenes, their music was more popular than ever. The Sailors’ packed schedule that year included several sets at the popular Glastonbury Festival.

When the tour wrapped, Guzmán was already looking ahead to 2024. By then Burney had realized that she’d have to bide her time if she wanted to see justice. The Captain “had to get so arrogant,” she said, “that he was going to make a stupid mistake.”

3.

I hate to sail on this rotten tub
Leave her Johnny, leave her
No grog allowed and rotten grub
And it’s time for us to leave her
Leave her Johnny, leave her
Oh leave her Johnny, leave her
For the voyage is long and the winds don’t blow
And it’s time for us to leave her
—“Leave Her Johnny,” a traditional sea shanty

Amy Harrison was a 26-year-old actress struggling to find work in London when she saw an Instagram post announcing that the Old Time Sailors were looking for singers for their 2024 UK tour. She figured she’d audition; she had nothing to lose. “I’ve been rejected from all these other things, so let’s just get rejected from a shanty band as well and then we’ll have a funny story to tell,” Harrison told me.

When she first spoke with Guzmán, on a video call, he gave her a familiar spiel: The band required hard work and played many gigs. Was she up for that? According to Harrison, the Captain also said she would have to travel to Argentina for rehearsals at her own expense, but that she would be reimbursed at the end of the tour. Harrison said that all sounded fine, sent along three recorded songs as her audition, and found herself on a plane to Buenos Aires in January 2024.

Diego Silvero was another recruit for the tour. The singer from Argentina had a wide range of interests—he sang opera as well as heavy metal—and taught music when he wasn’t performing. When he first met Guzmán, he was dazzled by talk of major festivals such as Glastonbury. “I was like, ‘That’s my dream, man,’ ” he said. Other new members included Franco Galante, a singer and musician with a boyish face, and Tana Abel, who quit his job as a systems engineer to play in the band. 

According to Silvero, Galante, Abel, and other musicians, rehearsals for the 2024 tour lasted up to ten hours each day. The band would practice without its leader for several hours, then Guzmán would arrive for the final stretch. He’d listen to a handful of songs and, as if channeling J. K. Simmons in the film Whiplash, pick a musician and accuse them of being out of tune, off-tempo, lazy, or stupid. Allegedly he sometimes used homophobic or racist insults. Silvero said he was a frequent target of Guzmán’s attacks. The Captain told him he was too fat to stand at the front of the stage and disparaged his musical talent.

Harrison couldn’t understand what Guzmán said in the rehearsals—she didn’t speak Spanish—but she found herself frustrated nonetheless. The harmonies she was supposed to sing were written for a soprano, and she was an alto. Her dyslexia made it hard for her to pick up all the lyrics. And according to Harrison, Guzmán said strange things to her. “I’m going to make you cry,” he told her once, adding that he wouldn’t try to sleep with her because he no longer dated European women. Harrison wasn’t happy, but it would be embarrassing to return home without the job she’d flown to Argentina for, so she knuckled down and kept rehearsing.

Prior to the band’s departure for the UK in April, Guzmán organized the musicians into small groups. Each was allegedly told to take a different flight and book accommodations that could be canceled without paying a fee. According to multiple musicians I spoke to, everyone had return tickets dated three weeks after their arrival, which they planned to change once they were in the UK. Guzmán allegedly instructed the band members to tell border officials they were on vacation and visiting friends. Abel was shocked. “What the fuck is going on here?” he remembered thinking. “I never knew that I was going to work illegally.”

Once the band was in the country, they made their way to that year’s lodgings: three large stationary RVs set up near a barn outside the town of Tavistock. The bathrooms and showers were in what looked like a converted cargo container. Lights strung outside gave the place a bohemian feel. But the shine wore off quickly. “The place wasn’t OK for living,” Abel told me. “It was full of rats. Diseases, obviously. And next to the barn, there was the place where the cows are stored. There was cow shit everywhere.” 

The Captain had his own camper van that he shared with his new girlfriend, a musician whom he reportedly showered with expensive gifts, and whose harp, which was used in only a few of the band’s songs, took up precious cargo space when the Sailors traveled to gigs. The other members were assigned to the RVs—as many as nine in each. In one, Galante slept on the sofa, while Harrison had her own small room.

The new recruits experienced what musicians from previous years had reported: deprivations, bullying, exhaustion. Around a month and a half into the tour, according to Galante, the Captain learned about a flippant comment Galante had made about his girlfriend’s harp—Galante had said it cost more than his salary. The next day, Guzmán sent a long message to the band’s WhatsApp group chat, saying that he didn’t need to justify how he spent his money to “Little Franco.” An argument ensued at the camp. According to several musicians, Abel sided with Galante and told Guzmán he was mistreating the band. In response, several of the Captain’s allies berated Abel and accused him of being ungrateful.

The musicians turned on one another, reporting trivial offenses like, say, not washing their dishes, speaking ill of another band member, or arriving late to rehearsal.

The next day, Abel, Galante, and Silvero, who’d supported his bandmates in the argument, were summoned one by one for a meeting with Guzmán. They were allegedly told that if they wanted to stay in the band, they would need to type out an apology, send it to one of the band’s core members for approval, and then post it to WhatsApp. Faced with the prospect of never getting paid, and of being stranded in the UK, they all complied. 

Galante’s difficulties weren’t over. He and Harrison had grown close. Despite Guzmán’s ban on dating within the band, on a rare night off from performing, after watching a movie together, “stuff happened” with Harrison, Galante told me. Guzmán soon became suspicious of their relationship, so he moved Galante to a different RV and allegedly told Harrison he’d kick Galante out of the group if they continued talking. Undeterred, Galante would squeeze through a small window into Harrison’s room in the RV so they could spend the night together. After another band member spotted Galante at Harrison’s window and told Guzmán, the Captain questioned Harrison. She said Galante was just bringing her candy.

In July, Guzmán wrote Harrison an email asking her to apologize for staying in London after a show to see friends. An exchange ensued, which quickly turned to the topic of Harrison’s relationship with Galante. Harrison said she had feelings for Galante but stopped short of admitting they were dating. Hoping to deflect suspicion, she apologized. “I’m so sorry for this, as I got carried away with my emotions, and I was selfish and not thinking of the band,” she wrote. “I really want to make it right.” Guzmán rejected her apology, claiming it wasn’t specific enough. “Feelings don’t develop unless one develops them,” he wrote. “You make it seem as an act of god when it wasn’t ever that. Flirting comes before feelings. Basic biology.” He signed the email “Cap’n Nick.”

Harrison considered leaving, but the Sailors were scheduled to open for a popular English band the following week, and her parents and a family friend were planning to be there. What’s more, she told me, “I still thought it was important for my career.” Harrison stayed on and broke things off with Galante.

Around the same time, Guzmán introduced the musicians to what he called the “distinctions” system. It was, musicians told me, a way of alternately rewarding and punishing their behavior. The Captain even created fake bank notes featuring a cartoon image of his own face, stamped with the phrase “In Poseidon We Trust.” The money, he allegedly told the band, could be earned by good behavior or by reporting fellow Sailors who broke his rules. The fake currency could be exchanged at the end of the tour for real money, or spent on beers and snacks at gigs. 

By then, most of the band members were broke and desperate to eat something other than guiso, an Argentinean stew made by the vat that was allegedly the Sailors’ only meal most days—that is, when it didn’t spoil in the heat during van rides. The musicians turned on one another, reporting trivial offenses like, say, not washing their dishes, speaking ill of another band member, or arriving late to rehearsal. A culture of paranoia developed. “You didn’t know who you could trust at that point,” Harrison told me. “You were looking around to see if somebody was trying to take a photo or a video of you. You didn’t know what, but at any point you could be doing something wrong and you could be penalized for it.”

In the second week of August, Galante was riding home from a gig with the band’s sound and lighting team when Emanuel Vázquez started talking to a fellow technician about standing up to Guzmán. Galante chimed in. “You need to be a warrior, otherwise dragons will eat you,” he said. Vázquez joked that if Guzmán didn’t pay him there would be consequences. The bandmates laughed.

Within minutes, Vázquez and Galante were notified that they’d been removed from the band’s group chat. Vázquez was then promptly abandoned at a service station, where he messaged Galante to tell him that a core member of the band had recorded their conversation and sent it to Guzmán. Vázquez had been fired.

When Harrison found out, she frantically contacted friends and family, hoping to find a place where Vázquez could stay. “I just couldn’t believe what was happening,” she said. She felt like she was in “the middle of hell.”

Galante wasn’t left on the roadside, but the next morning Guzmán summoned him to a meeting. According to Galante, core members stood around him in a circle as the Captain told him he was being let go. He was taken to a train station with his suitcase, where he messaged Harrison and asked if he could stay with her parents. He had no money, so it was either that or live on the street until he figured out how to earn enough to return to Argentina.

Harrison called her parents, leaving a tearful voicemail. They agreed to help but also told her they were worried about her. They could tell how anxious she was. “Once Franco got kicked out, I think he was my safety—what kept me going in the band,” Harrison told me. “I was scared of what would happen.” She worried Guzmán might become violent toward her.

The next day, she went to see the Captain in his motor home. She had already decided to quit, but she wanted to record their conversation as evidence of how he treated musicians. She later shared the recording with me. Over forty minutes, Guzmán criticized various band members, including Abel, Galante, and Silvero. “Those people,” he said, “they’ve never achieved nothing in life.” At one point, he picked up a copy of the contract that band members had signed. “This is a legal fucking document, with this shit I win a fucking suit,” he said. “Franco signed it, and here it says he can’t fuck you.”

Finally, Harrison informed the Captain that she wanted to quit. Guzmán told Harrison she was missing out on a huge career opportunity by leaving the band. “You literally fell in love with the wrong person,” he told her. “Someday, admit it to yourself, dude. You took away something from yourself, something that was going to be big. This thing is going to grow regardless. It’s going to go far. And you’re missing it because you wanted to shag someone.” Before ending the conversation, he hugged her. “You will always mean a lot to me,” he said. “I’m sorry, I don’t cry, but I mean it. Look at my face, bitch, I mean it.” 

Harrison was dropped at a halfway point between the band’s base near Tavistock and her parents’ home; her father picked her up. She rested for two or three days, then set her mind to taking down Guzmán for good.


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

“That’s Somebody’s Son”

“That’s
Somebody’s
SoN”

Three mothers, one struggle: saving their children with schizophrenia.

By Mary Margaret Alvarado

The Atavist Magazine, No. 171


Mary Margaret Alvarado’s poetry and nonfiction have appeared in The Iowa ReviewThe Kenyon Review, VQR, Outside, and The Georgia Review, among other publications. She is the author of the poetry collection Hey Folly and the nonfiction chapbook American Weather. She lives in Colorado.

Editor: Seyward Darby
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Kyla Jones
Photographer: Rachel Woolf

Published in January 2026


1.

Tracy* was in her basement in Colorado Springs, getting ready to watch a Colorado Avalanche hockey game on a Sunday in June 2022, when she called the coroner’s office in Dallas. Her wife, Jen, was out, so Tracy was alone. The woman at the coroner’s office was kind, Tracy remembers, and slow to confirm which unclaimed bodies were there. Something shifted in their conversation when Tracy described the triangular tattoo on her son’s left forearm. When the woman asked for his dental records, Tracy knew that he had died.

*To protect their privacy, some individuals in this story are identified by their first name only.

Ben’s body had been found face up in a creek in a leafy residential neighborhood on March 9. The autopsy, as Tracy understood it, showed that he had used methamphetamine, which stopped his heart, and that he suffered from exposure. He died held by a tree overhanging the water.

As a child, Ben had been a gifted swimmer who made it to the state championships year after year “without even trying,” Tracy says. “His breaststroke was out of this world.” At meets, before the whistle blew, he’d do the Macarena on the block. It gave Tracy some peace to know that her child had been drawn to the water, that he had wanted to get high, not die; and that, though he did die, at the age of 23, it was in a tranquil place, near a footbridge, beneath trees.

Ben had been a precocious child, who learned to read at age four from old Dick and Jane books. Tracy’s photos show him beautiful and glad, in train-patterned jammies, in OshKosh overalls, in a Sea World wet suit. His childhood in the small riverside town of Salida, Colorado, was sweet and ordinary: elementary school and its birthday parties, even if he was never the first friend invited and was sometimes the last.

Were the signs of his future suffering there all along? Tracy doesn’t know. But Ben would “have a total meltdown,” she said, if Max, his younger brother, “slobbered on his toys.” Certain textures were a problem. He didn’t like to get his hands dirty. When he lost the science fair that “he’d kind of half-assed,” he wasn’t disappointed, he was undone.

In sixth grade, Ben befriended a girl named Emily. She was the first person who ever truly accepted him, he told his mother. Emily was in remission from cancer, but when it returned the next year, she died. Ben told his mom that he could sense his friend’s presence in his room. Then he sensed an evil spirit in his brother’s room.

Maybe he was a medium? He thought he was medium. He’d been watching a show about one in Long Island. Perhaps there were mediums and her child was one. “Heck if I know,” Tracy says.

Tracy is a Gen X athlete, white with a slender build, light-filled blue-green eyes, and a small diamond stud in her nose. She’s quick to see the beauty in other people’s lives. As Ben changed, Tracy did, too. She went back to college to become a probation officer, after being a full-time mother to Ben and Max. Though she was married to their father, Ted, “a good man,” she wasn’t happy. When they separated in 2012, she thought she might be gay. She soon met Jen, who lived in Colorado Springs, and the two fell in love.

Meanwhile, Ben struggled to leave the house. His grief for Emily only grew. In seventh grade, he “could not stay organized,” Tracy says. The changes that came with middle school, moving to different classrooms and teachers—they overwhelmed him. This child who had always been known as uncommonly intelligent, and who cherished that identity, began to get B’s, then C’s. By the end of the eighth grade, Ben—now out as gay—was flunking every class.

Tracy was coaching volleyball, working full-time, and going through a divorce. She was living check to check but felt too ashamed to ask for help.

In August 2013, she started working in Springs, as she calls it. Her two kids went back and forth between her place and their dad’s. On October 29, she got a call from her ex in Salida. Something was very wrong with Ben. Tracy drove midway to Cañon City, a town known for its rock climbing and supermax prison, to pick up her son. He looked sick to her: pale and too thin. “He was so dehydrated that his lip was split open and bleeding,” Tracy says. He had just turned 15.

Something was trying to get into Ben’s body. That’s what he’d woken his father in the middle of the night, in terror, to say.

Tracy drove Ben to the nearest emergency room, where he was treated for anxiety. He was given Xanax—one of the most prescribed psychotropic medications in the United States—stabilized, and released, but they barely made it through the night. “And now it’s Halloween,” Tracy says, narrating what followed.

She remembers how her child was in the back of the car, holding his shirt up to his shoulders, showing her, begging her. What was trying to get inside of him? What was trying to take his soul?

Tracy took Ben to Cedar Springs, a private psychiatric hospital on a handsome, century-old campus, and he agreed to a stay that would last over a week. In addition to the Xanax, doctors gave him Risperdal, an anti-psychotic. Why would he need that if this was anxiety, Tracy wondered?

Tracy and Ben

In 2012, Ben began taking photos and posting them online: the braided trunk of a money tree, the aquamarine lanes of an outdoor swimming pool, a skillful self-portrait in pencil, kayaks leaning against a wall. “Death is sweet. Death is Life,” one caption reads. “Celtic knot I invented. It never ends,” goes another. More often the descriptions are funny. A picture of a red Solo cup is captioned, “Red solo cup.” A bowl of edamame: “Nothing a little edamame can’t fix.”

Some of the photos are posted under the name Eden Sealwood, which Ben briefly used at school and online. Elsewhere he was Eleanor. At home he was Ben, and remained so all his life. For an Instagram account, showing its owner’s soft blue eyes and elegant Roman nose, he was Benedetto Scango, an Italian form of his given name. Then, in his first semester of college in Gunnison, Colorado, Ben took the unisex Arabic name Nasim, the last name Hefran, and she/her and they/them pronouns.

Ben knew he was queer. There was not enough time of sustained mental health to see how she, he, or they would have flourished and made a life, whether as female and trans, male and gay, or nonbinary. Tracy would have welcomed any of those identities. She speaks of her beloved child as he was to family—as he, Ben, him. But she brightens to think of Ben as her daughter, someone she never had the chance to really know. Maybe Nasim was a “trailblazer,” Tracy says, early and brave.

“On our way to Mauii!” reads a caption on one of Ben’s pictures, from June 9, 2014. Tracy and Jen were wed on a beach in Hawaii. Photos show them beaming in white dresses, with Jen’s daughter between them, and Ben and Max on either side. But that trip “was a long ten days,” Tracy says. Ben locked himself in a bathroom, terrified of a tsunami and seeking what he always struggled to find: a place to feel safe.

Life at home in the years that followed was sometimes “chaos,” Tracy says, or “hell.”

She took two short phone videos in November 2020, desperate for someone to see what her child was enduring. The lens is close on Ben’s back. He’s dressed in a worn brown waffle shirt with holes along the neck, a talisman he wore often. He is very thin. His hands are raised up, fingers apart. His curly hair is long. He is making a rhythmic and muscular sound of exertion. It’s as if he’s pushing mightily against something, struggling ­­to repel it, to force it away. There is no solace in the sound. It is a sound of agony.

Then words, very quickly, with something like hope: “Jesus hears me.”

Tracy is not religious, and Ben was not raised in any church, but like many people who have experienced the crucible of profound mental illness, he called out for language and meaning older and more encompassing than what the medical models offer.

The bracing work begins again. Ben turns to his mother after another grievous bout and looks relieved. “I barely did it. I barely did it.”

“You did it,” Tracy says, her voice calm and encouraging.

Then, “Oh, my God!” Ben wails. “I touched my hands together.”

Ben is sure that if he touches his hands together, he will lose his soul. So in addition to all the other effort, there is this: He has to keep his hands apart.

“Well, don’t do that,” Tracy says, matter-of-fact. “Don’t touch your hands together.”

The quality of the footage is poor, and the camera is often pointed toward the ceiling—Tracy is filming with one hand, comforting her child tenderly with the other.

Ben says something that can’t be understood. You still have your soul, Tracy reassures him. He needs her to say it again, and in a specific way.

There is the sound of anguished crying, and words that are unclear under the burden of pain.

Then, “No!” he shouts. “I think I just lost my soul!”

“No, you didn’t,” Tracy says. “No, you didn’t.”

The pained sounds begin again, fiercer, louder, more awful.

There’s Tracy’s hand, in the next clip, holding up Ben’s lovely hair.

“Mama, say—” He is crying.

“I swear you have your soul.” Tracy’s voice is calm.

“Mom, promise me.”

“I promise you, you have your soul.”

The crying that follows is softer, like maybe what Tracy said is true.

2.

This is the story of three mothers of three children who were diagnosed in late adolescence or early adulthood with “a polygenetic … heterogenous spectrum of psychotic disorders that are neurodevelopmental and, when not optimally managed, neurodegenerative,” in the words of Dr. Robert Laitman. Or: schizophrenia. The mothers live in the largest city in the U.S. above 6,000 feet. That city is Colorado Springs. It is a place bedecked with blue skies. Sometimes those skies seem to sparkle, and there is a real song of a mountain looking out over the meager offerings of this civilization: strip malls; the Gas & Grass, a gas station chain that sells weed; and the wide roads that lead to them.

“I’m scared of him,” an old friend of Tracy’s said of Ben. “I don’t want anything to do with him.” A colleague told her, “Some people just aren’t meant to be in this world.” Tracy can’t think of a friend she could confide in about her child’s illness, “until, like, Elisabeth.”

Elisabeth is my older sister, and older sister describes her way of being in the world, too. She and Tracy met in the spring of 2020, through a Zoom support meeting run by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) during the COVID shutdown. Tracy remembers that Elisabeth and her husband, Corey, were sitting on their bed. Corey kept getting up and moving around. Elisabeth was crying. Their 16-year-old son, Luc, had a shifting series of mental health diagnoses and a DUI for cannabis, and they needed help.

Tracy told Elisabeth that she was in the system, a probation officer. Elisabeth and Corey were in that system, too, the one that’s supposed to be a “net.” Corey works at a soup kitchen that serves the unhoused, many of them mentally ill. Elisabeth is a nurse practitioner and medical director at a health clinic that primarily serves refugees, and was formerly on a medical team that helped survivors of sexual assault, often in one of the city’s emergency rooms. From their work, Elisabeth and Tracy knew a great many people in common, and they began texting that night.

“He’s hard to reach,” Elisabeth remembers her sister-in-law saying, about Luc. That’s not what anyone would have said of him as a child, when he was an absorbed enthusiast: of hot-air balloons and dinosaurs and all things John Deere. He was a fast little runner and a riveting performer, with beautiful features on his beautiful face. But by early adolescence, Luc did often seem apart while present, “hard to reach.”

What might have been ordinary—a teenager adrift—became alarming. His sixteenth birthday party was just family, no friends. Elisabeth would watch Luc in the yard from the kitchen window, alone on the swing they’d hung for a much younger child. Who was he talking to? There was no one there. What was he laughing at? She couldn’t see.

One day, Luc told his parents that his camera was broken, the Sony a6300 he’d used to take exquisite photographs: of children’s faces at a party; of scenes in a village in Haiti, where his family once lived; of the sand dunes and skies of Colorado. It won’t focus, he said. They took it to a camera shop for him. No, the technician reported back, the camera worked just fine. Perhaps the lens could use a little cleaning?

It was his Mamaw’s birthday in March 2020 when Luc got arrested for the DUI. A few months later, Elisabeth and Corey asked Luc’s grandparents, my parents, for a meeting outside, the four of them in masks. Luc was spitting out or refusing any food Elisabeth cooked, sure that she was poisoning him. He was convinced that his parents were evil. He’d left a piece of paper on the kitchen counter, addressed to no one, to everyone. “Tell them I need to dye my brain pink,” he wrote, “and I need to do soul studying.”

“We’re in trouble,” Elisabeth told our parents. Our father got out a yellow legal pad and began taking notes.

Tracy helped expunge Luc’s record. When his probation officer told Elisabeth that she didn’t like a menacing look Luc had made, Tracy talked to her colleague. “You better be good to Luc,” she said.

Things would get better, and then they would get worse. One evening in the summer after his DUI arrest, Luc broke his wrist when he jumped his father, a gentle man who did not strike back. His mother called the police, like his father would a year later, when Luc was found at midnight starting fires in the driveway with a gas can and lighter fluid.

The door to Luc’s bedroom was removed. His parents installed a lock on theirs. His younger brother and sister got locks and alarms.

It was too painful to grieve. To survive, Elisabeth had to think like a nurse. What would she do if this beloved child, perfectly made, her firstborn, were her patient? She would chart—so that’s what she did, casting herself in the third person. She charted hospitalizations, providers, medications a.m., p.m., and p.r.n. (pro re nata, or as needed). She tracked “medications Luc has tried and failed”—the antipsychotics, SSRIs, non-SSRIs, and stimulants, some of which made him feel low, others as if he were “disassociated from his body.” She remembers being upstairs one day when she heard Luc repeatedly vomiting downstairs. She didn’t know what was wrong, then the next step came to her: When you’re stuck, “you refer, you refer out.” She took him to the ER, where he was diagnosed with lithium toxicity. Elisabeth’s charting practice both helped to save Luc’s life—here was documentation—and made his doctors and nurses uneasy. Why was “Mom” so clinical?

Some notes Elisabeth took:

6/10/21 Probation today. Slept moderate (do we do a scale?). Not angry with anyone, even me when talking to probation. But delayed responses, tangential thinking. Perseverating on breaking into the design industry—not swayed by practicality. Even after Mary at probation explained the importance of doing what is asked in therapy, he still thinks he can alter the plan—it’s not clicking. Not a lot of humor but have seen smiles—almost like responding to internal stimuli at times.…

6/25/21 After lack of sleep and a rougher week—emotionally draining for us, lots to think about for Luc—he seemed catatonic yesterday. You could ask him a question several times and he would just stare at you. Sat on the couch most of the day without moving or responding to everyone around him. 

7/7/21 Luc very agitated—began following Elisabeth around the house calling her “evil” and certain she is “going to hell”—refused to leave E and C’s bedroom and began opening and closing drawers. Corey got home and made Luc go outside—Luc forced his way back in. Called 911.

7/14/21 Worst day of the week for Luc. Suspicious of Mamaw and Dad. Luc reported Corey and Mamaw’s speech as “garbled.” Would not let Corey be within 10 feet of him—concern for manipulation of his mind if Corey got too close. 

There is a record, too, of all the ways Luc tried, while in psychosis, to get out of it. He meditated with an app, a cushion, a Tibetan singing bowl. He joined his Mamaw at breakfast and Mass. He joined his cousins at a swimming pool, even if he needed to stay in a lawn chair off to the side.

Luc attended high school over Zoom during the first year of COVID. His Mamaw and Grandpa Ray took turns helping him with it, as he could not complete the assignments on his own. His Mamaw recalls how they would break often to take a walk and Luc would talk about his plan to live in Iceland. It struck her as “another name for a place too far for his illness to reach.”

One day he told her that he couldn’t talk to her anymore, because she wasn’t his Mamaw. She looked like his Mamaw, he explained, but she had a different voice. “Some being who meant us ill had taken over my body,” she says. “He couldn’t trust it. He needed to go home.”

Luc and Elisabeth

Imagine this: While you are showering, or making your coffee, or listening to music, a voice or several, known or new to you, quiet or very loud, are saying things so vile that you do not want to disturb anyone else with what you are hearing. Those voices are more insistent than the music playing, the coffee brewing, or the water running in the shower. They seem to know you. Now try to think while you’re hearing those voices. Now try to act.

The first time this happened to Luc, he was at his paternal grandparents’ house, playing a video game. He told no one. A year later, when the voices instructed him to strangle his cat, he asked to be committed rather than risk harming the animal in his care. At the hospital, he was prescribed lithium. He got out on Christmas Eve. The next day, at dinner, he could not eat the food on his plate because his hands were shaking, a side effect of the drug.

Elisabeth calls the voices “auditory hallucinations,” language that is medical, accurate, and deprives the symptom of the significance that makes people unkind to those who suffer it, when any of us would buckle under its burden. Sometimes the auditory hallucinations Luc experienced were encouraging, if outsize. Fame was promised; celebrities spoke. He was Jesus. He was going to be bigger than Elon Musk. There would be great and exceptional triumphs. Sometimes the voices were accompanied by a mania that shimmered in Luc, like a house at night with all the lights on. Mostly, though, the auditory hallucinations were wicked, fixated on sexual violence, racist lies, and elaborate and repeated instructions of how to kill oneself.

At Luc’s graduation from an alternative high school, he was one of two students given the Phoenix Award, for rising; the other was homeless. Luc summoned great courage to give a brief speech that day. The whole time he was at the podium, a hallucination was telling him to say the N-word. With great effort, he fought back against what he knew to be evil, and did not say it.

Hallucinations are a characteristic symptom of schizophrenia, but doctors were hesitant to diagnose Luc with the illness—even medical professionals are subject to its stigma. His parents were told that he had drug-induced psychosis, depression, anxiety, ADHD, autism, and bipolar II. “This is not bipolar,” Elisabeth told one psychiatrist. When a different therapist asked Elisabeth and Corey if they had a family history of schizophrenia, they felt a surprising thing: relief.

Elisabeth’s notes about Luc for July 21, 2021, begin “took to the hospital.” She and Corey had spent that morning looking for Luc. He would sometimes wander on foot or set out on his bike and get lost, because “he was responding to internal stimulation.” He wasn’t at the grocery store. He wasn’t at the park. He wasn’t at the shop where he sometimes stole film. He wasn’t at the library, and the guard there refused to say if he’d seen him.

Desperate, Elisabeth reached out to a friend who worked in an emergency room. The friend told Elisabeth that if they could get Luc to the hospital, she’d put him on an M-1 hold, the term in Colorado for an involuntary seventy-two-hour mental health evaluation, which can only be ordered by law enforcement or a health care professional, usually a doctor. When Luc was lighting fires in the driveway, his father had asked the police for an M-1 hold, but Luc was not an “imminent danger to self or others,” the police said, because they hadn’t seen him light those fires.

Elisabeth smoked one cigarette, then another, a habit she’d given up years before but needed now. Luc finally came home. To get her sick child to the hospital, she came up with a lie.

“Your probation officer called,” she said. “You missed a drug test.”

On the walk to the car, Luc photographed his mother and father repeatedly with a camera that had no film in it. He was suffering from paranoia that day, and he wanted to document what they were doing to him.

The guards at the hospital did not like this guy taking pictures. Luc said that he would not allow his vitals to be taken unless he could photograph it. Security took his camera anyway.

Think of what this family had going for it: two married parents, both educated, with insurance and two incomes, who knew how the medical system worked; a large and helpful extended family, including an uncle who was a psychiatrist; whiteness; social capital in the form of friends like the behavioral-health clinician who agreed to issue the M-1. Crucially, their son was seventeen, still a minor, so they could act on his behalf. Now imagine trying to get care for a child with serious mental illness if you have a job with no paid time off; if you’re intimidated by doctors, live in your car, don’t speak English; or if you’re just too damn tired.

Before Luc entered Care Unit Four, the locked ward, the staff took everything from him, a disorienting experience that would happen each time he was hospitalized. There was a whiteboard and dry-erase marker in the exam room where Luc waited. He called the diagnosis before his doctors did. On the board he wrote:

Christ

Schizophrenia

Why won’t you listen to me

3.

On a Friday night in April 2017, Felicia got a text from her son Quentin. She’d just had a great date with her husband, Will. “It’s eleven o’clock, we’re hanging out, and Quentin sends me this real long text,” she recalls. It was about what he was learning in college, Felicia says, and how “he should be dead or in jail and that he knows that he beat the system.”

Quentin is a Black man who was then a sophomore at Colorado State University Pueblo, where he played defensive end on the football team. His insights in the text were not wrong, Felicia says, but “just the whole vibe of it was weird. I messaged him back, he didn’t answer. I tried to call, he didn’t pick up.” She showed the message to Will. She reached out to her daughters. “Oh yeah, Mom, he’s having some kind of spiritual thing and he’s woke,” Qiana, her firstborn, told her.

Early the next morning, Quentin called Felicia back. “He went on a whole ramble,” Felicia says. He claimed that he’d been abused by his uncle as a child. “He said, ‘Mom I’ve had this vision, these vivid images.’ ” Felicia called Quentin’s father and stepmother, who lived in Connecticut. They were worried, too. She decided to drive south from her home in Colorado Springs to Quentin’s campus.

She found him on the quad. “Quentin is sitting in the middle of the field, no shirt on, just like staring into the sun,” Felicia says. He ran over to her, and she noticed that he smelled awful. “I pulled all my money out of the bank,” he said. “Mom, the end of the world is happening.” Felicia wondered if he’d taken something.

Quentin’s family brought him home to Colorado Springs. They tried to get him to eat, to shower, but he wouldn’t. Felicia knew that he needed to be in a hospital, but when they drove near one he freaked out. She understood why: There was a deep, family-wide stigma around mental illness.

Quentin was crying, Felicia recalls, “thinking we were going to lose all these people” when the world ended on Monday. He grew inconsolable, then delirious. Finally, on Sunday night, after getting him to shower, Felicia gave him sleeping pills. They fell asleep on the floor, as she was too scared to leave his side.

Felicia is in her early fifties, with a bright, easy laugh and a soft voice that moves quickly between registers. “We wake up Monday morning, he looks around, and I’m like, ‘We’re still here!’ ” she singsongs. This was good news, she tried to assure her son, but he wasn’t having it. He went to the bathroom. When he came back, he said, “Mom, don’t be upset with me, but I just killed Will.”

For a second, Felicia didn’t know what to think. Maybe he had.

Will peeked his head into the room and caught her eye. Alive, he mouthed to her.

Then Quentin was moving around, manic. He was determined to jump off the second-story balcony that morning, and he did, several times. “My husband went around the side of the house to try to catch him, and Quentin, like, beat him up.” Felicia’s voice gets quiet. “He punched my husband so hard.” She was finally able to get Quentin to stay in the house. For his own safety, she locked Will out.

Quentin has an uncle who is mentally ill and “in and out of jail,” Felicia says. A cousin is “touched.” Another uncle has a diagnosis of schizophrenia, but he manages. He doesn’t drive; he rides a bicycle. When things get bad for him, and too loud, he “just goes to the woods.” For Felicia, that uncle’s name is a kind of comforting shorthand for: wacky, but OK.  He’d say things that were “off the wall” when Felicia was growing up, things that made the family laugh because they were funny.

But Quentin? He said traumatizing things. “My son is just—he’s a beautiful soul,” Felicia says. “He’s a good human. He’s always just a pleasant…” She starts to cry. “It’s just been such a loss,” she says once, then twice: “It’s been such a loss.”

That day in 2017, with Quentin jumping off the balcony and the world just going on, Felicia realized she had to call the cops to get her son to a hospital. On the phone with law enforcement, she emphasized Quentin’s sweetness, his goodness, and tried to tell his story. It must have helped, because “the two best cops showed up,” Felicia says, her relief still real. They asked the family to stay inside while they talked with Quentin outside. When Felicia rejoined her son, she could tell from the way his arms were moving that he was sure he was flying.

“We talked to Khalil,” one of the cops told Felicia.

“Who’s Khalil?” she asked.

Her son, the cop said. He’d told the officers how his family had moved from Africa.

Recalling this, Felicia laughs. “I’ve never been to Africa,” she says.

Then the ambulance came. As soon as Quentin saw it, he lost it. Felicia was terrified. Her daughters were there with their boyfriends, and somehow they got Quentin to step into the ambulance. But after the doors were shut, he “turned into the Hulk,” Felicia says. He busted the closed doors open and stepped out, naked. Will jumped in front of Quentin, to try to save or stop or catch him, tragically aware of what police have done to other Black men in crisis. But Quentin ran down the street as an officer chased after him. Another followed him in a squad car. “Quentin started beating on the cop car,” Felicia says. He said he was going to kill the officer. But the cop did not retaliate; he remained calm.

Qiana’s boyfriend spoke to Quentin forcefully, in a way he could hear. “Quentin, sit down, sit down,” he said, and Quentin did. Felicia has kind, sloping eyes that are full of emotion. She looks deeply pained when she recalls how Quentin was handcuffed to a gurney. Her son was ill, is ill. He is not a criminal.

Quentin ended up in Peak View, a psychiatric hospital in Colorado Springs, where he stayed for fourteen days. That was in April. In June he was hospitalized again. Because he was 19, a legal adult, it was hard for Felicia to know what kind of care he received, but it often seemed inferior. During one visit to an ER, Quentin was near a small, drunk white girl whom staff were gently encouraging to take a seventy-two-hour hold, Felicia remembers. They treated her as if she was vulnerable and they wanted to keep her safe. Then there was Quentin, six-foot-something, a Black man with a strong build, “gravely ill,” she says with air quotes, and she couldn’t get him that same help because he was seen as a threat.

Quentin’s stepmother is a social worker, and she found a program at Yale for people newly diagnosed with psychosis. Quentin started getting shots of Invega there, a long-acting antipsychotic that’s easier for many patients to stick with than a daily pill. It worked. Initially he’d resisted participating in the program, but he left with a clearer mind. He’d been diagnosed with schizophrenia, he said, and he wanted to learn how to manage it.

“But then his dad decided that he should go back to college,” Felicia says, her peace disturbed. Quentin reenrolled in college, this time in Connecticut. When he and Felicia spoke, he was distraught, then suicidal. “Mom, get me out,” he’d say. The stress was too much.

Before the semester was over, Quentin returned to Colorado. He lived at home, got a job at a convenience store, and went to the doctor for his Invega shots. Felicia didn’t like that he was smoking pot, but at least he was happy, and the pot calmed him down.

“Then I fell apart,” she says.

Felicia was breaking under the strain. Quentin wouldn’t consent to be hospitalized, or he would consent, only to sign himself out and leave.

Felicia ran her own business for medical billing and coding, but caring for a chronically ill family member is a job. “I couldn’t work and take care of him,” she says. She drank to keep from thinking. She became suicidal from exhaustion. “I just needed a minute,” she says. She wound up admitting herself to Cedar Springs, the private psychiatric hospital, in September 2019, and she stayed for twenty-eight days.

Quentin visited his mother every day. He coached and encouraged her. Felicia did equine and group therapy and eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). She got steady and sober and learned new coping skills. Above all: She rested. She was permitted rest.

But her own mother was mad. Why was Felicia telling people her business? Felicia’s mother had once received a bipolar diagnosis, which she thought was bullshit. And anyway, she told Felicia, she already had medicine that worked, and that was E&J brandy.

The next time they talked on the phone, Felicia’s mother said that it must have been Will who made Felicia check into the hospital. Felicia was just back from EMDR and feeling tender. No, she said, I checked myself in. Then she told her mother something she never had before: that a relative had raped her when she was a child, and later she was raped again. In reply her mother said exactly the wrong thing, a mean thing.

When Felicia left Cedar Springs, she kept doing her outpatient work, a rebellion of sorts.

In December 2019, Felicia’s stepfather died, and she and Quentin flew to New Jersey for the funeral. Quentin stayed behind on the East Coast when his mother went home. His father was angry that his son was smoking pot, so Quentin gave that up and started drinking instead. He left the stove on after cooking. He stopped washing and caring for himself. In February, Felicia went to get her son. He was “chimney-smoking,” a pack of cigarettes in no time. He thought that his relatives were cyborgs and that there were terrifying figures in the trees. His family thought it was the drinking. Felicia had to say: This is an illness of the brain. He’s sick.

One day, Quentin’s cousin told Felicia that he was going to drive Quentin, then manic and in psychosis, from Colorado to Connecticut. He thought that a change of scenery would help. They made it to New Jersey, where Quentin’s grandmother called the police for help. He was hospitalized for more than sixty days.

When he returned to Colorado, Felicia started fighting with Diversus, a mental- and behavioral-health provider that treated her son. “They had him on Depakote, all this other stuff,” she says. “I was like, ‘This is not working. It’s making things worse.’ ” Quentin thought Felicia was not his mom and was sure a woman named Lois was. When he looked in the mirror, he saw a blue man. The blue man was terrifying and needed to be destroyed. Quentin cut off the blue man’s eyebrow, his own eyebrow. He cut his forehead trying to get rid of the blue man’s hair. He pulled out the blue man’s teeth. He would turn out the lights to hide.

Quentin hitchhiked. He wandered the streets. One day a nurse found him on the outskirts of Pueblo. Another time a kind man gave him a ride in Colorado Springs and called Felicia afterward. “I just picked up your son,” he said. “I don’t know if he’s well.”

Felicia was breaking under the strain. Quentin wouldn’t consent to be hospitalized, or he would consent, only to sign himself out and leave. Felicia wanted him involuntarily committed but couldn’t persuade anyone to issue an M-1. “I’m sitting in this hospital, with a guy with a missing eyebrow” who was “debating on hurting my husband,” but somehow that was not sufficient.

Desperate, Felicia cold-called an acquaintance to ask for help. “That was a God thing,” Deb Walker says. Deb is a left-leaning nonprofit leader who doesn’t usually speak like that. She says it again, emphatic. “That was a God thing.” Deb thought to call Elisabeth, whom she knew from community work, and Elisabeth picked up.

Quentin would become paranoid if his mother took a phone call, so Elisabeth and Felicia began texting. It was April 28, 2022. Elisabeth and Corey remembered what they’d had to do to get an M-1 hold for Luc less than a year prior. They’d tried and failed to time the “imminent danger” with calls to the police. Corey had taken six weeks off work to help his son. They’d called Luc’s psychiatrist uncle, who recommended that he receive Invega, the long-acting injectable. They were coached by a counselor to not retrieve Luc at the end of the seventy-two-hour hold, so that he could get further treatment. When they followed that advice, they had to foot a $40,000 bill for an extra three days’ stay at the hospital. Then there was the hostility of the behavioral-health worker the night Luc was committed. He was trying to find a reason to not hold Luc, to give him meds and send him on his way—“treat and street” is the shorthand for this problematic cycle. Why should your son get a bed, he asked Corey, when so many people need them? “Because my son is right here,” Corey said.

Bring Quentin in, Elisabeth told Felicia. Bring him in.

Felicia took Quentin to Elisabeth’s clinic. He was in “active psychosis,” Elisabeth recalls. He was pacing around, sure that Will was a cyborg, Felicia was a voodoo priestess, and Elisabeth was going to put him in jail. Elisabeth called 911 to get a transport to the hospital. An older paramedic and his young team showed up. While Elisabeth spoke with the lead, his charges ducked into Quentin’s room, got a pulse-oximeter reading, and took his vitals. “He’s alert and oriented,” one of them said. “He doesn’t qualify for an M-1 hold.”

Elisabeth thought that the EMT’s assessment was bullshit. Anosognosia, or not knowing that you’re sick, is common with profound mental illness, and Quentin had it. The term comes from the Greek: a (without), nosos (disease), gnosis (knowledge). One of the EMTs took out his phone to google whether or not a nurse practitioner can order an M-1 hold. (They can.)

Cops arrived, and by then Quentin was combative. The M-1 hold was placed.

Felicia and Quentin

As of this writing, Quentin has been hospitalized more than twenty times. To get to the hospital where he lived from January 2023 until August 2024, his mother and I take a highway for most of an hour, drive through some exurbs, and arrive in what looks like a little village. From 1887 until 1946, Fort Logan, one of two state-run mental hospitals in Colorado, was an Army base.

Felicia says that the first thing she wants to know about a place is if it’s clean. Fort Logan’s main building, built in the 1960s, is clean and sunlit. Its hallways and greeting areas have an open, airy feel. The floors are covered in small, pretty square tiles; the walls are blond brick. “It’s the total opposite of what I believe a state facility to be,” Felicia says. “In New Jersey, it does not look like that. The odor as soon as you walk in, it’s like, ‘I do not want my family here.’ ”

We walk to a wing behind a locked door to meet Quentin. He is wearing track pants, Nautica slippers, and a loose gray shirt. We sit down at a round table in a common room, not far from a guard. Quentin immediately gives his mother a gift, a stack of socks he bought at the hospital’s gift shop. One pair says: “Best Mom.” Another: “Running late is my cardio.” Felicia laughs. It is clear how much they adore each other, and how relieved they are to be together. Yesterday he and some other patients built gingerbread houses, Quentin says. Today is bingo.

Quentin has a young, handsome face, but his movements are slow, like those of an older man. He’s brought his journal with him, a perfect-bound composition book, as wire spirals aren’t allowed at Fort Logan. He’s crossed out many words and circled others. He shows his mother a list of healthy foods—cucumbers, orange juice, prune juice—beside his fitness goals. On another page he’s drawn a vision board, divided into the categories of work, nutrition, and clothes. He hopes that he and his mom will go to an outlet mall soon, and he has a list of places where he wants to shop: Adidas, North Face, Nike, Ralph Lauren.

Mostly he just wants to moon over Felicia, and she wants to hear about his days. He goes outside for walks, Quentin says. He goes to the gift shop and the vending machine. Patients get kudos points for showering, for relapse-prevention work, for participating in groups. There is music and karaoke.

“Karaoke?” Felicia says, thrilled.

“One time I did ‘Regulators,’ ” Quentin says. “One time Whitney Houston, ‘I Wanna Dance with Somebody.’ ” Another time it was “Ben,” his favorite Michael Jackson song.

“I play pool a little bit too, but I get my tail whipped,” he says, smiling.

“Quentin, I’m proud of you,” Felicia says.

He reads to us from his journal: “My nieces are changing my life.”

“They love you,” his mother says.

“You’re the best mom,” Quentin replies. He high-fives her, and she tears up.

That high-five is hard-earned. When Quentin first came to Fort Logan, the voices in his head were mean. “They were mean,” Felicia says. They told Quentin that he had molested his younger cousins, though he had not. The thought made him scared to go near the girls. The voices also told him that the family dog was a shapeshifter, so then he could not go near the dog. They said nobody likes you, over and over, to this likable, lovable man.

Like Luc and Ben, Quentin has tried many different medications. Felicia says that when he was first admitted to Fort Logan, he was on fifteen different kinds: “Abilify, Latuda, Depakote, lithium.” Haldol, a first-generation antipsychotic, made him too tired to do much of anything.

On her visits, Felicia usually brings a gift of food from the outside world. Today it is a sausage and egg muffin from Burger King and a mini Snickers bar. Quentin’s arms and hands shake while he eats, and it’s clear this worries his mother.

When he gets out of Fort Logan, Quentin wants to work the overnight shift, 8 p.m. to 8 a.m., at Safeway or Walmart. He has a little money saved, and he wants to save more, “to get a vehicle.” He moves his hand along his shirt while he talks and his tattoos become visible, traces of another life, when he was “Mr. Lova Lova,” in Felicia’s words—some gorgeous girl’s boyfriend, a football star with good grades.

She still wonders if something triggered his first psychotic break, LSD perhaps—he tried one of those little squares two or three weeks before he became convinced that the world was ending and that he had killed Will. But Felicia’s brothers think maybe Quentin was always different. When he was little, they called him Cave, short for Captain Caveman, to describe his energy: He wanted to put a fork in a socket, to run fast into a wall.

Quentin goes back to the room where he no longer punches the wall until it cracks and his knuckles bleed, the room he now shares with another patient. He returns with a green folder full of pictures he’s drawn. The lines forming a bear, a shoe, a lion, a shooting star are bright and strong, though the tremor in his hand has made them waver.

The guard tells us the visit is over. We are past time, actually, so we stand to go.

One day, Quentin will be told to go that abruptly. When it happens, and one of the people on the hospital’s waiting list gets his bed, Felicia will receive twenty-four hours’ notice, hardly enough time to pack up his room, let alone plan a new life. “He’s way more resilient than I am,” Felicia says. Still, could he handle working the night shift at Safeway or Walmart while chronically ill?

On the drive back, we pass a group home with gardens and a gracious porch. It makes Felicia happy. She’s grateful for Quentin’s survival, but she wants beauty for him too, wellness, something more. “I want his life to look like what he wants it to look like, and I don’t want to put my fear into it,” she says.

4.

I first met Tracy at Elisabeth’s kitchen table when they were arranging Ben’s memorial. We talked about what poems to read, an order for the service, where to place the heart-shaped rocks, who might speak. Tracy was curled up like a teenager in her chair, and Jen was next to her, giving her the gentlest touches on her legs and hands and feet and head—like strong, light anchors, so that she might not float off forever.

Jen never knew Ben in health, and it had been hard, in their home, to feel like he wasn’t contributing, wasn’t helping. For a while, as a kind of shield, he only wore blue. He ate very quickly. He couldn’t keep track of a conversation. He found it difficult to walk through doorways and had to perform certain rituals to do so. Even as he became more interested in the possibilities of makeup and fashion, he wasn’t able to shower regularly or brush his teeth.

Ben’s weekly therapy was not covered by insurance and cost $150 for thirty minutes. When he was prescribed an antipsychotic that had not yet been issued as a generic, it cost $700 a month. Again insurance would not cover it. His parents got samples. They scrambled. One psychiatrist seemed especially determined and “really gave him a run for his money,” Tracy says. He put Ben on an anti-seizure drug that seemed to help, but he was given so many different medications for so many different diagnoses—Risperdal, Abilify, Luvox, and Lamictal for anxiety, OCD, autism, and borderline personality disorder—that Tracy lost track of what worked when.

There were respites. Tracy describes Ben’s alternative arts high school as “the land of the misfits,” where all kinds of “quirky kids” flourished, and for five good weeks Ben did, too. The administrator at the front desk chose him for an aide. The principal told Ben that if he was having panic attacks, he could weather them in his office. “They were unconditional with him,” Tracy says. “They were like, ‘He’s the most popular kid here!’ ”

Ben loved it. Then he didn’t.

At his favorite coffee shop, he met Nikita, a foreign exchange student from Russia. There was the thrill of his first real boyfriend, the crush and the lust, but also the thrill of the world. Nikita spoke three languages. Ben began to teach himself Russian and German, then Italian, Spanish, French, and Japanese. He wanted the door fluency gave, the entrance and the exit.

College at Western Colorado University repeated what was now a pattern: It was good, and then it wasn’t. By Thanksgiving of 2016, Ben had dropped out and moved back home.

He was hired twice, a triumph, at McDonald’s. He got a job one year at Current, a greeting card factory, during its busy season around the holidays, but would vomit from stress when it was time to go to work, and ended up getting fired. He enrolled at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, then had “a total nervous breakdown,” Tracy says. He was unable to eat or leave his room, and he dropped out after two weeks.

Tracy and Jen and Ben’s dad, Ted, were forever trying one thing and then another. There were small problems to deal with (where was Ben’s passport?) and larger problems, too (who were the older men on his Tinder, and had he been sold for sex?). At one point, after Tracy met Elisabeth, the plan was for Ben and Luc to live together—to save money and become friends—but Luc went to a wilderness treatment center in Utah instead, and Ben got an apartment alone. Tracy remembers visiting Ben’s place. Stunned by what she saw, she took photos. They show kitchen and bathroom sinks that are unusable, filled with clothes and cans of Great Value food, matted papers, open bottles of soap, a glove, a coffee mug, a toy fish. Something is growing on the open toilet lid, and the bowl brims with black liquid and more papers. There are McDonald’s takeout bags in the bed. The stove is caked with dried batter. On the carpeted floor in the bedroom there’s loose toilet paper and a full gallon jug of milk and an upturned colander and a clothing iron and more takeout bags and piles of clothes and cardboard boxes and Fla-Vor-Ice sleeves and some half-eaten food.

He couldn’t do it, Tracy understands now. Couldn’t take care of himself, much less help around the house. Couldn’t. Jen knows this now, too.

Tracy wishes that her child had received permission to just be—from herself and from a culture that confuses productivity with worth. “A good day for him was a day with the cat,” she says. “That’s frowned upon.” Sometimes when he was living at home, he’d ask her to watch a movie with him, and she’d say, “Babe, I’m tired.” Now she realizes, “He was reaching out for help in any way that he could.”

Tracy holds a note and a box from Ben.

Tracy has a stack of forty-five bills that double as a travelogue. Thirty-five are unopened when she hands them to me. About half are addressed to Ben, half to Nasim. The return addresses are from Oklahoma City, for medical services in Seattle; Birmingham and South Bend, for charges from Boulder; LaPorte, Indiana; Wethersfield, Connecticut; Troy, Michigan; Oaks, Pennsylvania; Broomfield, Colorado; Coral Springs, Florida; the Woodlands, Texas; Akron, Ohio; Concord, California; Las Vegas, Nevada. The businesses seeking payment include Computer Credit Inc.; One Advantage; Certified Ambulance Group; Virginia Mason Franciscan Health; Radia Inc. P.S.; Dept. 233; Dr. Eric France, Chief Medical Officer, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; and, repeatedly, American Medical Response.

A bill dated 6/30/21, less than one month from the provision of service, says that the minimum amount due is the full amount: $13,570. A ride in an ambulance, with a “ground mileage” of “Qty: 5,” and one $23.94 injection of Droperidol, an antipsychotic that blocks dopamine receptors, cost $1,238.31. Bay Area Credit Service sent a bill for $18,847.77 for ten ambulance rides. A “urinalysis auto w/ scope” cost $6.97. There are offers for EZ Ways to Pay, including a “New & Improved Online Experience” and a “Live Agent Chat.” You can “Go Green” at MyDocBill.com. One bill asks its recipient to “rate the comfort of the waiting room.”

Ben often moved with an urgency that suggested he was seeking something he never found. He spent six months in Austria, until his parents said, “You have to come home.” Back in the States, he met a girl and they drove to Texas, then crossed the border into Mexico, where Ben ended up in Cancún, “working on a boat or something like that.” He left his passport at a hostel as collateral for an unpaid bill, Tracy says, and lived on the streets until the U.S. Embassy called her. In the five years leading up to March 2022, her child would disappear and reappear. He made it to Vatican City around Easter once. Ted called the police one day when Ben broke into his Salida home through the dog door, looking for food.       

Ben fell in love with a man named Parker, and they lived together in Seattle for six months. Parker became increasingly scared for his partner, whom he knew as Nasim, and broke it off. Ben came home. For a while, he worked at Olive Garden, which he called “the O.G.” “ ‘Minimum wage, minimum effort!’ ” Tracy remembers him saying. “He was always kind of funny in that way.”

In December 2020, their family signed a contract with a case manager, who treated Ben’s challenges as behavioral. “We (family) will no longer support your addiction; we will not tolerate your abusive and aggressive language. As you are an adult now you are responsible for your care and life choices,” the contract reads. Tracy’s greatest fear was that Ben would end up homeless, and then, for a year, he did. He had to be independent, the case manager said, and his family needed to say no. So they did. His grandmother said no when he asked to live with her. Tracy told Max no when he asked if he could put his sibling up in a hotel for the night. It was heartbreaking, and Tracy bitterly regrets it. When she and Jen would pass a person warming themselves on a heating vent on the street, panhandling from a traffic median, or conversing with presences no one else could see, Tracy would say, “That’s somebody’s son.”

So much was lost when Ben lived on the streets, including a great many of the objects that help to tell the story of a life. Tracy has a woman’s coat he wore then, a pair of his shoes, but that’s it. What she has from before are treasures now: sweet notes he wrote as a child, his signature, a green watercolor bird he painted, photographs of his singular face, his blue-gray eyes and steady gaze.

Tracy held her child after giving birth and knew what mothers know:

I heard the stranger & my brain, without looking, vowed
a love-him vow. His struggling, merely, to be.

That’s from “The Black Maria,” a poem by Aracelis Girmay. And the following language is from Ben’s neuropsychological report, generated after a daylong test meant to measure the full spectrum of a person’s brain functions, which he took after a period of homelessness: The reason for the referral was an “inability to engage in activities of daily living.” Ben had reported having daily panic attacks since the age of 15, along with “perfectionistic” tendencies. He needed to move certain objects from one place to another because they held negativity. He spoke of patenting a wearable EEG technology to predict and prevent panic attacks, of having an “eidetic memory” and the ability to speak twelve languages. He took pain pills, sedatives, hallucinogens. He thought that his mother worked for the FBI. He reported hearing her in the lobby of the testing facility when she was not there. He was troubled by obsessive thoughts between three and eight hours a day.

The report’s author described the patient as suffering from “marked elevations of persecutory beliefs” and “grandiose and bizarre delusions.” The patient had both avolition—a medical inability to engage in goal-directed activities—and anosognosia. Those two terms are in the paragraph where Ben finally received a diagnosis of schizophrenia.

The report was issued late in the fall of 2021. Babe, you need to read your neuropsych report, Tracy would say. If you couldn’t see, you would wear glasses, right? If I had diabetes, I would take diabetes medicine.

But anosognosia, that not-knowing, is one of the reasons profound mental illness is too often fatal. Ben never accepted his diagnosis. The last picture Tracy ever saw of him was a missing person sketch from the Dallas Police Department.


Tracy’s child was memorialized in a ceremony at a ranch in the violet foothills of Salida. Friends and family showed up in force. Elisabeth couldn’t stop crying. The guests reverenced Ben Nasim Michael’s ashes and placed heart-shaped rocks near them, on a quilt Tracy had made as a gift, one her child never got to use.

“Ben has been out too long in the elements,” the presider said. “Too long in the cold, too long in the dark. We are gathered here in the gentle shadow of the mountains where he found joy and peace, in this warm circle and kind light, to welcome him home.”

There was a strong, clean wind, the sort that whips anything untethered up, and it felt like we all might catch flight.

5.

Elisabeth has never liked Luc’s cat shirt, the trippy one he used to want to wear all the time. But Tracy is a fan. If he loves it, it’s perfect, she says. She remembers with admiration a family she met through NAMI, and how calm they were about their son’s connection to a particular tree stump. It meant something to him, so he kept the car he lived in near the stump, no big deal.

Tracy returns again and again to social solutions: We all need to change. The mostly well must become more hospitable, radically so, to those among us who have what Susan Sontag calls a “more onerous citizenship.”

Felicia can’t shake the conviction that her son is being spiritually tested, and she wants deliverance for him. Like people in many times and places, she sees how schizophrenia attacks one’s spirit, too. To live well, these days, “I keep busy,” she says, “and I get baptized.”

For Elisabeth, a nurse practitioner, this is a medical problem, in need of medical solutions.

They’re all right, of course.

Elisabeth found the work of Drs. Ann Mandel Laitman and Robert Laitman, who developed a protocol for treating schizophrenia after their son Daniel was diagnosed with it at 15. Schizophrenia is an illness of “gating,” Laitman notes. “Gating is the ability of the individual to be able to focus attention and at the same time tune out extraneous stimuli internal and external,” he writes. “Without gating people are continuously flooded by stimuli.” Those for whom this culminates in a break with reality are predisposed from birth by their genes and have “unquiet minds” in childhood. At some point between in utero and early adulthood, they usually experience a stressor, “trauma, infection, drugs,” that activates their genetic predisposition. The Laitmans recommend choline supplements during pregnancy, fish oil supplements for children in families with a history of serious mental illness, and clozapine as the first-line medication for those suffering from psychosis.

The Laitman Protocol, or EASE as it’s sometimes called, is intense. You begin with 12.5 milligrams of clozapine and build up from there. Because of the side effects of the medication, a patient will also take, as needed, Zofran (for nausea), sublingual atropine drops (for excess saliva), pantoprazole (for acid reflux), beta blockers (for tachycardia and anxiety), desmopressin (for nocturnal incontinence), and Klonopin, if a patient has catatonia that does not respond to the clozapine. Patients following this regimen take Colace (to prevent constipation), metformin (to prevent the dramatic weight gain that accompanies antipsychotics), and, for those with a high risk of seizures, lamotrigine.

When Elisabeth committed to following this protocol with Luc in March 2022, she was very much alone. Clozapine was regulated by an intense risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (or REMS) through the FDA, based on a small set of data from a population of the elderly. That REMS (which the FDA no longer requires) involved weekly blood draws, which made getting a prescription impractical, if not impossible, for most people. After being turned down by two other doctors, Elisabeth found one who knew the protocol and agreed to put Luc on it. Then she called pharmacy after pharmacy until one finally said that it could fill a clozapine prescription. She worked hard to cultivate a relationship with a pharmacist there. She would call every Tuesday, as the drug could only be released one dose at a time. She used a private insurance plan plus Medicaid to cover the costs. One week a different pharmacist refused to fill the prescription; he said it wasn’t safe. Luc’s psychiatrist called. There was a two-day lapse in treatment during which Luc grew increasingly symptomatic and afraid.

Because that’s the thing: This protocol works for Luc. He is well more days than not, and so lovely. At his twenty-first birthday party, to celebrate how far he’d come, his Mamaw smoked a cigar.

If asked, Elisabeth says, “My son is disabled”—language that gives grace for a different life, a slower life, which is not to say a lesser life. Luc has kept his sobriety, a triumph of three years now. He moved into a tiny home that feels large, next door to his parents, where he is a loving caregiver to his cat. One Friday last fall, at his favorite kava bar, he displayed some of his photographs for the first time. He works a few hours every week as an assistant at his uncle’s office downtown, and to do so he gets nicely dressed. Sometimes he takes an e-scooter there, and sometimes he gets a ride. I walk with him on a one-mile route that he favors, and he is kind and funny company. He still calls his mother many times a day when she’s at work. Evenings are out for socializing, as are large crowds, and change is unwelcome, but in what matters most—love—Luc is rich. We’re scheming on finding him a girlfriend, and she will be lucky indeed.

Still, sometimes Elisabeth gets terrified. At night she’ll go downstairs to check on her younger son while he’s sleeping, and she’ll call Luc to make sure he’s alive and OK.

The view from Memorial Park in Colorado Springs.

“I think Tracy’s in a special hell of isolation,” Elisabeth says. “Yeah,” Tracy immediately agrees. “I think that’s right.” We’re at a park together, walking.

What Elisabeth means is that other parents can’t go near their worst fear—the loss of a child—even within the community of people affected by serious mental illness, so Tracy feels like a burden to them with her grief. In the summer, it helps to garden. In the winter, in the evening, she likes to walk and walk, just looking at the Christmas lights. She tries to be there for Felicia and Elisabeth—at NAMI events, at fundraisers—but sometimes it’s too hard. When that happens, they carry her story with them.

Tracy had never heard of a neuropsych report until her child got one. Now, as a probation officer for juvenile offenders, she orders more of them than anyone on her team. “I don’t wait,” she says. She’s determined to get the help for other families that hers never received.

It was good for her and Jen to go together to the place where Ben died, such a pretty place, in a pretty neighborhood. They found a fuzzy brown caterpillar, its coat the color of Ben’s favorite waffle shirt. Climbing up the steep banks of the creek, they both slipped and fell, and the tree that caught and held Ben’s body in the water’s cold current caught and held them, too. That was a gift.

But so much still hurts. Tracy’s child’s ashes were sent through the mail: That hurts. She tries and fails and tries again to forgive the tough-love caseworker, to forgive herself. She still sends messages to the number Ben last used to text her: I miss you. I love you. Where are you? Now she and Jen are among the primary caregivers for Tracy’s niece, who was otherwise headed to a foster home. Ben’s old bedroom is this glad little girl’s, and after so much suffering, her joy is a balm. At the same time, Tracy says, “It’s like, when do I get to rest?”

Sometimes everything feels possible for Felicia. “I’ve worked really hard to be able to speak at these tables,” she says, and there are many. She was on her city’s Law Enforcement Transparency and Advisory Commission; she was awarded a mayor’s fellowship and a governor’s fellowship; she’s the secretary of the local Black Chamber of Commerce. When she met Elisabeth, she felt like God was saying, “This is your partner—you’re gonna do some things.” And they have. They went to the state capitol in the spring of 2025, with a group called Colorado Mad Moms, and held up poster-size photos of their sons printed with the words, “Severe mental illness is not a crime.” They are working to get some of the legal language around M-1 holds changed: what “gravely disabled” means, what “psychiatric deterioration” means. But then another week, the car breaks down; Felicia’s dog dies; she misses her mother, who passed away in 2022 and “could throw down in the kitchen like no one else.”

On a rough night last fall, she asked Will to take the keys so she couldn’t go get a drink. “My issue is I start to extra, extra, extra rely on the bottle,” Felicia says. Because here she is, trying to hold up her adult son, who has to stick to the Weather Channel after the TV started talking to him while he was watching Rocky—a breakthrough symptom. At home she needs to care for her autistic stepson, get him “pancakes every Saturday”; her husband, a veteran, sometimes leaps out of bed when the night terrors from his PTSD get bad; and, not long ago, one of her sweet grandbabies said things that made Felicia worry about schizophrenia all over again. Then there’s work, and the whole country, and who wouldn’t want something to take the edge off all that?

Jen had a nightmare, Tracy says: She had headphones on, they were loud, and she couldn’t take them off. The dream was about Ben’s illness—Jen was feeling what he felt.

Quentin has been at an assisted-living facility in Colorado Springs ever since he lost his bed at Fort Logan in August 2024. It feels like a certain sort of old folks’ home: quiet, dark, and carpeted, with lots of TVs on low. Felicia goes to see him often. When Quentin said that the sun god comes around and bothers him when he puts his Pumas on, his mom’s advice was sound. “Don’t put the Pumas on,” she instructed. “Put the church shoes on!”

Elisabeth went with Felicia to a recent meeting with the facility manager, who was trying to push Quentin out. He needs skilled nursing, the manager said, because he is sometimes incontinent, and the facility can’t do all that laundry, even though doing laundry is one of its advertised services. The manager said this in front of Quentin, which to Felicia felt shaming. It’s the meds, Elisabeth told her. If Quentin’s meds were managed correctly, this would not be happening. Elisabeth offered to find a nurse who would do that. The manager said no.

At least Quentin has a doctor Felicia trusts. “He listens,” she says. “He makes time.” Dr. Ash has been trying to sort out Quentin’s many and complicated medications to find out what’s working, what’s not. Felicia and Elisabeth learned that the assisted-living facility uses qualified medication administration personnel, or QMAPs, to give residents their meds. Instead of adjusting the dose when a change was prescribed, the QMAPs were just adding the old dose to the new one. Ten milligrams of Abilify after fifteen, for instance, when the order was to increase a dose from ten to fifteen. That explained the incontinence, Elisabeth says, and why Quentin was telling Felicia that there was a spaceship at his window.

Who would do that with someone’s meds for cancer? Or cystic fibrosis? You could die from that, Elisabeth says.

Lately, Quentin’s uncle has blocked phone calls from him. He loves his nephew, but he doesn’t want to have another conversation in which Quentin claims he hurt his cousins. Even Dr. Ash has pushed Quentin on that, asking “What’s the evidence?” for such a thing. Felicia loves that.

Healing comes, goes. Jen had a nightmare, Tracy says: She had headphones on, they were loud, and she couldn’t take them off. The dream was about Ben’s illness—Jen was feeling what he felt. To her clients dealing with addiction, Tracy now asks: What does it do for you? She wants to get to the root of their behaviors.

Elisabeth keeps taking more patients who suffer from psychosis into her practice. “I’m very comfortable with them,” she says. She recently won an award for her advocacy, after Felicia nominated her. “She makes the system move fast,” the presenter said of Elisabeth. “She conveys concern and compassion. She sees the person, not the illness.”

Felicia’s heart is broken right open by the story of a woman in her support group whose son is in prison, and by Rob and Michele Reiner’s deaths, and by their son, who must be so unwell. Her burdens get lighter around her granddaughters. She has kept some precious gifts from her own great-grandmother, totems of the fiercest and least complicated love she’s ever known, love like a shield, like shade. Sometimes she goes and sits near them, quietly, to remember. One day at dinner, Felicia tells me, Tracy, and Elisabeth that she’s thinking of running for office, and we all say: Do.

Early in all this, Felicia says, God gave her a vision. Quentin is standing in a tuxedo on a long red carpet, well and so handsome, before a gathered crowd. This is the word she got then: “People are gonna listen.”


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

The Two Faces of Lummie Jenkins


The Atavist Magazine, No. 170 — Originally published by Topic


Alexandra Marvar is a journalist and photographer based in New England. Her work has appeared in the New York Times, WSJ Magazine, The Believer, and other publications.

Editor: Seyward Darby
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Emily Injeian
Ilustrator: Fede Yankelevich

Published in December 2025.


Author’s Note: The American sheriff is an office as old as the colonies. In England, the sheriff—the reeve of the shire—was appointed by the king to maintain law and order, collect taxes for the crown, and raise the posse comitatus. After the Revolutionary War, this British import became an elected position. But 250 years on, some U.S. sheriffs seem to still want to answer to a king—and in the absence of a king, to hold absolute power. The following story was first published in 2018, in a too-short-lived magazine called Topic. At the time, I thought of my work as righting a whitewashed historical record, sharing an underrepresented perspective, filling out the context around a supposedly heroic “legend in his own time” in the Deep South. We were not quite one year into Donald Trump’s first presidential term, and constitutional sheriffs—ironically, the term for sheriffs who believe they have more authority than the Constitution when it comes to choosing whether or not to enforce federal laws—were emerging as some of his most vocal supporters. Now a year into Trump’s second term, this claque of sheriffs are ever more boldly superseding federal law on issues like immigration, voting rights, and election procedures. Revisiting this story now, I understand Lummie Jenkins differently. I’d originally considered my piece to be a history, revealing the dark truth about a man who tamped down the civil rights movement in his county while maintaining a public reputation of charm and humor. Now I also see it as a case study on the making of the constitutional sheriff and how that figure’s particular brand of power has persevered through wave after wave of democratic reform.

—Alexandra Marvar


Talk to anyone over the age of 70 in Camden, Alabama, and they can tell you a story about Lummie Jenkins, the sheriff of Wilcox County from 1939 to 1971. According to newspapers across the Deep South, Percy Columbus Jenkins—also known as Sheriff Lummie, Mr. Lummie, or just Lummie—was “a superb raconteur,” a “master psychologist,” and a “modern-day hero.” It was common lore that, unlike other sheriffs in the region, Lummie didn’t need to carry a gun, and he didn’t go prowling for suspects. Instead, he kicked back in his chair at his chinaberry-wood desk, packed his pipe with Prince Albert tobacco, and summoned the guilty parties to the Wilcox County Courthouse in downtown Camden simply by word of mouth. Out of fear or respect, the legend goes, suspects came in of their own accord.

Introducing The Atavist’s Revived series.

The length of Lummie’s tenure as Wilcox County’s chief law enforcer—eight consecutive terms—broke records in Alabama. And because much of it took place before the dawn of Miranda rights, which were enshrined in law by a Supreme Court ruling in 1966, there are countless stories, some surely truer than others, about the sheriff’s knack for coercing a confession from anyone. Newspapers reported claims that he employed sorcery, mind reading, and dreaded doses of “Truth Medicine”—sips from a glass bottle of Listerine he kept in his office that sported the disclaimer “Will paralyze if you lie.” Lummie had powers, people said, that exceeded those of ordinary lawmen.

You could say that law enforcement was in his blood. His father, P. C. Jenkins Sr., was sheriff of Wilcox County from 1911 to 1914. Lummie was just 12 when he snuck out of school to watch his dad preside over a public execution by hanging in Camden’s town square. “There were so many people,” he later recalled. “It looked just like a show day.”

Wilcox County sits in Alabama’s Black Belt, so named for its rich, dark soil and concentration of Black residents. It’s a place where the legacy of slavery runs deep; immediately before the Civil War, few counties across the South had more enslaved people. The sheriff’s domain comprises the city of Camden, four small towns, and a tangle of hilly two-lane highways and red-dirt roads that weave through the overgrowth of fallen cotton empires and felled pine woods. In 1960, there were some 18,000 residents in Wilcox County, 78 percent of whom were Black. Today, the population is fewer than 10,000 and more than 70 percent of residents are Black. Then as now, Wilcox hovered near the top of the list of the nation’s poorest counties.

In 2008, Lummie’s granddaughter, Delynn Jenkins Halloran, celebrated her grandfather’s gilded reputation by self-publishing a compendium of lightly edited newspaper articles and collected praise titled Lummie Jenkins: The Unarmed Sheriff of Wilcox County. The contributors to her crowdsourced book included white family members, white journalists, white congressmen, white governors, and white sheriffs of nearby Alabama counties—as well as the white wives of many of these men. An additional source on Lummie’s legacy, from autobiographical cassette tapes he recorded in his final years, was the man himself.

On the cover of the 168-page paperback is a color photograph of the sheriff. He wears a jaunty grimace and a white cowboy hat to match the white vest buttoned over his brick-red shirt. One of his cherished pistol-themed tie clips glistens at the center of his chest. Taken for the Birmingham News in 1968, and appearing above the caption “Wilcox County’s gunless sheriff always gets his man,” the photo shows Lummie leaning against a sheriff’s cruiser before the antebellum columns of the Wilcox County Courthouse, squinting through the fat lenses of his glasses.

I visited the site of this photograph in the fall of 2018. The courthouse looked exactly the same as it does in the Birmingham News photo; even the Jim Crow–era drinking fountain still protruded, unmarked, from a patch of grass on the street corner. I’d been to the area a couple of months earlier to meet a legendary group of quilt-making artisans in a nearby community called Gee’s Bend.1 Lummie Jenkins had been dead for forty years, but in Gee’s Bend I kept hearing mention of the late sheriff and his granddaughter’s book.

1. During the Great Depression and into the mid-twentieth century, women in Gee’s Bend stitched quilts from every available fabric—cotton scraps, old blue jeans, feed sacks—to keep their families warm. In the 1960s, civil rights organizers helped the women set up a mail-order business. In the 1990s, a pioneering art collector named Bill Arnett came to the community, purchased quilts in large numbers, and surfaced them to arts critics, collectors, and curators. Today its quilts are on U.S. postage stamps and in the permanent collections of major museums worldwide.

I was hard-pressed to find a cup of coffee in Camden—Hardee’s had run out—but I did come across copies of The Unarmed Sheriff on two occasions. It was on a shelf at the Wilcox County Library, upstairs from Lummie’s former office in the courthouse, where a researcher helped me locate news clippings about him. (“Mr. Lummie!” she remembered warmly, and told me that he had once given her family a puppy.) The book was also available for $16.95 at the Black Belt Treasures Cultural Arts Center, a nonprofit gallery and shop packed with gifts, paintings, and crafts, located about five hundred feet from the courthouse door.

Outside Wilcox County, copies of The Unarmed Sheriff were harder to come by. There was a used copy available on Amazon, where the book had two reviews.2 One gave it five stars: “Awesome book. Very very good read.” The other was a one-star review: “Wait a minute wasn’t this the ‘infamous’ Sheriff who beat the Black woman McDuffie to death with a rubber hose? … So thankful my father got me and my Mom out of Alabama as soon as I was born.”

2. Today I can only find a copy on eBay, for $84.

“Wait a minute wasn’t this the ‘infamous’ Sheriff who beat the Black woman McDuffie to death with a rubber hose?”

Gee’s Bend is an unincorporated town, tucked so deep into one of the Alabama River’s oxbow arcs that it feels (and functions) like an island. The families there can trace their roots and last names directly back to slavery. In the generations that followed the Civil War, white landowners left; Black residents stayed. The town’s geography makes it thirty-eight miles from Camden by car via the nearest bridge, or about six miles on the local ferry—an hour and a half drive or a fifteen-minute boat ride.

In 1949, during Lummie’s tenure, the government decided to change the town’s name, which was taken from plantation owner Joseph Gee. Authorities rechristened it Boykin, after a segregationist senator. Following Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination in 1968, residents filed a request to rename their home again, this time to King. Nearly sixty years on it’s still Boykin, but most everyone calls it Gee’s Bend.

On an afternoon in October 2018, I boarded the ferry in Camden. I rode across a wide, flat reservoir to the muddy shore of the Bend. The Welcome Center served a free hot lunch to seniors on weekdays, and when I arrived a few women—all quilt makers—were picking over the carrot-and-raisin salad or skipping directly to the Moon Pies.

Lummie’s reign as sheriff ended almost a half-century ago, but several of the women remembered him well. At first the stories I got—as a white stranger asking questions in a community where outsiders are few and memories are long—felt reserved. But as the women cautiously gauged my response, their physical reactions said more than their words. When I asked Lola Pettway, then 77, if she remembered Lummie Jenkins, she recoiled, like I’d spooked her. She could remember Mr. Lummie standing at the edge of a field, watching her and her family pick cotton; something about that image sent chills through her body. Nancy Pettway, then 83, told me about how, just before she was married, Mr. Lummie made the trip over to the Bend, arrested her fiancé, and threw him in jail after hearing that he’d killed a dog that attacked him.

I left the Welcome Center and drove a few miles down dirt lanes and through rolling fields to a farm on John Gragg Road. A silver Cadillac was parked askew near some hay bales in a field of cows. Barking dogs eagerly surrounded my car. I was there to see none other than John Gragg, 88, the son of a well-known preacher and landowner in the Bend. Gragg came to the door with his walking stick and invited me into the living room of his one-story 1930s farmhouse.

“Lummie Jenkins?” Gragg said. He sat back in his recliner, his walking stick resting on his knee. “He was the boss man.” He chuckled to himself. The music from an old black-and-white western flared up from his television set. I asked him if it was true that Lummie didn’t carry a gun. “Didn’t carry a gun?” Gragg sounded amused. “He carried a gun and a nightstick.”

Virtually everything I’d read—all the profiles, op-eds, obituaries, and tributes—pegged the sheriff’s mystique to the idea that he was unarmed. But Gragg remembered a different Lummie. He also remembered the sheriff’s cronies. “He had his snitches,” Gragg said, “and they would tell him what he want to know.”

As I kept talking to people in the Bend, I heard more about this other Lummie Jenkins. The one who, if he was in a mood and caught a Gee’s Bend resident on the wrong side of the river after Camden’s eight o’clock curfew, would make them swim home, even in winter. Fear was essential to keeping white power intact, and as the civil rights movement whipped up revolutionary energy across the Black Belt, Lummie’s and his colleagues’ efforts intensified. People told me that, in 1962, as voting rights organizers started to arrive in Wilcox County, the leadership shut down the Gee’s Bend ferry, turning a short passage into an all but unmanageable journey—you needed a car, gas money, and time. This effectively cut Bend residents off from local services, including the voting registration office. Lummie reportedly made a comment about the decision that’s the stuff of legend: “We didn’t close the ferry because they were Black. We closed it because they forgot they were Black.” (The ferry would remain out of commission for forty-four years. In 2006, it was reopened with fanfare and hat-in-hand apologies.)

Gee’s Bend residents also remembered King’s visits in 1965, and the march on Selma’s Edmund Pettus Bridge, some forty miles north. They remembered walking as children and teenagers for days in the rain with King and John Lewis. They remembered gathering by the hundreds at the Camden courthouse for another demonstration, being blockaded by Lummie and Mayor F. R. Albritton, being immersed in tear gas and pummeled with smoke bombs, getting arrested, kneeling in the street, refusing to leave. They remembered the songs they sang. Some people also remembered what happened to David Colston, what happened to Della McDuffie.

Some people would have preferred not to remember that time at all.

The Wilcox County Courthouse

Lummie Jenkins may have been a nonpareil in Wilcox County, but he was not an anomaly in the Jim Crow South, where sheriffs were considered more powerful than the American president. He held office during the rise of “peace officer” organizations—groups of law enforcement officials, organized state by state, who shared similar conservative ideas about the Constitution and other matters. Lummie was a loyal member of the Alabama Peace Officers Association and something of a celebrity among its ranks, serving as vice president and then president between 1959 and 1963. As one admirer wrote in a 1975 edition of the Alabama Peace Officers Journal, “Lummie is not only respected and loved by his people in Wilcox County; he is the only officer I have ever seen walk into a meeting of law enforcement officers and get a standing ovation.”

Members of peace officer organizations embraced a concept called interposition: They believed that it was a sheriff’s job to insert himself between state or federal authorities and his constituents to prevent the enforcement of laws he didn’t agree with. In 1958, the Supreme Court held that this doctrine had no legal basis, but peace officer groups continued to foster and amplify sheriffs’ dissent against legislation they didn’t like. This would last decades. In 1994, a pair of sheriffs filed a suit against the federal government over a new law that compelled police to run background checks on people who bought handguns. The sheriffs won—it was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled, for the feds to make local police enforce the policy. Then, in 2013, in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre, dozens of sheriffs united again, this time against gun-control regulations proposed (but never passed) during the Obama administration.

American sheriffs are still spreading the doctrine of interposition. The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA), which was established in 2011, is now a nationwide organization of right-wing law enforcement officers who share an interpretation of the Constitution that gives sheriffs the “authority to check and balance all levels of government within the jurisdiction of the County.” Among its most famous members is Joe Arpaio, the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, who was pardoned by Donald Trump in 2017 for racially profiling Latinos in order to turn them over to immigration authorities.

There’s always been just one way for most sheriffs to maintain their power: They have to keep getting elected to office. For most of Lummie’s career, that wasn’t a problem. Then came the civil rights movement.

In January 1965, registration of eligible Black voters across the South was upwards of 40 percent, but in Wilcox County it was zero percent. Meanwhile, white registration was 113 percent—some deceased residents were still on the rolls.

One day in 1963, a dozen or so men dressed in their Sunday best climbed into pickup trucks and caravanned from the Bend to Camden. They intended to register to vote, a right guaranteed them by the Fifteenth Amendment, which by then had been on the books nearly a century. They knew that they were breaking ground and risking everything. They’d all heard the infamous story about an elderly Black minister who, years prior, tried to register in Wilcox County, only to be shot and killed. The incident wasn’t documented, but true or not it had an impact. One by one, the men filled out an application at the county courthouse. All of them were rejected.3

3. The first documented instance of a Black man attempting to register to vote in the county was the Reverend James Foster Reese, a transplant from Kentucky. He believed racial dynamics in Wilcox County could and should change, so one day in 1958, he went to the courthouse to exercise his right to get his name on the voting roll; he was turned away. He kept trying to register, but the more he persisted, the more consequences he faced, including physical attacks and threats to his family. He eventually moved to Tennessee. He never succeeded at registering to vote in Alabama.

Hundreds of Black residents would follow their lead in the next two years. Every one of them had to overcome the fear of death. They also had to accept that they could lose their jobs, and that they and their families might face intimidation and threats. The Ku Klux Klan and other vigilantes across the South torched churches, set off car bombs, and assaulted or murdered Black neighbors and voting rights organizers in a desperate war to keep the white power structure intact.

As if that weren’t enough, Black would-be voters had to contend with onerous logistics. As of early 1965, the voting registration office in Camden was open for business twice a month. If a Black resident had a way to get there at the right time on the right day, they still had to pass a literacy test. If they did that, state law dictated that they needed two registered voters of good “moral character” to vouch for them before their registration could be validated. In Wilcox County, there were apparently no white voters willing to vouch for their neighbors of color. In January 1965, registration of eligible Black voters across the South was upwards of 40 percent, but in Wilcox County it was zero percent. Meanwhile, white registration was 113 percent—some deceased residents were still on the rolls.

That February, during a civil rights demonstration in Camden, Martin Luther King Jr. himself approached Sheriff Lummie in a crowd outside the courthouse with a request: Would Lummie himself vouch for voters of color? Onlookers would remember that the sheriff was courteous. He explained plainly to King that, well now, being “in politics” as he was, he couldn’t vouch for any individual voters. King asked him if that was indeed the law. “I haven’t read that in the law, but I’ve heard it,” Lummie said. King then asked if he and his colleagues could at least count on Lummie’s protection. The sheriff shrugged: “I only have two deputies.”

The following month, Jim Clark, the sheriff of Dallas County, Alabama, made international headlines for the violence he and his officers wrought on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, on what became known as Bloody Sunday—March 7, 1965. Even local news coverage celebrated King’s march and vilified Clark.

The press wasn’t a problem for Wilcox County’s sheriff, at least not locally. Once in a while, a reporter from elsewhere would note the county’s “bad reputation” in the context of civil rights, but what happened there tended to stay there. Hollis Curl, the publisher of the local paper, was an old friend and hunting buddy who would later eulogize Sheriff Lummie warmly.4 Curl’s paper didn’t run a word about the marches, smoke bombs, and tear gas in Camden in 1965.

4. Curl described the sheriff as folksy, humble, loyal, larger than life—“a mighty man.” Lummie “loved people” and helped anyone who came to him. He “had the respect of both races,” said Curl, who was sure that “some of his best friends were colored.”

In charming the local media, Lummie was less like Jim Clark than like Laurie Pritchett, police chief of Albany, Georgia. If Clark galvanized the civil rights movement, Pritchett, whom journalist and historian James Reston once called “the smartest of King’s adversaries,” did the opposite. Just like King, Pritchett had studied civil disobedience and the strategies of Mahatma Gandhi, and he set out to diffuse civil rights efforts without producing martyrs. His tactics included keeping racially motivated violence in check, skillfully managing public relations, and cultivating a cordial relationship with King himself. He countered a civil rights push in Albany in November 1961 by ordering his officers to be nonviolent and calling on every Georgia sheriff within a 70-mile radius to give him access to their jails. Hundreds of demonstrators were arrested and dispatched to borrowed cells.

Pritchett’s success was of great interest to Alabama authorities. Bull Connor, the notoriously violent public safety commissioner of Birmingham, once offered what Pritchett called “an outrageous sum” for him to take a short break from his police chief duties and come on as an adviser in the Alabama capital. Pritchett reluctantly agreed, only to leave after a short time in disgust. “I didn’t have anything in common with Bull Connor,” he later said.

Like Pritchett, Lummie had less overt ways of imposing fear and keeping the racial hierarchy intact. Once, when civil rights leaders asked for his protection while they ate at a local restaurant, Lummie let the activists know that it wasn’t his job to look out for them. He also asked for their home addresses. He wanted to be able to reach their families, the sheriff said, because the restaurant’s proprietor was “going to kill you for sure.”

Law enforcement using tear gas and smoke bombs against Camden students in the spring of 1965.

“He was the lawless lawman,” said Sheryl Threadgill Matthews, who at 15 became one of the first of two Black students to integrate Wilcox County High School. There was no police protection for students like Matthews, and no punishment for the classmates who verbally and physically abused her. She wasn’t getting much of an education, she said, so her enrollment lasted only a year before she returned to Camden Academy, the Black Presbyterian secondary school where her father, the Reverend Thomas Threadgill, was a chaplain. “Lummie didn’t play by the book,” Matthews told me. “He did whatever he wanted.”

For a time in 1965, Camden Academy offered housing to student volunteers who came in from across the U.S. to help with voter registration efforts. One student Matthews remembers from that time was Maria Gitin, a skinny white 19-year-old on summer break from college in San Francisco. She had seen the attacks of Bloody Sunday on TV and left home to enlist in a ten-week voter registration program in Wilcox County.

“Lummie Jenkins: not my favorite subject!” Gitin emailed in response to my interview request. She described the sheriff in her 2014 memoir of the civil rights movement, This Bright Light of Ours, as a “notoriously cruel,” “bandy-legged,” “homely” man who endorsed and enforced segregation, and lent his full support to the local Ku Klux Klan, “all while shaking hands and patting Black children’s heads.” Gitin recalled a traumatizing night she spent in the Camden jail, listening to a fellow organizer being brutally beaten in a neighboring cell. (“He was always arresting us,” she said of Lummie when we spoke on the phone. “Every few days.”) Upon her release the next morning, she remembered, she had to pass through the sheriff’s office, where Lummie and his deputies heckled her, laughing and passing around a jar of moonshine. “He was far from unarmed,” she said. “He pretty much always had a big shotgun with him.” It had been pointed at her the day before, when he came to round up her group of civil rights organizers at a local church for “conspiracy to boycott.”

That church was Antioch Baptist, a hub for voter registration efforts. King spoke there at least twice. One night that June, a white mob broke into the building and beat two Black teenagers so severely they were hospitalized. Two days later, on July 1, Lummie showed up at Antioch, ordered everyone out, and padlocked the doors shut.

White students in Gitin’s voter registration program were paired with Black locals. Her canvassing partner was a 16-year-old named Robert Powell. Now living in Bridgeport, Connecticut, Powell still had family in Wilcox County. He laughed out loud when I asked him on the phone about the “unarmed sheriff.”

“When we was demonstrating, we had songs made up about him,” Powell told me. “I’ll never forget some of those songs.” He recited one: “ ‘Ol’ Lummie, you’ll never be able to jail us all—segregation is bound to fall.’ ” Powell said that Lummie hated the songs. As for the people singing them: “There wasn’t much he could do at the time, with a hundred or two hundred fifty people, but jail them. And the jail wasn’t big enough to hold everybody,” Powell said. “He couldn’t stand it.”

Shelly Dale was arrested in the summer of 1965 during a voting rights demonstration. She was a teenager at the time; she went on to become Wilcox County’s tax assessor. She kept her arrest record in her desk drawer and fished it out to show me. “When you’re young, you’ll do some crazy things, right?” she said.5

5. Shelly Dale’s interview wasn’t originally featured in this story, because the audio files of my conversation with her were corrupted. I was later able to salvage them and can now include her perspective.

But getting arrested wasn’t the most memorable occurrence of that summer. “My baby sister got shot right there, right [in] front,” she gestured out the window of her office, at the town square. She recalled the bullet ricocheting off a parked car. It went in one of her sister’s shoulders and out the other. The bullet left “a long scar,” Dale said, and nothing worse. “If it had went that way,” Dale drew a line with her finger from her shoulder toward her heart, “she would have been dead.”

I asked her if, amid everything that happened that summer, she ever met Lummie Jenkins personally. “Please don’t call him Lummie Jenkins, OK?” she asked me gently. “He was such a mighty man. Please call him Mr. Lummie.” She saw him, she said, but never spoke to him. She told me it wasn’t her place to judge what he did back then. “He just had… power,” she said. “And people was afraid of him. Simple as that.”

By the end of the summer of 1965, the number of Black voters registered in Wilcox County had gone from a couple dozen to five hundred and counting. When the national Voting Rights Act became law that August, Alabama’s vouching rule was no more. The following year, federal election supervisors would arrive to see that Black voters were able to cast their ballots in the 1966 election. It wouldn’t be long before Black voters outnumbered white voters in Wilcox County and throughout Alabama.

Still, the past kept dogging the present, and Sheriff Lummie helped it along.

“Please don’t call him Lummie Jenkins, OK? He was such a mighty man. Please call him Mr. Lummie.”

“We had a café on the side of the road, right down there,” John Gragg told me as we sat in his house in Gee’s Bend. He pointed over his shoulder, toward where Route 5 joins the top of the Bend to the west. In his slow, low voice, he said, “They went in there, beat her up, and killed her.”

By the mid-1960s, there were outside eyes on white law enforcement here. But in the years before the civil rights movement, things were different. Stories from that time still circulate in whispers around Gee’s Bend. Della McDuffie’s story is one of them.

On a Saturday just after midnight in April 1953, Lummie Jenkins and other officers entered a Black-owned café, apparently to enforce a law that no music be played on Sundays. The place was bustling, and witnesses later told the Chicago Defender and the Afro-American that the sheriff and his deputies stormed in swinging blackjacks and a rubber hose, firing shots into the ceiling and floor “to scare the n–––s.” It worked. Patrons dove out windows to escape. One person, however, couldn’t run: the café owner’s wife, Della McDuffie. She was 63 and paralyzed, so she used a wheelchair. Several accounts would describe Lummie ordering her to get up and go to bed. When she couldn’t, he beat her with a rubber hose. Within an hour—despite frantic care from her husband, William, and the arrival of a doctor—Della was dead.

William would later recall seeing a trickle of blood running from his wife’s ear down her face. Her death certificate, prepared by the sheriff’s office, listed her cause of death as a “preexisting blood condition.”

Her family fought back. Future Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall, then a lawyer and head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, asked the Justice Department to open an investigation into Della’s death, along with injuries sustained by another woman on the scene. According to press coverage from the period, the FBI made preliminary inquiries, but local witnesses, some of whom had already been threatened, refused to testify, and law enforcement was uncooperative. A year later, William McDuffie drowned in unclear circumstances. DOJ investigators wrote back to Marshall that they couldn’t do anything further with the case. Subsequently, the surviving McDuffies reported house fires and death threats made against them. They eventually left Alabama.

On Lummie’s watch, there were other suspicious and often violent deaths of Black residents that the sheriff’s office never found any foul play in connection with. In January 1966, 32-year-old David Colston was killed by a white farmer, J. T. Reaves, near Antioch Baptist Church. Colston had been on his way to a funeral, after which he was going to a rally for the election of Black citizens to local office, when Reaves rear-ended his car. Reaves claimed that Colston got out of his vehicle and confronted him, so he shot him in self-defense. Colston died at the scene.

Following the shooting, Reaves turned himself in to Lummie. As for what happened next, some reports say that, after handing over his gun, Reaves went home. Others claim that he spent a night in jail. Either way, in short order Reaves was free. He was never punished for the crime, which the sheriff’s office recorded was the result of heated tempers during a “traffic incident.”

Witnesses contradicted this account from the start. Colston’s wife, who was in the car with him, said there was no argument between her husband and Reaves. In her telling, Colston went to check his car’s bumper after Reaves hit him and Reaves shot him in the head at close range. It was an assassination.

Colston’s murder seems to have shifted the tone of life in Wilcox County. Black residents recalled their white neighbors becoming emboldened, leaving guns on their car seats and dashboards for all to see. They understood Reaves’s violence to be not just against Colston but against all of them. Colston’s funeral portrait was hung in the Southern Christian Leadership Conference headquarters in Selma—“a literal picture,” Jet magazine reported at the time, “of Alabama Negros’ drive to secure the vote.” 6

6. The NAACP called for the investigation of other deaths of Black Wilcox County residents that occurred in 1967—a year Lummie also happened to serve as the countys coroner. One of the deceased was 31-year-old Rodell Williamson, whose body was found “hung up” with fishing line in the Alabama River. The sheriff’s office declared it an accidental drowning. Lummie was quoted in Jetmagazine as speculating that Williamson “may have been in the river swimming. Or he could have fell in.” Family members who identified Williamson’s body told reporters that his neck was gashed and appeared to be broken, that his head was “smashed,” and that there were bruises on his chest. A number of area residents claimed they’d heard that Williamson had been beaten to death, but Lummie’s deputy said that was “a damn lie—and you can quote me.”

Walter Calhoun campaigning for sheriff.

Fewer than two weeks after Colston’s death, a Black grocery store owner named Walter Calhoun put on a suit, drove down to the courthouse, and filed papers to run for sheriff of Wilcox County. Calhoun was evicted from his store two days later, but he didn’t bow to intimidation. His name stayed on the ballot.

Meanwhile, with encouragement from King, Black residents of Wilcox County continued to register to vote. Lummie didn’t seem worried about his electoral prospects. “I’ve always tried to protect people of both races and the people know it,” he told a New York Times reporter. “I believe I’m going to get votes from both sides.”

White federal election supervisors were again appointed to watch over the polls. Ballot counters were white; polling places were white businesses. There was no guarantee that Black citizens’ votes would be counted, that they would feel safe voting for the candidate they wanted, or that they would feel safe voting at all. Whatever happened, whoever was able to vote as they wished, of the 6,198 votes cast in the sheriff’s race, Lummie beat Calhoun by a margin of 722.

It would be four more years before Lummie’s reign finally came to an end. In the 1970 election, at the age of 69, he lost to his opponent by just ninety-three votes. The victor wasn’t a Black man, however. It was F. R. Albritton, the former mayor who’d once joined Lummie in trying to block civil rights protesters from reaching the county courthouse. “The other man catered to the n––– vote,” Lummie lamented to Bob Adelman, a photographer who covered the civil rights movement. “He made speeches to them. He went to their churches. I’ve never done that.”7

7. Albritton said he ran for sheriff because his old friend Lummie—who’d had two heart attacks—was planning to retire. Only at the last minute, Albritton claimed, did Lummie decide to stay in the race. According to Albritton, when he won Lummie didn’t speak to him for a month.

The Alabama Peace Officers Association would print that Lummie Jenkins had “retired.” According to a report from a university student teaching in Wilcox County at the time, he went out with a vow to “fill the jails with n–––s” before he left office.

Among the Gee’s Bend voters who cast a ballot for Albritton was John Gragg. “We all voted for Albritton,” he told me. “Albritton got to be the sheriff and forced Lummie Jenkins out.” That was satisfying. “But then Albritton made him a deputy,” Gragg added.

Lummie didn’t leave the law completely, but he no longer had absolute power: a small but significant change that showed Wilcox County might soon be ready for a bigger transformation. And two terms later, in the November 1978 election, a remarkable thing happened. Albritton was beaten by Prince Arnold, a 27-year-old Black schoolteacher from the tiny unincorporated town of Pine Apple. Arnold would go on to serve eight terms, tying Lummie for the title of longest-serving sheriff in the state.

A month after Arnold was elected, but before he took office, 77-year-old Lummie Jenkins died of a heart attack. By then, Sheryl Threadgill Matthews was a social welfare officer at the Alabama Department of Human Resources. “My coworker, a white lady, came up to me at the water fountain,” she remembered. “She said to me, ‘Mr. Lummie said he would die and go to hell before he see a Black man become sheriff. And, well, I guess he sure did.’ ”

According to a report from a university student teaching in Wilcox County at the time, Lummie went out with a vow to “fill the jails with n–––s” before he left office.

In the summer of 1965—the same summer when white residents shot at and tried to run down Maria Gitin, Robert Powell, and other voter registration volunteers in Wilcox County—19-year-old Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, a recent graduate of Wilcox County High School, was still living in Camden. In 2006, as a U.S. senator from Alabama, Jeff Sessions voted along with the rest of Congress to unanimously extend the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Still, he complained that it was outdated and unfair to the history of his state. “I am worried because [the extension] does little to acknowledge the tremendous progress made over the last forty years in Alabama and other covered jurisdictions,” Sessions said at the time. “Today is not 1965, and the situation with respect to voting rights in Alabama and other covered jurisdictions is dramatically different from 1965. I would have expected Congress to recognize this tremendous progress.”

In 2013, Sessions championed a Supreme Court decision restricting federal oversight of voting rules in nine southern states, calling it “good news for the South.” Within two years, Alabama codified a requirement that voters show state-issued identification at the polls, then proceeded to announce that it was closing the offices that issue driver’s licenses in nearly half the state’s sixty-seven counties. All the affected locations were rural, and they included every county where at least 75 percent of the population was Black. Wilcox was among them.

In some ways, Wilcox County is different than it was in Lummie’s time. Many of its current elected officials are Black, including Earnest Evans, the current sheriff, who has held the position since 2010. In a photograph on Evans’s 2018 reelection campaign website, he stands before the Wilcox County Courthouse Annex, which was erected in 1976. It looks a lot like the courthouse Lummie posed in front of in the photo adorning the cover of his granddaughter’s book. Evans’s sheriff’s badge shines on his suit jacket. His gaze is toward the horizon. Underneath the photograph is a reminder: “You will need a Photo I.D. to vote.” Meanwhile, at the county’s main public high school—the one Sessions attended, the one where Sheryl Threadgill Matthews toughed out a year of abuse in the name of desegregation—enrollment has flipped entirely. Due to white flight, not a single enrolled student is white.8

8. Today the school is 98 percent Black.

When Robert Powell looks at today’s Wilcox County, he doesn’t see the progress he fought for. “We put our lives on the line to try to create some type of change, as a people, as a race of people,” he told me. “But Camden is still a segregated place to this day.” Despite “all the struggles and sacrifices we made, the more things change, the more they stay the same.”


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

14,445 and Counting

The Blue Book Burglar

The Social Register was a who’s who of America’s rich and powerful—the heirs of robber barons, scions of political dynasties, and descendants of Mayflower passengers. It was also the perfect hit list for the country’s hardest-working art thief.

By Jack Rodolico

The Atavist Magazine, No. 168


Jack Rodolico is a freelance writer and radio reporter. His work has aired on NPR, the BBC, Marketplace, and 99% Invisible.

Editor: Jonah Ogles
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Jake Conley
Illustrator: Nada Hayek

Published in October 2025.


The phone inside the mansion rang relentlessly—five times, twenty, forty—echoing from the spacious kitchen to the bedrooms upstairs. The house was a 5,200-square-foot Georgian Colonial constructed of red brick. It had a pool and a tennis court, and it stood at the end of a long wooded driveway, off a secluded cul-de-sac in Greenwich, Connecticut. The town was the crown jewel of the state’s so-called Gold Coast, a swath of wealthy enclaves where Prescott Bush—father of George H. W.—was buried, where Robert F. Kennedy got married, and where Donald Trump would soon purchase his starter mansion. The owners of the red-brick mansion were a banker and his wife (herself the daughter of another banker) whose wedding had been written up in the New York Times. It was Independence Day 1980, and like many people in their social set, they were vacationing on the South Shore of Long Island.

That’s exactly what the caller was hoping for. As the phone rang again and again, his two accomplices listened outside the home. The caller hung up after fifty rings. The men hiding in the dark were confident that the home was empty, but they took one more precaution to be absolutely sure. Once the ringing stopped, they snipped the phone line clean through, setting off a silent alarm that notified police of a break-in. The men then hid in the trees near the house and waited. A Greenwich patrolman pulled up, surveyed the property, assumed it was a false alarm, and left.

Listen to the audio version of this story from Apple News

It was time. The two men broke a pane of glass near the back door, entered the mansion, and proceeded to plunder its contents. From a linen closet they took several pillowcases and filled them with approximately 350 pieces of silver: salad forks, fish knives, and bouillon spoons; a pair of grape shears and a cold-meat fork; a baby’s hairbrush and an ashtray; something called a star-footed muffineer. In the master bedroom, they emptied drawers of pearls, a gold watch, and a diamond-and-platinum band. They were thorough, searching cabinets in the library and lowering a pull-down ladder to ransack the attic. They took choice baubles, such as a porcelain umbrella stand and a tea caddy with an ivory finial.

In the living room, the men did something out of the ordinary for most house thieves: They removed a handful of paintings from the walls, but stole just two. These were landscapes by eighteenth-century Dutch and American painters whose names were unlikely to appear in an art history textbook. They were valuable pieces of art, but obscure ones.

Once the thieves had collected what they came for, they exited the house and walked to the end of the driveway. The third accomplice, who had been circling the block in a getaway car since calling the residence, picked them up there, and together they drove off into the night.

When the adjusters at Tiffany & Co. later appraised what had been taken from the mansion, the inventory stretched to five pages. The robbery was valued at more than $100,000, a figure that, when adjusted for inflation, nearly quadruples in today’s dollars—although the art has likely increased tenfold in value.

Greenwich detective Jim Hirsch had become somewhat inured to such crimes when he first heard about the burglary. Home robberies peaked nationally in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and Greenwich, where many houses were essentially poorly guarded museums, attracted talented thieves. There was the Silver Bandit, who snuck into the dining room of a home while its occupants were sleeping to steal antique silver. There was the Dinner Set Gang, who, while the rich entertained in the dining room, tore apart the bedrooms in search of jewelry. These thieves were a “pain in the ass,” Hirsch told me.

It would take Hirsch some time to discern what was exceptional about the crew that pulled off the Independence Day heist. For one, their M.O. was supremely cautious. Even more unusual was that this crew had an eye for quality, be it silver, jewels, antiques, or art. “They knew when they saw something,” said Hirsch. “They knew value.”

Actually, just one of the thieves knew value. And he was not yet done stealing the prized possessions of the East Coast elite. Not even close.

While stealing art is a challenge, selling it—and making a profit—is much, much harder.

I came across the Greenwich case in 2017. At the time, I was part of a team producing an investigative podcast about the 1990 robbery of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston. The Gardner burglary is a case of utmost superlatives. It ranks as the largest property theft in U.S. history, and has been called “the greatest art heist ever.” More than half a billion dollars’ worth of masterpieces were stolen, including Rembrandt’s only seascape. None of them have been recovered, and no one has ever been charged for the crime.

And yet I couldn’t help but wonder: Greatest art heist compared with what?

In searching for an answer, I learned everything I could about art robberies big and small, from the decades before and since the Gardner heist. I interviewed cops and crooks, academics and insurance adjusters. I pulled news clips about museum jobs across the U.S. and Europe. I read papers about organized-crime syndicates looting archaeological sites in Asia and the Middle East. I learned a lot about this rarified corner of the crime world—for instance, that the black market values stolen art at about 10 percent of the legitimate market price, and that authorities are most likely to recover missing pieces at the point of sale, whether that’s a Christie’s auction or a handoff in a hotel room to an undercover cop pretending to be a cash buyer. While stealing art is a challenge, selling it—and making a profit—is much, much harder.

So when I read a news story about the thief who had led the crew behind the Greenwich robbery, I wanted to know more. The red-brick mansion burglarized in 1980 was just one hit on a long list of them. Dozens of homes owned by members of America’s moneyed class were raided by the same thief and his crew. They were after art, but not the sort that would draw interest from the press. They wanted lesser-known works, and lots of them—the kinds of pieces that would be relatively easy to sell because the entire world wasn’t looking for them.

Over the course of my reporting, I came to believe that the ringleader of these crimes was in a class by himself. I doubt there’s such a thing as the greatest art thief of all time, but I don’t know of any burglar who worked so hard.

Jim Hirsch admired the titans of finance, politics, business, and industry he was sworn to protect. “Loved ’em,” he said. I interviewed Hirsch in a conference room at a Greenwich hedge fund where he’d taken a job as head of security after retiring from the police force. “Old money is tremendous. New money stinks. They seem to think they’re something special,” Hirsch said.

He told me about a friend of his: Andrew Rockefeller, of the Rockefellers, who passed away a few years ago. “Nicest guy you ever want to meet. Khaki pants, Top-Siders, and a sport shirt.” Hirsch was proud to know Rockefeller and his ilk. “Super, super people who remained friends with you after you left the job,” he said.

So when more than eighty homes in Greenwich were stripped of riches on Hirsch’s watch between 1980 to 1982—and that’s not counting the dozens more that happened in nearby communities—he took it a little personally. “It was embarrassing,” he said.

What the burglars stole was as impressive as who they stole it from. From the home of a political strategist Richard Nixon once included on his “enemies list,” they took a collection of oriental rugs (worth $19,400 at the time) and cracked a safe to find a sizable collection of antique stamps ($60,249). From the palatial estate of a family so rich they gifted a library to Yale University, the thieves stole three Tiffany floor lamps ($31,000). “These are not lamps, these are lamps,” Hirsch told me. “Highly identifiable tempered lampshades. They’re magnificent.”

From an insurance executive, the thieves took a nineteenth-century Swiss music box ($20,000). From a Rockefeller—not Andrew, another one—they took a platinum bracelet embedded with 280 diamonds ($15,300). They broke in to the homes of a pioneering cardiologist, the chairman of the National Audubon Society’s board of directors, and a descendant of an early investor in Thomas Edison’s light bulb. They stole a pair of handheld fans originally owned by an emperor of France ($2,000) and a full-length raccoon-fur coat ($2,000). They stuffed an untold fortune’s worth of silverware into countless pillowcases.

And then there were the paintings. The thieves homed in on eighteenth- and nineteenth-century oils, each canvas small enough to fit inside a briefcase. The works had humdrum titles such as A Hawking Party Resting at a Wayside Inn ($2,400), Hunter in Pink Coat on Brown Horse Jumping Fence ($3,000), and H.M.S. Duncannon 120 Guns ($5,000). They were painted by long-dead British, American, and Dutch artists for whom there was a boutique market of small galleries catering to the tastes of the very types of people the art was stolen from. It was uncanny what the thieves recognized as valuable. For instance, from the widow of a descendant of a signer of the Declaration of Independence they stole an 1842 painting by a French artist, a work that had not been on the open market in generations because it was passed down through the family.

Victims of these thefts returned from vacations in Europe, Martha’s Vineyard, or the Virgin Islands to find their homes ransacked—although one police report stated, “The entry was not immediately noticed due to the enormity of the house.” Losing family heirlooms was bad enough, but the violation of privacy and security was something else. “The property’s always insured,” Hirsch told me. “The problem that your home was invaded is a whole different world. There were some people that sold their houses. Some people used to greet you at the door with a baseball bat after that.”

DNA evidence was not yet a forensic tool, which was unfortunate since the thieves left behind plenty of it, often on cigarette butts stubbed out in the course of the robberies. Once, in a guest bathroom, a burglar defecated in the toilet and did not flush.

As the rate of the robberies picked up, from about one per month in 1980 to several per weekend in 1982, police began to notice patterns: the pillowcases used as loot bags, the broad array of high-value spoils, the timing (always after dark and on weekends). “You could take the complainant’s name off any of these burglary reports and exchange it with any other one,” Hirsch once told a newspaper reporter. “They were all identical.” Law enforcement concluded that the burglars cut the phone lines in the homes they targeted to deliberately trigger alarm systems, most likely to watch hapless patrolmen visit and then leave the scene.

Who was buying all the loot from the thieves? The cops figured it was someone with art-world savvy. “A burglar is only as good as his fence,” a detective from Bedford, New York, just across the state line from Greenwich, told a New York Times reporter. “A junkie doesn’t have a good fence—he goes to a pawnbroker. But someone who steals paintings, he has a good fence. You know you’re not dealing with something run-of-the-mill.”

Law enforcement also became convinced that there was a link among the victims. Not just their wealth and the location of their homes—something more singular. Detectives in Fairfield County, Connecticut, and Westchester County, New York, cross-referenced their cases. Did the victims belong to any clubs? Only the most exclusive yacht and country clubs in the country, but there wasn’t one they all belonged to. What about academic affiliations? Collectively, they’d been to every elite boarding school and Ivy League university, but they weren’t all, say, graduates of Yale. Did they use the same arborist? Was the same individual collecting their trash? No and no. The police did notice one thing: Many of the victims’ phone numbers were not publicly listed, which made the fifty-ring calls odd—to say nothing of the hang-up calls some targets had received prior to being robbed.

Two years into the crime wave, investigators were no closer to identifying the burglars, who were more prolific than ever. Over Memorial Day weekend in 1982, they hit five houses in Bedford alone. In Greenwich, they were returning to rob homes they’d previously struck. Police decided to cast a wider net via teletype, a messaging system used by law enforcement around the country, in the hope that someone, somewhere, knew something useful. According to Hirsch, the teletype spelled out the thieves’ methods and asked any department experiencing similar crimes in its jurisdiction to contact the Greenwich police.

The next morning, Hirsch got a call from a cop in Massachusetts who wanted to know: Had he ever heard of a book called the Social Register?

Blue Book members were the richest of the rich, the oldest of old money. Their homes were almost guaranteed to be chock-full of high-value loot.

America’s aristocracy traces its lineage to a time between the end of the Civil War and the dawn of the twentieth century, in the Gilded Age. Think Andrew Carnegie, J. P. Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt. Robber barons built obscene fortunes, monopolies lined the pockets of corrupt politicians, and unchecked capitalism opened a permanent chasm between the very rich and everyone else. The upper crust loved to throw opulent balls and banquets, which allowed hosts to show off their money, power, and influence, and prominent socialites kept so-called visiting lists of well-connected friends, acquaintances, and business contacts.

Louis Keller was not part of the new aristocracy, but he recognized a business opportunity in these quasi-private lists. He collected them, consolidated them, and produced a master copy of high society, selling it only to those who’d made the cut. First published in 1886, the Social Register was a thin, elegantly bound book with pumpkin-colored lettering on a black background. When later editions featured a blue cover, it became known as the Blue Book.

The first edition drew exclusively from the social lists of people with homes in Newport, Rhode Island, a favorite vacation destination of the elite. In time there were Blue Books for almost every major U.S. city. A group called the Social Register Association became the gatekeeper of the Blue Book, and it created strict rules for new entries. A person could be listed because of marriage to someone already included in the book, if they were elected president of the United States, or if they were nominated by an existing member. For many years, the Social Register was classist as well as anti-Semitic and racist; excluded Jewish society members in Chicago created their own version of the Blue Book in 1918, and the Social Register did not include a Black member for nearly a century after its creation.

In 1976, the city books were consolidated into a single volume covering high society nationwide. It listed approximately 50,000 names. By the 1980s, being in the book still had low-key cultural cachet, particularly for direct descendants of Gilded Age gentry. Members could flip through the Social Register’s pages to learn the essentials about each other. What school did so-and-so attend? What yacht club did they belong to? Were they related to someone on the Mayflower? And, for the purposes of correspondence, what was their address and telephone number?

While it was difficult to get listed in the Blue Book, it did not take a criminal genius to obtain a copy. “All you gotta do is one burglary in one house, and there they are!” said Roland Anderson, a retired Massachusetts detective who, as far as I could ascertain, was the first person to suspect that the burglars targeting Greenwich, Bedford, and other wealthy East Coast communities were using the Social Register as a hit list.

Anderson spent forty years as a cop in the Boston suburb of Weston, which, during his tenure, was the richest town in Massachusetts. Now 82, “Rolie” Anderson possesses a stunning memory for details about burglars he chased in the 1970s. When I met with him for an interview, he drove me around Weston as if still on patrol. “That one up there was hit,” he said, gesturing toward a single-family home large enough to be a castle. “Think of the dark of night. They entered through a cellar window near the garage. And they cleaned it out.”

When Anderson joined the force, in 1968, home robberies were common but not lucrative; burglars typically struck during the daytime, when victims were at work, stealing televisions and maybe a fistful of jewelry. But in 1978, two years before the Greenwich robberies began, a more ambitious crew commenced working in Weston. “We started to see the oriental rugs rolled up, antique furnishings taken,” Anderson said. “And, in some cases, paintings.” The thieves also cut their targets’ phone lines during robberies. Anderson questioned victims about their affiliations, hoping to figure out why the thieves had singled them out. One of them said, “Well, we are listed in the Social Register.”

Anderson had never heard of it. But thumbing through the book’s pages, he decided that what the thieves were doing made perfect sense. Any big house in Weston was likely to be a decent target for a thief, but Blue Book members were the richest of the rich, the oldest of old money. Their homes were almost guaranteed to be chock-full of high-value loot.

In an era of police work that Anderson calls “the dark ages,” he was particularly effective at shoe-leather investigating. That included combing through teletypes, which were, he said, “the only network we really had among all of us.” Though reading all the messages that came over the transom could be tedious and time-consuming, Anderson and his colleagues still did it “every single day.” That’s how he discovered a slew of identical unsolved robberies in virtually every exclusive Boston suburb, as well as tony communities in Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and Maine.

So he’d figured out the scheme. But who was behind it? Anderson studied the rap sheets of known antiques thieves and their associates, and soon built up a lengthy, almost encyclopedic list of men he believed were capable of pulling off the Social Register robberies. “Rolie Anderson is probably the best detective I’ve ever worked with,” said Arthur Bourque, a former trooper with the Massachusetts State Police’s major crimes unit. “He’s just got a ferocious appetite for background and research.”

On November 19, 1979, Bourque met with Anderson and produced the single oldest law enforcement document I obtained about the Blue Book burglaries. The memo’s subject line reads: “Intelligence regarding antique thefts in Massachusetts received from Det. Rollie [sic] Anderson of the Weston, Mass. P.D.” It includes a list of fifty-eight names, all people Anderson believed were involved in organized antiques theft. But he had no way to know which of them—if any—were using the Blue Book. “They were so adept at what they were doing and how they did it,” Anderson told me.

No sooner had Anderson handed off his list of suspects to the state police than the Social Register robberies in northern New England stopped. Bourque concluded that the thieves suspected law enforcement was onto them. “There was just too much heat going on up here,” he said.

Two years later, in August 1982, Bourque stepped up to the long roll of paper issuing from his office’s teletype machine to inspect what had come in overnight. That’s where he found the notice describing a string of burglaries in Connecticut and New York with a familiar M.O.

Convinced that the thieves Anderson investigated had moved their operations south, Bourque dialed up Jim Hirsch. “Get ahold of this fuckin’ book,” Hirsch remembered Bourque telling him, “because whoever you got in town who’s in that book is a potential target.”

Armed with intelligence from Massachusetts, Greenwich police went into Labor Day weekend 1982 as prepared as they’d ever been to catch the burglars in the act. They suspected that the crew were driving down from Massachusetts to commit their crimes, so patrolmen were directed to look out for cars with Massachusetts plates. Police were confident that the homes of people in the Social Register were at risk. The problem was knowing which ones: Greenwich was home to more Blue Book members than any suburban community in America.

At 1:30 a.m. on Friday, a resident heard banging noises next door at the house of a Blue Book member who was away for the weekend. Police arrived to find the house’s phone line snipped and a window busted; a perpetrator had slashed his arm on the broken glass and fled before entering the home. Then, at 12:04 a.m. on Saturday, a Social Register family reported that they had returned from dinner to find their power and phone lines cut and their home robbed. According to a police memo, “The intruder/s had made entry to a room which can only be described as a vault.” There they filled seventeen pillowcases with sterling silver. While inspecting the outside of the home, cops “heard what they felt to be a large subject running away,” but they were unable to track him through the dark woods. Later, on Saturday night, a third Social Register family returned from vacation to find their home stripped of more than $80,000 in valuables.

Despite law enforcement’s best efforts, the thieves had a good haul to show for the weekend. But it would prove to be their last ride in Greenwich.

The following weekend, at 10:50 on Friday night, a Greenwich cop spotted a white 1982 Plymouth Reliant with Massachusetts plates. There were three men in it, and they were cruising down Round Hill Road, where seven homes had been hit over the previous two years, more than on any other street in town. Police followed the car onto the Merritt Parkway, where it set off eastbound toward Boston, then pulled it over. According to a police memo describing the stop, the men in the Reliant said they were returning from the racetrack at Belmont Park, on Long Island, and were looking for a place to eat.

The driver handed over a license that identified him as Dennis Quinn; the car was a rental, Quinn said, from a company in Cape Cod. The other two men had no identification but gave their surnames as Gallagher and Hogan. Quinn allowed the police to check the car’s trunk. “Nothing was found,” the memo states. “Subjects were allowed to continue on their way.”

The next morning, after Hirsch learned about the traffic stop, he compared the names the men had provided against Rolie Anderson’s list of suspects and found a match: Dennis Quinn, 34, short and slight, with a mop-top haircut and an aquiline nose. Police then found that Quinn had rented a hotel room near Greenwich nearly every weekend that summer.

As for the other two men, one of them was identified as Charles Gallagher, 26, tall and hulking, with a horseshoe mustache. He wasn’t on Anderson’s list, but he had a criminal record—larceny, breaking and entering, stealing government property, assault with a deadly weapon. Police records turned up nothing about the man who called himself Hogan.

So Hirsch went to the expert. He dialed up Anderson and described the unidentified man in the Reliant: five feet ten, paunchy, with blue eyes, shaggy brown hair, and a hooked nose above a chevron mustache. Anderson knew exactly who Hirsch was talking about, but his name wasn’t Hogan. It was Raymond Flynn.

amazingly, they appeared to commit yet another burglary right under the FBI’s nose.

After years of playing cat and mouse with the Blue Book thieves, law enforcement finally had information they could work with, and in the waning weeks of the summer of 1982, a rare collaboration began. A dozen local police departments from York, Maine, down to Long Island worked with state police from Massachusetts, New York, and Connecticut to funnel intelligence to the FBI, which committed three dozen agents from six field offices to the investigation. The expansive team engaged in round-the-clock surveillance—including unmarked cars and fixed-wing aircraft—of Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher, who were now officially known as the Social Register gang.

Eager to shut down the burglary operation, the FBI came up with a two-step plan: First observe Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher robbing a home. Then follow the suspects to their fence. Step two was crucial. “It all revolves around their fence. And in some cases, like artwork, there’s probably only one real fence who can get rid of it, maybe two,” Bourque told me. “You can have twenty-five different burglary operations and one or two fences.”

Law enforcement tracked the Reliant the men had been driving to a rental company near Flynn’s home on Cape Cod. There they learned that the men often rented the same car. By the time the suspects rented it again and drove to the North Shore of Long Island—Great Gatsby territory, where Blue Book homes had been intermittently struck since 1980—the FBI had equipped it with a tracking device. According to a law enforcement memo, the suspects cased homes in Oyster Bay, Mill Neck, and Laurel Hollow, all towns “of Social Register caliber.” Three times, Quinn dropped off Flynn and Gallagher in ritzy neighborhoods. Though agents did not observe a robbery, they suspected that one had occurred because when the suspects convened at a Ramada Inn later that night, “they were observed to be carrying clothing, possibly attempting to conceal any contraband.”

The next morning, Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher drove to a Western Union in Queens and picked up $1,500, which the FBI hypothesized had been wired to them by their fence as an advance on whatever they’d stolen the previous night. The suspects then proceeded to the Belmont Park racetrack. After gambling, they drove to Providence, Rhode Island, where they stopped for Chinese food. There, according to a police memo, the “suspects became involved in an argument between themselves and Gallagher walked out.” Flynn and Quinn hopped into the Plymouth and caught up with Gallagher as he ascended an entrance ramp to the highway. “Gallagher got into the car and a fistfight ensued,” the memo states. As the men threw punches inside the parked Plymouth, the FBI tail was forced to continue onto the highway to avoid being spotted. “Suspects then backed down the ramp,” the memo notes, “and FBI lost the car.”

The next weekend, the FBI were on their heels when Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher drove the Plymouth to a Holiday Inn in Princeton, New Jersey. FBI agents booked the room next to the suspects as well as the room above, and from a surveillance van in the hotel’s parking lot, they snapped tight-framed black-and-white photographs: Quinn placing a call from a phone booth. Gallagher scratching his ass while pointing at a parked Corvette. Flynn, more than once, seeming to look directly into the camera. “Suspects were overheard to say that they only had six dollars among themselves,” reads a law enforcement memo.

Agents observed the men casing five Social Register homes in a single neighborhood on Saturday night. On Sunday night, undercover law enforcement followed the men back to the same area, where, amazingly, the crew appeared to commit yet another burglary right under the FBI’s nose. “When the suspects returned to the motel,” a memo states, “they were observed to be carrying a large box.” This time agents were able to confirm that a robbery had occurred: Someone had just stolen $25,000 worth of silver, jewelry, and three yellow pillowcases from the Princeton home of a great-great-great-grandson of President Martin Van Buren.

The next morning, the suspects picked up more cash from the Western Union in Queens and again drove to the racetrack. As they gambled, something happened that gave the FBI an advantage. “While the car was at the track parking lot, it sustained a flat tire,” a memo reads. There is no evidence that the FBI was responsible for the flat, but it was certainly a fortuitous development. When the thieves returned to the vehicle and opened the trunk to look for tools to change the tire, a photographer in the FBI’s surveillance van was perfectly positioned to see what was inside—including a yellow pillowcase. It was the kind of evidence law enforcement had been looking for.

Now all the agents had to do was follow the burglars to their fence. But when the thieves slammed the Reliant’s trunk shut, according to a memo, “the FBI [tracking] device fell from the car and was discovered by the suspects.” The men left the racetrack “very wary of any tails.”

Fence or no fence, the FBI was not about to lose the suspects again. Agents swarmed the car and arrested the Social Register gang on the Throgs Neck Bridge connecting Queens to the Bronx. Inside the Reliant, in addition to yellow pillowcases full of silver, agents found road atlases for the Northeast with various locations circled; hand-written lists of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of 917 people listed in the Social Register; and a 1975 edition of the Blue Book for New York City and its wealthy suburbs.

Over his three-decade career, from 1967 to 1998, FBI agent Peter Melley worked all kinds of cases: terrorism, organized crime, even the bomb squad. “This was my one and only art theft case,” he told me. When I sat down in Melley’s dining room in Long Island for an interview, he presented me with an extraordinary artifact: the Blue Book seized from the Plymouth Reliant, its yellowed pages crammed with handwritten marginalia. I flipped through it with something approaching reverence.

Melley was not on the Throgs Neck Bridge on October 4, 1982, but the case landed on his desk shortly after the arrests. The Department of Justice tasked him with tying Flynn, Quinn, and Gallagher to as many Blue Book burglaries as possible and pressuring them to flip on their fence. He sent a memo to police departments requesting unsolved cases that fit the burglars’ M.O. He was quickly inundated with files—none of which definitively tied the men to the robberies.

When Melley visited them in jail, he quickly figured out who was in charge. “Quinn and Gallagher were not the most intelligent people in the world,” Melley said. Quinn was the wheelman, the getaway driver, while Gallagher struck Melley as more of an opportunist than a seasoned art thief. The two men refused to cooperate. Even if they had talked, Melley told me, “they wouldn’t have made much difference.” (Both pleaded guilty to interstate transportation of stolen property. Gallagher was sentenced to four years; Quinn got 18 months.)

Ray Flynn, on the other hand, “was a highly intelligent person,” Melley said. If the feds hoped to bring a case against the fence, Melley was sure, Flynn would have to talk.

Flynn was one of eight children raised in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and his siblings were all upstanding. Some were veterans of the Army, Navy, and Coast Guard. Some were elementary school educators. One of his brothers was a Cape Cod police officer. Flynn started out on the straight and narrow. He attended Stony Brook University on Long Island but dropped out, according to Melley. Throughout his twenties, Flynn caught a slew of larceny charges, serving two yearlong sentences in state prison. In 1974, when he was 27, his Massachusetts rap sheet abruptly ceased growing, but not because he stopped breaking the law. “He was getting busted when he was younger,” Rolie Anderson said. “He was making some stupid mistakes.” Simply put, he stopped getting arrested because he got better at his line of work.

When Melley interviewed Flynn, he was facing several years in federal prison for the Blue Book burglaries. So prosecutors offered him a deal: Confess to the crimes, identify the fence and any other people involved in the scheme, and prosecutors would grant him immunity. That would allow him to return home to his wife and their children. “We wanted to know every crime he had ever committed,” Melley said.

But Flynn wouldn’t sing. Instead, in December 1982, he pleaded guilty at the U.S. District Court in Brooklyn to interstate commerce of stolen goods. Afterward he was moved to federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut.

Within a year, circumstances changed. In September 1983, Flynn learned that his family had been in a horrific car crash. His wife and daughter would recover, but his two-year-old son was in a coma. The news pushed Flynn over the edge, and he agreed to talk if it meant getting out of prison. “He gave us chapter and verse,” Melley said. “He was fully cooperative.”

Once Flynn started talking, he had a lot to say. “We must have spent about three or four months with him,” Melley said. “He took us all over Connecticut, Westchester County, and the North Shore, and showed us all the different homes they burglarized. He remembered when they did it and what they had taken. He had a phenomenal memory.”

Flynn answered all manner of niggling questions. For example, Melley had interviewed many Social Register targets who owned large purebred dogs. “They all swore up and down that they had the best guard dogs in the world,” Melley told me. “They invariably would tell us that the burglars obviously had drugged the dog.” But Flynn said they didn’t need to. “The dogs loved Charlie,” Melley remembered Flynn saying, referring to Gallagher. Flynn’s accomplice played with the dogs, fed them from the target’s refrigerator, locked them in a bathroom, and released them when the robbery was done.

With Flynn’s help, Melley solved burglaries at the homes of 103 members of the Social Register in six states, with property losses valued at upwards of $40 million in today’s dollars. Flynn also told the FBI that his crew wasn’t the only one using the Blue Book. He gave Melley the names of nine men from New England, most of them on Anderson’s list of suspected antiques thieves, who had used the Social Register as a hit list over the years. It turned out that between 1981 and 1982, three teams of thieves were breaking in to Blue Book houses in Connecticut, Long Island, Massachusetts, and Westchester County.

But to Melley’s mind, those other thieves were dabblers. Flynn was the one who’d perfected the Blue Book scheme. He’d been involved with the lion’s share of the robberies. And the 1975 copy of the Blue Book that Melley showed me when I interviewed him? That was Flynn’s. His notes were all over its pages.

How, though, had Flynn gotten so good at identifying quality art? Knowing which paintings to steal, and which to leave behind? The answer was his fence. Or at least one of them. Because, as Flynn confessed, he actually had two.

Over time and dozens if not hundreds of robberies, Flynn came to recognize by sight the kinds of paintings His Fence was looking for.

In February 1984, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York announced that a grand jury had indicted Anthony Ursillo, a 49-year-old antiques dealer in Providence, on twenty-four counts in connection to fencing the proceeds of sixty-one Blue Book burglaries. Ursillo had done time for breaking and entering, and the FBI in Boston long suspected he was dealing in stolen goods. The Tiffany lamps, the sterling silver, the antique baubles and tchotchkes—Flynn said Ursillo took it all.

Phone records showed that the burglars would call Ursillo after a robbery, after which he would wire them a down payment. Then he would meet the burglars in Rhode Island to exchange the goods for more cash. The evidence was damning. Ursillo took a plea deal and was sentenced to four years in prison and a $20,000 fine.

But Flynn said that he’d used a different fence for paintings, a Boston art dealer named Michael Filides. The child of Greek immigrants, and by all appearances a good citizen, Filides had worked his way up from a blue-collar background. He was briefly employed in finance before opening a gallery in the heart of the city’s arts district. An artist himself, Filides specialized in appraising nineteenth-century European paintings.

A federal grand jury indicted Filides, 51, on three charges of receiving stolen property and three charges of transporting it across state lines—all in connection with thirteen Blue Book burglaries. But the case against Filides wasn’t as cut-and-dried as the one against Ursillo. Filides didn’t deny buying art from Flynn. Rather, he claimed that he didn’t know that the works were stolen. “I am a victim of the lies of a convicted felon who is trying to shift his criminal conduct … onto me,” he told the press. That argument struck at the heart of the most serious charge against Filides—conspiracy in furtherance, which meant that he knew he was an integral part of the Blue Book robberies. Filides pleaded innocent to all charges and soon became the only person allegedly involved in the Social Register scheme to face a jury.

His trial began on June 4, 1984, with Flynn the star witness. Describing himself to jurors as a professional thief who made ends meet by “selling silver, gold, jewelry, antiques, and paintings from burglaries,” Flynn testified that he originally met Filides at the dealer’s gallery in 1976, when Flynn showed up with another burglar and a stolen painting. Flynn said that Filides not buy that piece, but he did offer tips for future targets: He wanted to fence landscapes and seascapes, not portraits, which were too easy to trace. He didn’t want any paintings larger than a suitcase, because that would make it too difficult to transport them to Europe, where Flynn claimed that Filides sold stolen art to other galleries. Flynn also said that Filides wanted paintings valued between $4,000 and $50,000—anything less would damage his reputation in the art business, and anything more would draw too many questions from buyers and insurance companies. Flynn even claimed that Filides provided him with a list of more than one hundred marketable French and Dutch artists whose work he and his crew should look for. Over time and dozens if not hundreds of robberies, Flynn came to recognize by sight the kinds of paintings Filides was looking for.

Testifying in his own defense, Filides was “alternately pained and bemused,” according to Newsday. He admitted that he had never questioned Flynn on the provenance of the art he came in with—something respectable dealers routinely do. Filides testified that, yes, he did often fly to Europe, despite his gallery turning an annual profit of only about $15,000. (Prosecutors pointed to this discrepancy as evidence that the dealer spent far more money than he “officially” earned.) Filides acknowledged, too, that he had sold paintings Flynn handed him. In fact, he still had several pieces in his possession at the time of Flynn’s arrest. (Filides eventually forfeited those works, twelve in all, to the FBI. They would be the only ones ever returned to the targets of the Social Register gang.) Still, Filides maintained that he had no idea anything he did was illegal.

A jury of nine men and three women deliberated for five days. They sent the judge twenty notes asking for explanations of legal issues and readings of testimony. On the fifth day, the foreman informed the judge, “We are hopelessly deadlocked on all seven counts in this case after infinite amounts of deliberation and many secret ballots.” The judge declared a mistrial. In an interview with a reporter, one of the jurors said they didn’t trust Flynn or Filides. Asked by the press how he felt about his odds in a new trial, Filides only smiled.

Melley sat through the whole thing. He had built the case against Filides—interviewing Blue Book victims, collating police reports from more than a dozen departments, driving Flynn all over New England to get eyes on the Social Register homes the thief had robbed. He knew prosecutors couldn’t bring Filides to court a second time without new evidence.

Melley wanted another witness, someone who would testify about Filides’s criminal activities. And that person needed to be someone who wasn’t a professional thief, because the feds needed the jury to trust them. “Fortunately,” Melley said, “Flynn had a very good memory.”

Flynn had first met Jack Farrell, a Boston insurance appraiser who worked for wealthy clients, at the racetrack—a place where they each spent a lot of time. As the two became more friendly, Flynn mentioned that he needed to get rid of some paintings of questionable origin. Farrell told Flynn he knew exactly who to turn to: Filides, a dealer willing to buy purloined art.

Though Farrell introduced the men well before Flynn began robbing Social Register homes, law enforcement decided to bring Farrell in as a character witness in Filides’s second trial, someone who could attest to the art dealer’s misbehavior. The trial began in September 1984, and the proceedings unfolded much as they had the first time—until Farrell arrived in the courtroom. Melley described his first appearance as if it were a scene from a movie. When Farrell walked in, everyone turned to get a look at him, including Filides. Prosecutors had told Filides that they’d be putting Farrell on the witness stand, and he’d made no objections. Now Melley wondered if that was because Filides hadn’t remembered Farrell. “Filides was looking at him like he had no concept,” Melley said. “Then all of a sudden, Farrell starts giving all these details.” Melley kept his eye on Filides, whose face fell as Farrell’s testimony proceeded.

Farrell did exactly what Melley had hoped he would: persuade jurors to believe Flynn when he said that Filides had been in on the Blue Book robberies. On October 2, a jury found Filides guilty of receiving stolen property, interstate transport of stolen property, and conspiracy.

Melley hoped for a yearslong sentence. But a few weeks later, District Court Judge I. Leo Glasser sentenced Filides to five years’ probation, a $30,000 fine, and a thousand hours of community service in the form of art lectures to disadvantaged Boston residents. The decision still mystifies Melley. “He was a person who deserved to be incarcerated. And, more importantly, had he been incarcerated, he would surely have cooperated and told us where the art went,” Melley said.

Of everyone involved in the conspiracy, Flynn was sentenced to the most time: five years behind bars. Thanks to his cooperation as a witness, though, he was out in less than twelve months.

Finding him wasn’t easy. All I had to go on was the Boston equivalent of John Smith—indeed, shortly after Ray Flynn’s arrest in 1982, voters in the city elected a mayor by the same name.

Most people involved in the Social Register robberies are now dead. Both fences are gone: Ursillo passed away in 1994, Filides three years later. Charlie Gallagher died in 2019. His obituary recounts a favorite expression: “I’ll be with you until the wheels fall off.”

As for Dennis Quinn, when I started working on this story, I traced him to a public housing apartment in the Boston area, which I visited twice. The first time, there was no answer when I knocked on his door, so I left a note. At my next visit, his name was no longer on the mail slot. This fall, I turned up his obituary: He died in April 2025, at 77.

The person I wanted to speak to the most was Ray Flynn. Other than a passing comment to a courthouse reporter at Filides’s trials, Flynn was never interviewed by a journalist. He never spoke publicly about the extent of his crimes, which, by all accounts, were voluminous.

Finding him wasn’t easy. All I had to go on was the Boston equivalent of John Smith—indeed, shortly after Ray Flynn’s arrest in 1982, voters in the city elected a mayor by the same name. I didn’t catch a break until I talked to Rolie Anderson, who immediately remembered Flynn’s middle initial, even decades after the investigation. It was X, for Xavier.

With his full name in hand, I found records that showed the Blue Book case was not the end of the line for Flynn. In 1996, he was arrested for robbing a room in the luxurious Mount Washington Hotel in New Hampshire. A manager and bellman doing a routine security check spotted him wearing tennis shorts and a dress shirt. When they asked if he was a guest, he ran away. Police then tracked him to a country road, where they nabbed him and recovered a diamond ring, a Tiffany watch, three credit cards, and a master room key to the hotel.

Flynn was convicted and sentenced to several years in prison; he was released in 2000. Prosecutors later brought other charges against him, mostly for breaking into other hotels. But in every instance he was either found not guilty, the charges were dismissed or dropped, or he was sentenced to probation. Still, buried in one of the police reports from these cases, I found Flynn’s phone number.

“Maybe I was a little adventurous. Maybe it was challenging to some degree.”

During my first phone call with Flynn, he took credit for two major heists. Years before the Blue Book robberies, in 1975, he claimed to have stolen a Winslow Homer painting from the public library in Malden, Massachusetts, in broad daylight. The next year, he said, he broke in to the Cambridge home of the president of Harvard University and stole six paintings valued at $380,000, including works by the French landscape painter Eugène Boudin.

I knew about these robberies from my research of famous art heists, but Flynn was never mentioned in the stories or police reports I’d read. Though I couldn’t confirm his connection to the Homer theft, an FBI agent I spoke to remembered driving past the Harvard president’s home with Flynn and Melley when Flynn, unprompted, told him, “Oh yeah, I did that one.” As I looked into the various crimes Flynn said he’d committed, the evidence I found often backed up what he’d told me. It never contradicted it. Flynn might have been a thief, but he didn’t strike me as a liar.

I hoped to learn more from Flynn. When I told him that I wanted to do a recorded interview, he suggested we meet at the Barnstable District Courthouse, of all places—the same place he’d beat his latest burglary charges. So I drove to Cape Cod, where Flynn was living. When I walked in, Flynn and his attorney were there to greet me in the lobby. Flynn looked healthy. He was trimmer than in his old mug shots, with short gray hair and no mustache. Dressed in business casual, he looked like he could be on his way to a country club.

His attorney ushered us into a small, windowless conference room. As soon as we sat down, Flynn said that he’d changed his mind; he didn’t want to be recorded anymore. We talked briefly about the story I wanted to tell—at one point, he stood up to mime taking a painting off the wall—and then he left.

This was the start of what became a yearslong back-and-forth between us. Flynn didn’t shy away from questions, but he always ended our conversations quickly. Sometimes I called and left a message, and he wouldn’t get back to me. During other periods we talked on multiple occasions in a single month. He was sad when I told him that Charles Gallagher was dead. More recently Flynn asked me, “How’s Pete Melley doing?”

Mostly, though, we talked about his crimes. The master room key for the Mount Washington Hotel? “It was like picking candy off a tree,” he said. Flynn claimed that he’d used the key to rob upwards of 150 rooms over the course of a decade before management finally caught him. Did he ever struggle to sell his stolen paintings? Sometimes, he said. But he never held on to them for long. “One thing you can do, which I did 200 times,” he told me, “is burn them.”

When I brought up the Social Register case, Flynn told me that he’d hit close to 500 Blue Book homes, far more than the hundred-some robberies the FBI had linked to him. When I relayed this claim to Melley and Anderson, both men found it credible.

I don’t know of any art thief who stole more and spent less time in jail. I found police reports and court records linking him to crimes ranging from 1965 to 2010. That’s not a job—it’s a career. Not that Flynn didn’t pay a price. When I asked about his family’s car accident, he said that his son woke up from a coma but remained in poor health, and died at the age of five. “You say to yourself, ‘If I was there, it wouldn’t have happened,’ ” Flynn told me. He and his wife are now divorced.

There are as many reasons to steal art as there are to steal anything else. There’s opportunism: In 1911, long before thieves in reflective vests plucked jewelry from the Louvre, an Italian handyman who had installed protective glass over the Mona Lisa stole the famous painting from the Paris museum. (The work was recovered twenty-eight months later, and the thief was arrested.) There’s kleptomania, as in the case of the French thief who stole more than 300 works from museums throughout Europe, and who remains under house arrest today. There are also more convoluted motivations, as with a Boston burglar who stole a Rembrandt to use as a bargaining chip, returning it in exchange for a reduction in the sentence he was facing for stealing other paintings.

But Flynn had a different reason altogether. A more mundane one. He found something he did well and worked at it—hard. “I needed fast money. I went to Las Vegas a lot,” he told me. “Maybe I was a little adventurous. Maybe it was challenging to some degree.”

Even now, Flynn’s motivation hasn’t changed much. Once, on a handshake deal at a bar on Cape Cod, he again agreed to let me record our conversation—if I was able to sell a podcast about him. But he later backed out when he realized that he wouldn’t make any money off the deal.

It’s not that Flynn is cagey; he’s calculating. As one of his lawyers told me, “Ray rhymes with pay.”


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

I’ve Gone to Look for America

I’ve Gone to Look for America

American Hindenburg

American Hindenburg

The Talented Mr. Bruseaux

The
Talented
Mr. Bruseaux


The Atavist Magazine, No. 165


Matthew Wolfe’s writing has appeared in the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Harper’s, National Geographic, and The New Republic. His first book, about the Earth Liberation Front and radical environmentalism, will be published by Viking in 2026. His previous Atavist story, “The Ghosts of Pickering Trail,” was written with Will Hunt and appeared as issue no. 51.

Editor: Jonah Ogles
Art Director: Ed Johnson
Copy Editor: Sean Cooper
Fact Checker: Emily Injeian
Illustrator: Mark Harris

Published in July 2025.


Early in the evening of April 10, 1928, the day of Chicago’s municipal primary, a candidate for alderman named Octavius C. Granady was pulling up to a polling station, choked with voters fresh from work, when a man dressed in a gray overcoat and a fedora strolled up to his car, drew a pistol, and fired a volley of shots through the back window. Amazingly, the would-be killer missed his target. Granady’s driver slammed his foot on the gas, sending the vehicle, hung with campaign banners, burning rubber down Washburne Avenue. The gunman hopped onto the running board of a nearby Cadillac, which promptly gave chase.

The weeks leading up to the city’s election had been marked by a frenzy of political violence. Chicago’s flamboyantly amoral mayor, William “Big Bill” Thompson, who had recently won office on the populist slogan “America First,” enjoyed the backing of local gangsters, including the infamous syndicate kingpin Al Capone. To push through Thompson’s ticket of loyal supporters, Capone’s henchmen adopted a blunt approach to canvassing. Houses of political officials were bombed, poll workers beaten, and the citizenry intimidated by club-wielding thugs. Tabloids dubbed the election the Pineapple Primary—“pineapple” being slang for a hand grenade.

A brave coalition of civic reformers, however, was fighting back against the corruption afflicting the city. Among them was Octavius Granady. A Black lawyer and World War I veteran, Granady had volunteered to run against a longtime Thompson ally named Morris Eller, who was white, for the city council seat representing Chicago’s 20th Ward. The heavily contested race soon became the front line in the battle for the soul of the city. Fearing for his life as primary day approached, Granady had asked for protection from the police department. The request was denied.

After the attempt on his life, Granady’s car careened wildly for more than a mile through the crowded streets of the South Side, trying desperately to lose its pursuers. The hit man, still hunched low on the running board and clutching the Cadillac’s steel frame for balance, continued to snap off rounds. Then, while trying to maneuver a turn, Granady’s driver lost control and crashed into a curb.

Dazed, the candidate stumbled from the wreck, only to be met by a trio of attackers exiting the Cadillac. Squaring up, they brought him down in a spray of shotgun fire. As Granady lay dying, the assassins sped off, a banner for his opponent flapping from their vehicle’s chassis.

Nearly a decade into Prohibition, Chicagoans had become inured to a certain amount of murder and mayhem. But the daylight execution of a principled political reformer shocked the populace. A special prosecutor was appointed to bring the perpetrators to justice. His first task was to hire someone to lead the investigation into the killing—someone fearless and independent, free from influence by the city’s notoriously troubled police department. A series of reputable investigative agencies, however, failed to make any headway in the case. Frustrated, the prosecutor turned to an unlikely choice—a Black man, one who had been blazing an extraordinary path through the world of criminal investigation: Sheridan Bruseaux.

A little less than a decade before, Bruseaux had become, by all extant records, the United States’ first Black licensed private investigator. The industry was, at the time, a white man’s enterprise, with illustrious agencies such as Pinkerton and Baldwin-Felts marketing their services to the country’s moneyed elite. Bruseaux pitched his to Chicago’s growing Black bourgeoisie, who were beginning to suffer the same messy divorces and estate battles as their white counterparts. While Bruseaux snooped into embezzlement and infidelity—a private eye’s bread and butter—he also moonlighted as an avenger of racial violence, hunting perpetrators of lynchings and bombings. His advantage over his white competitors, Bruseaux would later claim, was his vast network of informants, hidden in plain sight: Black cooks and cleaners and doormen, an army of service workers who received no second glances but were privy to the city’s whispers and confidences.

Though Bruseaux has since been neglected by history, he was once a household name in the Black community. But as he prepared to take on the Granady case, the biggest of his career, his public persona revealed only part of his story. He had become wealthy and famous by unearthing other people’s secrets, but the man known as Sheridan Bruseaux was keeping a few of his own.

William “Big Bill” Thompson

On April 26, 1890, Sheridan Bruseau—the second to last of fifteen children, nine of whom survived past adolescence—was born in Little Rock, Arkansas. Sheridan’s father, Alexander, had been born into slavery on a sugar plantation in Louisiana, a land of serpentine bayous and long fields of swaying cane. In harvest season, cutting gangs waded into the tall grass, hacking at the stalks with flat, double-sided knives from dawn to dusk. Among Southern slaves cane plantations inspired terror, so frequent was death from exhaustion, disease, or industrial accidents. (The famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass dubbed captivity on such plantations a “life of living death.”)

During the Civil War, when the Union Army marched into Louisiana, thousands of slaves dropped their blades and fled, many choosing to enlist with their liberators. In the summer of 1863, Alexander Bruseau, then 25, joined up and was mustered into the U.S. Colored Troops 79th Infantry. Following the Union’s final victory in 1865, Bruseau received $249.60 in military benefits from the Freedman’s Bureau and headed north to Arkansas. By the late 19th century, Little Rock was home to a thriving class of Black entrepreneurs and craftsmen. Most former slaves, though, had few marketable skills, and they were forced into menial work and subsistence incomes. Bruseau became a gardener. In 1877, he married a woman, Nancy, from North Carolina, with whom he had several children, including Sheridan. Their home, a simple frame shack near the city limits, sat in sight of a cemetery honoring the Confederate dead.

Under Jim Crow, Black Southerners were frequently subjected to spectacular violence. In 1904, when Sheridan was 14, the town of St. Charles two counties over became the site of one of the largest mass lynchings in U.S. history, in which 13 Black men were shot to death. Such brutal vigilantism often received the tacit support of journalists. Little Rock’s Arkansas Democrat once printed on its front page that a “black brute”—an alliterative phrase the publication had a special fondness for—accused of assaulting a “highly respected lady” was hanged from a telephone pole in the town of Tillar. The report noted that he had been left strung up for much of the next day. The alleged assailant was 17, only a year older than Sheridan.

After attending a local high school, then the recently established Arkansas Baptist College, Sheridan faced a cruelly delimited future. He took a series of low-paying service jobs—day laborer, messenger, porter. But soon an opportunity presented itself. With the onset of World War I, factories in northern cities began stamping out munitions and canned food. Word of higher wages and fairer treatment spread south. Between 1916 and 1919, around half a million Black Americans departed the rural districts of their birth for the North’s industrialized sprawl and hope of a more profitable, less frightening tomorrow. Sheridan, his mother, and many of his siblings were among them.

When Sheridan reemerged in Chicago, his last name was entered into the public record with an x on the end. Viewed one way, the addition was a simple embellishment—attempted evidence, perhaps, of an unprovable claim Bruseaux would later make to a journalist that he was of French descent. But it was also an act of reinvention. In the comparative safety of the North, Bruseaux was free to fashion a new self.

The Chicago Defender, the city’s leading Black newspaper, boasted that Keystone was the first detective agency to be run by “our group.”

If Bruseaux thought he was leaving racial violence behind in moving north, his optimism was quickly dashed. Across the nation, racial tensions were beginning to erupt. When the United States entered World War I, millions of white working men were sent overseas, many to fill the trenches of the Western Front. After the Armistice was signed at the end of 1918, many returned home to find their jobs and apartments filled by Black faces, newly arrived from the South. A violent backlash ensued. During the Red Summer of 1919, white residents of dozens of U.S. cities launched a program of attacks on Black homes and businesses, terrorizing and slaughtering hundreds of people. The Ku Klux Klan, an organization moribund for over four decades, was not only revived but became a political force.

Chicago did not escape the national mood. The city’s Black population had doubled between 1916 and 1919, and workers of all extractions furiously competed for shifts in packing houses and abattoirs while crowding into cramped apartments with exorbitant rents. The welcome received by migrating Black families, once so hopeful about a better life above the Mason-Dixon Line, was made no smoother by local newspapers. “Half a Million Darkies from Dixie Swarm the North to Better Themselves,” blustered a headline in the Chicago Tribune. In the months leading up to the summer of 1919, white mobs assaulted Black citizens in the streets and firebombed their properties. “It looks very much like Chicago is trying to rival the South in its race hatred against the Negro,” wrote the famed muckraker Ida B. Wells-Barnett in the Tribune in July 1919.

Just weeks later, on a sweltering late-July afternoon, a handful of Black teenagers, cooling themselves on a homemade raft, accidentally drifted into a zone of Lake Michigan considered off-limits to people of color. From the sandy shore, a white man began lobbing rocks at them. At first it seemed to the boys like a game: The vessel was a good distance from the beach, and their assailant’s aim was lazy. But then, just as 17-year-old Eugene Williams, who was swimming alongside the raft, popped out of the water, one of the rocks hit him in the forehead. Stunned, Williams sank to the bottom of the lake and drowned. When his distraught friends reported the incident to a white police officer, he refused to make an arrest. A brawl broke out, and the violence spread into the worst race riot in Chicago history. In a matter of days, 38 Chicagoans were dead and 500 were injured. The bloodshed only ended with the arrival of thousands of state militiamen and a chilling rain.

It was in this very moment, when the hot days of Red Summer were easing into autumn, that Sheridan Bruseaux hung a shingle for a new detective agency in Chicago’s Bronzeville neighborhood, then a center of Black life. Promoting his services in Black newspapers alongside ads for “High-Brown Face Powder,” Bruseaux, now 29, claimed an impressive pedigree. He proudly stated that, since leaving Arkansas, he’d earned a law degree from the University of Minnesota and spent the war years in Europe working for the government’s Secret Service, which ran a vast counterintelligence network. After a stint with an investigative firm in Chicago, Bruseaux had decided to go into business for himself.

In September 1919, Bruseaux opened the doors of the Keystone Detective Agency at 3333 South State, a popular address among Black entrepreneurs. The agency was the first of its kind to be owned by a Black man. The Chicago Defender, the city’s leading Black newspaper, boasted that Keystone was the first detective agency to be run by “our group.”

Tall and broad shouldered, with his short hair conked and split into a stylish side part, Bruseaux cultivated an air of old money, wearing the finely cut suits favored by bankers. (He’d one day be included on a list of the city’s best-dressed men.) Along with other investigative services, Bruseaux offered to shadow unfaithful spouses and locate lost relatives—a common concern for families whose members had been separated during the migration north. His agency made use of emerging technologies like fingerprinting, listening devices, and hidden cameras. Ambitious from the start, Bruseaux made it known that he was available for jobs anywhere in the country, publicizing his business with the slogan “We Cover the World.”

Drawing clients from the city’s growing Black middle class, Bruseaux assembled a diverse docket of cases. Investigations ranged from retrieving stolen jewels and catching currency forgers to debunking confidence men and quacks. In an early success, Keystone made the front page of the Chicago Whip for catching the trafficker of a 15-year-old girl “lured into the underworld.”

Bruseaux’s big break came a month after his agency’s founding, though it wasn’t exactly an investigative coup. The editor of the Chicago Defender hired him to set up the Black nationalist leader Marcus Garvey, who had incurred the integration-minded Defender’s wrath by urging Black Americans to return to Africa and establish their own state. At the editor’s behest, Bruseaux bought two shares of stock in Garvey’s Black Star shipping company. By selling them, Garvey violated an obscure Illinois law forbidding the sale of equities without a state license, and he was briefly jailed. The arrest of a prominent activist was controversial—Garvey had plenty of supporters in the city—but it transformed Bruseaux into a boldface name. In just a few months, he’d have enough business to move from his humble Bronzeville office into two spacious suites decorated with oil paintings and panel mirrors.

Discovering that many of the prejudices that afflicted his family in Arkansas and Louisiana had followed him to Chicago, Bruseaux took on a sideline gig investigating racial violence. He dug into bombings of Black family homes on the South Side, the burning of a Black church, and the murder of a Black 16-year-old by a white druggist from whom the boy had tried to purchase pomade. By investigating such crimes, Bruseaux’s agency offered an alternative path to justice for Black Americans shunned by the legal system.

Bruseaux also began interrogating the root causes of social problems. One client hired him to look into the conditions causing Black unemployment in the Midwest. In a letter to an official at the Department of Labor, Bruseaux asked “why the Negro is constantly being discharged from positions, and even the commonest labor at which he has previously been employed.” Bruseaux frequently drew from interviews, surveys, and first-person observation—mirroring the pioneering work being done by sociologists at the University of Chicago. He waded into public debates, and once used statistics to dispute charges that Black men were responsible for a disproportionate amount of the city’s crime.

As Bruseaux’s profile grew, his work took him farther afield—to investigate a lynching in North Carolina; to reexamine the killing of a Black teenager by a policeman in Gary, Indiana; and to locate a Creek Indian girl in Oklahoma who claimed that she was coerced by a group of white men to sign over a deed to valuable oil lands.

Though Keystone promised in its ads that all client business would be kept “strictly confidential,” Bruseaux’s exploits were breathlessly covered by the press. When hired by attorneys to testify in court, he often delivered sensational evidence on the stand. In 1923, during the scandalous divorce proceedings of Williams Stokes, a millionaire real estate heir, and his second wife, Helen, Bruseaux was brought in to rebut a maid’s accusation that Mrs. Stokes had been seen in the apartment of another man. After the maid’s testimony, Bruseaux shocked the court by producing an affidavit from her mother stating that she was lying, forcing the witness to break down and admit that she had perjured herself. The move, one newspaper noted, “puts Mr. Bruseaux on record as one of the cleverest detectives in the country, not only of his own race, but any race.”

Not all coverage was favorable, however. The following year, Bruseaux earned the enmity of the Black-owned Chicago Whip after investigating its publisher for the theft of $8,000 in bonds. In an angry article, the paper dismissed Bruseaux as a “joke” and a “dining car detective.” It mocked his Arkansas accent, writing that “one could easily picture the sleuth trailing a plough in the southern cotton fields.” The Whip’s attack displayed a condescension commonly directed at new Black arrivals in the city. “Securely established Negro citizens were perturbed by the avalanche of their rustic brethren whose manners and personal appearance were not always so prepossessing as they might be,” noted Arna Bontemps in Anyplace But Here, a book about the Great Migration. “Feet used to a plowed field found it hard to steady themselves on a lurching streetcar, so that migrants stepped on toes and jostled their fellow passengers.” Some members of the Black professional class even complained that, in their uncouthness, Southerners such as Bruseaux were responsible for the new tension with white citizens, having upset a hard-won equilibrium—blaming them, in effect, for dragging racism up from the plantations.

Perhaps seeking to overcome this class prejudice, Bruseaux hosted extravagant parties. In 1923, after several years of public bachelordom, Bruseaux married Ethel Sewell, who the Chicago Defender reported was from a prominent Philadelphia family. The paper hailed her as one of the “most charming young matrons in Chicago.” By that time, Bruseaux was wealthy. Together the couple threw opulent soirees in their fashionable home on Grand Avenue, where they were neighbors of the champion boxer Jack Johnson (whose wife, it was reported, had once retained Bruseaux to probe her marriage). Guests of the Bruseauxs—among them actor Paul Robeson and jazz legend Louis Armstrong—were presented with expensive gifts like gold watches, glassware, and traveling bags.

By the mid-1920s, Chicago’s Black residents had built a thriving enclave, with its own stores, churches, theaters, newspapers, literary societies, and professional class. The latter half of the decade, as St. Clair Drake and Horace Cayton observe in their 1945 study Black Metropolis, would be “the Fat Years”—the most prosperous in the community’s history. And Sheridan Bruseaux sat atop that plenitude, scraping cream from the scandals of the affluent. But as Bruseaux would soon discover, his position, based on perception as much as deed, was a precarious one.

Octavius Granady

The death of Octavius Granady happened, in part, by chance. When deciding who would run against Morris Eller, Granady and another reformer had flipped a coin; Granady lost.

Taking on Eller brought with it considerable risks. During his campaign, Granady’s staff were harassed and sabotaged, their headquarters raided and the telephone lines cut. A chilling rumor spread that, even if Granady won, he’d never serve a day in office. On the morning of the primary, one of Granady’s poll monitors was kidnapped by three men, who forced him into a car and bashed his head with a revolver. Chicago police stood around, the monitor later recalled, “watching in amusement.”

Danger was not unique to the alderman’s race. The Second City felt increasingly lawless. Its murder rate had skyrocketed and its governance was in decline—both thanks to Prohibition. One local sociologist described “an unholy alliance between organized crime and politics” that allowed criminality to flourish, an environment where Al Capone could reportedly raise $200,000 for mayor Thompson’s campaign in exchange for the freedom to run a violent empire.

Thompson was an opera buffa demagogue, a loud, self-styled cowboy who once set his 300-pound frame atop a horse and rode it into a city council meeting. In 1927, he’d staged a debate against two live rats: stand-ins for his political opponents. The Chicago Tribune later declared Thompson “a byword for collapse of the American civilization” and his political career synonymous with “filth, corruption, obscenity, idiocy, and bankruptcy.”

According to the New York Times, the city’s police department, under the command of a Thompson-appointed commissioner, accomplished little in its investigation of Granady’s murder. Fed-up state officials summoned a special attorney to look into the killing and the broader lawlessness plaguing the election. The man they chose for the job was the legendary square-jawed crime fighter Frank Loesch.

Loesch was a veteran Chicago prosecutor with an unimpeachable reputation for honesty and integrity, an eminence grise whom one newspaper compared to the Roman Republic’s Cato, waging a relentless battle against the city’s foes. He struck a profile that the Los Angeles Times described as “erect, snowy-haired and unafraid.” But Loesch, now 76, was too old to work alone. To find Granady’s killer, he would need a reliable deputy, someone to do the heavy lifting the investigation would require. Loesch didn’t trust Chicago’s usual authorities—he believed the police to be untrained, prosecutors ignorant, and judges corrupt. To build his case, Loesch needed a true outsider, someone unafraid of making enemies.

At the time of Granady’s killing, Sheridan Bruseaux’s practice was busier than ever, with operatives all over the country. He had become a community hero of sorts—a crusading sleuth fighting hatred and exploitation. Loesch offered him the job, and Bruseaux accepted. He was given a detail of three Black police officers to assist him, and charged with assembling a criminal case Loesch could bring to trial.

From the beginning, Bruseaux faced long odds. Finding witnesses wasn’t difficult; hundreds had observed either the initial attack on Granady, the frantic chase through the streets of Chicago, or the murder itself. But Capone’s thugs were said to be cruising the South Side, warning residents that they’d be killed if they testified in the case and offering $1,000 for the location of witnesses so the goons could intimidate them. Meanwhile, the New York Times reported that the criminal underworld had created a defense fund, levying a tax on gamblers, hoodlums, and saloonkeepers, to assist anyone who might be arrested for the crime.

Bruseaux was undaunted. He announced that his investigation would cover the whole city, leaving no complicit party untouched by the hand of justice. “Every man who comes within the scope of the inquiry will be investigated regardless of his political standing or his position within the police department,” Bruseaux told reporters. “And all such information gathered through the investigation will be presented to the grand jury without fear or favor.”

Persuading bystanders to reveal what they’d seen required all of Bruseaux’s skill and charm; keeping them alive posed more significant challenges. Weeks into the investigation, gangsters with shotguns, posing as insurance salesmen, tried to break into the home of James Huff, a Granady campaign worker and a passenger in the candidate’s car when it was attacked. Huff’s wife slipped out the back and notified Bruseaux, who dispatched a member of his detail to rush the witness and his family to safety.

Bruseaux soon realized that even his colleagues couldn’t be trusted. While he employed his own staff, he also received assistance from state investigators and local police. At one point, suspicious of a Black detective assigned to his detail, Bruseaux followed him from work. After trailing him through the city, Bruseaux watched as he knocked on the door of Oscar DePriest, an influential Black boss in the Thompson machine. Bruseaux kicked the detective off the case. By way of revenge, the police commissioner pulled the rest of Bruseaux’s detail. Loesch assigned Bruseaux a bodyguard, and after that only Bruseaux knew the names and locations of cooperating witnesses.

As Bruseaux dug deeper, he began to unearth a monstrous conspiracy. Witnesses told him that Granady had been pursued by not one but two cars—the Cadillac and, a short distance back, an olive-green Buick. (Bruseaux would eventually track down the former, sold two days after the assassination.) The Buick was said to have been driven by men in police uniforms—the same ones who then responded to the scene of the murder.

After weeks of work, Bruseaux finally identified the shooters: Harry Hochstein, Johnny Armando, and Sammy Kaplan. The men were not only freelance goons for Capone, they were also on the payrolls of powerful people associated with Granady’s rival, Morris Eller, whose banner had been affixed to the killers’ car. In fact, Hochstein and Armando worked directly for Eller’s campaign. What’s more, Bruseaux found evidence of far-reaching electoral fraud. On the day of the primary, gangs of Eller supporters had driven from polling place to polling place—venues often staffed entirely by America First clerks and judges—where they stuffed ballot boxes. Hundreds of “voters” who resided in vacant buildings or at nonexistent addresses cast ballots; some did so from beyond the grave.

In other instances, election officials appeared to have altered the ballot tallies to give Thompson candidates the edge. Bruseaux found too that, in the weeks leading up to the election, hired thugs extorted tribute from speakeasies, craps games, and brothels to finance Eller’s campaign. A gambling operator, for example, was taxed $600 per week—the equivalent of about $10,000 today.

At times during interviews, suspects seemed to be having Bruseaux on. The notebook of one reputed gangster showed multiple payments of $100 to police. When asked about them, the man claimed he liked to play “policy games,” or illegal lotteries, on the South Side. “And how do you spell policy?” asked an investigator assigned to the grand jury. “P-O-L-I-C-E,” he replied.

On June 29, 1928, Loesch stepped forward to address a swarm of reporters. He unveiled a series of shocking charges: In all, 19 suspects were indicted by a grand jury as part of a vast conspiracy to murder Octavius Granady and meddle with the election for the benefit of Morris Eller. Among them were five Chicago detectives, including the leader of a squad assigned to the 20th Ward on election day. Eller and his son, Emmanuel, were accused of providing protection to criminals in exchange for votes. Two witnesses, a barber and a collector on Eller’s payroll, testified that it was Eller himself who had supplied the 20th Ward’s gangsters with guns on the day of the primary.

Charges were also filed against Oscar DePriest, the politician whom Bruseaux had seen a police detective visit, for election fraud. DePriest, a South Side power broker, was in the midst of a campaign to become the first Black official elected to Congress in almost 30 years. The indictment asserted that DePriest and others had collected money from liquor, vice, and gambling establishments in exchange for police protection—cash that was then routed to a slush fund in Mayor Thompson’s America First campaign.

Announcing the indictments, Loesch, who was usually grim faced, couldn’t help but break into a smile. “Gentlemen,” he informed reporters, “we have them.”

The indictments were built on the efforts of Bruseaux, who—overcoming what Loesch described as “insurmountable obstacles”—had secured the testimony of more than 100 witnesses. The detective estimated that he’d uncovered more than $5 million that had been illicitly collected for Thompson’s political machine from gangsters and corrupt politicians. Overnight, Bruseaux became a sensation, the daring gumshoe who stood up to corruption and sought justice for murder. Publications around the country rushed to interview him. The New York Amsterdam News, in a glowing profile, compared him to Sherlock Holmes. Even his journalistic bête noire, the Chicago Whip, which once had mocked Bruseaux’s unpolished style, reluctantly lauded his accomplishment.

Bruseaux was at the pinnacle of his career, his achievements sufficiently impressive that the NAACP took notice. Since 1915, the nation’s preeminent civil-rights group had awarded an annual prize recognizing the individual in America who best embodied Black excellence. The Spingarn Medal was its most prestigious honor, previously bestowed on such trailblazers as the Army’s first Black colonel, Charles Young, and agricultural scientist George Washington Carver. In early 1929, when the organization was considering nominees, Bruseaux’s name was at the top of the list.

Records show that W. E. B. DuBois, the NAACP’s cofounder and head of publicity, received dozens of letters from Black luminaries written on Bruseaux’s behalf—the most for any candidate. Among Bruseaux’s supporters was Ida B. Wells-Barnett, another NAACP cofounder now living in Chicago. “Every day for six months, I thrilled with pride over the tributes to this negro’s ability,” her handwritten note to DuBois read. “Because Mr. Bruseaux could neither be bribed nor bullied … he has won a signal victory for the forces of law and order, and the gratitude of the entire city.” Arthur Mitchell, a well-known Chicago lawyer, noted that the Tribune had been unstinting in its praise of Bruseaux—no small matter for a paper, Mitchell observed, that “heretofore had been thought to be most unfriendly to ambitious Colored men.… Winning the commendation of this paper for the race and changing its attitude on many racial questions is, within itself … worthy of the highest commendation.”

Soon, Bruseaux was reported to be in the running for a top post at the Justice Department, with an annual salary of $10,000 (around $187,000 today). While traveling for business, Bruseaux happened to pass through his erstwhile hometown of Little Rock, where he was feted by onetime neighbors. His picture was hung in his former high school, at a ceremony attended by the city’s Black elite—the high society from which, growing up, he had been excluded. Where Bruseaux’s horizons had once been stifled, his future now seemed limitless.

But just as Bruseaux was taking a victory lap, his life began to unravel.

The investigators working for Bruseaux faced danger, too—one of his deputies was stabbed in the back on his way home from work, leaving him bleeding but alive.

In retrospect, there were early signs that Loesch’s case against Granady’s alleged killers might run into trouble once it went to trial. Emmanuel Eller was an elected judge, and despite the criminal charges against him, it was in his court that the men accused of shooting his father’s political opponent first appeared, in July 1928. Judge Eller immediately cut their bond, allowing their release. A few weeks later, one of Morris Eller’s henchman suspected of participating in Granady’s killing was found murdered under a pile of rubbish in an alley—“a warning,” a city official declared, “from those pulling the strings that it isn’t healthy to squawk.” Soon after, a second suspect, wanted for questioning, was also found dead, his body slumped over a car steering wheel with eight shots to the head. The investigators working for Bruseaux faced danger, too—one of them was stabbed in the back on his way home from work, leaving him bleeding but alive.

That November, the Thompson machine was smashed in the general election, with every one of the mayor’s candidates soundly defeated, including Morris Eller. But the defendants in Loesch’s case had yet to be prosecuted. The date of the proceedings was repeatedly delayed, and by the time the first witness entered the courtroom to give testimony, 19 months had passed since Granady’s assassination. Readying for trial, Bruseaux became so stressed that he was hospitalized for ulcers. He was right to be anxious, because what transpired in the courtroom was, in the words of one journalist, a farce.

Bruseaux, Loesch, and the state’s attorney disagreed about whether to indict the police officers in the second car, the green Buick, that chased Granady. Ultimately, the cops faced trial, but Judge Joseph David appeared conspicuously preferential toward them, dismissing witnesses who claimed to have seen the men participate in Granady’s murder as “liars.” David even hinted that he would set aside a guilty verdict, should the jury reach one. Some witnesses’ testimony had changed since they were first interviewed—a bystander to the murder, asked in court to identify one of the shooters, pointed to a defense attorney.

Perhaps to some degree these shifting recollections were a result of the time that had elapsed since the crime is unclear. But witness tampering was also a specialty of Mayor Thompson’s most powerful supporter, Al Capone, and it would be another year and a half before he was charged with tax evasion and forced to cede his throne as king of Chicago’s underworld.

The Granady trial was briefly halted when one of the prosecution’s star witnesses, Margaret Welch, was reportedly threatened with death. On November 1, 1929, the 23-year-old was set to tell the jury that she had overheard two of the defendants—John Armando, one of the alleged shooters, and James Belcastro, accused of driving the Cadillac—mention killing Granady in the days following the murder. On the morning of her testimony, according to the Tribune, Welch received an anonymous telephone call informing her that if she went through with it, she’d get her head blown off. To prove that they were serious, Welch’s harassers kidnapped her brother, reducing her to a state of hysterical collapse.

When she was finally coaxed into court a few weeks later, Welch’s hand shook as she took the oath. After giving her name and address, she fell to her knees and begged the judge to protect her. (“And some people pay $5.50 a seat to see a show,” mused a front-row spectator.) After being escorted to the county hospital, Welch never retook the stand. The charges against Armando and Belcastro were dismissed, and the men were set free.

Then, suddenly, a serious charge was leveled against Bruseaux. Under cross examination, several witnesses for the prosecution claimed that the detective had bribed them. A few said that Bruseaux had promised them jobs and paid their expenses in exchange for testimony, and one witness, a preacher named Joseph McMillan, declared that Bruseaux offered him $1,000 to identify Armando as one of the shooters. Though Granady’s own driver had already testified that it was Armando who fired off rounds from the running board of the Cadillac, Judge David was incensed, declaring the preacher’s allegation “far more serious than murder.”

Around the same time, an anonymous letter was mailed to the court accusing Bruseaux of a variety of crimes. The letter’s contents were never revealed; David, in a fit of rage, tore up the document, yelling that something should be done about the detective. “If the things they say about this man Bruseaux are true,” thundered the judge, “he ought to be in the penitentiary.”

Bruseaux vehemently denied the bribery charges, calling them “ridiculous,” but they weakened the prosecution’s case. After a series of unfavorable rulings, the judge dismissed the indictments against some of the defendants. Ultimately, the 15 of Eller’s henchmen who remained on trial escaped with fines after being found guilty of conspiracy.

Many of the broader corruption allegations also faded away. Morris Eller and his son were never tried in court, and both would remain active in law and politics for years. Loesch dropped the indictment against Oscar DePriest, and Bruseaux would claim publicly that DePriest, set up by political foes, was innocent of any crime. It’s unclear whether Bruseaux was bowing to political pressure or if he’d been hasty in his initial accusations. Regardless, DePriest, who had won his congressional race, becoming the first Black man elected to the House of Representatives since Reconstruction, had already had his revenge.

Archival records show that, in early 1929, one of DePriest’s associates, writing on the politician’s letterhead, mailed the NAACP a court document indicating that Bruseaux had been indicted for bigamy in 1917, two years before starting his detective agency. In 1906, while living in Arkansas, Bruseaux had married a young woman, and he’d never dissolved their union. The Spingarn Medal was awarded in the spring of 1929, well before the fiasco of the Granady trial. The NAACP presented it to the president of Howard University. Bruseaux had been passed over.

Al Capone

The accusations against Sheridan Bruseaux that aired during the Granady trial, though dubious, hinted at a larger pattern of lies and ethical shortcuts. The year before, in the midst of preparations for the case, the leader of a Black fraternal organization in Indiana claimed Bruseaux had tried to shake him down for $5,000. In 1930, the former head of the National Bar Association, C. F. Stradford, accused Bruseaux of extortion, stemming from a case in which Stradford had represented an abortionist. Bruseaux, he claimed, made himself “an involuntary, uninvited partner of anyone who receives or has an attractive sum,” adding that “money disappears quickly when one is making a bid for social position by giving expensive parties.” Nor was it the first time Bruseaux had been accused of trying to strong-arm clients: One Black newspaper stated that such a charge was “exactly in keeping” with its opinion of the detective and warned the public against associating with him.

His image tarnished, Bruseaux’s reputation within the Black community began to fade. Still, he worked steadily over the next several years. He exposed bank officers who used customers’ deposit to fund dog-race tracks; investigated the mysterious murder of the National Baptist Convention’s chief auditor, whose body was found in a river shot six times; and helped dismantle a prolific counterfeiting ring. Then Bruseaux’s desire to defend the Black community collided with his tendency to blur the truth, in a way that led to his undoing.

On June 19, 1936, the great boxer Joe Louis, then undefeated, was scheduled to fight German heavyweight Max Schmeling. The bout, with its inescapable political overtones—Schmeling was the pride of the Nazi Reich, Joe Louis a rising star of Black America—was an international spectacle. During the fight, staged in Yankee Stadium and broadcast to tens of millions over the radio, Schmeling, an eight-to-one underdog, launched a series of right crosses at Louis’s jaw, until finally, in the 12th round, the Brown Bomber hit the mat and was counted out. In the Black community, grief at the loss was apocalyptic. The poet Langston Hughes, who attended the event, described watching grown men sob like children on the streets of Harlem after the defeat. Hitler, meanwhile, cabled his congratulations to Schmeling.

Louis’s fans searched for an explanation as to how their hero came up short. In was in this sensitive moment that Bruseaux stepped forward to offer a hypothesis. Louis, he declared, hadn’t been beat, he’d been drugged. In an affidavit, Bruseaux claimed that, just before the fight, one of the boxer’s physicians had administered an injection that hindered Louis’s left arm—a story, Bruseaux said, related to him by Louis’s sister. Asked for comment, Louis and his managers angrily rejected Bruseaux’s theory. “I had no shot of any kind except a few hard rights from Schmeling’s glove,” Louis told the Chicago Tribune. Louis’s sister, for her part, said that she’d never told Bruseaux any such thing.

Whatever Bruseaux was attempting with the stunt, it backfired. He became an object of national ridicule, with one sportswriter labeling his affidavit “too screwy to be believed.” Louis’s managers claimed that Bruseaux had tried to extort them, threatening to go to the press with his accusation if they didn’t pay him off, and accused the detective of operating a “shakedown racket.” They filed a lawsuit against Bruseaux for libel, as did Louis’s physician. Bruseaux countersued, claiming defamation. The matter was settled out of court.

As he fell from grace, his case load thinned, and Bruseaux became financially overextended. In 1937, he sent a pleading letter to Arthur Mitchell, asking to borrow $150 because a catering company was trying to seize his car. Then, in his mid-fifties, Bruseaux hit a new public low: He was arrested and charged with grand larceny and blackmail after a client’s husband alleged that Bruseaux attempted to extort $1,900 from him. Bruseaux claimed that the charge was retaliation for tracking down the husband, who had skipped town with much of his wife’s money.

Bruseaux was given one last opportunity to salvage his reputation. In 1943, the detective was quietly hired to investigate another incident of racial violence, a riot in Detroit. On a hot summer day—much like the one in 1919, when Chicago exploded into violence—a pair of false rumors spread through the city: that a group of Black men had raped a white woman, and that a mob of white people had thrown a Black infant from a bridge. When the smoke from the resulting riots cleared, 25 Black Detroiters were dead, most of them killed by police, as were nine white residents. Civic leaders prevailed upon Bruseaux to investigate what had happened. His detective agency, after all, had been founded upon the ashes of a similar incident.

Bruseaux arranged focus groups of Detroit residents and asked them about life in the city. With the help of a team of research assistants, he canvassed the city’s neighborhoods to better understand the context in which the riot erupted. His report blamed the violence and resulting deaths on social conditions, namely overcrowding and competition for jobs and housing.

Despite its insights, the report did little to restore the detective’s prestige. As Bruseaux got older, his fabrications intensified, even as he developed a late-life obsession with the use of polygraphs. In his last known interview, with Ebony magazine in 1949, he unfurled a sad tapestry of self-aggrandizing lies, claiming that he had personally handled some 4,000 cases, that he’d turned down J. Edgar Hoover’s job as director of the FBI, and that he’d led an investigation into a famous divorce case in which, records show, he played no part. The magazine printed his fabulations as fact.

In 1950, after a short illness, Sheridan Bruseaux passed away at Roosevelt Hospital in New York City, at the age of 60. Though he was once the toast of Chicago, his obituary in the Tribune consisted of only a single paragraph, buried in the back of the paper.

Emerging from nowhere, Bruseaux had fashioned himself into a Gatsby of Chicago’s ascendant Black bourgeoisie.

In the 75 years since his death, Bruseaux has mostly faded from history. Other than a few stray mentions in books about Marcus Garvey and Joe Louis, nothing of substance has been written about him. Bruseaux and his wife, Ethel, who passed in 1973, had no children together. Records show that Bruseaux had a daughter years before, from an extramarital relationship, and a single surviving great-granddaughter. When I reached out to her, though, she had little information to offer, noting that Bruseaux had not been involved in the life of her grandmother, who, to her recollection, never mentioned him.

Ethel, who was married to Bruseaux for 27 years, has numerous living relatives. She gave birth to a daughter before meeting her husband, when she was a teenager living in Baltimore. The daughter’s name was Dorniece; she was sent to live with cousins in southern Maryland.

I met Ethel’s great-grandson Damon Caldwell for coffee in Manhattan’s Columbus Circle, just a block from where Bruseaux died. Now in his sixties and retired, Caldwell graduated from Stanford University, followed by Harvard Business School, then enjoyed a long, successful career. As it turned out, his daughter, a doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, was researching the changing nature of anti-Black violence during almost the exact years when her great-great-step-grandfather was investigating instances of that violence.

Caldwell had heard only vague accounts of Bruseaux, who, as a result of family lore, he’d always thought was a lawyer. Asked if Ethel had indeed hailed from a prominent Philadelphia family, as newspapers reported, Caldwell laughed: That was likely one of Bruseaux’s exaggerations.

Archival sources reveal that much of the professional backstory Bruseaux used to buttress the Keystone Detective Agency was bogus. During World War I, he was not employed in Europe by the Secret Service. According to his draft registration card, in 1917 he worked as a waiter on the Tacoma Eastern Railroad. He’d obtained an exemption from military duty by claiming that he needed to support his wife and mother. Nor did Bruseaux ever receive a law degree from the University of Minnesota—there’s no record he was ever even in the state. And while he was at one time employed by Chicago’s McGuire & White Detective Agency, it appears to have been in the role of telephone operator.

Bruseaux even appears to have been, at one time, the type of con artist he later investigated. In 1918, the year before he opened Keystone, a short article in the Chicago Whip reported that a “Sheridan Bruseau,” while pretending to be the head waiter at a local hotel, had fleeced a number of men by promising them jobs in the dining room in exchange for a fee. When the men realized they’d been deceived by Bruseau’s “smooth line of talk,” they threatened him. “Fellow employees testified to the unfaithful regard that Mr. Bruseau has for the truth, and seemingly are not surprised at this unlawful practice,” the article read. “It is also said that women have fallen prey to his beautiful word pictures to obtain them jobs as chambermaids.” (If Bruseaux added an x to his name to avoid association with his past misdeeds, it seemed to work—the Whip, which later set itself against Bruseaux, appears to have overlooked the fact that he had been in its pages before.)

Bruseaux, Caldwell and I agreed, was a complicated figure—a wealthy, charming man of tremendous talent who was also dishonest, profligate, and, at times, morally compromising. He stood as a paradox, someone who adopted advanced research methods in pursuit of justice, but also spread falsehoods when it suited him. Emerging from nowhere, he fashioned himself into a Gatsby of Chicago’s ascendant Black bourgeoisie. “It was refreshing to see that, at that time period, an African-American man could remake himself,” Caldwell told me. “He came from nothing and became something.” 

Would Bruseaux have achieved the same success if he had been honest about his past—if, while starting up his business, he’d copped to being, not a highly educated former government agent, but a mere porter with a two-year degree from a humble Baptist college? Almost certainly not.

Once he was established, however, his investigative skills were exemplary. By an act of will, Bruseaux became the very thing he’d claimed to be. Yet like the fictional Gatsby—a character who, Fitzgerald wrote, seemed to spring from his own Platonic conception—Bruseaux, though mastering a profession dedicated to seeking out obscure truths, hid himself in fiction. The raw facts of his own life seemed, perhaps, too shameful for candor.


© 2026 The Atavist Magazine. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic.
Privacy PolicyOpt-out preferencesPrivacy Notice for California Users

Conversations with a Hit Man

Conversations
with a Hit Man

A former FBI agent traveled to Louisiana to ask a hired killer about a murder that haunted him. Then they started talking about a different case altogether.

By David Howard